Modi government called ‘out of touch' for claiming India is one of world's most equal nations
The federal Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on 5 July claimed India ranked "fourth globally in income equality", citing a World Bank report. "This is a remarkable achievement for a country of its size and diversity," the release said.
The World Bank, in its 'Poverty & Equity Brief' report in April, found that over the past decade India had indeed significantly reduced its poverty rate. "Extreme poverty [living on less than $2.15 (£1.5 )per day] fell from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, lifting 171 million people above this line," the report stated.
The World Bank said India's consumption-based Gini index improved from 28.8 in 2011-12 to 25.5 in 2022-23, while warning that inequality may be underestimated due to data limitations.
The Gini Index, which ranges from value 0 through 100, is used to understand how equally income, wealth, or consumption is distributed across households or individuals. The lower the Gini Index, the more equal the country is perceived to be.
The World Bank report added that in contrast, the World Inequality Database shows income inequality rising from a Gini of 52 in 2004 to 62 in 2023. "Wage disparity [in India] remains high, with the median earnings of the top 10 per cent being 13 times higher than the bottom 10 per cent in 2023-24," it added.
The Modi government in its press note claimed that India's Gini index made it the fourth most equal country in the world, after the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Belarus. The World Bank has made no such claims about India's ranking.
"Three months after its release, the Modi Government's drumbeaters and cheerleaders have begun spinning the World Bank's data to make the staggeringly out-of-touch claim that India is among the world's most equal societies," the main opposition party, the Indian National Congress, said on X.
Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh dismissed the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government's assertion, arguing that no country with a poverty rate of 28.1 per cent could make "a justifiable claim to being one of the most equal societies in the world".
He noted that the government's use of an updated purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factor from 2021, rather than 2017, would inflate poverty reduction figures. 'More updated data... would result in a higher rate of extreme poverty,' the statement read.
Indian news website The Wire noted if the World Bank's income inequality figures are accounted for rather than consumption, India has a Gini index of 61 in 2019 and 2023. That would rank India 176th out of 216 countries and territories, compared to an equivalent rank of 115th in 2009.
The Congress party questioned the Modi government's poverty benchmarks, saying that according to the World Bank's lower-middle-income poverty line of $3.65/day (£2.6), India's poverty rate stood at 28.2 per cent in 2022.
Mr Ramesh said the figure contrasts sharply with the government's assertion, based on a $3/day (£2.2) benchmark, that only 5.3 per cent of the population was living in poverty in 2022-23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Xi Jinping may be losing control of China's military
General He Weidong, a vice-chairman of the Communist Party's Central Military Commission and China's number two-ranked uniformed officer, was reportedly last seen in public on March 11. The general was known as a Xi Jinping loyalist in the military. The Financial Times reports that former and current US officials believe that he has been removed from his People's Liberation Army and Party posts. There are even unverifiable rumours that the general died in May – in the PLA's 301 Hospital in Beijing – but in any event General He has evidently been sidelined, no longer able to implement Xi's orders. Many believe that China's leader was the one who sacked the general. 'The fact that Xi Jinping can purge a CMC vice-chair shows how serious he is about stamping out corruption in the military,' Neil Thomas of the Asia Society Policy Institute told the Financial Times. 'Xi wants to turn the PLA into an effective fighting force beyond China's borders but also into a complete servant to his domestic agenda.' The FT apparently agrees with this assessment, labelling General He's treatment 'the most dramatic act of [Xi's] military anti-corruption campaign and first firing of a general in that role in six decades'. Xi has been powerful for a long time, so it's natural that analysts and journalists ascribe every significant action in China to him. It's also true that, at one time, he had almost complete control of the military, which reports not to the Chinese state but to the Communist Party. Xi's continual 'corruption' purges, carried out throughout his rule, and his major reorganisation of the PLA, conducted in the middle of last decade, gave him the opportunity to install loyalists. So, unsurprisingly, the Xi-is-strong narrative has persisted. Australia's ABC argues that General He may have fallen because of Xi's need to control internal politics: 'In He's case, the removal may have been less about personal wrongdoing and more about managing factional rivalry and consolidating political control.' Others have suggested that Xi has become a Stalin-like paranoid who sees enemies everywhere and so churns the ranks of senior officers. But General He is not the only recent uniformed victim, nor the only general to have been toppled who was supposedly loyal to Xi. Also disappeared include General Li Shangfu, a defence minister, General Wei Fenghe, one of Li's predecessors, and General Miao Hua, head of personnel and ideological inspection. 'The continuation of the purges is hard to explain if Xi dominates the political system because his supporters are now being purged,' Charles Burton of the Prague-based Sinopsis think tank told me this month. 'Sometimes the simplest explanations are the most credible. The simplest explanation is that Xi's enemies – not Xi himself – removed Xi's loyalists.' There is evidence indicating that Burton, a former Canadian diplomat in Beijing, is right. According to the Jamestown Foundation, beginning July 9 of last year PLA Daily, the Chinese military's main propaganda organ, ran a series of articles praising 'collective leadership,' a clear criticism of Xi's demand for complete obedience. These articles – apparently written by those aligned with the number one-ranked uniformed officer, Central Military Commission Vice Chairman General Zhang Youxia – are unlikely to have appeared if Xi were in complete control of the military. There is also evidence that Xi has lost influence among civilians. His skipping of the just-completed Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro – the first such gathering he has missed – is a clear signal that he might no longer be in control. Perhaps he is no longer permitted to travel outside China. Some point to the Politburo's establishment of new coordination 'regulations,' announced by Xi himself on June 30, as marking a formal limitation on his power. The Chinese regime has been especially opaque this decade, so it has been even harder to read than in earlier times. Nonetheless, there are obvious signs of instability. Is China's unstable regime more or less dangerous? As an initial matter, strongmen like Xi rarely go quietly. If he is under threat, he may well think that he has to act against the others fast. Among other things, China triggering a war would inhibit other senior CCP leaders from trying to remove him in the midst of fighting, so he may think that provoking a conflict is in his interest. A regime in turmoil is probably not capable of the planning and unity necessary to start large-scale military operations, such as an invasion of the main island of Taiwan. Yet it is more likely to end up in a conflict than a stable one. China has for years been provoking countries on its periphery, from South Korea in the north to Australia in the south. Additionally, Chinese planes and ships have been challenging America in the global commons in risky confrontations. Now, China may be unable to defuse any crisis that it causes, either by accident or on purpose. Because only the most hostile responses are considered acceptable in a militarised and highly turbulent Beijing, regime figures will not be able to deal with others constructively. A weak Xi and a Communist Party in turmoil are dangerous, and probably far more dangerous than a strong leader and a stable ruling group.
BreakingNews.ie
44 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump threatens 25% tax on goods imported from Japan and South Korea
President Donald Trump has placed a 25% tax on goods imported from Japan and South Korea, citing persistent trade imbalances with the two crucial US allies in Asia. Mr Trump provided notice of the tariffs to begin on August 1 by posting letters on Truth Social that were addressed to the leaders of both countries. Advertisement The letters warned both countries not to retaliate by increasing their own import taxes, or else the Trump administration would further increase tariffs. 'If for any reason you decide to raise your tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Mr Trump wrote in the letters to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung. The letters were not the final word from Mr Trump on tariffs, so much as another episode in a global economic drama in which the US president has placed himself at the centre. He has declared an economic emergency to unilaterally impose the taxes, suggesting they are remedies for past trade deficits even though many US consumers have come to value car, electronics and other goods from Japan and South Korea. Advertisement But it is unclear what he gains strategically against China — another stated reason for the tariffs — by challenging two crucial partners in Asia who could counter China's economic heft. 'These tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country,' Mr Trump wrote in both letters. Because the new tariff rates go into effect in roughly three weeks, Mr Trump is setting up a period of possibly tempestuous talks among the US and its trade partners to reach new frameworks. Mr Trump initially sparked hysteria in the financial markets by announcing tariff rates on dozens of countries, including 24% on Japan and 25% on South Korea. In order to calm the markets, Mr Trump unveiled a 90-day negotiating period during which goods from most countries were taxed at a baseline 10%. Advertisement The 90-day negotiating period technically ends before Wednesday, even as multiple administration officials and Mr Trump himself suggested the three-week period before implementation is akin to overtime for additional talks. He is relying on tariff revenues to help offset the tax cuts he signed into law on July 4, a move that could shift a greater share of the federal tax burden on to the middle class and poor as importers would pass along much of the cost of the tariffs. His trade framework with Vietnam is clearly designed to box out China from routing its America-bound goods through that country, while the quotas in the United Kingdom framework would spare that nation from the higher tariff rates being charged on steel, aluminium and autos. The United States ran a 69.4 billion dollar trade imbalance in goods with Japan in 2024 and a 66 billion imbalance with South Korea, according to the Census Bureau. Advertisement
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Dozens missing after flash floods and landslides in Himachal Pradesh
India's mountainous state of Himachal Pradesh has been left reeling after it was hit by rainstorms, flash floods and landslides, with dozens of people reported missing. Hundreds of homes, bridges, roads and electricity pylons in the north Indian state were washed away after 23 flash floods and 16 landslides caused by unusually heavy rainfall over the weekend. There were also 19 cloudbursts, in which an enormous amount of rain falls in a sudden deluge, according to a report by the Himachal Pradesh state government. Several districts remained on high alert for further landslides, with warnings of more rainfall this week. Himachal Pradesh, a state that spans the mountainous terrain of the Himalayas, has suffered repeatedly in recent years as the climate emergency has led to the monsoon rains becoming erratic and falling in more intense, unmanageable bursts. In 2023, large swathes of essential infrastructure in Himachal Pradesh was destroyed and more than 300 people lost their lives after destructive flooding across north India, caused by heavy rains. Many of the state's biggest towns and cities are built on steep slopes, resulting in hundreds of homes – often built on insecure terrain – collapsing or being engulfed in mud due to landslides and flooding. The state disaster management authority said the death toll from monsoon-related disasters had reached 78 so far this year, which included deaths from flash floods, electrocution and road accidents. Rescue efforts were ongoing on Monday to find dozens of people still missing after the landslides, but officials said efforts had been hampered by the region's treacherous terrain and the destruction of vital roads. Many areas across the state were left isolated, without access to clean water and power. One of the worst-affected urban areas was the town of Mandi in Himachal Pradesh. The town's MP, Bollywood star turned politician Kangana Ranaut – known for her often provocative statements – caused outrage after she said she did 'not have any funds for disaster relief or hold any cabinet post'. Experts have repeatedly said the climate crisis is intensifying the risk of flooding in India to dangerous levels, due to increased rainfall, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather events, particularly during the monsoon period between June and September, when about 80% of the country's rain falls. Serious flooding in June had already led to dozens of deaths in the north-eastern Indian states of Assam and Mizoram where the monsoon rains arrive earlier. The early arrival of heavy monsoon rains in Mumbai left large areas of the city under water, bringing the metropolitan area, home to about 24 million people, to a standstill.
