YouTube pirates are cashing in on Hollywood's summer blockbusters
But the company also had cause to be concerned. In the days after the Disney film's opening, a pirated version of Lilo & Stitch proved to be a hit on YouTube, where more than 200,000 people viewed it, potentially costing Disney millions of dollars in additional sales, according to research from Adalytics, a firm that analyses advertising campaigns for brands.
The findings of the research shed new light on the copyright issues that once threatened to upend YouTube's business. They also show how advertisers have unwittingly supported illicit content on YouTube, and they provide rare data about piracy on the platform.
YouTube has long tried to tamp down piracy, but users who upload stolen films and television shows have employed new tactics to evade the platform's detection tools, the research showed, including cropping films and manipulating footage.
YouTube then recommended the uploaded videos to users on its homepage, promoting pirated streaming of box office releases like Lilo & Stitch, or movies exclusively available on streaming platforms, like Captain America: Brave New World, according to screen recordings compiled by Adalytics and an analysis by The New York Times.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, may also have generated revenue from some stolen videos, though it's unclear how much money it may have made.
The company has a program known as Content ID to identify videos protected by copyright. It allows copyright holders to block the videos, share in advertising sales of the videos or receive data about who views the videos. Over the years, YouTube has paid billions of dollars to rights holders. YouTube reported flagging 2.2 billion videos last year and said rights holders permitted about 90% of those videos to stay on the platform.
Jack Malon, a spokesperson for YouTube, said the company does not analyze the less than 10% of videos it removes at the request of copyright holders and does not track how many of those videos may be recently released, full-length movies.
The channels that uploaded the videos of Lilo & Stitch and Captain America: Brave New World were terminated for violating YouTube's policies on spam, Malon said.
He declined to say whether the company had profited from commercials shown in copyrighted videos that evaded detection by Content ID or racked up views before rights holders asked that they be taken down.
At YouTube's request, Adalytics and the Times provided 200 videos for YouTube to review, most of them full-length films. YouTube analysed the videos but declined to provide insight into what percentage of the films their rights holders had permitted to stay up or had required to be removed.
'To frame these videos as 'illicit' without first reviewing the specific choices made by each rights holder misunderstands how the media landscape on YouTube works today,' Malon said. While 'mistakes do occur' on YouTube, he said, he dismissed the Adalytics report as an effort to get companies to sign up for the firm's services.
Holders of copyrights for the videos, including all the major film studios, did not respond when asked for comment by the Times.
The founder of Adalytics, Krzysztof Franaszek, who conducted the research, said he had observed 9,000 examples of possible copyright violations, 'including full-length movies that were in theatrical release, Netflix exclusives such as Extraction 2, TV shows such as Family Guy and live NCAA college football games.' The videos collectively had more than 250 million views. More than 100 of these uploads were also reviewed by the Times.
Movies from every major film studio were found on YouTube in unofficial streams uploaded from last July to May, Adalytics found. When briefed on the research findings, Larissa Knapp, the chief content protection officer of the Motion Picture Association, a trade group for movie studios, said she found them concerning.
At one point, the anti-piracy work between the studios and YouTube 'did work', Knapp said. 'But now it seems like some of the stuff may have gone off the rails if illegal content is being placed with ads.'
The research recalled a time in YouTube's history when Hollywood accused the platform of profiting from its stolen content. In 2007, Viacom sued YouTube, claiming it engaged in 'brazen' copyright infringement by allowing uploads of the media company's material without its permission. In 2012, YouTube won the suit by arguing it was shielded from liability by the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which exempted YouTube from liability for hosting copyrighted work.
The law shifted the burden for protecting a copyright from the platform and video creators to rights holders, said Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University. Without the rule, he said, 'the Internet would not be able to exist in its existing format.'
YouTube has tried to work with film studios, television networks and streaming services to combat piracy. Google, YouTube's parent company, developed its Content ID technology to recognise copyrighted videos, and YouTube became more aggressive at policing its platform for piracy. Copyright holders gained the right to either have the content removed or collect a share of the advertising revenue the videos generated.
The box office in the United States and Canada routinely loses US$1bil (RM4.25bil) each year to piracy, which is roughly 15% of its annual haul, according to the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment, a trade group of 50 entertainment companies that tries to reduce piracy.
Franaszek began the research after his advertising clients noticed that as much as 60% of their ad spending on YouTube went to videos or channels that were labelled 'no longer available'.
After digging deeper, he found that his clients had paid to support content that YouTube later removed because it violated company policies against nudity, violence or hate speech, or because of other offenses.
When videos are removed from the platform, YouTube scrubs advertisers' records so that they can no longer see the name of the video. Advertisers have to go to the link for the removed video to see if it was removed for a copyright violation, Franaszek said. He added that the platform did not fully reimburse the advertisers for the cost of commercials in those videos.
Erich Garcia, a senior vice president at Quote.com, which lets consumers compare insurance offerings, said his company's ads routinely ran with videos that had disappeared, limiting his insight into the effectiveness of his promotions.
Malon said YouTube advertisers could get more insight into those videos by asking their account representatives for more information. Representatives can provide advertising credits.
Ads from Disney, Hulu, HBO Max, Focus Features and dozens of other companies from various industries were found alongside unauthorised film and television uploads, Adalytics said.
Pirates deployed a range of deceptive tactics to evade YouTube's anti-piracy algorithms. Some uploaded and voluntarily removed copyrighted videos on the same day, racking up viewers before being caught. Other pirates mirrored the videos to reverse the images, or cropped the frames in an effort to trick the Content ID system. Still others placed clips of regular people at the end of a Hollywood blockbuster video to further cover their tracks, Adalytics and the Times found.
Franaszek said Adalytics clients who paid for advertising in videos that were removed over copyright issues had a simple request: 'to have visibility into what content their YouTube ad dollars are funding, and where their ads appear.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Traditional puppet ban in Indonesian capital threatens buskers
In the sweltering streets of Jakarta, Indonesia, buskers carry towering, hollow puppets and pass around a bucket for donations. Now, they fear becoming outlaws. City authorities say they will crack down on use of the sacred ondel-ondel puppets, which can stand as tall as a truck, and they are drafting legislation to remove what they view as a street nuisance. Performances featuring the puppets – originally used by Jakarta's Betawi people to ward off evil spirits – will be allowed only at set events. The ban could leave many ondel-ondel buskers in Jakarta without a job. 'I am confused and anxious. I fear getting raided or even arrested. But what can I do? I need money to eat,' said Adi Sutisna, a 26-year-old Jakarta native who works as an ondel-ondel busker. A row of unfinished ondel-ondel puppets, large traditional figures from Jakarta's Betawi culture originally used to ward off evil spirits. Photo: AFP Adi, who only graduated from elementary school, has been working as an ondel-ondel busker for seven years, earning US$7 (RM29.70) on a good day to provide for his wife and five-year-old daughter. Ondel-ondel is the pride of the native Jakarta tribe, the Betawi people. Traditional performances were accompanied by instruments for festive and celebratory events, including weddings, circumcisions, and welcome ceremonies for honourable guests. Cyril Raoul Hakim, spokesman for Jakarta governor Pramono Anung, said that the ban was still being drafted with 'the preservation of Betawi culture' in mind and it would be put to legislators soon. 'We hope it will be passed not too long from now,' he said. For survival Over time, ondel-ondel have been increasingly used by buskers who sway the puppets to music from loudspeakers, seeking money on the roadside, at traffic lights, and in the alleyways of Jakarta's densely populated neighbourhoods. The city administration has long wanted to ban ondel-ondel busking, arguing that the practice sullies the dignity of the cultural icon. Street performers playing the traditional Indonesian bamboo instruments angklung as they walk past ondel-ondel puppets. Photo: AFP Bureaucrats believe roadside busking undermines the puppets' cultural significance. But many Jakartans rely on the entertainment to bring in much-needed cash. According to government data, the number of people living below the poverty line in metropolitan Jakarta – a megalopolis of 11 million people – was up from 362,000 in 2019 to 449,000 as of September 2024. The Central Statistics Bureau says the poverty line in Indonesia in 2025 is just over one dollar a day. 'The ondel-ondel is heavy; it is very hot inside,' said Adi. 'But I do it anyway because if I don't, my wife and my kid won't be able to eat.' For the right reasons The planned ban has left authentic ondel-ondel performers and makers torn about the preservation of their culture and the plight of the buskers. Performers such as Fadillah Akbar believe the cultural symbol must be revered, and should not be used to beg for money. 'The problem is that they beg on the street – that's a disturbance, and it bothers my soul,' said the 33-year-old ondel-ondel artist. He believes ondel-ondel must come in pairs, a woman and a man, and be accompanied by traditional live music instead of a recorded song playing on loudspeakers. Ondel-ondel performer Fadillah, who recently performed at Japan's Expo 2025 in Osaka, posing in front of his puppet warehouse. Photo: AFP 'Of course, I feel bad for the buskers, especially since I know many of them, but it is a cultural icon whose dignity must be upheld,' Fadillah said. The head of Jakarta's public order agency, Satriadi Gunawan, said ondel-ondel busking disturbed road users with loudspeakers and requests for money. 'In Betawi culture, upholding ondel-ondel's dignity is important, and now it is often used to beg for money,' he said. But some historians disagree, saying limiting the puppet presence on Jakarta's streets could hurt efforts to keep the dwindling tradition alive. 'Banning ondel-ondel busking in the name of culture signifies their lack of understanding for tradition,' said Jakarta-based historian J.J. Rizal. 'It proves that not only does the city government not understand culture, but it also endangers the preservation of art.' – AFP
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Cafe's sea view turns out to be just printed mural
Compiled by CHARLES RAMENDRAN, TAN SIN CHOW and R. ARAVINTHAN A CAFE in China has stirred online controversy after its much-hyped 'lemon tree-themed sea view' turned out to be just a printed mural on an interior wall, China Press reported. Feeling deceived, a netizen shared her frustration on Xiaohongshu, a Chinese lifestyle platform, after travelling a long way to the cafe in Qingdao, Shandong province. The woman, who enjoys exploring different cafes and shops, said there was no real sea at the backdrop or lemon tree in sight unlike what was featured online. Her post went viral and drew a wave of sarcastic comments. A social media user said: 'Good thing you posted this – I might have gone myself.' Another likened the marketing as 'worse than scams in KK Garden in Myanmar', referring to a cybercrime and online fraud hub. > The residence of the late Cantopop diva Anita Mui has been described as 'maze-like', with some suggesting it should be converted into a museum, Sin Chew Daily reported. Many social media users commented that her home at Henredon Court, Shouson Hill Road in Hong Kong is spacious, with others even analysing its feng shui. This came after Michael Lui, a real estate agent, showcased a rare look inside the house on his YouTube channel. Mui purchased the property in 1993 under a company name for HK$20mil (about RM10.86mil) then. The duplex unit, measuring 4,075sq ft, overlooks Ocean Park and the Wong Chuk Hang MTR Station. It also offers a breathtaking 180-degree view of Shouson Hill. Mui, known as the 'Asian Madonna', died in 2003 at the age of 40 after a long battle with cervical cancer. The above articles are compiled from the vernacular newspapers (Bahasa Malaysia, Chinese and Tamil dailies). As such, stories are grouped according to the respective language/medium. Where a paragraph begins with a >, it denotes a separate news item.
The Star
17 hours ago
- The Star
Kim Kardashian's face wrap for Skims fuels beauty pressure debate
It's a telling sign of current beauty standards that Kim Kardashian's shapewear and underwear brand, Skims, has started selling a piece of headgear that bears a close resemblance to a postsurgery compression garment. Skims' Seamless Sculpt Face Wrap, which was released Tuesday (Aug 29) and sells for US$48 (approximately RM205), is billed as something that will scoop up the cheeks, neck and chin and hold them in place. The product generated much online chatter in the hours after the company unveiled it on Instagram and is now available only on a waiting list. With its chin strap and Velcro closures, the Seamless Sculpt Face Wrap is eerily similar to the bandagelike garments worn by patients who have undergone intensive cosmetic surgery, said Dr Jonathan Sykes, a plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills, California, and the former president of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. In its promotional language, Skims says its facial wrap is made from the same 'signature sculpting fabric' as its shapewear shorts and tank tops. It is also said to include 'collagen yarn', though it's unclear what that is. The company did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Read more: Shrouded in secrecy: What's up with the Kim Kardashian and Nike fashion team up? The wrap is an effort by Kardashian to bring beauty products under the Skims umbrella after the shuttering of her makeup and skin care line, SKKN by Kim, last month. It also signals her entry into the growing universe of devices that offer the chimeric promise of a more sculpted face without the surgery, said Jessica DeFino, a beauty critic and writer of the Review Of Beauty newsletter. Kardashian is 'capitalising on this look that she likely got with much more expensive, potentially invasive, treatments, and is trying to sell it to the general public', DeFino said, with a product that 'will just never give a consumer the result that they are looking for'. The release of the product comes at a time when members of the Kardashian family and other celebrities have become more candid about their body-enhancing procedures, such as Botox and breast augmentations, and the use of photo-editing apps. The pursuit of so-called 'snatched face' has driven demand for an array of beauty devices in recent years, said Anna Keller, a senior global analyst at the market research agency Mintel. More people are seeking out affordable ways to achieve results that would typically cost time and money at a dermatologist's clinic or a luxury spa. One of these products, a hand-held machine from the beauty brand NuFace, is said by its manufacturer to rely on 'microcurrent' to 'increase cellular energy' and 'improve facial tone'; others use red-light therapy to target inflammation. In clinical settings, compression garments can reduce swelling after liposuction procedures or face-lifts, said Dr Alan Matarasso, a plastic surgeon in New York City. Since becoming commercially available, they have also been used to treat nonsurgical inflammation, such as what arises 'if you had a salty meal or a pizza that's going to make you a little bit puffy in the morning', Matarasso said. The latest devices for the face, he added, are imperfect solutions for those who cannot afford or may not want cosmetic surgery, because they are likely to provide only short-lived results. Skin Gym, a company that produces several beauty devices, started selling its own facial wrap this year, said Karina Sulzer, the brand's founder. 'It sold out maybe five times,' she added. Read more: 'Michael Jordan of influencers': Can Kim Kardashian best the activewear market? Social media has only turbocharged the trend. The hashtag #facesculpting has led half a billion TikTok users to videos of people pulling and pinching at their faces, with or without specially designed tools, in attempts to attain the latest beauty standards. The hashtag #morningshed – with users posting videos of themselves removing the layers of skin care products and devices they have worn while sleeping – has racked up more than one billion views. In Instagram posts about its new facial wrap, Skims nodded to #morningshed by recommending that its product be worn overnight – a suggestion that DeFino, the beauty writer, considered a 'depressing' sign. 'What that says to me is that this pressure to look beautiful has become so consuming that there is not even a moment of our day – while we are sleeping – that has not been commodified for the project of becoming more beautiful,' DeFino said. – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
