logo
Immunity is for the fearful and guilty, Dr M tells Anwar

Immunity is for the fearful and guilty, Dr M tells Anwar

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad (left) slammed Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for acting as 'judge and prosecutor' in the matter.
PETALING JAYA : 'I do not need to be given immunity due to my age', former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has told Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim after the Cabinet refused to take action against him over his role in the Batu Puteh issue.
In a post on X today, Mahathir said he should be taken to court to be proven guilty given the accusations.
'The one who judged me as guilty was Anwar. The one who said no action needs to be taken against me was also Anwar.
'He said I was not charged, despite being guilty, as I am 100 years old. This means I have been given immunity.
'I know I am not guilty, and I want to prove it. Immunity is for those afraid of going to court because they know they are guilty,' he said.
Yesterday, Anwar noted that a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) last year had found it likely that Mahathir had deliberately influenced the Cabinet to discontinue review applications regarding Batu Puteh's sovereignty in 2018, despite the views of international consultants who said the applications had a reasonable likelihood of success.
The RCI recommended that a police report be lodged against Mahathir, saying a criminal investigation could be initiated under Section 415(b) of the Penal Code for cheating.
'Was he not wrong? He was wrong. Should we take action? The Cabinet agreed not to. We made a decision because it involved a former prime minister who is 100 years old,' Anwar said in the Dewan Rakyat.
Mahathir lambasted Anwar for acting as 'judge and prosecutor' in the matter.
'Such is his great power. But the constitution does not say that the prime minister can be a prosecutor or judge,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Salleh: GRS' polls partnership with PH reflects desire to maintain close ties with Anwar's administration
Salleh: GRS' polls partnership with PH reflects desire to maintain close ties with Anwar's administration

Borneo Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Borneo Post

Salleh: GRS' polls partnership with PH reflects desire to maintain close ties with Anwar's administration

Salleh noted that GRS' decision to cooperate with PH likely reflects a strategic desire to maintain close ties with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's administration. — Bernama photo KOTA KINABALU (July 28): Gabungan Rakyat Sabah's (GRS) decision to partner with Pakatan Harapan (PH) in the upcoming state election should be respected, said Umno Sabah treasurer Datuk Seri Salleh Said Keruak. The former Sabah chief minister said in a Facebook post that GRS had made a conscious decision not to contest the election alone but instead align with national political forces, rejecting what he described as the 'Sarawak formula' of distancing from federal parties. 'GRS has ultimately rejected going solo and opted to align with national parties. Undoubtedly, they have their own reasons, and the people will be the judge,' he said. Salleh noted that GRS' decision to cooperate with PH likely reflects a strategic desire to maintain close ties with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's administration. 'Let us give them the benefit of the doubt, perhaps they want to work with the Prime Minister's party, which is PH, and to ensure strong ties with the federal government. This aligns with the need to ensure political stability and continued development for Sabah,' he said. He stressed that Barisan Nasional (BN), of which Umno is a component, had been consistent in its position from the beginning. 'We in BN have been clear from the start: forming a coalition with PH is the best approach for political stability. 'Our decision was made early on, based on the fact that both PH and BN form the foundation of the Unity Government at the federal level. This cooperation is a logical and responsible continuation of that partnership,' he explained. Salleh said how PH manages its relationship with both GRS and BN is not a concern for the coalition. 'What matters to us in BN is sincerity in partnership, and our focus remains on strengthening our party on the ground. We want to win and help our coalition partners,' he said. He also emphasised BN's political approach, saying: 'We do not play a double game. Our approach is clear, honest, transparent, and always for the good of the people of Sabah.' GRS-PH lead Salleh Said Keruak

Is KLIA ‘counter setting' a symptom of deeper migrant exploitation? — Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid
Is KLIA ‘counter setting' a symptom of deeper migrant exploitation? — Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid

Malay Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Is KLIA ‘counter setting' a symptom of deeper migrant exploitation? — Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid

JULY 28 — The recent detention of an enforcement officer at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) Terminal 1 has renewed public scrutiny over a clandestine practice known as 'counter setting'. This tactic, where individuals are allowed to bypass formal immigration procedures, raises serious concerns not only regarding border security and official corruption but also about structural vulnerabilities in Malaysia's migration management, labour demands, and institutional accountability. Last November, nearly 50 immigration officers were reassigned following investigations by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) into a similar syndicate operating at KLIA. A senior immigration officer, believed to be the mastermind behind the network, is expected to face charges over a human trafficking ring that allegedly facilitated the unlawful entry of foreign nationals without immigration clearance. The act of 'counter-setting' which involves corruption at borders is a well-recognised enabler of both human trafficking and migrant smuggling. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) identifies bribery and abuse of power as systemic 'pull factors' that facilitate transnational crime. In this context, 'counter setting' is not just negligence, it is an institutional gateway for illicit entry under the guise of administrative authority. However, criminalising rogue officers should not automatically lead to the assumption that all individuals who passed through these compromised checkpoints are victims of trafficking or knowingly complicit in smuggling. Immigration Department officers inspecting passports of foreign visitors at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) in this file photo taken on July 3, 2023. — Bernama pic Trafficking vs. smuggling: Distinct legal frameworks Public discourse frequently conflates 'migration', 'trafficking', and 'smuggling', an issue compounded by certain NGO and academic narratives that generalise irregular movement as either criminal or victimhood, obscuring nuanced legal distinctions. Under both the UN Trafficking Protocol (Palermo Protocol) and Malaysia's Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (ATIPSOM), human trafficking consists of three essential elements: act (e.g., recruitment, transportation), means (e.g., coercion, fraud, abuse of power), and purpose (e.g., exploitation such as forced labour or sexual servitude). However, ATIPSOM does not clearly criminalise attempts to traffic nor does it automatically recognise someone as a trafficked person simply because they entered the country irregularly. As studies has established, most trafficking victims enter Malaysia legally which means that they are in possession of valid passport and are even given a 30-day visa free entry if they are from South-east Asian countries. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to establish the key component of 'exploitation' unless it is evidently demonstrated at the border entry. Mere facilitation without evidence of exploitation does not constitute trafficking. By contrast, migrant smuggling involves consensual facilitation of unlawful entry in exchange for financial gain. Once the border is crossed, the smuggling transaction ends. In such cases, the migrant is typically treated as an offender who have breached immigration laws. An individual's status only becomes 'irregular' if immigration officers on arrival fail to stamp or process their entry. This administrative omission does not by itself amount to criminal conduct or evidence of trafficking. This brings us to a critical question: how can authorities establish that the individuals who entered via 'counter setting' were trafficked, smuggled, or simply irregular migrants? Without evidence of coercion or exploitation, these individuals remain at best suspects or irregular entrants. As many of us has experienced, it is extremely difficult for individuals to board international flights to Malaysia without valid travel documents. Multiple layers of checks include immigration clearance at the point of departure, airline document verification, and pre-boarding checks by flight crew. This may not necessarily be the case when entering Malaysia through land. For example, Malaysia's land borders especially in areas such as Rantau Panjang, Sungai Golok, and Wang Kelian are far more porous. In Wang Kelian, a one-kilometre 'no man's land' separates Thai and Malaysian posts, making unsupervised crossings possible. Arrests involving undocumented Myanmar nationals and the unregulated movement of Malaysians into Thailand highlight systemic gaps in surveillance and border management. Labour agents and recruitment networks Malaysia's fluctuating labour policies such as the temporary freeze (and subsequent lifting) on the intake of Bangladeshi workers for example, have created a market of desperation. To fulfil recruitment contracts or avoid refunding fees, unscrupulous agents may resort to corrupt arrangements with enforcement personnel to smuggle workers into the country. One major concern is the licensing regime. In Malaysia, work agents are not required to possess individual licences. Licences are tied to agencies, creating a regulatory blind spot. Some agents operate without registration; others exploit legal platforms while engaging in parallel black-market operations. Disturbingly, many such agents are foreign nationals already residing in Malaysia, which helps them gain the trust of vulnerable migrant communities. Upon arrival, many of these migrants are placed in overcrowded accommodation and squalid conditions. They are also subjected to long hours of work, meagre pay, and minimal legal protection. While exploitative, these conditions do not always rise to the legal threshold of trafficking unless all the trafficking elements are clearly present. Malaysia must move beyond reactive enforcement and address the systemic factors that enable counter setting and migration-related abuse. A rights-based and reform-oriented strategy should include: stricter employer vetting procedures and meaningful penalties for labour exploitation; crackdowns on unlicensed and unscrupulous agents, including those operating under legal facades; enhance institutional oversight across border enforcement agencies to prevent corruption; implement a victim-centred approach that treats irregular entrants as potential victims unless complicity is proven; and ratify the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. As a conclusion, it is evident that the KLIA 'counter setting' scandal is not just about corrupt officers, it exposes systemic cracks in Malaysia's migration governance, labour recruitment processes, and institutional safeguards. While prosecuting offenders is necessary, structural reforms must follow to protect migrants' rights and preserve the integrity of our borders. To strike a balance between national security and human dignity, Malaysia must clearly distinguish between 'victims', 'offenders', and 'irregular migrants' and, above all, recognise the human realities behind each case. *Dr Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid is a Criminologist and Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya. She can be reached at [email protected] **This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Police: Outdated CCTV at Dr Mahathir's grandson's home offered little help; nearby footage now under review in RM1.8m burglary
Police: Outdated CCTV at Dr Mahathir's grandson's home offered little help; nearby footage now under review in RM1.8m burglary

Malay Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Police: Outdated CCTV at Dr Mahathir's grandson's home offered little help; nearby footage now under review in RM1.8m burglary

KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 — The police will examine the closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage from surrounding areas near the residence of former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's grandson in Bukit Ledang, here, which was reportedly broken into last Wednesday. Acting Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said the CCTV system at the residence itself was of limited use as it only retains footage for 24 hours, making it difficult to aid in the ongoing investigation. 'The CCTV system at the house was installed in the 1990s and has limited storage capacity,' he told a press conference today. 'The incident is believed to have occurred more than 24 hours after the police report was made by the owner of the house, which meant the footage had already been overwritten,' he told a press conference here today. According to Mohamed Usuf, the house is an old house that is rarely visited by Dr Mahathir's grandchildren. 'So far, the police have recorded statements from three individuals, namely Dr Mahathir's grandson, a security guard and a maid. The police are also analysing the evidence received, including fingerprints, and this may take some time,' he said. According to reports, the residence belonging to the former Prime Minister's grandson was broken into, resulting in the victim losing RM1.8 million worth of jewellery. It is understood that the incident was discovered by the maid at 3pm last Wednesday after she found the gate at the back of the house had been cut and her employer's room was ransacked. When asked about the case involving singer Shila Amzah, who claimed to have been verbally attacked by another singer, he said the police would record statements from two more witnesses to complete the investigation paper. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store