Boy sliced man with 8-inch knife after what he agreed to buy from shop
A 15-year-old attacked a man who bought him cigarette rolling paper, as he and his friends chased after him down a street in Everton, Merseyside, and attacked him with a knife
A man who bought teenagers cigarette rolling paper from a shop was stabbed in the head and back with a huge hunting knife, suffering severe injuries which left him permanently scarred.
Peter Gabriel was on his way to meet a friend in Everton, Merseyside, when he saw three youths near a shop. After a brief chat he agreed to go inside the store and buy them Rizla paper using change given to him by the group. When he came out Liverpool Crown Court heard how he followed them around a corner when he was punched in the chin, causing him to fall, before they started chasing the victim.
He was chased toward his home by the three as they "challenged him as to why he was in the area", the court heard, with one warning "go before I stab you in the neck lad". The defendant then produced a "huntiny style knife" with an eight-inch blade from a sheath, using it to strike the victim four to five times in the back, Liverpool Echo reported.
The blows caused Mr Gabriel to stumble to the floor and left him "screaming for help". The teen's friends were "encouraging the attack", as they urged the boy to "chop him up" before the youth approached him once more and stabbed him in the head. His attackers fled as neighbours came to help.
Mr Gabriel was said to have suffered a "number of stab wounds to the back" which were closed with sutures, although the "most significant injury" was sustained to the top of his head. The court was told the youth, who cannot be named for legal reasons, committed a series of offences over a "short space of time" between September and December last year, including attacking Mr Gabriel.
In one incident the now-15-year-old carried out "unprovoked" assaults against three members of staff at the care home wher ehe was living and damaged an internal door. He had been speaking to a friend on FaceTime in a communal area when he was "asked to calm down" by one of the workers, Helen Chenery, prosecuting, said.
The prosecutor said he responded by racically abusing the carer before attempting to headbutt and bite him kicking him in the shins and repeatedly punching him in the head and body. He went on to hurl further slurs at the staff member before kicking the door to an office which he had "barricaded himself" inside. Two employees intervened, with the boy biting one on the forearm and punching him twice in the left eye before spitting in the face of a female staff member who had stepped in.
Another incident included breaking into the home of a 76-year-old man, along with two "significantly older" men, one of whom went on to brandish a hammer toward the OAP, demanding money. The victim handed over £240 from his pocket, while a second offender took the keys to his £25,000 Jaguar from his briefcase. The three climbed back out through the broken window and "sped away" in the vehicle.
The car was later written off after being involved in a head-on crash that same evening. The defendant, who suffered serious injuries including a broken leg in the collision, was found in the front passenger in possession of £50 in cash, the complainant's wallet and a knife.
He has one previous conviction for three charges of theft and assaulting an emergency services worker, for which he received a youth referral order in August 2024. The youth admitted robbery, theft of a motor vehicle, possession of a bladed article in a public place, two counts of racially aggravated assault, assault, criminal damage and possession of cannabis in relation to a small quantity of the class B drug which was seized from him during an unrelated arrest in October 2024.
He was found guilty of wounding with intent following a trial before the youth court. Appearing in the dock wearing a black shirt, he was handed four years and seven months in youth detention. A judge told the teen today that the man could have been killed during the shockingly violent episode.
Martine Snowdon, defending, told the court: "He is only just 15 years old. There are some very real features of his upbringing and circumstances that bear on his behaviour last year and the prospects of his rehabilitation, his dangers and risks and how long it will take to achieve rehabilitation.
Judge David Potter said the youth's term would have been 10 years if the offences had been committed by an adult. He added in his sentencing remarks: "I have seen the injuries. They are horrible. One stab wound is enough to kill a man. Mr Gabriel was extremely lucky not to be more seriously injured or worse, killed.
"You led the charge on Mr Gabriel and used a highly dangerous weapon to inflict injuries. Mr Gabriel did suffer a grave injury. It has caused no doubt permanent scarring.
"You are still very young. You have the capacity to grow and mature. I have read a lot about your background. I accept that you have had a very difficult start to life and that your experiences have affected you and your opportunities in life.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
12 hours ago
- Wales Online
Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises
Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises Parents may be wondering if their child is ready to stay at home alone or go out unsupervised this summer Many parents grapple with tough choices when it comes to their children, one of which is determining the appropriate age for their children to stay at home without adult supervision. During school holidays parents often find themselves needing to arrange child care. This could involve relying on family members or shelling out for holiday clubs but some parents might deem their child mature enough to stay at home alone. Whilst there's no legal age stipulated for when children can be left at home unsupervised it's illegal to leave a child alone if it puts them in danger. As we approach the summer holidays we checked guidance published by the NSPCC to assist parents in making informed decisions during the summer break. Helen Westerman, the NSPCC's head of local campaigns, said, "a child who doesn't feel comfortable shouldn't be left alone". She said this is why making a universal legal age is impractical as some children, albeit the same age, have different levels of maturity. Parents must also consider if it's safe for their children to play outside without supervision, reports the Liverpool Echo.. Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Ms Westerman added: "Lots of parents will be thinking about whether it's safe to leave their children at home safely and if they're old enough to leave the house unsupervised. This can be a really tricky decision for parents and carers to make as it will differ from child to child. "As well as navigating if a child is ready to be left alone lots of parents will also find managing work alongside the school break really challenging, particularly in light of the soaring child costs and the cost of living crisis, which is putting additional pressure on families." Article continues below In 2022 Ms Westerman said the NSPCC had received more than 21,000 calls concerning children being unsupervised in the past four years with nearly half of these calls coming during the summertime. "As children get older it's common for them to want more freedom and learn to be independent. "This is an important part of growing up, but we know there can be a lot to think about for parents. As every child is different, we recommend building up their independence at their pace and checking in with them to make sure they feel safe." She provided advice for parents and carers considering leaving their children home alone or allowing them to go out unaccompanied during the summer. Are they ready to be left home alone? Parents should consider whether their child is prepared to handle being unsupervised, especially in the event of an emergency. Ms Westerman said: "Think about if they can deal with risks; will they behave responsibly, and will they be safe? And, perhaps most importantly, how does your child feel about this idea?" Take sensible precautions If you're contemplating the idea of your child staying at home alone make sure to take safety measures such as providing them with a spare set of keys and ensuring they can access food and the bathroom. Ms Westerman added: "Consider if there's anything that could hurt them and how you could reduce that risk." Never leave infants or little ones by themselves It is crucial that infants and very young children are never left on their own, irrespective of whether they seem peacefully asleep or are wide awake. Ms Westerman said: "Children under the age of 12 are rarely mature enough to cope in an emergency and should not be left at home alone for a long period." The organisation also cautions against leaving minors under the age of 16 unsupervised overnight and reminded caregivers to think about whether a child has any special requirements before making the decision to leave them on their own or in the care of an older sibling. Be informed if they're going out without adult supervision Knowing where your child plans to go, what they'll be doing, who they'll be with, and how far they'll be travelling is essential when they venture out without adult oversight. Having this information is key for parents to "make the right decision". Ensure they know important contact numbers Ensure your child has a reliable means of contacting a parent or guardian and identify a trustworthy nearby adult to turn to in an emergency if they are staying home alone. Ms Westerman advised: "If they're going out alone make sure they know a trusted adult's full name and address and have two trusted adults' phone numbers." Discuss various scenarios with your child Have an open conversation with your child about potential situations they may encounter and how to stay safe. Ask them how they would react and how they think they would feel. Ms Westerman added: "If they're going to be home alone, for example, ask them what they'd do if they hurt themselves or if a stranger knocks on the door. "If they're going out alone you might want to ask them what they'd do if someone asks them to do something they're not comfortable with." Set clear boundaries Make sure your child is fully aware of the rules when they're unsupervised, whether at home or out alone, so both you and they understand how they should behave in your absence. Ms Westerman said: "It's a good idea to agree on some house or outside rules that suit their maturity before you leave them alone. Article continues below "Give your child a chance to build their independence by building your trust. If they adhere to rules and boundaries you set you'll feel more confident letting them do more on their own." If you have concerns about a child contact the NSPCC helpline on 0808 800 5000 or email help@nspcc.
Wales Online
a day ago
- Wales Online
He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral
He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral Andrew New's mum was very much alive, a court heard 'I gave this person everything I had' (Image: Liverpool Echo ) A fraudster falsely told his girlfriend that his mum was dead so that he could swindle her out of more than £15,000. A court heard Andrew New claimed that he needed cash in order to arrange his mother's funeral, despite his mother being very much alive and well. His ex also transferred him money so that he could purchase Champions League final tickets on the empty promise that he would pay her back. But the "born again Christian", who previously found himself in the dock after scamming a woman who he met on dating website Plenty of Fish, has been spared an immediate prison sentence because his case has taken three years to come to court. Liverpool Crown Court heard on Thursday that New, 36, had been in a relationship with Sarah Haslam between April and June 2022. During their brief relationship New had made repeated requests for her to transfer money into his bank account, as well as those of a friend and his "Uncle Joe", for a "variety of fabricated reasons". Henry Riding, prosecuting, described how these included having forgotten to take his credit card while filling up his car at a petrol station and a wish to purchase tickets for Liverpool FC's 2022 Champions League final against Real Madrid in Paris. Most shockingly, she sent him thousands of pounds so that he could "make funeral arrangements" for his own mum who was alive. New, from Wirrall who now resides in a rehab facility in Motherwell, Scotland, "promised to pay her back in due course, but never did". This led to him pocketing a total of £15,734.65 of Ms Haslam's money in just two-and-a-half months. Article continues below Andrew New promised to pay her back but never did (Image: Liverpool Echo ) Reading her witness statement, Ms Haslam said: "As a result of what happened to me, I'm exhausted both mentally and emotionally. I've told very few people what they did to me three years ago. I say they, because I can't say their name out loud. "This was a person I believed cared deeply for me. I now know I was manipulated by them. I gave this person everything I had. In return, I was controlled and coerced until they broke me. I've lost part of myself. "Three years on, I still live the trauma. I felt like I had ruined my life. A day doesn't go by when I don't feel the hurt, pain and shame for not recognising what was happening to me." Having been arrested in 2022, and pleading guilty during his first appearance before the crown court in August last year, New's case did not proceed to sentence until now due to ongoing proceeding against the two other men whose bank accounts were used as part of the scam. These charges were ultimately dropped against them by the Crown Prosecution Service. The court heard that the defendant has a total of four previous convictions for four offences, including for fraud in 2019. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here Defence barrister Paul Becker, told the court: "The defendant is sorry for what he has done. He did not know, first thing today, that the victim was going to be present. Having heard her victim personal statement, he is utterly ashamed of himself. "This is an unusual case. The delay, in some respects, helps the defendant, because he has been able to rebuild his life. He has moved to Scotland. He has been at a rehab centre for the last year. "He works six days a week helping people. Because he is working, he gets free accommodation. He has been able to move away from this area, from obviously problematic relationships and the addiction he has had. "He has stayed off cocaine. That was the blight of his life. He can only say that it was because of drugs. "He has an unattractive record. He has done his best since he moved away to try to turn his life around. If the defendant goes to jail today, he spends a few months in jail, he comes out on licence and he is back to square one. "Everybody wants Mr New to be rehabilitated, to stay off drugs, to stay away from a situation where he is essentially stealing and to be a working, productive member of society. My submission is that the defendant should be given a chance today." New admitted one count of fraud by false representation and was handed a 21-month imprisonment suspended for 20 months with 180 hours of unpaid work, a rehabilitation activity requirement of up to 20 days and a 12-month condition of residence. Upon sentencing, Judge Gary Woodhall said: "On many occasions you asked her to make transfers, saying that you owed others money or you were paying for items such as petrol, funeral arrangements for your mother, although she was alive and well, and football tickets. "All of these transfers flowed on the basis that you would pay her back. You never did. You had no intention of doing so. "What you did has caused her very significant financial difficulties. She is still now, three years on, repaying monies which you took from her. That has delayed her ability to buy her own home. "You have accepted full responsibility. You had issues with the use of cocaine. You are now residing in a Christian rehabilitation facility. You now identify as a born again Christian. "You work on a charitable basis six days a week, paying for your accommodation. You act as a mentor. You have expressed remorse and shame and want to apologise to your victim. As Mr Becker puts it, you have rebuilt your life. You have tackled, or are in the process of tackling, your addiction, which underlines all of your offending. "The mitigation in your case all flows from one thing. That is the delay in bringing this case to resolution, a delay of around three years. It cannot be said that the delay is attributable to your actions. "That delay means that you can show that you have committed no further offences and allows Mr Becker to identify that you have turned your life around in that three-year period. That is very significant. "This is a case where appropriate punishment could only be achieved by an immediate custodial sentence. However, there is the significant issue in this case, which I am obliged to take into account. That is the fact that the offending is now three years old. Article continues below "Had you been sentenced closer in time to the commission of this offence, I have no doubt that an immediate custodial sentence would have been the only correct disposal. "An immediate custodial sentence would mean a number of months in prison, the removal of your support network and, frankly, has the potential of unpicking the progress that has been made. You have come very close to going to prison today. If all the promises suggested on your behalf are not made out and you return to offending, this sentence will be activated."
Wales Online
a day ago
- Wales Online
Notorious Cardiff-born killer's basic life in prison with 'minimum legal entitlements'
Notorious Cardiff-born killer's basic life in prison with 'minimum legal entitlements' Southport killer Axel Rudakubana is serving 52 years behind bars and is being held at HMP Belmarsh Axel Rudakubana is serving a lengthy jail term after carrying out one of the most heinous crimes in modern memory (Image: Merseyside Police ) Southport killer Axel Rudakubana receives the basic minimum legal requirements while serving his jail term in a Category A prison. That means the 18-year-old is permitted to purchase items from the HMP Belmarsh canteen, using money either earnt at the prison or sent to him by family members, but spends limited time outside of his cell and is brought items to where he is staying, the Liverpool Echo has learned. The Cardiff-born teenager, currently serving his 52-year term at the London jail alongside around 700 other inmates, killed three children in Southport on July 29 last year when he walked into a Taylor Swift-themed workshop shortly before midday. The then-17-year-old stabbed 11 children, killing three girls and injuring the rest, as well as attacking two adults in the rampage. Following his arrest at the scene, ricin was found in his bedroom at his family home in Banks, Lancashire, as well as a plethora of weapons and a second identical knife to that he used in the attack wrapped in his duvet. It further transpired how the murderer had previously been reported to Prevent on three occasions as well as being stopped by his own dad from getting in a taxi destined for Range High School just seven days prior to the attack on Hart Street, Southport. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in January this year with him being kept in HMP Belmarsh, which is a high-security Category A facility. This article explains why despite the severity of his crimes he was not eligible for a whole-life jail term. But since being locked up the killer has allegedly attacked a prison officer, hospitalising him and forcing him to take time off work. Article continues below Rudakabana was in his prison cell at the time of the incident and allegedly used boiling water from a kettle in the room, as reported by Sky News. He then allegedly threw the boiling water over the officer through a hatch in his cell door. The prison officer was taken to hospital as a precaution but only suffered minor injuries. Since then Rudakubana has been given the legal minimum entitlements a prisoner can have, which restricts the amount of time he spends outside his cell and what he has access to. It is understood the legal minimum means he can still purchase items from the canteen using money either earnt at the prison or sent to him by family members but spends limited time outside of his cell and is brought items to where he is staying. National chair of the Prison Officers Association, Mark Fairhurst, said: "It is normal for every prisoner to have access to prison canteen items that they may purchase from private cash or prison earnings. "Restricting this would probably lead to a legal challenge under the Human Rights Act so the service would not be able to remove these privileges from prisoners." A Met Police spokesman said: "The Met is investigating after a prison officer was subject to a serious assault at HMP Belmarsh on the afternoon of Thursday, May 8. Article continues below "The prison officer was taken to hospital where he was assessed before being discharged later the same day. "The investigation is being led by officers from the Prison Investigation Team on the Met's South East Command Unit."
