Hochul admits New York needs nuclear power — but getting it won't be easy
Bad news: New York's history of politicians pandering to anti-nuke hysteria will scare off a lot of potential private 'partners' on building the one-gigawatt plant.
After all, it's just four years since then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo forced the early closure of Indian Point — and four decades since then-Gov. Mario Cuomo killed the $6 billion Shoreham nuke plant before it even opened.
Hochul has belatedly recognized reality: New York has no hope of coming near meeting any of its clean-energy goals without nuclear power — and indeed is already hard-pressed for enough generating capacity to meet the natural growth in electric demands.
For example, Micron's New York semiconductor plant will require massive amounts of reliable electricity, potentially 1.85 gigawatts at full capacity — enough to power half a million homes.
The windmills and solar power plants pushed by the state Climate Action Plan can never meet that need.
Yet nuke plants take a long time to build, and getting the state-of-the-art modular reactor Hochul envisions is a lot harder than calling for it.
The Cuomos' anti-nuke actions — Long Islanders are still paying for Shoreham, while Indian Point had supplied 25% of the electricity needed for the city and Westchester — ensure that any company will demand a huge risk premium before investing a dime in building a nuke plant in the Empire State.
Which is why Hochul left the door open to the Power Authority footing the bills itself — without mentioning this means taxpayer support and/or stiff new fees on utility bills.
She also didn't mention that, since any new nuclear plant is 15 or so years off, the state's going to need new carbon-fueled power plants in the meantime, pushing the Climate Act's goals even further out of reach.
Consider it all just a few more reasons we all have the Cuomo clan to thank for a huge chunk of New York's deep 'affordability' problems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Hochul weighs a decision on medical aid in dying
Beat Memo Gov. Kathy Hochul is facing a political tripwire as she weighs the future of a decade-old bill that would allow terminally ill people to obtain life-ending medication. The bill would make New York the 12th state in the country to legalize medical aid in dying. Hochul is already assessing her options. Her office began meeting with key interest groups shortly after the Legislature's end of session last month, signaling the Democratic governor may act sooner rather than later. Advocates who fought for years to pass the measure are hopeful Hochul will sign the bill without demanding changes. Among the most influential voices boosting the bill is the Medical Society of the State of New York, whose decision to back medical aid in dying last year was considered pivotal in getting the Legislature to pass it this year. 'We've learned from other states what's important,' Jane Simpson, the society's vice speaker and a palliative care physician, told POLITICO. That includes a requirement that two doctors sign off on a patient's request and a provision allowing doctors to not participate in the program. The bill is set to land on Hochul's desk as she gears up for a tough reelection contest next year, when she will likely see challengers from the left and the right. One likely opponent, Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik, is already wielding the issue as a political brickbat. 'Instead of investing in palliative care, mental health support and life-affirming resources for those facing terminal illness, this legislation offers an immoral shortcut that devalues human life,' Stefanik said in a statement after the bill's passage in the Assembly. But hospice and palliative care providers have denounced arguments that pit the two treatment pathways against each other. 'This is not an independent decision on medical aid in dying — this is about quality of end-of-life care,' Jeanne Chirico, president of the Hospice & Palliative Care Association of New York State, told POLITICO. IN OTHER NEWS: — 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East endorsed Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani on Friday after backing Andrew Cuomo's failed primary bid, POLITICO Pro reported. 'We are proud to endorse Zohran Mamdani who will fight side-by-side with us to ensure New Yorkers get the services they need, build affordable housing, and create safe communities,' union president Yvonne Armstrong said in a statement. 'We need a mayor like Zohran who has a plan to ensure frontline caregivers can continue working and living in our city.' ON THE AGENDA: — Tuesday, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The state Opioid Settlement Fund Advisory Board will meet. — Thursday at 10:30 a.m. The state Medicaid Evidence Based Benefit Review Advisory Committee will meet. MAKING ROUNDS: — George Han was appointed director of research for NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst. GOT TIPS? Send story ideas and feedback to Maya Kaufman at mkaufman@ and Katelyn Cordero at kcordero@ Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. What you may have missed — Gov. Kathy Hochul is weighing her options for addressing fallout from the federal tax law, which could upend the state's heath care industry and yank health insurance coverage from more than a million New Yorkers, she told reporters Thursday. The Democratic governor noted President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will result in a $750 million hit to the state's budget this year, and $3 billion next year, which Hochul said the state is not equipped to fully backfill, POLITICO Pro's Katelyn Cordero reports. 'Those who say, 'Well I'm not on Medicaid, it doesn't affect me,' when perhaps one of the five hospitals in the North Country closes, you and your family will not have anywhere to go either,' Hochul said, arguing that the five House Republicans in New York's delegation will have to answer to constituents for their support of the bill. Odds and Ends NOW WE KNOW — Three things to know about President Trump's vein condition. TODAY'S TIP — Avoid these mistakes when trying to increase your protein intake. STUDY THIS — Via STAT: The Republican tax bill could increase overdose deaths by 1,000 each year, researchers estimate. What We're Reading — Mayor Adams touts cleanup of Bronx drug market, but locals say root problems remain. (Gothamist) — Insurers and customers brace for double whammy to Obamacare premiums (KFF Health News) — A new recall of injected penicillin may put gains against syphilis in peril. (CNN) Around POLITICO — CBO report finds NIH and FDA cuts would slow drug development, Simon J. Levien reports. — Via Giedre Peseckyte: Trump medicines tariff will cause shortages in the U.S., experts warn. MISSED A ROUNDUP? Get caught up on the New York Health Care Newsletter.
New York Times
8 hours ago
- New York Times
How New York Schools Will Crack Down on Cellphones
Good morning. It's Monday. Today we'll get details on new regulations that will bar students from having cellphones in class once school starts in September. For students in New York City's 1,600 public schools, something will be different when the 2025-26 academic year begins on Sept. 4, thanks to one sentence on Page 5 of an eight-page regulation that was approved last week: 'Students may not use personal internet-enabled electronic devices during the school day.' Translation: No smartphones in class. Or in the gym. Or in the cafeteria. Is it a ban? The Department of Education asked that question — but did not answer it — on a webpage explaining the new policy. But there is no question that the city's restrictions mirror state regulations championed by Gov. Kathy Hochul, who maintains that a 'bell-to-bell' prohibition through the school day would mean better learning and less cyberbullying. Hochul is so committed to the idea that the $254 billion state budget deal for the fiscal year that began on July 1 included $13.5 million for school districts that need help purchasing equipment to store cellphones. Hochul said during a recent appearance with Schools Chancellor Melissa Aviles-Ramos that Mayor Eric Adams was putting in $25 million in New York City, where about half of the schools had already imposed regulations on their own. The city's rules will differ from school to school. The Department of Education says that each school will develop its own policy, in writing. The FAQ section on the department's webpage says that children can take their phones to school, but that once they arrive, the phones must be stored. Phones can go into 'school-assigned personal or shared lockers' or cellphone pouches, but cannot simply remain in a backpack all day. 'Backpacks alone are not considered a sufficient storage option, unless they are kept in a closet or cubby that cannot be accessed by students without permission,' the webpage says. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Gov. Hochul's latest redistricting threat is dangerous and undemocratic
Gov. Kathy Hochul and fellow Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps to win seats for their party. And in mid-decade, no less, in clear violation of the state Constitution. It's sleazy, anti-democratic — and illegal. Even Hochul admits it, but suggests Dems may do it anyway since Texas and Ohio are moving to draw up new districts in their states. Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps, writes The Post Editorial Board. Andrew Schwartz / 'All's fair in love and war,' she huffed last week. 'If there's other states violating the rules and are trying to give themselves an advantage, all I'll say is, I'm going to look at it closely.' Huh? If Texas and Ohio rig their maps, that doesn't give Hochul & Co. the right to break New York's laws — even if her goal is to offset any advantage Republicans get in those states. Note, too, that Hochul is huffing not about protecting New York's influence in Congress but her party's. And at the expense, presumably, of Republican voters in New York, since the goal would be to draw district lines favorable to Democrats. True, Texas and Ohio Republicans are expected draw lines they hope will favor them. But if those states cheat their Democratic voters, those voters can sue. Hochul and her party are worried that if more Republicans are elected from those states, it'll make it harder for Democrats to win control of the House in next year's midterms. But again, if the donkeys think those states are breaking any laws, they can go to court, too. Meanwhile, if Hochul tried to gerrymander in time for the midterm, she'd be doubly violating the state Constitution. First, redistricting can take place only once every 10 years, after the Census, not mid-decade. Second, in 2014 New Yorkers passed a constitutional amendment that empowered an independent decennial redistricting commission and specifically banned partisan gerrymandering. But Democrats ignored the amendment and tried to gerrymander anyway a few years ago, and it took a ruling by the state's top court to stop them. We don't condone gerrymandering, by either party, in any state. It cheats voters, skews representation and undermines democracy. As even Democratic boss Jay Jacobs warns, 'We need to be careful about democracy,' adding, 'You don't change the rules of the game to your advantage just because you can.' Given the tight timeframe, it's unlikely Democrats could pull this off. But then, if New York Dems were willing to violate the Constitution before, who can be sure they won't 'break the rules' again to push through corrupt new district lines in time? New Yorkers of both parties should demand Hochul take back her threat and obey the law.
