West Africa's air transport still the costliest globally
Airfares within West Africa are the most expensive globally, hindering regional integration efforts.
Air travel in West Africa accounts for less than 10% of the region's transport activity, the lowest worldwide.
West Africa significantly lags behind other African regions in air transport growth and infrastructure development.
Speaking in Lomé on Tuesday at the opening of the ECOWAS Parliament's Sixth Legislature Delocalised Joint Committee Meeting on Infrastructure, Energy and Mines, Agriculture, Environment, and Natural Resources, Mr Douka underscored that the high cost of air transport continues to hamper regional integration efforts.
ECOWAS moves to harmonise policies
Mr Douka explained that the ECOWAS leadership is deeply concerned about the situation and has tasked the Commission with coordinating and harmonising air transport policies, programmes, and projects among Member States.
'Air tariffs in West Africa remain excessively high compared to other parts of the world,' he stated. 'It is often cheaper to fly to a non-ECOWAS African country than to travel between two ECOWAS countries. This situation undermines the region's future and collective airspace.'
West Africa lags behind other regions
Referencing recent 2024 studies by respected international bodies, Mr Douka noted that air transport growth in West Africa remains below 10%. In contrast, North Africa stands at 40.4%, Southern Africa at 21.4%, and East Africa at 20.5%. The region also trails behind in terms of domestic flights, intra-African travel, major airline presence, and airport infrastructure.
'This significant underperformance calls for urgent policy action,' he added.
Past efforts and ongoing strategy
Mr Douka recalled that under Article 32 of the Revised ECOWAS Treaty, the Commission has been mandated to coordinate and advance initiatives to improve air transport within the sub-region.
In 2017, ECOWAS and its Member States launched a study on a common policy for air transport-related fees and charges, with a final report presented in Accra in 2018. This policy was later revised during expert and ministerial validation workshops in May 2021.
Following this, a dedicated task force was formed to:
Commitments made by ECOWAS leadership
The ECOWAS Heads of State and Government, during their 65th Ordinary Session on 7 July 2024 in Abuja, Nigeria, acknowledged the need to make air transport more affordable. In response, a Ministerial Meeting on Air Transport was held on 8 November 2024 in Lomé.
At that meeting, Ministers adopted a new legal instrument—Additional Act A/SA.2/12/24 6—concerning a common policy on fees and charges, which was submitted to the ECOWAS Heads of State and Government and endorsed on 15 December 2024.
'Our priority is to adhere to ICAO's core principles on charges, which are non-discrimination, transparency, appropriate service pricing, and user consultation,' said Mr Douka.
Concrete steps for cheaper air travel
Among the key recommendations made to Member States were:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Measuring Generative AI's Economic Impacts
I am often asked about the potential impact of generative AI on the economy. The reality is that investment in generative AI is already having an impact on economic activity, but not necessarily on productivity which affects longer-term growth. In the first half of 2025, real (inflation-adjusted) investment in information technology equipment accounted for 59% of real GDP growth.1 This category largely involves building out the infrastructure of generative AI, suggesting that investment in this technology drove the economy in the first half of this year. Moreover, in the first half of 2025, there was a sharp decline in real non-residential investment in structures,2 including factories, warehouses, office buildings, and shopping centers. Yet it is likely that there was a significant increase in investment in data warehouses, which would be included in the larger category of structures. If so, it implies that other investments in structures amounted to even less, making investment in generative AI even more impactful. The weakness of investment in structures may be attributed to businesses postponing decisions about the location of facilities due to tariff uncertainty. If investment in generative AI is so massive, this might explain the frothiness of equity prices3 at a time when there is reason to expect a weakening of the overall economy. In fact, the so-called 'Magnificent Seven' tech-related companies accounted for about half of the increase in the S&P 500 index of U.S. shares in 2024. Some believe this is a bubble that will inevitably unwind. A quarter of a century ago, there was the so-called 'dotcom bubble,' in which shares of tech-related companies surged dramatically, ultimately leading to a market correction as the profitability of investments in dotcoms came into question. Moreover, that correction contributed to a mild recession. In today's case, a market correction is a potential scenario worth considering. Tariffs and immigration policy may slow the U.S. economy, and when that slowdown becomes apparent, it will likely result in lower prices of non-tech equities. Tech prices could also come down if investors liquidate positions to cover other losses. Another major area of concern related to generative AI is electricity consumption.4 The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that in the U.S. 'power consumption by data centers is on course to account for almost half of the growth in electricity demand between now and 2030. Driven by AI use, the U.S. economy is set to consume more electricity in 2030 for processing data than for manufacturing all energy-intensive goods combined, including aluminum, steel, cement and chemicals.' In addition, the IEA said that 'global electricity demand from data centers is set to more than double over the next five years, consuming as much electricity by 2030 as the whole of Japan does today.' Moreover, about half of planned increases in electricity capacity in the U.S. involve renewable energy sources. With cuts to subsidies for such investments, this capacity will involve higher energy costs for consumers. In fact, the Deloitte Center for Energy & Industrials predicts that these trends will result in a significant increase in electricity costs for U.S. households. That, in turn, could have a negative impact on consumer demand. While investment in generative AI is playing a big role in driving economic growth and asset valuations in the U.S., there remains uncertainty as to when this investment will pay off in terms of productivity gains, which affects longer-term growth. Theoretically, generative AI should eventually have a big positive impact on labor productivity, thereby generating faster economic growth and improvements in living standards. On the other hand, it will significantly disrupt labor markets. Yet what we know from history is that there is a lag between the introduction of new technologies and their impact on productivity. It takes time for new technologies to become fully embedded in an economy. In part this is because it takes time to figure out the best ways to utilize new technologies. Although generative AI is already having an impact in some industries and some processes, it is not yet fully integrated into the economy in a way that drives overall productivity. Influences on U.S. Government Debt Following passage of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill by the U.S. Congress in July, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published its baseline forecasts for US government deficits and debt.5 The baseline makes reasonable assumptions about future trends in economic growth and other factors. Under that baseline scenario, the deficit remains high and the level of debt continues to grow sharply. However, the CBO also published alternative scenarios based on different assumptions. One assumption that is very important is the predicted rate of growth of total factor productivity (TFP), a measure of the increase in output growth that comes after taking account of increased supplies of labor and capital. It reflects the impact of technological innovation and process improvements. If the introduction of generative AI is successful in the years ahead, it will likely boost the growth of TFP. Although the CBO does not explicitly discuss the impact of generative AI on productivity, it does offer an alternative scenario in which TFP grows 0.5 percentage points faster than the baseline scenario for the foreseeable future. Under this scenario, federal debt held by the public would be 113% of GDP by 2055 versus a baseline scenario of 156%. That is because a stronger economy would generate faster growth of revenue. In fact, under the faster productivity growth scenario, real GDP per person would be 17% higher than under the baseline scenario by 2055. If government borrowing turns out to be less than currently anticipated that could mean lower bond yields. On the other hand, if the economy grows faster (all other things being equal), that implies higher bond yields. Meanwhile, faster productivity growth would likely mean lower inflation than otherwise. Should productivity grows even faster than the CBO's alternative scenario suggests, then theoretically the budget deficit could go away. We simply don't know. We know that, historically, productivity growth has been uneven and unpredictable.6 We also know that there has generally been a large lag between the introduction of radically new technologies and their impact on productivity. This was true of computers which were widely introduced in the 1980s but where productivity acceleration did not take place until the late 1990s. Of course, no one knows how much faster productivity will grow due to the introduction of generative AI, or even if it will grow faster at all. ——by Ira Kalish, chief global economist, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
M23 rebels suspend peace talks with DR Congo government
The main rebel group in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, the M23, has walked away from peace talks with the government, saying it will not return unless the authorities adhere to a previous ceasefire deal. Fighting between the two sides escalated in January, when the M23 captured large parts of the mineral-rich east, including the regional capital Goma. In Qatar last month, the rebels and the government signed a ceasefire agreement, intended as a step towards a permanent peace deal. But on Monday, as negotiations were set to resume, the M23 said its representatives were not present in Qatar. M23 spokesperson Lawrence Kanyuka told the BBC's Great Lakes service that the Congolese government "doesn't want peace". How Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace deal What's the fighting in DR Congo all about? He accused the authorities of not respecting the provisions contained in the ceasefire deal, but DR Congo's military denies this charge. Kanyuka alleged that government forces had continued to attack rebel positions, despite the agreement stating that both sides must refrain from assaults. However, the Congolese armed forces accused the M23 of launching attacks almost daily in the North Kivu and South Kivu provinces. The Qatar peace deal was supposed to be signed by Monday. On Sunday, an unnamed official from Qatar told the AFP news agency that a draft agreement had been shared with DR Congo and the M23. The agreement runs alongside a peace deal between DR Congo and Rwanda, which was brokered by the US in June. DR Congo, the UN and numerous Western powers have accused Rwanda of backing the M23. Despite participating in the Washington peace talks, Rwanda has long denied the allegations against it. The Washington peace deal, hailed by President Donald Trump as a "glorious triumph", could grant the US access to DR Congo's vast mineral wealth. However, it is the latest in a long line of failed peace deals in the region. During the ongoing conflict, thousands of people have been killed and hundreds of thousands of civilians forced from their homes, the UN says. More stories from DR Congo: Listen: Why DR Congo is sponsoring FC Barcelona The would-be saint murdered 'mafia-style' for refusing bribes Inside the Congolese mine vital to mobile phones, as rebels give BBC rare access Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica BBC Africa podcasts Africa Daily Focus on Africa
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global Investors Cut Back Dollar Hedging, State Street Says
(Bloomberg) -- Global investors have reduced protection against a weaker dollar, countering expectations from earlier this year that an increase in hedging would drag the currency down. Data compiled by State Street Markets, a division of one of the world's biggest money custodians, shows that non-US investors in American equities have cut their hedge ratio to 21.6%, down 2 percentage points from May. It's roughly back to levels in early April, before tariff shocks roiled stock markets and the greenback. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds That shows the shift in insurance against foreign-exchange losses has turned out to be less of a challenge to the dollar than feared. Analysts had warned that equity investors outside the US would continue to pile into hedges — typically by selling the currency in the forward market — to protect against further downside. 'This is nothing like past moves in the hedge ratio that we've seen before, where it's moved by as much as 10%,' said Michael Metcalfe, head of macro strategy at State Street Markets. 'It remains the dollar threat that has yet to trigger.' The tariff turmoil hurt the commonly held view that the dollar was good insurance against US equity losses, since in previous bouts of risk-off sentiment the greenback traditionally rallied. Despite the change in correlation in April's selloff, foreign investor behavior doesn't seem to have shifted that much, Metcalfe said. 'Everyone's very focused on it because everyone knows the hedge ratio is low and it could be higher, but the reality is that here we are in middle of August and it hasn't really gone up,' Metcalfe said. That may reflect the fact that investors typically look back over a longer period, such as three to five years, when assessing the best level of currency protection. On that basis, the dollar still looks like a decent hedge for periods where stocks have dropped. On top of that, the dollar won some respite in July as the worst-case scenarios for trade tariffs appeared to have been averted. Meanwhile, a recovery in US stocks has seen the S&P 500 surge back to all-time highs. Holding Back Given hedging comes at a cost, fund managers may simply be taking longer to decide on the best path from here. Three-month dollar hedging costs for euro-based investors, for example, climbed from a low of 1.31% last September to more than 2.40% in June and July, and are still holding above 2.20%. 'Investors seem to be holding back to see how much of what we've seen in the first eight months of 2025 will be repeated going forward,' Metcalfe said. Earlier this month, Deutsche Bank AG suggested that July's dollar bounce — when it posted its first monthly gain this year — may have been linked to a lack of new information around hedging decisions and portfolio re-allocations by long-term investors. Still, strategist Tim Baker said such changes are likely to take longer to play out. 'Our work has shown a raft of lightly-hedged dollar exposures around the world as of earlier this year, and we're not sure that's been addressed in a few short months,' he wrote in a note. 'Our take — give this story time.' (Adds additional context, Deutsche Bank comment.) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
