Casey reflects on Biden's diagnosis, his own cancer fight
'It was just two words,' the former senator remembers. 'It's cancer.'
Casey, a Scranton native serving his third term in the U.S. Senate, was diagnosed with prostate cancer in late 2022. He was 62 and had no symptoms of disease. The cancer was caught by a routine blood test that revealed elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen.
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese greet neighborhood resident Molly Kankiewicz while taking a walk in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Casey was shaken by the diagnosis, but knew the cancer was manageable and detected early. He had decisions to make and time to make them.
'I can't imagine hearing those two words, 'It's cancer,' and having it be the kind of cancer which is not manageable,' Casey said in a recent interview. 'It hits you really hard, but I also had a general sense that this was more manageable, so it wasn't as devastating as it would have been if it were some other kind of cancer. But even with that, it still hits you hard.'
Casey had successful surgery in 2023 and has remained healthy since, an example of advances in testing and treatment that have dramatically improved survival rates for the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in American men. Only lung cancer is more lethal. About one in eight men will be diagnosed over their lifetime with prostate cancer, according to the American Cancer Society.
Former Sen. Bob Casey smiles in the living room of his Scranton home Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Scranton native and former President Joe Biden was diagnosed last month with aggressive prostate cancer that spread to his bones. Prostate cancers are graded using what's known as a Gleason score. Scores range from 6 to 10. Biden's score is 9, suggesting his cancer is among the most aggressive types. It can be treated, but not cured.
Casey said he sent Biden, 82, a message of support, but hasn't spoken to his old friend and political ally since the diagnosis.
'I reached out just to say, 'You're not alone,' and to tell him that we're thinking of him,' he said. 'I did see him right before he left (the White House) in January. I really haven't been in touch with him since, but (the diagnosis) is a hell of a thing after all he's been through.'
Joined by Allentown firefighters and U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, President Joe Biden addresses the media Friday, Jan. 12, 2024, at Mack South Fire Station in Allentown. (April Gamiz/The Morning Call)
Casey, 65, credits the support and advocacy of Terese Casey, his wife of 40 years and a key partner in his treatment and recovery.
'She jumped right in helping me research it, and we interviewed a group of surgeons,' he said. 'Technically, I had three options — just let it go and see what happens; No. 2 was to get radiation; and No. 3 was to have surgery. I chose a prostatectomy, where you just get it out. I was really fortunate. I had a good doctor and got a good result.'
Choosing the right doctor and treatment plan are key not only to survival, but quality of life, said Don Ezrin, a three-time cancer survivor who until recently chaired the Northeast Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Survivors Support Group. The group no longer meets in person, but maintains a vibrant presence on Facebook, one of many regional pages for cancer survivors on the platform.
A Vietnam-era Air Force veteran, Ezrin learned he was at risk during his discharge physical. His doctor told him his prostate was enlarged.
'I really remember the doctor with his rubber glove going, 'What is this? That's a bit enlarged,'' Ezrin said. 'So I was watching it thoroughly, and the minute it raised its ugly head, we proceeded to do something.'
Ezrin was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2002. He opted for intensity modulated radiation therapy, which was not widely available in Northeast Pennsylvania at the time. His cancer has been under control for 20 years, which he credits in part to choosing the right treatment.
'You've got to understand that each medical professional is very similar to a car salesman,' the 78-year-old Clarks Summit retiree said. 'They want to sell what they practice, and if you start asking questions and they're not in that field, they're going to shut you down real quick, which was the reason for starting the group.'
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey talks with neighbors with his wife Terese by his side in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk on the couch in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese walk out of their house in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Show Caption
1 of 5
Former Sen. Bob Casey talks with neighbors with his wife Terese by his side in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Expand
Every treatment — whether surgery, radiation or hormone therapy — comes with side effects, Ezrin said. When he was diagnosed, his wife, Lisa, was 40. Ezrin was 57, and leery of the sexual side effects of some treatment options.
'I was not ready to give up what I call 'the finer things of life,' which is what can happen if you choose the wrong therapy to treat prostate cancer,' Ezrin said. 'A lot of the drugs that are out there today can rob you of the desire to want to do anything other than just exist.
'I've seen guys bounce back immediately and I've seen guys just fall apart. The bottom line is you've got to get educated on what you're up against and then make the best choice for you, your family and your financial situation.'
Casey echoed Ezrin's call to research options widely before making treatment decisions. Seeking the support and counsel of survivors is also important, he said. Shortly after he announced his diagnosis, other members of Congress reached out with advice and support.
'That was a big help, and again, I was very fortunate to have good doctors and a good result,' he said. 'And the recovery was pretty fast. I think I was back voting in the Senate on day 12.'
Casey was defeated in the November election and exited the Senate in January. His win over prostate cancer gives him more time to spend with his two grandchildren. Another is due in June.
'On Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congress, I purposely got in my car and drove to their house to be with them,' Casey said. 'I've been really lucky. I had a great run and had a lot of years in government and now I've got to do something else. I'm still working on that, still trying to figure that out, but I've been fortunate.'
The former president's diagnosis and treatment going forward should serve as a reminder to men of a certain age to get tested regularly, Casey said.
'Whenever these things happen to someone who's prominent, it obviously brings a lot of attention to the topic,' he said. 'It's a powerful reminder for men to get the test, especially when you're in your 40s and 50s. It's important and it's so simple. You get a blood test. Treatment has come a long way over the past 25 or so years. What used to be a death sentence no longer is.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian
Politics & Policy A White House official told Axios that President Trump intends to expand his review of American museums for "woke" ideology beyond the Smithsonian Institution. Why it matters: The size and scope of Trump's inquiries represents an unprecedented level of museum oversight in the nearly 250 years of American democracy, historians say. It also represents an escalation of the president's attack on cultural institutions. Here's what historians and curators fear could happen if Trump reframes museums through his perspective. What exactly does the president have in mind? Trump said that the "Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL" on Truth Social earlier this week. He then directed his attorneys to conduct a comprehensive review of the museum system, similar to the process officials have conducted at colleges and universities. What they're saying:"President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable," a White House official told Axios. "He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there," they continued. Reality check: The Smithsonian is not a federal agency under control of the president, according to the institution. It's an independent institution, governed by a Board of Regents, which is composed of seventeen members, including the Vice President. Trump has no authority over private museums. Yes, but: The president could freeze the federal funding that some private museums receive, the way he has for schools that don't align with his anti-diversity views on education. What does Trump's perception of American history look like? Trump claims that there has been a "widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history" over the past decade. He insists that these efforts "undermine" America's achievements by casting its founding principles as "inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed." Historians say the administration's singular, sanitized approach to the past, focusing solely on America's positive moments misses out on the nuance of American history and excludes the lived experiences of Black, Indigenous, Latino, and LGBTQ+ people. Friction point:"That is anti-democratic," Beth English, executive director of the Organization of American Historians told Axios, referring to the administration's push to stifle and sanitize information, debate and historical facts. "It's not education, right?" English questioned. "It begins to kind of veer into the space of indoctrination, selecting, sort of a selective memory of what is and isn't going to be part of our national story." Why is Trump's push to install political appointees to review museums problematic? Curators said distilling history into accurate, engaging examples that the public can understand requires a level of expertise that an untrained political appointee likely lacks. The majority of curators at national museums have PhDs, or have been trained in museum studies through rigorous degree programs and research. "It's not like people are creating exhibitions to tell a story, to win a political agenda," Omar Eaton-Martinez, former board president of the Association of African American Museums said. "People are actually curating exhibitions based on scholarship that is supported by evidence," he continued. Don't museums reframe and reevaluate history all the time? Historians say museums expanding their collections isn't evidence of nefarious behavior, but rather, it's simply how the static nature of history grows. Zoom out: Collections have increasingly included the perspectives of sociologists, psychologists and other social scientists over the past few decades, in addition to more thorough reviews of census records, genealogy, oral histories, archeology, objects, and images. "We're constantly building on prior scholarship to help ask more nuanced questions about a topic," Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association said. "We're always peeling back the layers of the onion, so to speak." Black, Indigenous and Latin scholars have been digging into their respective histories for centuries, and those experiences have been recognized and incorporated into museums in recent decades. That includes history that was once ignored, such as the burning of records in thriving Black neighborhoods such as the massacres in Tulsa, Oklahoma or Rosewood, Florida; the forced removal of Indigenous nations from one part of America to another during the " trail of tears"; and urban renewal projects to upgrade cities that ultimately gentrify communities of color. What funding and programs has Trump already taken aim at? The Trump administration has taken aggressive action to reduce the staffing and funding available for the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS,) the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the National Endowment for the Arts. Stunning stat: IMLS's acting director testified in court that the administration cancelled roughly 92% of the agency's Grants to States. Only 100 grants remain out of the original 1,200 managed by the institute prior to Trump's executive order. The president also attempted to fire Kim Sajet, the director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, earlier this year due to her support of diversity initiatives, despite not having the authority to do so. The Smithsonian has legal authority over personnel decisions, but Sajet eventually decided to step down in the weeks following Trump's announcement. What other times has an American museum pivoted after political influence? An exorbitant amount of debate goes into exhibit decision-making, so museums have already determined the best way to display potential controversies. When museums modify exhibits, it's typically due to public pressure, and has never been under significant force from the president. Case in point: The Smithsonian's 90s exhibit on Enola Gay, the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb, sparked opposition from veterans and members of Congress on how to interpret the bomb's dropping and America's role in World War II. The bottom line:"These kinds of controversies exist frequently, and that's a good thing, because public debate about the nation's past is healthy," James Grossman, former executive director of the American Historical Association told Axios. "But the President of the United States has no business telling museums what to exhibit, telling teachers what to teach, and has no business telling Americans what to think," Grossman continued.
American Press
21 minutes ago
- American Press
James Dobson, Focus on the Family founder, dies at 89
James Dobson, a child psychologist who founded the conservative ministry Focus on the Family and was a politically influential campaigner against abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, died on Thursday. He was 89. Born in 1936 in Shreveport, Louisiana, Dobson launched a radio show counseling Christians on how to be good parents and started Focus on the Family in 1977. He became a force for pushing conservative Christian ideals in mainstream American politics in the 1980s alongside fundamentalist giants like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. At its peak, Focus on the Family had more than 1,000 employees and gave Dobson a platform to weigh in on legislation and serve as an adviser to five presidents. His death was confirmed by the Dr. James Dobson Family Institute. He is survived by his wife of 64 years, Shirley, as well as their two children, a daughter-in-law and two grandchildren. 'Mount Rushmore' of conservatives Dobson interviewed President Ronald Reagan in the Oval Office in 1985, and Falwell called him a rising star in 1989. Decades later, he was among the evangelical leaders tapped to advise President Donald Trump. in 2016. In 2022, he celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade — including Trump's conservative appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court credited with the landmark decision that allowed states to ban abortion. 'Whether you like Donald Trump or not, whether you supported or voted for him or not, if you are supportive of this Dobbs decision that struck down Roe v. Wade, you have to mention in the same breath the man who made it possible,' he said in a ministry broadcast. He belongs on the 'Mount Rushmore' of Christian conservatives, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, another group Dobson founded. 'Very few people have had such a positive impact in the shaping of the American family, from what we would describe as a biblical standpoint,' said Perkins, promoting ideas that pushed back against progressive parenting of the 1960s. Weighing Dobson's legacy John Fea, an American History professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, has been critical of Dobson's politics and ideas but recounts how his own father was a better parent after becoming an evangelical Christian and listening to Dobson's radio program. Fea's dad was a tough Marine who spanked his children out of anger, which Dobson opposed. 'Even as a self-identified evangelical Christian that I am, I have no use in my own life for Dobson's politics or his child-rearing,' he said. 'I've been critical of it most of my career. But as a historian what do you do with these stories? About a dad who becomes a better dad?' Possible presidential run After developing a following of millions, Dobson considered running for president in the 2000 election, following in the footsteps of former television minister Pat Robertson's surprise success in 1988. 'He had a big audience. He was not afraid to speak out. He became a very important voice and there was even talk that he might run for president,' said Ralph Reed, a Christian conservative political organizer and lobbyist who founded the Faith and Freedom Coalition. 'If Jim had decided to run, he would have been a major force.' Despite their close association later in life, Reed's enduring memory was as a younger political organizer traveling through rural America with Dobson's voice as his sole companion. 'I'd be out there somewhere, and I could go to the AM dial and there was never a time, day or night when I couldn't find that guy,' Reed said. 'There will probably never be another one like him.' Dobson left Focus on the Family in 2010 and founded the institute that bears his name. He continued with the Family Talk radio show, which is nationally syndicated and is carried by 1,500 radio outlets with more than half a million listeners weekly, according to the institute.
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it
Tiny studs, big trouble? Parents itching to pierce their kids' ears might want to put down the needle — a growing body of research suggests the popular practice could cost more than just a few tears. 'Delay ear piercings in young girls,' Dr. Niha Qamar (@doctor._.q), a board-certified allergist and immunologist, said in a recent TikTok, warning it could increase the risk of a serious, lifelong allergy. Dr. Niha Qamar is a board-certified allergist based in New York. TikTok/@doctor._.q Nationwide, nickel is the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis — a red, itchy rash that flares up when the skin touches a normally harmless material. Roughly 1.1 million American children are affected by a nickel sensitivity, and studies show that number has quadrupled over the past 30 years. Researchers say early ear piercings are a major factor. In a Swedish study of 960 schoolgirls aged 8 to 15, researchers found that 'the ones who had ear piercings had 13% nickel allergy, versus 1% of the girls who didn't have ear piercings,' Qamar said. Another study out of Finland showed that 31% of pierced kids had a reaction to nickel — compared to just 2% of those without. And in the US, a study found that just 4% of men with no piercings were sensitive to nickel, while 11.1% and 14% of those with one or multiple piercings, respectively, were affected. 'Europe actually passed legislation to decrease the amount of nickel in jewelry (for this reason),' Qamar said. Many Americans get their ears pieced as infants or young children. deltahman – That regulation, the Nickel Directive, was introduced by the European Union in 1994 to limit how much nickel can leach from items like earrings. In the years since, countries like Denmark have reported major drops in sensitization, along with an estimated $2 billion in related health care savings. Nickel allergy isn't deadly, but it can make life miserable. Reactions may include hives, cracked skin, burning, itching and discoloration. More severe symptoms can strike when someone eats nickel-rich foods or has a metal device implanted. Blisters, diarrhea, fatigue, headaches and full-body swelling are all on the table. With no cure, managing symptoms becomes a lifelong battle — and avoiding nickel isn't easy, since it lurks in everything from jewelry and belt buckles to bra hooks and braces. Some people require treatment, which can include medication and even light therapy. With nickel sensitization on the rise in the US, major medical groups are calling for tighter regulations like those already in place in Europe. In 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged the federal government to crack down on nickel in clothing and jewelry. 'The burden of symptoms and cost is high,' the policy statement notes. 'The United States can act on EU data revealing that legislation to limit exposures in childhood, especially with earrings, can impact the prevalence and potentially the severity of disease.' Until then, Qamar says parents should play it safe and hold off on piercing their kids' ears. 'If your child is getting pieced ears, get jewelry that is nickel free,' she recommended. 'That will reduce the risk of nickel sensitization.'
