Starmer raises case of Briton detained in India during meeting with Modi
It is understood that Sir Keir raised the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh activist from Dumbarton near Glasgow, who was arrested while in India for his wedding in 2017.
Mr Johal's brother Gurpreet had suggested the meeting was a 'golden' chance for the UK Government to seek to secure his release.
Thankful to PM Keir Starmer for the warm welcome at Chequers.
Our discussions reflect a shared commitment to deepen India-UK ties across sectors.@Keir_Starmer pic.twitter.com/XiIpyG7OKs
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) July 24, 2025
Mr Johan is being held in custody by the Indian authorities, despite having been cleared of one of the cases against him earlier this year.
He still faces charges at a federal level, which his supporters, who claim an initial confession he made was as a result of torture, fear could take years to come to a conclusion.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Thursday, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the issue was 'complex' but the Government was working to resolve it.
'The Government are doing all we possibly can to get this resolved,' he said.
'There was a recent meeting, just at the start of June, between the Foreign Secretary and his counterpart in India to try and get these issues resolved.
'So it's right at the top of the agenda and we can assure and reassure that we're doing everything we possibly can to get these issues resolved as quickly as possible.'
Gurpreet Singh Johal, a Labour councillor in West Dunbartonshire, had earlier told BBC Radio Scotland: 'Raising the case is not enough, it's what we've been saying since day one.
'There's a golden opportunity here for the Prime Minister now, prior to the deal being signed or as the deal is being signed, that he strongly calls for Jagtar to be returned to his family so he can continue his married life.'
Mr Murray said: 'The call is for these issues to be resolved and we're all fully on the same page in terms of having to get them resolved as quickly as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump drops the hammer on India with crushing 50% tariffs in massive trade war punishment
President Donald Trump punished India by signing an executive order doubling tariffs on the South Asian democracy for continuing to purchase Russian oil amid the deadly war in Ukraine. Starting August 27th, India will face an additional 25 percent tariff if it continues to buy oil from Russia, making the total tariff rate a crushing 50 percent. Trump coupled his new order with a threat to impose additional tariffs on other countries that purchase Russian fossil fuels. The executive order is a key part of the administration's increasingly muscular strategy to pressure the Kremlin to resolve the three-year war in Ukraine. After years of cozying up to Vladimir Putin, Trump is now calling Russia an ' extraordinary threat ' to the US as the country repeatedly ignores his deadline to end the Ukrainian invasion. Previously, Trump gave the Kremlin until this Friday to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine, or the US would begin implementing massive tariffs on Russia's main trading partners. Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow on Wednesday for three hours. The Kremlin described the meeting as 'a very useful and constructive conversation.' The pair reportedly discussed ending the Ukrainian war as well as developing strategic cooperation between the United States and Russia. But while Trump touted 'great progress,' there was no indication Putin was willing to end his furious campaign to take Ukraine. Trump previously imposed a 25 percent tariff last week on India citing unfair trade barriers. After Wednesday's executive order, the total tariffs on goods coming from India will rise to 50 percent – the highest levies on any US trading partner. A statement from India's Ministry of External Affairs said that its energy imports help ensure the 'security of 1.4 billion people,' while indicating it did not intend to stop purchasing Russian oil. 'These actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' the statement says. China is the largest buyer of Russian oil and energy products in the world. Turkey is also a significant buyer, but the two countries have not faced additional tariffs so far. When asked why the president did not place an additional tariff on China for their purchase of Russian oil, the White House did not respond at the time of publishing. Over the last eight months, India imported approximately 1.75 million barrels daily from Russia, which is up one percent from the same period last year. However, Trump did tease a threat to impose similar 25 percent tariffs on other large importers of Russian energy. In his Wednesday executive order, the president directed administration officials to 'determine whether any other country is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil,' and then decide if they should face economic punishments. Trump's congressional allies praised the president's drastic moves. Republican South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham wrote on X, 'I completely understand and applaud President @realDonaldTrump's decision to hit India with an additional 25 percent tariff ... because India insists on purchasing Putin's oil to prop up his war machine, allowing the bloodbath in Ukraine to continue.' 'President Trump has put the world on notice that if you continue to buy Putin's oil, you are no longer going to be allowed to have access to the American economy without substantial tariffs,' Graham added. Nikki Haley, Trump's former United Nations ambassador and rival for the 2024 Republican nomination, agreed that India shouldn't be buying oil from Russia but warned Trump against burning a relationship with a strong ally. Trump's tariff bombshell lands just 48 hours before Trump's make-or-break Friday ultimatum to Putin—demanding Russia agree to Ukraine ceasefire talks or face a mammoth sanctions blitz. The crackdown signals Trump is serious about wielding his tariff power to try to bend world leaders to his demands. Switzerland also looked like it would be a loser in Trump's trade war with its president reportedly ending her visit to Washington on Wednesday without a deal to lower its tariff rate.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump taking on Modi risks worst of both worlds
Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil were meant to be the bunker buster in Washington's sanctions armoury, a weapon so devastating it would cripple Moscow's economy. Yet by appearing to punish India alone, Donald Trump risks squandering its impact. He may end up with the worst of all worlds: dropping a bomb too small to do significant damage to Russia while alienating a vital ally and counterweight to China. After months of resolutely refusing to punish Russia, the US president has changed tack. Convinced that Vladimir Putin has no interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Mr Trump has concluded that targeting Russia's energy sector – which generates a third of government revenue – is the key pressure point. 'If energy goes down, Putin is going to stop killing people,' he said this week. India has undeniably helped prop up the Kremlin's war machine, buying £42bn of Russian oil last year. But other nations have also helped fund Putin's invasion. China buys more than India, while Turkey, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and even some European Union states are significant consumers. It is possible that Mr Trump may widen his net in the coming days. He has given Putin until Friday to agree to a ceasefire or face consequences. Until now, Russia has faced a 10 per cent tariff, the lowest level Mr Trump applies. That figure is almost certain to rise, but with bilateral trade at £3.9bn last year, such a move will barely trouble the Kremlin. More direct sanctions on Russia's banks or its shadow tanker fleet could follow, but these too seem unlikely to force a change of course. Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil could, in theory, bite harder. Yet, by singling out India with a 25 per cent penalty, the weapon has been fired half-cocked. Analysts speculate that Mr Trump may extend the measures to other countries. If that is his intent, it is curious he would shame India rather than wait 48 hours to announce a broader policy. The strategy risks misfiring. Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, has endured repeated humiliations from a man he once called a friend. Yet in recent months Mr Trump has imposed higher tariffs on India than on most of its Asian competitors and caused anguish by courting Pakistan, which is closely aligned with China. With public anger in India growing over Washington's perceived high-handedness, Mr Modi would find it politically tricky to halt all Russian oil purchases, even if he wished to. Given the importance of the US market for Indian exports, he may have to find a fudge. Any concession, however, will come at a cost. Analysts say India is now likely to edge closer to China and Russia, weakening one of Washington's most valuable relationships in Asia. Even if India reduces imports, it is unclear whether losing a single buyer – even one as important as Delhi – will seriously dent Russia's war economy. A policy that leaves Putin undeterred while estranging India is hardly a triumph of statecraft – though final judgment must wait until Mr Trump reveals the rest of his plan.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Full list of London police station front desks being shut - see on our map if your local counter is being axed
Half of the front desks at London police stations will close as the Met has unveiled a new money-saving plan. The Mail's interactive map shows the full list of affected areas after Scotland Yard admitted it would break its pledge to have one counter accessible 24 hours a day in each of the capital's 32 boroughs. Only 20 desks will remain open with 18 set to be axed by the Metropolitan Police as the force scrambles to balance its £260million budget shortfall. The Met has faced criticism it will now be 'less accessible' as critics claim the change is 'another nail in the coffin of community policing'. Met Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist and Kaya Comer-Schwartz, Sadiq Khan 's deputy mayor for policing and crime, are expected to face a number of angry London Assembly members at an extraordinary additional meeting where the proposals will be discussed. The full list of affected police stations can be viewed in the map below. The closures will impact Kentish Town in Camden; Tottenham in Haringey; Edmonton in Enfield; Harrow; Bethnal Green in Tower Hamlets; Dagenham; Chingford in Waltham Forest; Kensington; Hammersmith; Twickenham in Richmond; Lavender Hill in Wandsworth; Wimbledon in Merton; Hayes in Hillingdon; and Plumstead in Greenwich. Four more stations, which already operate with reduced desks, will also shut - at Barking Learning Centre, Church Street in Westminster, Royalty Studios in Kensington and Chelsea and Mitcham in Merton. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp posted on X: 'The police will now be less accessible and Londoners even less safe.' Liberal Democrat MP for Twickenham Munira Wilson also wrote to the Home Secretary demanding she fully commits to funding the force. It comes as Yvette Cooper has been warned 'further cuts only put another nail in the coffin of community policing'. As a result of the policy, residents in south west London will now no longer be able to walk in and speak to an officer face-to-face due to the losses in Twickenham, Merton, Wimbledon, Lavender Hill and Mitcham. There are also fears those on bail may have to travel miles to report as part of their conditions - increasing the risk a defendant could abscond. But surprisingly, Kingston police station will remain open so the nearest 24-hour counter Richmond is not Acton, Sutton or Lambeth. Last week the Mail revealed London as the 15th most dangerous city for crime in Europe. The capital, which is also the 100th worst out of 385 locations around the world, is less safe than rival European cities from Athens to Brussels and Milan to Barcelona. London is also worse than major US cities such as New York, Los Angeles and Dallas as well as other global destinations from Cancun to Cairo and Bali to Bangalore. The city is however only the fifth worst UK location for crime - behind Bradford, Coventry, Birmingham and Manchester, according to Numbeo's Crime Index. Stella Creasy, Labour MP for Walthamstow, where a young woman was raped in the town centre on June 29, claimed the police in her borough did not want to 'engage with the public at all'. Her comments came upon hearing Chingford would close and residents would have to go to Stratford or online if they wanted to contact someone. Paula Dodds, chair of the rank-and-file Met Police Federation, said: 'If we close police station front counters the public can't have access to us when they need it most. 'We can't hide behind technology because not everyone has access to technology to call the police or go online to report a crime – they want that personal interaction. The public are going to have to go further to get access to a police station if they need it out of hours.' A Met spokesman said: 'Just five per cent of crimes were reported using front counters last year, with only one per cent of these being made during the night. 'At the busiest front counter in London on average 15 crimes are reported a day – less than one an hour - and in the least busy, only 2.5 crimes are reported a day. 'Londoners tell us they want to see more officers on our streets. 'The decision to reduce and close some front counters will save £7million and 3,752 hours of police officer time per month allowing us to focus resources relentlessly on tackling crime and putting more officers into neighbourhoods across London.' The force added the Met 'is focusing ruthlessly on visible policing on London's streets, modernising services and increasing visibility in neighbourhoods with over 300 additional PCSOs and over 300 additional officers'.
