Shehnaaz Gill Goes Full Jamaican For ‘Ikk Kudi' With Yo Yo Honey Singh
Renowned Miami defense attorney Roy Black passed away at 80 in Coral Gables, Florida, after battling an undisclosed illness. Widely regarded as a legal titan, Black remained active at his law firm until his final days. Following news of his death, conspiracy theories exploded online, with many linking it to his past ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Viral posts claim it's 'no coincidence,' calling it another piece removed from the board. His wife, Lea Black, confirmed the passing and promised a public tribute soon. Black gained national fame after defending William Kennedy Smith in a historic televised rape trial and later represented high-profile names like Justin Bieber, Rush Limbaugh, Helio Castroneves, and Epstein. He is survived by his wife and two children, RJ and Nora, marking the end of an era in American legal circles.
1.7K views | 4 days ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Says Beyonce, Oprah, Kamala Harris Took Illegal Money from Democrats Firstpost America
Trump Says Beyonce, Oprah, Kamala Harris Took Illegal Money from Democrats |Firstpost America | N18G US President Donald Trump has accused Beyonce, Oprah Winfrey, and Al Sharpton of receiving illegal payments from the Democratic Party to endorse Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign. In a Truth Social post made from Scotland, Trump alleged that Beyoncé was paid $11 million despite not performing, while Oprah and Sharpton received millions for "doing nothing." However, campaign finance records contradict these claims, listing payments as event production costs. Critics say Trump's accusations are a diversion from ongoing scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The explosive post adds to Trump's ongoing battles with the media and political rivals. Watch the video to know more. See More
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Creating realistic deepfakes getting easier than ever, fighting back may take even more AI
For Washington insiders, seeing and hearing is no longer believing, thanks to a spate of recent incidents involving deepfakes impersonating top officials in President Donald Trump's administration. Digital fakes are coming for corporate America, too, as criminal gangs and hackers associated with adversaries including North Korea use synthetic video and audio to impersonate CEOs and low-level job candidates to gain access to critical systems or business secrets. Thanks to advances in artificial intelligence, creating realistic deepfakes is easier than ever, causing security problems for governments, businesses and private individuals and making trust the most valuable currency of the digital age. Responding to the challenge will require laws, better digital literacy and technical solutions that fight AI with more AI. "As humans, we are remarkably susceptible to deception," said Vijay Balasubramaniyan , CEO and founder of the tech firm Pindrop Security. But he believes solutions to the challenge of deepfakes may be within reach: "We are going to fight back." AI deepfakes become a national security threat This summer, someone used AI to create a deepfake of Secretary of State Marco Rubio in an attempt to reach out to foreign ministers, a US senator and a governor over text, voice mail and the Signal messaging app. In May someone impersonated Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles. Another phony Rubio had popped up in a deepfake earlier this year, saying he wanted to cut off Ukraine's access to Elon Musk's Starlink internet service. Ukraine's government later rebutted the false claim. The national security implications are huge: People who think they're chatting with Rubio or Wiles, for instance, might discuss sensitive information about diplomatic negotiations or military strategy. "You're either trying to extract sensitive secrets or competitive information or you're going after access, to an email server or other sensitive network," Kinny Chan, CEO of the cybersecurity firm QiD, said of the possible motivations. Synthetic media can also aim to alter behaviour. Last year, Democratic voters in New Hampshire received a robocall urging them not to vote in the state's upcoming primary. The voice on the call sounded suspiciously like then-President Joe Biden but was actually created using AI. Their ability to deceive makes AI deepfakes a potent weapon for foreign actors. Both Russia and China have used disinformation and propaganda directed at Americans as a way of undermining trust in democratic alliances and institutions. Steven Kramer , the political consultant who admitted sending the fake Biden robocalls, said he wanted to send a message of the dangers deepfakes pose to the American political system. Kramer was acquitted last month of charges of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. "I did what I did for USD 500," Kramer said. "Can you imagine what would happen if the Chinese government decided to do this?" Scammers target the financial industry with deepfakes The greater availability and sophistication of the programmes mean deepfakes are increasingly used for corporate espionage and garden variety fraud. "The financial industry is right in the crosshairs," said Jennifer Ewbank, a former deputy director of the CIA who worked on cybersecurity and digital threats. "Even individuals who know each other have been convinced to transfer vast sums of money." In the context of corporate espionage, they can be used to impersonate CEOs asking employees to hand over passwords or routing numbers. Deepfakes can also allow scammers to apply for jobs - and even do them - under an assumed or fake identity. For some this is a way to access sensitive networks, to steal secrets or to install ransomware. Others just want the work and may be working a few similar jobs at different companies at the same time. Authorities in the US have said that thousands of North Koreans with information technology skills have been dispatched to live abroad, using stolen identities to obtain jobs at tech firms in the US and elsewhere. The workers get access to company networks as well as a paycheck. In some cases, the workers install ransomware that can be later used to extort even more money. The schemes have generated billions of dollars for the North Korean government. Within three years, as many as 1 in 4 job applications is expected to be fake, according to research from Adaptive Security, a cybersecurity company. "We've entered an era where anyone with a laptop and access to an open-source model can convincingly impersonate a real person," said Brian Long, Adaptive's CEO. "It's no longer about hacking systems - it's about hacking trust." Experts deploy AI to fight back against AI Researchers, public policy experts and technology companies are now investigating the best ways of addressing the economic, political and social challenges posed by deepfakes. New regulations could require tech companies to do more to identify, label and potentially remove deepfakes on their platforms. Lawmakers could also impose greater penalties on those who use digital technology to deceive others - if they can be caught. Greater investments in digital literacy could also boost people's immunity to online deception by teaching them ways to spot fake media and avoid falling prey to scammers. The best tool for catching AI may be another AI programme, one trained to sniff out the tiny flaws in deepfakes that would go unnoticed by a person. Systems like Pindrop's analyse millions of datapoints in any person's speech to quickly identify irregularities. The system can be used during job interviews or other video conferences to detect if the person is using voice cloning software, for instance. Similar programmes may one day be commonplace, running in the background as people chat with colleagues and loved ones online. Someday, deepfakes may go the way of email spam, a technological challenge that once threatened to upend the usefulness of email, said Balasubramaniyan, Pindrop's CEO. "You can take the defeatist view and say we're going to be subservient to disinformation," he said. "But that's not going to happen."
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
All The Ways Epstein Continues To Haunt Donald Trump
It is fair to say that most political scandals fade with time. Just like red wine stains gradually scrubbed from white linens, they lose their shock value. But not the Epstein affair, it seems. Not the files filled with prominent names. Not the infamous client list. And certainly not Donald Trump's connection to it. No matter how far President Trump flies - whether to Mar-a-Lago, Manhattan or the manicured golf greens of Scotland (from where he returned on Tuesday) - the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein refuses to part with him. Years after the disgraced financier died under suspicious circumstances in a federal prison, his shadow still lingers. It has become an albatross around Trump's neck - a symbol of growing public cynicism about power, secrecy and selective justice. Just last week, as President Trump landed in Scotland to project an image of calm statesmanship and international poise, there was a nice moment of diplomatic triumph: a favourable EU trade deal. Surely, a feather in his cap. But even as he celebrated, reporters circled like hawks round an old, rotting carcass: the Epstein files. 'Terrific Guy' Questions flew, about trade and foreign policy, but also about the convicted sex offender he once called a "terrific guy". It's hardly the kind of backdrop any president wants on a global stage. But this is not 2016. Trump, once the disruptor-in-chief who thrived on political and personal scandals, now finds himself increasingly cornered by liberals or "the deep state," as well as by the ghosts of his own political base, which has turned strangely inward. The Epstein controversy is no longer about Epstein. It's about hypocrisy, about broken promises, about firebrands-turned-functionaries who once shouted from the rooftops and now hide behind legalese. A Little Recap Let us rewind the tape. According to available records, Trump's association with Epstein dates back to the 1990s, a time when New York's moneyed elite mingled in Mar-a-Lago-style opulence. Trump once praised Epstein's 'taste' in women, noting that "many of them are on the younger side". Later, after Epstein's 2007 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, Trump publicly distanced himself. By 2019, when Epstein was arrested again and subsequently died in prison under murky circumstances, Trump was already president and the traditional media as well as social media were ablaze with speculation. The photos, the guest lists, the deposition quotes. They never really disappeared. They simply lingered in online forums, social media threads and the corners of Reddit and Telegram where conspiracy theories ferment. But what started as fringe chatter has taken on a more central role in today's political discourse upon Trump's second coming, especially among the very voters Trump relied on to return to the White House. The Voices That Fell Silent When the infamous Epstein files were partially unsealed earlier this year as part of civil litigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell, media outlets poured over the documents for salacious details and political implications. While many big names appeared, it was Trump's name that lingered in headlines the longest. Not because the documents proved guilt or involvement, but because of the administration's handling of the files now. Trump's handpicked officials - FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi - were once warriors in the Epstein-obsessed right-wing media ecosystem. Patel famously hinted at a cover-up involving "the highest levels of government", while Bondi made rounds on cable TV brandishing supposed client lists with grim resolve. But now, as custodians of these same institutions, they are singing a different tune. Nothing more to disclose. Nothing left to see. This abrupt U-turn has enraged large sections of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, whose loyalty was forged not just by economic grievances or immigration policy, but by a belief that Trump alone would "drain the swamp". Epstein was the ultimate symbol of that swamp - its depravity, its privilege and its impunity. To see former conspiracy hunters now become gatekeepers of silence is, for many, nothing short of betrayal. Is 'Trumpism' Crumbling What we are witnessing is a kind of slow-motion war within Trumpism. The same base that once trusted Trump to take on "globalist elites" now accuses him - on forums and alt-media channels - of becoming one of them. "The Deep State is now MAGA," reads a popular meme. Fringe influencers like Laura Loomer and Mike Cernovich have openly questioned why Epstein's full files remain sealed, even under Trump's presidency. The implication: if he had nothing to hide, why didn't he order full transparency? To mainstream media, this may sound like more conspiracy-mongering. But politically, it's a potent problem. Trump's appeal always relied on his outsider status, his ability to "say the quiet part out loud". If that image crumbles - if he begins to look like just another manipulative politician with skeletons in his closet - the loyalty that brought him victory in 2016 and again in 2024 could erode. Optics Is Everything Legally, Trump has not been charged with anything related to Epstein. The files, it is widely believed, contain mentions of him, but so far, no smoking gun. But legal risk is not the same as political risk. In a media environment where perception often trumps evidence, it's the optics that matter. Trump's repeated denials, his refusal to unseal the remaining files fully and his attacks on journalists asking about Epstein only deepen public suspicion. Polls show growing scepticism among independents and younger Republican voters. A recent Pew survey indicated that 58% of Americans believe Epstein's death involved foul play, and 46% say they don't trust either party to investigate it fairly. That is not just bad news for Trump, it is a crisis of legitimacy for the institutions he once vowed to reform. There is a deeper philosophical question here: what happens when movements that were built on tearing down opaque institutions inherit those very institutions? Do they reform them? Or do they simply use them for protection? Trump's presidency and the lingering Epstein scandal provide an uncomfortable answer. The very agencies once accused of cover-ups are now run by those who made their name demanding truth. And yet, the files remain locked, redacted, classified. In that sense, the Epstein case has become a serious test for American democracy. For some, it proves that the elite protect their own. For others, it is a cautionary tale about the dangers of populist promises. For all, it is a painful reminder that truth in the age of political tribalism is a slippery thing. Anatomy Of A Scandal So, where does this all go? A few scenarios are possible. One, the Epstein controversy remains a side note in the remaining three-and-a-half years of Trump's administration, fodder for fringe media but not a mainstream concern. or Two, the scandal explodes, perhaps through new leaks or insider whistleblowers. It becomes a central issue in the midterm polls. or Three, the issue festers, neither resolved nor forgotten, casting a long shadow over every press conference, every debate, every international appearance. The very ambiguity of it - what is known, what is suspected, what is denied - becomes its own kind of scandal. Deny, Deflect, Distract If Trump's track record is any guide, he will attempt to bulldoze through the issue with distractions, denials and declarations of victimhood. In fact, his adversaries believe he has already started to use this tactic openly. In classic Trumpian theatre, when the spotlight got too hot over Epstein, the script abruptly changed. Last week, President Trump's camp hurled a fresh grenade. This time aimed at Barack Obama. The charge? That Obama cooked up the intelligence linking Russia to election meddling in 2016. Critics see this as pure deflection, a political sleight of hand. With Epstein files refusing to die and Trump's own name etched too close for comfort, the administration appears to be rummaging through old playbooks: distract, distort and direct outrage elsewhere. But this time, this may not be enough. The public has grown weary of circus acts and sleights of hand. Half Truths, Whole Lies The Epstein scandal is not just about Jeffrey Epstein. It is not even just about Trump. It is about a political culture that thrives on half-truths and unfinished narratives. It is about what happens when you raise the curtain on elite misbehaviour and then abruptly close it again. For Trump, the problem is not just the past. It's the present - his own appointees, his own choices, his own silence or weak denials. In the end, it may not be what's in the files that hurts him, but the fact that those files still exist, untouched, unspoken, festering in the public imagination like an open wound. There's a lesson here, not just for the MAGA faithful or the liberal sceptics, but for anyone watching the great American drama unfold: ghosts don't die just because you stop talking about them. Sometimes, the more you try to bury them, the louder they knock.
