Chhattisgarh government school teachers fail to spell 'eleven' in class. Watch video
Ironically, Balrampur is not some remote hinterland but a district where multiple government schemes, teacher appointments, and education budgets are in force - at least on paper.
Even more troubling is the alleged response of the local administration. Reports suggest that the District Education Officer (DEO) issued verbal instructions to bar journalists from entering school premises.When contacted, the DEO said an enquiry would be initiated and action taken accordingly.- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
India dismisses Fake News claiming govt reviewing list of US goods exempted from tariffs
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) fact-checking handle on Sunday dismissed a fake news which claimed that the Indian government is currently reviewing a list of US-made products exempted from the tariffs after US President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs plus a penalty on domestic exports to America from August 1. An X handle named 'China in English' claimed 'The Indian government begins reviewing the list of U.S. products exempted from tariffs… and declares: No privilege without mutual respect' However, MEA FactCheck, the official social media handle of the fact-checking arm of the Ministry of External Affairs on the social media platform X, said, "This is FAKE News!.' MEA FactCheck on Sunday, 3 August 2025, refuted the post on U.S. products exempted from tariffs on the social media platform X. The fact-checking account also debunked another 'fake news' report floating around social media in order to prevent the spread of further disinformation amongst the people through the platforms. MEA FactCheck also refuted the claim that the government is 'considering suspending or reviewing certain bilateral agreements with the United States if hostile economic policies continue.' 'Fake News Alert! This is FAKE News. No such statement made,' according to the post from MEA on Sunday, highlighting that no such statement was made by the Indian government. Last week, US President Donald Trump imposed 25% tariff on all imports from India along with some additional undisclosed penalties. Trump cited the Asian nation's high tariff rates and its relationship with Russia as being the 'vast majority' buyer of military equipment and crude oil. Later, Trump called out both India and Russia as 'dead economies' amid the ongoing trade talks with India. In a suo motu statement in both the houses of Parliament, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said said, the government is examining the implications of these tariffs and is engaged with all stakeholders including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation. "The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry. We will take all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest," he said. The commerce minister also said that in just over a decade, India has rapidly transformed from being one of the fragile five to the fastest growing major economy in the world and it is also widely expected that India will become the third largest economy in a few years.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Not prepared for fourth year': DU's push for 12-hour shifts at colleges sparks criticism
Amid the rollout of the fourth year undergraduate programme (FYUP) under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 from this academic session at Delhi University, the varsity's push for 12-hour shifts has drawn criticism from teachers and students. Expressing myriad concerns, faculty unions are demanding the university withdraw the advisory and hold wider consultations as the classes for the new session begin Monday. In a notification dated July 31 notification, the university asked colleges to extend their hours and operate from 8 am to 8 pm to 'ensure availability of faculty and staff during the period,' suggesting a staggered deployment to accommodate additional academic requirements. However, faculty representatives argue that this blanket approach ignores the realities on the ground. 'The order clearly shows that we are ill-prepared for the fourth year,' said Abha Dev Habib, Secretary of the Democratic Teachers' Front and Associate Professor at Miranda House. She added, 'Teaching distribution and timetables must be planned in advance during the vacation itself if classes are to begin smoothly. Pushing this on August 1, with classes beginning August 4, leaves teachers scrambling. It also means that first-year teaching is now pushed toward guest faculty, which is no way to welcome students to a university.' Safety is emerging as the biggest worry. Many DU campuses are located in areas where traveling at odd hours feels unsafe to students and staff. 'This latest DU notification is extremely problematic. It is extremely dangerous from the safety perspective of students and teachers in many areas of Delhi,' said Dr Mithuraaj Dhusiya, an elected member of DU's Executive Council. 'Making students sit from 8 am to 8 pm is neither feasible nor practical. It just shows that DU is not prepared for the fourth year of NEP — neither on infrastructure nor manpower.' Rudrashish Chakraborty, Associate Professor of English at Kirori Mal College and Delhi University Teachers' Association (DUTA) Executive member, called the measure 'anti-teacher and anti-student.' 'It forces colleges to adopt a draconian system. The notification expressly instructs colleges to prepare a staggered timetable of a minimum five hours per day for every teacher, even if there is no space for teachers to sit and work,' he said. Chakraborty also flagged the potential impact on evening colleges, which traditionally cater to students who work during the day. 'It is not clear how this will impact evening colleges. Are they going to schedule their classes from 8 pm to 8 am? Or are they going to be dismantled altogether as institutions?' Faculty members also warned of an emerging hierarchy under the new system. 'The university has said that only senior faculty should teach and supervise the fourth-year students. This is a vicious attempt to create a division between so-called senior and junior colleagues, which will undermine collegiality and disrupt teaching culture,' Chakraborty added. 'We cannot implement structural reforms like this through last-minute orders without preparation, safety measures, or teacher training,' said Habib. Although the strength of students was not as high on Friday when colleges held orientations, better attendance is expected on Monday, officials said.
India.com
5 hours ago
- India.com
Dev Anand made her star, Dawood Ibrahim was madly in love with her, producer was murdered, she left India, went to Pakistan due to..., name is...
The most memorable era of Bollywood was from the 80s to the 90s when many new faces tried their luck in the industry. While some sustained, others had to leave as they couldn't make a mark. Then there were those actors and actresses who were allegedly known for their connection with the underworld. Today, we will discuss an actress who was Pakistani but wanted to become a big name in Bollywood. However, she had to leave the industry soon, and the reason was fugitive Dawood Ibrahim. If you are wondering who we are talking about, this actress is Anita Ayub. Who is Anita Ayub? Born in Karachi, Pakistan, Anita studied in an all-girls college. She earned a master's degree in English Literature from Karachi University before moving to India to pursue acting. Anita enrolled at the Roshan Taneja School of Acting in Mumbai, where Roshan Taneja became her mentor. In 1993, she returned to India to shoot an advertisement, during which she met Dev Anand. Impressed by her ad, Dev Anand cast her in his film Pyar Ka Tarana. In 1993, Anita made her in the film Pyar Ka Tarana alongside Dev Anand. After this, she again worked with Dev Anand in the film Gangster in 1995, which was a box-office success. Anita Ayub's Career Was Ruined A major turn in Anita's life came when rumors about her dating Dawood Ibrahim began to spread. Both were spotted together multiple times. In 1995, producer Javed Siddiqui turned down the actress an refused to cast her in his next Bollywood project, and shortly afterward, he was murdered. Many reports claim that Siddiqui was shot by Ibrahim's men. Later, the Pakistan-based magazine Fashion Central reported that many in the industry believed Anita Ayub to be a Pakistani spy, leading to her being banned from films. Following these allegations and controversies, her Bollywood career came to a complete halt.
