Mitsui OSK Talking to Japan Over EU Sanctions on Its LNG Tankers
'We are not at all happy about this, so we are now lobbying the EU through various channels, including the Japanese government,' Chief Executive Officer Takeshi Hashimoto said in an interview on Tuesday.
The North Moon, North Ocean and North Light — managed by Mitsui OSK — were included in the 17th package of sanctions adopted by the European Council last week. The measures were part of the EU's mounting efforts to push Moscow into a peace deal with Ukraine, addressing workarounds to previously imposed restrictions.
The three vessels recently helped move shipments from Yamal LNG, which is not under sanctions. They loaded cargoes transshipped near the port of Murmansk, where cargoes arrive on ice-class ships directly from the plant, according to shipping data compiled by Bloomberg.
Some of the vessels are already loaded and Mitsui OSK will unload them as soon as possible, Hashimoto said.
'I think those vessels will be unusable for some time to come,' he said. 'But, to be honest, they have been saying for a long time that the Yamal project is not subject to sanctions, and suddenly these ships are subject to sanctions.'
The company saw a considerable rush for stockpiling LNG from January to March ahead of tariffs by US President Donald Trump and, after dropping in April, demand has been very strong since May following an easing in the trade war.
'We expect it to continue to be strong during May and June,' Hashimoto said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
White House reportedly considering Budapest as location for trilateral talks with Zelenskyy and Putin
Hungarian capital Budapest could host US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the proposed trilateral talks to end the ongoing war. Politico, citing a Trump administration official and a person close to the administration, reported that the US Secret Service is preparing for the summit in Budapest. The report added that while the Secret Service often scouts multiple locations and the ultimate venue could change, Budapest is emerging as a first choice for the White House. The choice of Budapest as the venue for the talks may, however, not be a welcome news for Zelenskyy as Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, is a long-time Putin ally. On Monday, during his meeting with Trump in the White House, Zelenskyy had expressed his willingness to engage in trilateral talks involving himself, Putin and the US President to end the war that has been ongoing since February 2022. Some European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, had suggested Switzerland as a possible host nation for a meeting between the three presidents. 'It will be [hosted by] a neutral country, maybe Switzerland — I'm pushing for Geneva — or another country,' Macron told French news channel LCI, on Monday. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis, who welcomed the suggestion, said that his country was willing to host the three leaders. 'We are ready for such a meeting, and we also thank you for the trust placed in us. We have always signalled our willingness, but it naturally depends on the will of the major powers,' he told Swiss state broadcaster SRF. Putin has an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2023 for alleged unlawful deportation and transfer of children from former Ukrainian territories. On this, Cassis said under certain circumstances, Putin would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland without facing arrest. Though Trump and Zelenskyy have spoken about the trilateral meeting, there is no confirmation from the Kremlin if Putin has agreed to the same. On Tuesday, Trump warned that Putin would face a 'rough situation' if he did not cooperate in the peace process 'I hope President Putin is going to be good and if he's not, that's going to be a rough situation,' Trump said.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
They told me I am viral in Russia: Who is Mark Warren, an Alaska man who gets a personal gift from Putin?
Mark Warren, an Alaska man, received a personal gift from Russian President Vladimir Putin after Putin came to Alaska to meet President Donald Trump. It is a new Ural motorbike but Warren never met Putin. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The gift follows a chain of events as preparations for the high-stakes summit were underway. Russian media were in Alaska before the summit, and they found Warren, a retired fire inspector, with his Soviet-era bike doing his errands. They first stopped Warren seeing the bike and they admired it. Warren told them that it was becoming difficult to find spare parts for his bike and the manufacturing plant is located in Ukraine. 'So for you, if they resolve this conflict here in Alaska, I mean Putin and Trump, it will be good?' the reporter asked Warren in the report. 'Yes, it will be good,' Warren replied. Days later, Warren said he received a phone call from one of the reporters that he was viral in Russia and even caught Putin's eye. Russian officials promised him a new bike of $22,000 and Warren thought it was a scam. But within 24 hours after the Trump-Putin meeting, officials from the Russian embassy reached out to Warren to arrange for him to meet to hand over the new motorbike. The gift handover was broadcast on Russian state media. Warren said he likes his old motorbike but the new one is much better. 'I'm speechless, it's amazing. Thank you very much," he said. The gift of the motorbike was described by Russian media as a goodwill to Americans, though Warren said he did not think he was being used as a propaganda tool. "They're getting nothing from me," he said, adding that he's receiving backlash for accepting the gift from Putin but he's nonchalant. 'I took it. I could have not taken it, and probably pi**ed off just as many people as doing that. I don't care.' The new motorbike was manufactured on August 12, indicating that it was procured very recently after he went viral in Russia.
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars
India misread the tariffs brought on by the United States and, at a broader level, the Trump administration. We were one of the first to approach the US on this matter, and we continued to believe that we would have a favourable deal till recently, given what we felt was a great rapport between Modi and Trump. Mainstream electronic media houses were complicit in driving this narrative. To understand why India got it wrong, it would be useful to connect two disparate data dots. Top that with India's misreading of Trump's desire to be seen as a look at the first irritant and its impact. India exports roughly $90 billion, paying approximately 2 per cent tariffs currently, and imports roughly $45 billion at 12 per cent tariffs. The trade deficit of $45 billion carries a tariff differential of $5 billion per year in India's favour after adjusting for exempted products. We should have seen this imbalance in America's trade deficit and tariffs long ago and proactively addressed this. Modi is now overhauling the tax rates in a bid to boost the economy. This is expected to cost $20 billion, four times the tariff differential India was enjoying. .The other irritant is oil imports. In 2021/22, India imported roughly 2.5 million barrels of oil every day. Under the tacit approval of the West, India's imports from Russia grew from 2 per cent then to 40 per cent today. India buys 45 per cent of the exported oil from Russia, a growth of 1900 per cent from pre-war levels. China buys the same percentage, a growth of 50 per cent from pre-war levels. So why did India need this extra oil suddenly? It was because we processed this extra oil and sold it for a profit overseas. Therefore, the rhetoric is misplaced, as we are profiting and fuelling the Russian war machine. Predicting the flow of events, we should have scaled down our offtake back to the 2022 levels and with that, justify our need to fuel the Indian economy and keep inflationary tendencies in check. We have now started to do this, drawing a balance between the US and predict that the impact of tariffs at 25 per cent is likely to be in the region of $11-12 billion per annum on tariffed goods and about 0.25 per cent on GDP. In the earliest days of cranking up our imports of oil, the difference was around $30 a barrel, leading to a gain of $16 billion. That has now come down to around $5 a barrel after accounting for logistics, etc. The benefit we get is estimated today to be only $3.5 billion, a delta of $8.5 billion from what we lose out on with the long commentators have suggested many responses, ranging from the knee-jerk to keeping the long-term in mind. The real issue is what we do now. There is no pattern in the madness. Why have the four treatments of the BRIC countries been different? Because there is a different playbook with each one. With Brazil, the US has a trade surplus. Why then, do they have tariffs of 50 per cent, which is higher than China and equal to India? Bolsonaro? With China, 150 per cent was brought down to 30 per cent; here, it is about the rare earths. For the quantities required, the ecosystem is expensive, and the returns don't work out for a commercial operation. The CCP subsidised this for leverage and their long-term plans to pursue electric mobility and clean energy. This leverage on supplies was used to resolve the $650 billion of trade at stake between the US and China. .India made public its hypocritical treatment at the hands of the US, as it bought palladium, uranium, etc. from Russia. However, the reality is that US imports from Russia were at best $3 billion, down some 45 per cent from the previous year. India's imports from Russia stood at $70 billion, almost twice what it imports from the must now not get caught in the whirlpool of its rhetoric. And it certainly must not seek to appease China and Russia in a hurry and on the rebound. One can expect that this is short-term. There are many moving parts – Russia and Ukraine could arrive at a truce as early as next month. India has already started to demonstrate it is willing to reduce its import of Russian oil while not displeasing Russia. The midterms in the US could go against Trump, and the US courts could reverse Trump's executive decisions. Importantly, Trump does not define the long-standing US relationship with India. Trump himself may not have a long-term view on this the US, it seems clear. The average tariff on its imports has seen inflows of $28 billion, three times post these levies were collected in June. This aggregates to $350 billion. Add to this DOGE cuts and some others, and we have $500 billion being saved or added to the US treasury. This pays half its annual interest cost of $1 trillion, which, if left alone, is not sustainable. This is good for no one, as it is the world's biggest market by the short term, one sees no harm in subtly managing the relationships and dynamics at play and being practical. In the long term, anyway, as economist John Maynard Keynes said, we are all dead..(The writer is the former managing director of a Tata Company and now runs a Bengaluru-headquartered corporate finance practice)
