Pregnant drivers warned over dangerous seatbelt mistake
I was heavily pregnant and running late. Then I hit a pothole – hard.
For a moment I felt like I was auditioning for Fast & Furious: Prenatal Drift.
Cue panic. I pulled over and Googled: 'Driving over pothole pregnancy'.
The results? Terrifying.
Phrases like 'placental abruption', 'seek immediate care', and 'avoid at all costs', jumped out at me.
There is no evidence that going over potholes harms the foetus.
MORE: 'Huge threat': Fears over common Temu buy
Could one bump in the road, at low speed, really put my baby at risk?
Thankfully, no.
'There is no evidence that going over speed bumps or potholes at low, reasonable speeds harms the foetus,' says Associate Professor Stefan Kane, director of maternity services at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne.
'There is no data linking this to miscarriage or preterm labour at normal speeds.'
But the real danger lies elsewhere.
'Sadly, motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of trauma-related maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality,' says Associate Professor Kane.
'Risk of injury increases during the second and third trimesters … However, proper seatbelt use significantly reduces the risk of the baby dying in crashes.'
Yet many pregnant drivers don't wear their seatbelts properly.
Many pregnant drivers don't wear their seatbelts properly. Picture: Getty Images.
Obstetrician Dr Guy Skinner often sees women pushing the sash belt up high behind them, thinking it's safer or more comfortable for the bump.
'There's no point wearing a seatbelt if it hasn't done its primary thing and that's to slow the human body from hitting the dashboard or seat in front of you,' he says.
And those maternity seatbelt adjusters sold online cheaply through businesses like Temu, Ebay and Facebook Marketplace? Remove from cart! The advice is to use a normal seatbelt properly.
Experts warn maternity seatbelt adjusters don't help in any way. Picture: AliExpress
MORE: Direct threat': Temu hits back over 'fake' claims
Associate Professor Sjaan Koppel from the Monash University Accident Research Centre explains the right way to buckle up:
'The lap belt should be placed below the baby bump, snugly across the pelvis and upper thighs. Never across or above the abdomen,' she says.
The belt should be placed below the baby bump. Picture: Getty Images.
'The shoulder (sash) belt should run between the breasts and over the collarbone. Not under the arm or behind the back. Ensure the belt is flat and not twisted.'
Beyond seatbelts, Dr Skinner says one of the most common questions he gets is: When should I stop driving?
Back in the day, it was common advice to stop driving after around 32–34 weeks because steering wheels didn't retract, and bumps didn't fit behind them.
Now, if you're carrying a single baby, it's usually safe to drive right up to the end of pregnancy. Multiples? You're more likely to be benched by 32 to 34 weeks, due to spatial logistics.
And what about airbags? Contrary to some fears, they're safe and protective, as long as your bump isn't pressed right up against the wheel.
Experts say pregnancy can change the way we drive. Picture: Getty Images.
MORE: The hybrid delivering more for less
Low-speed crashes, such as carpark fender-benders or knocking into poles, are surprisingly common during pregnancy.
'We see them every three to four weeks,' Dr Skinner says. 'It's probably due to some change in concentration in pregnant women.'
He claims minor bingles at low speed (under 20 km/h) are unlikely to cause concern.
So, while a pothole won't send you into labour, experts say pregnancy can change the way we drive, and not always for the better.
If it means easing into the Driving Miss Daisy era a little early? It might be the safest move, for mum and bub.
Originally published as 'Risk of injury': Do you need to stop driving while pregnant?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
14 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Forever chemicals: NSW Health findings defy public concerns
Don't miss out on the headlines from Illness. Followed categories will be added to My News. There is 'considerable concern' among communities about exposure to so-called 'forever chemicals' found in everyday products and their potential health risks. However, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence, experts say the health effects appear to be small and individual blood testing offers no clear medical benefit. The NSW Health Expert Advisory Panel on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) has released its final report, delivering clear guidance on the health effects of these widely found 'forever chemicals', the value of blood testing, and the best ways to communicate risks to communities. PFAS have been used since the 1940s in products resistant to heat, stains, grease, and water, but concerns have grown worldwide about their presence in the environment and potential health impacts. The panel, made up of leading clinical experts across toxicology, oncology, cardiology, public health, and risk communication, evaluated the latest Australian and global research to inform health advice. While acknowledging the body of research for health effects related to PFAS is 'large and still growing', the panel concluded that the health effects of PFAS 'appear to be small'. It noted links between PFAS exposure and conditions including high cholesterol, reduced kidney function, immune system changes, hormone alterations, liver enzyme changes, menstruation issues, lower birthweight, pregnancy high blood pressure, and some cancers. However, the panel stressed the evidence was inconsistent, with 'limited evidence of a dose-response relationship' and difficulty separating PFAS effects from other factors that can affect health, especially in studies with PFAS levels similar to the general population. It also highlighted the influence of bias and confounding factors such as smoking, diet, and age. A $3.5 million mobile PFAS treatment system installed at the Cascade Water Filtration Plant on the outskirts of Sydney. Picture: Supplied Addressing widespread public concern about cancer, the panel said it remained confident that the absolute cancer risk from PFAS was low based on the human epidemiological studies and levels of exposure in the Australian population. The panel noted that while the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified PFOA as 'cancer causing' and PFOS as 'possibly cancer causing', IARC's findings didn't specify safe exposure levels, how much exposure increases risk, or how big that risk might be. PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate) are specific types of PFAS. The panel stressed that, despite these hazard classifications, the actual cancer risk from PFAS in Australia was low based on studies and typical exposure levels. One of the panel's strongest messages is that there is 'no clinical benefit' for an individual to have a blood test for PFAS. The report stated that PFAS chemicals appeared in more than 95 per cent of people tested, showing widespread exposure from multiple sources. PFAS contamination in water sources remains a key concern. Picture: NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Because PFAS are so common, the expert panel said blood tests were hard to interpret and didn't predict health outcomes, so it didn't recommend individual testing. Although levels have been declining over the past 20 years, high background exposure makes studying health effects challenging. The panel supports ongoing population monitoring to track changes This stance differs from 2022 guidance by the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), which suggested blood testing might guide clinical care. The NSW panel pointed out limitations in NASEM's approach, including reliance on studies with small effects and possible bias, and noted that US agencies like the CDC and ATSDR have not adopted NASEM's recommendations for individual blood testing. PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid) are the three main PFAS types historically used in aqueous firefighting foams. The panel also advised against interventions such as phlebotomy or cholesterol-lowering medications to reduce PFAS in the blood, calling their benefits 'uncertain' and warning they 'may cause harm' like anaemia or medication interactions. Instead, clinicians are urged to focus on 'usual preventative health interventions' to support patients. Recognising 'genuine concern' in parts of the community about exposure to PFAS and the potential health impacts, the panel stressed that risk communication must be 'tailored to the diverse levels of concern' and continued transparency maintained. The panel stated that reliable epidemiological studies required 'well characterised' exposures, measured confounders, and sufficiently large populations; conditions 'not currently met in the Blue Mountains population or in other communities in NSW'. It urged authorities to avoid using currently available human epidemiological studies to derive threshold levels due to the higher risk of bias and confounding. Instead, it supported continuing Australia's conservative approach of setting exposure limits based on animal studies with safety factors, such as those by the National Health and Medical Research Council. NSW chief health officer Kerry Chant said updated NSW Health advice provided consumers with guidance on how to reduce PFAS exposure. 'There is considerable concern, particularly in the Blue Mountains community, about exposure to PFAS through drinking water, and NSW Health takes these concerns very seriously,' Dr Chant said. 'NSW Health will continue to support local clinicians with information for GPs who may be managing patients with concerns about PFAS exposure, including evidence about potential adverse health effects, counselling patients, the utility of blood tests for PFAS and the role of further investigations.' Originally published as Widespread PFAS exposure, but cancer risk 'low,' experts confirm
The Australian
2 days ago
- The Australian
Pregnant drivers warned over dangerous seatbelt mistake
I was heavily pregnant and running late. Then I hit a pothole – hard. For a moment I felt like I was auditioning for Fast & Furious: Prenatal Drift. Cue panic. I pulled over and Googled: 'Driving over pothole pregnancy'. The results? Terrifying. Phrases like 'placental abruption', 'seek immediate care', and 'avoid at all costs', jumped out at me. There is no evidence that going over potholes harms the foetus. MORE: 'Huge threat': Fears over common Temu buy Could one bump in the road, at low speed, really put my baby at risk? Thankfully, no. 'There is no evidence that going over speed bumps or potholes at low, reasonable speeds harms the foetus,' says Associate Professor Stefan Kane, director of maternity services at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne. 'There is no data linking this to miscarriage or preterm labour at normal speeds.' But the real danger lies elsewhere. 'Sadly, motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of trauma-related maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality,' says Associate Professor Kane. 'Risk of injury increases during the second and third trimesters … However, proper seatbelt use significantly reduces the risk of the baby dying in crashes.' Yet many pregnant drivers don't wear their seatbelts properly. Many pregnant drivers don't wear their seatbelts properly. Picture: Getty Images. Obstetrician Dr Guy Skinner often sees women pushing the sash belt up high behind them, thinking it's safer or more comfortable for the bump. 'There's no point wearing a seatbelt if it hasn't done its primary thing and that's to slow the human body from hitting the dashboard or seat in front of you,' he says. And those maternity seatbelt adjusters sold online cheaply through businesses like Temu, Ebay and Facebook Marketplace? Remove from cart! The advice is to use a normal seatbelt properly. Experts warn maternity seatbelt adjusters don't help in any way. Picture: AliExpress MORE: Direct threat': Temu hits back over 'fake' claims Associate Professor Sjaan Koppel from the Monash University Accident Research Centre explains the right way to buckle up: 'The lap belt should be placed below the baby bump, snugly across the pelvis and upper thighs. Never across or above the abdomen,' she says. The belt should be placed below the baby bump. Picture: Getty Images. 'The shoulder (sash) belt should run between the breasts and over the collarbone. Not under the arm or behind the back. Ensure the belt is flat and not twisted.' Beyond seatbelts, Dr Skinner says one of the most common questions he gets is: When should I stop driving? Back in the day, it was common advice to stop driving after around 32–34 weeks because steering wheels didn't retract, and bumps didn't fit behind them. Now, if you're carrying a single baby, it's usually safe to drive right up to the end of pregnancy. Multiples? You're more likely to be benched by 32 to 34 weeks, due to spatial logistics. And what about airbags? Contrary to some fears, they're safe and protective, as long as your bump isn't pressed right up against the wheel. Experts say pregnancy can change the way we drive. Picture: Getty Images. MORE: The hybrid delivering more for less Low-speed crashes, such as carpark fender-benders or knocking into poles, are surprisingly common during pregnancy. 'We see them every three to four weeks,' Dr Skinner says. 'It's probably due to some change in concentration in pregnant women.' He claims minor bingles at low speed (under 20 km/h) are unlikely to cause concern. So, while a pothole won't send you into labour, experts say pregnancy can change the way we drive, and not always for the better. If it means easing into the Driving Miss Daisy era a little early? It might be the safest move, for mum and bub.
Courier-Mail
4 days ago
- Courier-Mail
New mum Alexis Walker fighting for life in Brisbane hospital
Don't miss out on the headlines from QLD News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Alexis Walker should be at home cradling her newborn son. Instead, just three weeks after giving birth, the 25-year-old Logan mother-of-two is in a coma, fighting for her life after contracting the flu. She was placed in an induced coma just over a week ago after becoming critically ill with influenza A, which developed into pneumonia. Her partner, Leo Hookem, 26, and their two little boys, Riley, 3, and newborn Reign, now face an unthinkable wait, clinging to hope. Ms Walker, from Holmview, remains in a critical condition at Brisbane's Princess Alexandra Hospital after being transferred from Logan Hospital. Ms Walker's stepmother, Sandra Burton, 54, who set up a GoFundMe page to support the family, had seen her stepdaughter only a week before her health started to decline. Alexis Walker with her husband Leo Hookem and son Riley (3). She is struggling to comprehend how quickly everything changed. 'We're praying she wakes up and she beats this,' says Ms Burton, who lives in Pacific Pines on the Gold Coast. 'When I went to see her, the baby was perfectly healthy, he was adorable and she was healthy, she didn't even have a sniffle. 'She was a proud mum with her new baby, as she would be, and Riley was there as well and they were just normal. 'I was really shocked to find out she was fighting for her life in hospital. 'It's still 50/50, it can go either way.' Ms Burton said her stepdaughter was healthy when she gave birth at Logan Hospital on July 16 but she returned to hospital five days later to have her stitches from the birth checked. 'She was roughly there for around seven hours. She was in emergency then took Reign for a jaundice test also which he passed, so that may be why they were there for so long. 'We suspect that's where she got sick.' Their newborn son Reign with three-year-old Riley. Ms Burton saw Ms Walker at her home two days after that visit and said she 'appeared to be healthy'. But the next day Ms Walker mentioned she was starting to feel unwell. 'She deteriorated so fast … she would have been tired looking after a baby,' says Ms Burton. 'She was more worried about looking after her baby, not looking after herself as much as she should have been. It took her down really fast.' Six days after Ms Walker first started to feel sick, Mr Hookem found Ms Walker unresponsive on the bathroom floor. She was rushed to hospital with her heart and lungs in rapid decline. 'Leo spoke to her around 11pm that night and went to bed and woke up at 3am to the water running and the house flooded. 'She must have been running a bath thinking that might make her feel better and this is when she's gotten really bad and Leo found her passed out on the floor beside the bath. 'The little boys were asleep but when Leo went and checked on the baby, he was face down in the cot, she must have started getting delirious at this stage and must have been trying to look after him but her body was shutting down.' Little newborn Reign. Ms Walker has remained in a coma since and Mr Hookem, a plasterer and Ms Walker's partner of five years, hasn't left her side. 'He's an absolute wreck,' says Ms Burton. 'At the hospital he just sits there holding her hand, crying and talking to her, it's quite confronting. 'He said he's been writing in a diary every time he feeds the baby a bottle or baths him, so she can read it. 'I suggested he film it and take a photo of him (Reign) every day because babies change so much in the first few weeks. 'Having a newborn baby is already very stressful under normal circumstances but he's dealing with a toddler, the newborn, the love of his life fighting for her life, and on top of that he had to move out of his home because it was damaged from the water.' What should be one of the happiest moments in their lives has become an agonising wait for Ms Walker's family. 'She (Alexis) is missing out on all the stuff that a little new baby does, those precious days that you love so much when you're bonding with your baby,' said Ms Burton. 'It's really devastating. She was so excited having her baby and the little room set up, and knowing she's fighting for her life and that little baby is without his mummy, and Riley too of course, he doesn't know what's going on. 'She loves those little boys so much. It's heartbreaking. 'We all just keep praying that she beats this.' People can support the family via GoFundMe:
