Casey reflects on Biden's diagnosis, his own cancer fight
Bob Casey was on a train bound for Washington, D.C., when he got a call that stopped him in his tracks.
'It was just two words,' the former senator remembers. 'It's cancer.'
Casey, a Scranton native serving his third term in the U.S. Senate, was diagnosed with prostate cancer in late 2022. He was 62 and had no symptoms of disease. The cancer was caught by a routine blood test that revealed elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen.
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese greet neighborhood resident Molly Kankiewicz while taking a walk in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Casey was shaken by the diagnosis, but knew the cancer was manageable and detected early. He had decisions to make and time to make them.
'I can't imagine hearing those two words, 'It's cancer,' and having it be the kind of cancer which is not manageable,' Casey said in a recent interview. 'It hits you really hard, but I also had a general sense that this was more manageable, so it wasn't as devastating as it would have been if it were some other kind of cancer. But even with that, it still hits you hard.'
Casey had successful surgery in 2023 and has remained healthy since, an example of advances in testing and treatment that have dramatically improved survival rates for the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in American men. Only lung cancer is more lethal. About one in eight men will be diagnosed over their lifetime with prostate cancer, according to the American Cancer Society.
Former Sen. Bob Casey smiles in the living room of his Scranton home Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Scranton native and former President Joe Biden was diagnosed last month with aggressive prostate cancer that spread to his bones. Prostate cancers are graded using what's known as a Gleason score. Scores range from 6 to 10. Biden's score is 9, suggesting his cancer is among the most aggressive types. It can be treated, but not cured.
Casey said he sent Biden, 82, a message of support, but hasn't spoken to his old friend and political ally since the diagnosis.
'I reached out just to say, 'You're not alone,' and to tell him that we're thinking of him,' he said. 'I did see him right before he left (the White House) in January. I really haven't been in touch with him since, but (the diagnosis) is a hell of a thing after all he's been through.'
Joined by Allentown firefighters and U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, President Joe Biden addresses the media Friday, Jan. 12, 2024, at Mack South Fire Station in Allentown. (April Gamiz/The Morning Call)
Casey, 65, credits the support and advocacy of Terese Casey, his wife of 40 years and a key partner in his treatment and recovery.
'She jumped right in helping me research it, and we interviewed a group of surgeons,' he said. 'Technically, I had three options — just let it go and see what happens; No. 2 was to get radiation; and No. 3 was to have surgery. I chose a prostatectomy, where you just get it out. I was really fortunate. I had a good doctor and got a good result.'
Choosing the right doctor and treatment plan are key not only to survival, but quality of life, said Don Ezrin, a three-time cancer survivor who until recently chaired the Northeast Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Survivors Support Group. The group no longer meets in person, but maintains a vibrant presence on Facebook, one of many regional pages for cancer survivors on the platform.
A Vietnam-era Air Force veteran, Ezrin learned he was at risk during his discharge physical. His doctor told him his prostate was enlarged.
'I really remember the doctor with his rubber glove going, 'What is this? That's a bit enlarged,'' Ezrin said. 'So I was watching it thoroughly, and the minute it raised its ugly head, we proceeded to do something.'
Ezrin was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2002. He opted for intensity modulated radiation therapy, which was not widely available in Northeast Pennsylvania at the time. His cancer has been under control for 20 years, which he credits in part to choosing the right treatment.
'You've got to understand that each medical professional is very similar to a car salesman,' the 78-year-old Clarks Summit retiree said. 'They want to sell what they practice, and if you start asking questions and they're not in that field, they're going to shut you down real quick, which was the reason for starting the group.'
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey talks with neighbors with his wife Terese by his side in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk on the couch in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese walk out of their house in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Former Sen. Bob Casey and wife Terese talk in their living room in their Hill section residence in Scranton Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Show Caption
1 of 5
Former Sen. Bob Casey talks with neighbors with his wife Terese by his side in Scranton's Hill section Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Expand
Every treatment — whether surgery, radiation or hormone therapy — comes with side effects, Ezrin said. When he was diagnosed, his wife, Lisa, was 40. Ezrin was 57, and leery of the sexual side effects of some treatment options.
'I was not ready to give up what I call 'the finer things of life,' which is what can happen if you choose the wrong therapy to treat prostate cancer,' Ezrin said. 'A lot of the drugs that are out there today can rob you of the desire to want to do anything other than just exist.
'I've seen guys bounce back immediately and I've seen guys just fall apart. The bottom line is you've got to get educated on what you're up against and then make the best choice for you, your family and your financial situation.'
Casey echoed Ezrin's call to research options widely before making treatment decisions. Seeking the support and counsel of survivors is also important, he said. Shortly after he announced his diagnosis, other members of Congress reached out with advice and support.
'That was a big help, and again, I was very fortunate to have good doctors and a good result,' he said. 'And the recovery was pretty fast. I think I was back voting in the Senate on day 12.'
Casey was defeated in the November election and exited the Senate in January. His win over prostate cancer gives him more time to spend with his two grandchildren. Another is due in June.
'On Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congress, I purposely got in my car and drove to their house to be with them,' Casey said. 'I've been really lucky. I had a great run and had a lot of years in government and now I've got to do something else. I'm still working on that, still trying to figure that out, but I've been fortunate.'
The former president's diagnosis and treatment going forward should serve as a reminder to men of a certain age to get tested regularly, Casey said.
'Whenever these things happen to someone who's prominent, it obviously brings a lot of attention to the topic,' he said. 'It's a powerful reminder for men to get the test, especially when you're in your 40s and 50s. It's important and it's so simple. You get a blood test. Treatment has come a long way over the past 25 or so years. What used to be a death sentence no longer is.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Moms Are Trying To Delay Daughters' First Period—Experts Say They're Right
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Puberty in American girls is starting earlier than ever—and some moms aren't waiting around to see what that means for their daughters. Rebecca Kinderman is just one who's doing everything in her power to try and delay her daughters'—aged 10 and 12—first periods. Her Instagram reel (@bec_kinderman) on the subject had received 1.6 million views and and over 57,000 likes across the platform at the time of writing. For the Gold Coast mom, this has meant overhauling everything from her family's diet to screen time. "I believe that if we can delay this part of 'growing up,' especially when their brains are not developed enough to be able to handle everything that they could be exposed to online, we are allowing our girls to stay young for longer," the 36-year-old told Newsweek. Indeed, data shows the average age for a girl's first period is now just 11.9 years, with 16 percent starting before age 11 in the United States. What is even more alarming about starting your period early is the increased risk of hormone-related cancers later in life. For instance, girls who start their period before age 12 have a 23 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to those who start at 15. Additionally, early menarche has been linked to increased risks of endometrial and ovarian cancers. But it wasn't always like this. Elena Bridgers (@ a science writer who specializes in maternal wellness and mental health, explained in a recent reel on Instagram that girls in hunter-gatherer societies often started their periods as late as 17 and began proper ovulation around 19. "For millions of years, women's brains and bodies went through the emotional turmoil of adolescence before we actually hit reproductive puberty, but modern teens have to deal with painful periods, the risk of getting pregnant, and sometimes actually getting pregnant well before their brains and bodies are actually mature enough," Bridgers said in her now viral clip. This trend suggests an "evolutionary mismatch" adds Bridgers, with modern teens facing reproductive challenges before they are emotionally and physically mature. "Early onset of menarche is associated with higher risk of miscarriage, more menstrual cramping, more painful and irregular periods, higher risk of preterm delivery, reproductive cancers, anxiety and depression," Bridgers told Newsweek. "We are not sure whether early onset of menarche causes these things, or whether there is a third explanatory variable, like obesity, that causes both early onset of menarche and puts girls at higher risk for depression. But, on the whole, I think we can safely say that starting your period too early is not a good thing." Evidence suggests that some of the leading contributing factors to early menarche—the age at which a girl starts her period—are in fact environmental, including stress, psychological factors and diet-related. With this in mind, Kinderman is raising her daughters as holistically as possible. "We are very focused on raising our kids with as much of a holistic approach as we can," she said. "This includes no personal devices for any of them, and certainly no access to social media and the internet." The family eats mostly organic and removes pesticide residue from fruit and vegetables. Kinderman explained that there are no toxic chemicals in the house either. "We make our own perfumes using essential oils," she told Newsweek. "This age is really big for girls wanting to smell pretty and unfortunately perfumes are a cocktail of hormone-disrupting chemicals." Meanwhile mom of two daughters—7 and 4—Nicky Skinner has taken similar steps to delay her own daughters' first periods. On her Instagram page (@nourished_and_vibrant), Skinner, from New Zealand, raises awareness that girls are starting their periods earlier than ever. Her recent reel on the topic, which had clocked up 8 million views at the time of writing, provides a list of reasons why other moms may want to join her on her mission. But while delaying first menses is her goal, it's not about artificially manipulating natural development, she told Newsweek. "It's about creating an environment that doesn't bring the period on prematurely," she said. "It's about an awareness that girls are starting to ovulate earlier, knowing that comes with risk, so doing what I can to ensure the environmental factors I can control as a mother—knowing there's a lot I can't control—are not impacting my girls' health in a negative way." Indeed, the two moms are part of a growing group of parents rethinking early puberty and how modern life may influence when a girl has her first period. And the subject is gaining traction with with experts too. Lara Briden, a doctor of naturopathic medicine with almost 30 years of experience in women's health, notes that very early menarche—before age 8—is considered abnormal and warrants medical attention. "But even early menarche—before age 11—is not ideal," Briden told Newsweek. "From a health [and] biology perspective, early female puberty and menarche are also associated with a greater risk for insulin resistance, PCOS [polycystic ovary syndrome], and breast cancer later in life. "Importantly, the early menarche may not directly cause those long-term health risks. Rather, it may simply be another manifestation or complication of the metabolic dysfunction (high insulin) that drives all the downstream health risks." Briden, who is also the author of Period Repair Manual, said that the timing of female puberty is significantly influenced by food supply and environmental factors, leading to variations throughout human history. She said that during periods of scarcity, puberty tends to be delayed. Meanwhile in times of abundance, it generally occurs earlier—adding that male puberty is not as sensitive to food supply. "The modern trend toward earlier menarche is, in part, a biological response to more reliable nutrition, which is a good thing," Briden said. "But it has also coincided with an alarming rise in metabolic dysfunction (insulin resistance), which now affects people across all ages. It's not just that metabolic problems are increasing. They're also amplifying in severity, and that's happening across generations because of epigenetics." Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background. Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background. @bec_kinderman So, is it any wonder that moms doing everything they can to delay their daughters' first period to prevent the associated risks? Of course, Kinderman and Skinner acknowledge that, while moms can try their best to do everything they can to delay their daughters' first periods, there is no guarantee. "It's important to remember that genetics play a big part in this, too," Skinner said. "If mother got her period early, even if you do everything 'right,' the daughter may still menstruate earlier, too. There need be no shame or guilt around this." Bridgers said that genetic factors at play and even environmental factors can be very hard to control, and warns that setting a goal to delay a girl's menarche can cause shame and failure for both parents and girls, and may lead to unhealthy parenting practices. "I do think, however, that parents should do their best to make sure their children are eating a healthy diet and getting plenty of outdoor exercise," Bridgers said. "We know this will be good for them anyway." Bridgers advised limiting sugars and processed foods, ensuring they have plenty of time outside and away from screens and avoiding heavy use of personal care products with known endocrine disrupters. Briden said that, while something can be done, the goal shouldn't be to delay menarche. "It's not about restriction or micromanaging childhood, and certainly not about calorie restriction for kids," she said, adding that she doesn't believe Skinner or Kinderman are suggesting this. "Instead, it's about trying to create or restore a food environment that allows normal human female physiology to unfold." Both Kinderman and Skinner are also advocates of open conversation around periods with their daughters. Kinderman told Newsweek that she is always been open with her girls about their cycles and puberty. "My hopes are that, when it does happen, it will be a really positive experience for them," she said. "There won't be any fear or uncertainty. I've heard too many women share that they weren't prepared for it, mothers never talked about it or talked very little about it, and they got it young and felt scared. My hopes are that my girls feel excited for the day and will be celebrated when it happens."
18 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: White House drops NASA nominee with Musk ties
The senate was slated to vote on Jared Isaacman next week. 3:08 President Donald Trump on Friday claimed China violated its trade agreement with the U.S. and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said talks between the world's two largest economies stalled. This week, Trump's global tariff policy hit a major roadblock as two federal courts ruled he does not have the power to unilaterally impose some levies. The tariffs can stay in place, for now, as the court considers the administration's appeal. Meanwhile, Elon Musk is leaving his role as a "special government employee" but is expected to remain an unofficial adviser to Trump. Latest headlines: May 31, 2025, 4:24 PM EDT White House pulls NASA nominee Jared Isaacman, billionaire with Musk ties May 30, 2025, 8:11 PM EDT Trump touts US Steel-Nippon deal May 30, 2025, 6:13 PM EDT Trump says he's doubling tariffs on steel imports to 50% May 30, 2025, 2:42 PM EDT Trump on possible pardon for Diddy: 'I would certainly look at the facts' Here's how the news is developing. May 31, 2025, 4:24 PM EDT White House pulls NASA nominee Jared Isaacman, billionaire with Musk ties The White House withdrew Saturday the nomination of Jared Isaacman to become the next NASA administrator just days before his scheduled confirmation vote in the Senate. "It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon," Liz Huston, a spokesperson for the White House said in a statement. Isaacman, who is the CEO of the payment processing company Shift4, has had a long history with Musk and worked with SpaceX on commercial flights into space. Isaacman attempted to distance himself from Musk during his confirmation hearing as he was getting grilled by Democrats on the committee. Musk and Trump have emphasized their desire to prioritize Mars, whereas Isaacman clarified during questioning that a lunar landing would take precedence over a Mars mission. In a post on social media, Trump confirmed he had pulled the nomination. "After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA," Trump said without elaborating. "I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space." May 30, 2025, 8:11 PM EDT Trump touts US Steel-Nippon deal President Donald Trump on Friday touted a "blockbuster agreement" between U.S. Steel and Japanese company Nippon Steel that he said would keep the iconic U.S. steelmaker in Pittsburgh -- though he previously opposed such a merger and offered few details on the intricacies of the deal. Trump discussed the deal during a rally at the Irvin Works plant in Allegheny County on Friday evening. President Donald Trump said he will double the tariff imposed on imports of steel from 25% to 50%. Trump made the announcement during a rally in Pennsylvania on Friday to discuss the "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan-based Nippon Steel. Trump said the increase in steel tariffs "will even further secure the steel industry in the United States." Trump imposed the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum in March, about a month before he announced sweeping across-the-board tariffs on what he called " Liberation Day." In a follow-up post on social media, Trump said the increased rate would go into effect June 4. May 30, 2025, 2:51 PM EDT Musk says his child punched him in the face Elon Musk, wearing all black, had a visible bruise over his right eye while speaking at the Oval Office. Asked what happened, Musk said his 5-year-old son punched him in the face. "I said, 'Go ahead, punch me in the face.' And, he did," Musk said.
Business Journals
an hour ago
- Business Journals
Uneven ground: Why state-chartered banks bear the brunt of proposed legislation
The United States has one of the most diverse and robust banking sectors in the world and is represented by banks of all sizes that serve every segment of the American economy. The nation's approximately 4,500 banks include community banks, midsize banks, regional banks, and large banks. Banks of every size add unique value and are critically important to our financial system and our economy. While banks may have different business models and strengths, institutions succeed when they meet the needs of their communities. Part of what makes the U.S. banking system special is the dual banking system which provides bankers with a choice of operating under a national charter or a state charter. Unfortunately, the California state charter is under attack and its value proposition is diminishing. Just this year, several California legislative measures target state-chartered banks or will be preempted limiting the measure's application. One such measure allows the commissioner of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to enforce violations of the federal Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) through unfair, deceptive, abusive acts or practices claims. Proponents claim that this measure is necessary because the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under President Donald Trump's administration will not enforce DFA. The reality is that the commissioner already possesses this authority; however, to deploy it, the commissioner must provide notice to the CFPB, which may become a party to the action and/or can seek to remove the action to federal court. The rationale behind this potential intervention is to avoid duplicative and uncoordinated enforcement actions. Large big box retailers are pushing a measure to limit the charging of an interchange fee by prohibiting the fee being assessed against sales tax. These retailers need to remember the convenience and certainty credit card payments have provided them, and that the underlying infrastructure that facilitates these transactions has a cost. Additionally, interchange fees support low and no-cost bank accounts and credit card reward points programs that customers appreciate. The bill will be preempted for federally chartered banks, leaving its application to state-chartered banks. Another measure establishes a state-level Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) applicable to certain state-licensed entities, including California-chartered banks. This effort is duplicative and potentially contradictory to the federal CRA, which all banks are subject to. Rather than layering on top of state banks, the measure should be amended to apply solely to California-chartered credit unions, which do not have a federal CRA requirement, though they are depository institutions and may operate similarly to banks. As we have fiercely advocated for our member banks, we commonly hear legislators express appreciation for community banks. But with measures advancing like those described above, we are increasingly convinced that those are just words and that their actions prove otherwise. Banks are highly regulated entities and miraculously excel at finding a path to compliance on what seems to be a never-ending list of new laws and regulations. But there is a breaking point. Consolidation within the industry has been driven, in part, by over-regulation. Smaller community banks, just like small businesses, are struggling to keep up with overregulation and are finding that they must get to scale to survive the regulatory avalanche. We are gravely concerned that new laws and regulations will accelerate consolidation and may leave communities who need access to banking services in financial deserts. This unfortunate result could push the door more widely open to the less-regulated shadow banking industry where there is often less consumer protection. And because of the dual-banking system, banks can exercise their choice and operate under a national charter, which leaves the state with less oversight. If policymakers really care about the important role of community banks, as they have suggested, it's time they put a stop to efforts that could make the state charter less valuable.
