
Mamdani and his campaign doubted viability early on
NEW YORK — During the genesis of Zohran Mamdani's now-surging mayoral campaign, the candidate and his democratic socialist allies said it was highly likely — or even certain — that Mamdani would lose the mayor's race.
Instead, the goal from the campaign's inception was to build the New York City arm of the Democratic Socialists of America, said six Democrats who relayed private discussions and meetings with Mamdani, a campaign staffer and DSA leadership. All were granted anonymity to freely discuss private strategy.
'He was pretty clearly like, 'I know I'm not running to win. I know I have no path to victory,'' said one Democrat, who spoke directly to Mamdani shortly before he launched his campaign.
The strategy appears to be working. Since Mamdani's October campaign launch, DSA membership has grown 40 percent and a DSA leader told POLITICO the campaign has put together a trove of data the party can repurpose to launch primary challenges in areas where Mamdani is popular.
'Since Zohran launched his mayoral campaign, we have gained over 2,400 members,' Grace Mausser, co-chair of NYC-DSA, said in a statement. 'New members often mention Zohran's success and the refreshing nature of a candidate — and movement — that puts working people and affordability first.'
Mamdani joined the race with little name recognition, less than four years in public office and a spot at the bottom of the crowded pack of candidates. Early polls put him at 2 percent or less in the race.
But since his launch, he has risen to take a decisive hold on second place. His longshot effort has morphed into the strongest opposition to mayoral front-runner Andrew Cuomo. Mamdani was the first to max out in the city's public campaign finance system, has the backing of a super PAC and has the very real potential of landing key progressive endorsements from the Working Families Party and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as their top-ranked candidate.
Ocasio-Cortez's membership in the NYC-DSA and her national popularity have made her a power broker on the left.
But barring a primary win, the yardstick for measuring Mamdani's success may end up being subjective. Some on the left, who are already rankled by his rise, are more inclined to preemptively view his run as a failure.
Many progressives fear Mamdani's label as a Democratic Socialist repels voters in a city ruled by a moderate Democratic governor and a moderate Democratic mayor-turned-friend of President Donald Trump. Mamdani's positions on Israel and thin legislative experience don't endear him with the political establishment, either.
All of this, they claim, is blocking other candidates closer to the center-left who could be capable of building a broad enough coalition to beat Cuomo.
Mayoral hopeful Brad Lander has the cash, legislative record, experience winning a citywide election and support from Democratic electeds to theoretically attract a base big enough to win the primary — but Mamdani has prevented him from breaking out of an increasingly distant third place.
While a Marist College poll conducted earlier this month shows just one-fourth of Democratic voters in the city identify as 'very liberal' — a potential ceiling for Mamdani — a poll released this week showed him surpassing that benchmark in later rounds of ranked choice voting.
The survey found he came within just eight points of beating Cuomo in the final round.
'From the day he entered this race, Zohran has been running to win — and nothing demonstrates that quite like the latest polls, which have us less than nine points away from defeating Andrew Cuomo,' Mamdani's spokesperson, Lekha Sunder, said in a statement. 'With still three weeks to go, millions in cash-on-hand, and 25,000 volunteers who believe in this movement, we are on a clear path to victory and to a city New Yorkers can actually afford.'
DSA leadership's statements and resolutions also show the organization's members can range from reluctant to outright hostile when it comes to embracing other anti-Cuomo candidates in the city's ranked choice voting system.
'Their goal was to get in third place and to build the party, build the DSA, and now their goal seems to be to get into second place and build the DSA,' said another Democrat, who spoke directly with top DSA leadership this fall after Mamdani launched his campaign.
Members of the DSA who were present during the fall forum when Mamdani sought the DSA's endorsement say the campaign was pitched as a party-building exercise, instead of a genuine path to City Hall.
'It was just said over and over again, that this was a way to build the base that would make it easier to win campaigns in the future,' said one DSA member.
A Mamdani spokesperson, Mausser and Michael Whitesides, the DSA's current electoral working group co-chair, deny this.
'That was not how this was framed to me,' Whitesides said. 'I don't think DSA takes on races we feel like we can't win. We can appreciate it's a long shot and think about the consolation prizes — like grow capacity or learn new skills — but we as an organization are not in races to lose. The thrust of the pitch to run Zohran was to try and win.'
Mamdani's campaign also directed POLITICO to previous statements from the candidate, including in late February when he said, 'We always were setting up a campaign that could win this race.'
But the city's DSA chapter — which hasn't supported a mayoral candidate since David Dinkins' run in 1989 — is open about the fact that Mamdani's campaign is simultaneously serving as a vehicle for the future of the party.
'We're seeing a crazy amount more interest in voting for a socialist than I would have guessed eight months ago,' Mausser said. 'One thing we'll be looking at is: OK, what neighborhoods voted for Zohran number one? Are these places that we can and should be running in the future?'
In recent weeks, Mamdani has stood out as the candidate willing to boost other candidates — who all trail Cuomo by even wider margins than Mamdani's. He's the only candidate who has promised to endorse someone else as a No. 2 ballot choice through the city's ranked choice voting system, and he encouraged his supporters to donate to City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams' mayoral campaign after he raised the maximum amount through the city's public campaign finance program.
Despite these efforts, the DSA's local party leadership, who are fully behind Mamdani's bid, have stood in the way of supporting other candidates.
Mausser confirmed the party passed a resolution calling for DSA-endorsed elected officials to announce their intentions to rank Mamdani first on their mayoral ballot — if they don't, it could count against them the next time the organization is doling out endorsements.
Last month, Gustavo Gordillo, NYC-DSA's other co-chair, applauded Bronx state Sen. Gustavo Rivera for endorsing Mamdani — and cheered his decision to not endorse Lander, whose positions on the Israel-Hamas war and freezing rent put him at odds with the DSA.
'Credit to Gustavo Rivera for not being afraid to tell Brad no and buck the left-liberal orthodoxy,' Gordillo wrote in a since-deleted X post.
Mausser stressed the DSA does not have a formal position on the other candidates and is only rooting against Cuomo, who polling shows is projected to capture 50 percent of both Black Democratic voters and Democratic voters from the Bronx. He's also projected to win the support of 41 percent of Latino voters.
And while Mamdani places second in all recent polls, he has struggled to gain ground with groups representing a disproportionate share of low-income earners — the very demographic the DSA purports to be focused on persuading.
An April Siena College poll found Mamdani captured just 10 percent of Black voters, who, along with Latinos, make up the largest share of the city's low-income residents. He won only 2 percent of the vote in the Bronx, where median income significantly trails other boroughs.
'You can't win a mayoral race as a progressive without the support of working and middle class, black and brown communities, and this campaign does not have those relationships,' one DSA member told POLITICO. 'They have not had that from the jump, and as the race has unfolded, that has continued to be the case.'
Sunder, Mamdani's campaign spokesperson, said the campaign has knocked on about 12,000 doors in the Bronx and won endorsements from current and former Bronx elected officials like Rep. Jamaal Bowman, who left office in January. The campaign also touted Mamdani's support from Latino voters, which Marist clocked at 20 percent in its poll.
Gordillo said in another social media post that the DSA is using Mamdani's campaign to, in part, increase awareness residents have of their own position in the city's socioeconomic strata.
'NYC DSA is the only org on the left trying to use the mayoral race to change the political terrain on our terms and to raise class consciousness,' he wrote. 'I think this experiment will have outsized effects like Bernie did in 2016.'
The line between Mamdani's campaign and Gordillo and Mausser's DSA chapter has been hazy from the start.
The party helped orchestrate Mamdani's launch, and Mamdani made it clear he would not run for mayor unless he had the DSA's support. There are weekly meetings between the campaign and the chapter, and DSA members are helping with strategy in addition to taking the lead on his canvassing operation, Mausser said.
So far, with the DSA's help, Mamdani has knocked 545,000 doors, according to his campaign.
While Mausser claimed the DSA and Mamdani are in it to win it, regardless of whether he wins or loses, the post-primary prospects for the party — and Mamdani — are already looking up.
She pointed to the possibility of a failed mayoral bid cementing Mamdani's influence over the left flank of city politics, an outcome similar to the one experienced by Cynthia Nixon, Cuomo's 2018 gubernatorial primary challenger.
Nixon hasn't run for office since, but she hosted a fundraiser for Mamdani in March.
'Even if he loses, we'll now have an assemblymember who's dedicated to working with us, who has a huge profile and who can use his political clout to fight for DSA's priorities in Albany,' Mausser said. 'Cynthia Nixon is still a much sought endorser, and Zohran can find himself in a similar position as being something of a power broker for the progressive left.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
White House plans to pull nomination for NASA administrator
The White House is planning to withdraw the nomination of Jared Isaacman to be the administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, a White House official confirmed to POLITICO. The sudden move comes days before the Senate was slated to vote on his nomination to lead NASA. Isaacman, a commercial astronaut and billionaire CEO of the payment processing company Shift4, has a long-standing relationship with Elon Musk, who this week left his post as a senior adviser to President Donald Trump and chief of the Department of Government Efficiency. It's not yet clear what the White House's reasoning is for the personnel change. Semafor was first to report on the plan. The White House official was granted anonymity to discuss not-yet-announced personnel moves. Senate Democrats for months have been critical of Isaacman's relationship with Musk, in light of his close ties to the White House and his role as CEO of SpaceX, one of NASA's largest contractors. In March, The Wall Street Journal reported that Musk personally asked Isaacman to lead the agency, which Democrats honed in on during his confirmation hearing last month.


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
DOGE started the war on waste —now it's up to Congress to keep it going
As Elon Musk steps back from his role at the Department of Government Efficiency, making the savings his team found stick is now in Congress's hands. DOGE's crack team of mostly young techies shined a light on surreal instances of fraud and waste— from the literal mine where all federal government employee resignations are processed by hand to millions of dollars in fake unemployment claims filed with birth dates 15 years in the future. But for all of the fanfare, outrage, and outright hysteria over DOGE's supposedly drastic measures, the department's actual power was limited to mostly cancelling grants and contracts, which put a major cap on how much in savings could actually be realized. Much of the discretionary spending it lined up for the chopping block was approved by Congress, and Congress alone can decide its fate. Republicans make sure that DOGE's efforts aren't fruitless, and should, as quickly as possible. First, pass the $9.4 billion 'rescissions package' that the White House plans to deliver to the House on Tuesday, which will claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid from the African Development Foundation and the US Agency for International Development. USAID, which Team Trump has near-totally dismantled, absolutely deserves such a slash: It bankrolled a mess of beyond-parody projects, like sending terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki to college and improving LGBT workplace inclusion in Serbia. The package will also yank $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which oversees PBS and NPR. NPR and PBS long ago abandoned their role as nonpartisan public resources; both should have to rely on the non-government funding they insist dwarfs what the feds now provide. House Speaker Mike Johnson has promised to bring the package to the floor pronto and get it passed; the Senate should follow suit. But $9.4 billion is barely a drop in the bucket of the $1.9 trillion deficit, and far below the $175 billion in savings that DOGE touts on its website — a figure that represents more than $1,000 per US taxpayer if Congress can keep following up. That means the recessions package can only be the start: The next round of federal budgeting must aim to translate the majority of the DOGE savings into law, over the screams of special interests and other feeders at the federal trough, Democratic distortions amplified by the lefty media, and the fears of weaker-willed Republicans. Once agencies get used to their bloated budgets, wrenching money (no matter how ill-spent) back is an exercise in teeth-pulling; expect a lot of kicking and screaming. Though Musk won't be as hands-on at DOGE, the department's work isn't over; much of the team he hired will stick around, battling the fund-sucking bureaucracy. Some DOGE employees have been embedded into permanent roles at other agencies to keep on cutting waste, such as Jeremy Lewin at the State Department, and Stephanie Holmes and Tyler Hassen at the Interior. Musk didn't hit the (always unlikely) $2 trillion-in-savings goal he had on Day 1 of DOGE, but the effort drew crucial attention to Uncle Sam's incomparable talent for misspending taxpayer money. The cat is out of the bag; as voters long suspected, the feds are taking way more money than they need. DOGE started the war on waste; now it's up to Republicans in Congress to finish the job.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could this politician from California be the future of the Democratic Party?
In the ever-changing jumble of names, titles and organizations that plagues the capitol, I'll be honest that I couldn't have told you who or what a 'Ro Khanna' was before perhaps Feb. 5 of this year, when noted oligarch and overgrown schoolyard bully, Elon Musk, tweeted 'Don't be a (expletive)' at him. The heated exchange came after Khanna, the state representative from California's Silicon Valley, missed a vote in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to subpoena Musk over his ongoing, furtive changes to the federal government. (Oh, how clueless we were just three months ago!) Khanna had publicly said that, if he'd had enough notice, he would have voted yes, triggering Musk's tantrum. And while that was certainly an unconventional way to come on the radar, Khanna has since become a recurring character in early conversations, both overheard and participated in, about who the Democrats might run against the Republican Party in three years. (Please forgive us wonks for floating the topic so early; we are also annoyed with ourselves and wish we could stop.) At The Bee's invitation, Khanna recently sat down with me and California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton to discuss a wide range of topics. Nothing was off the record — a courtesy rarely given to journalists these days. My first impression of Khanna was to notice his undeniable charisma. It's something politicians either have or don't — and Khanna certainly has it — though I'm not sure yet if it's something that will translate from an in-person meeting to soundbites through a screen. He was relaxed and easy in conversation, serious when appropriate and clearly intelligent about a wide variety of topics. He spoke from memory, with no notes to aid him and no prompting from the one team member he brought to the meeting. He fielded questions from the board with ease, from housing and homelessness to the economy, Medicaid and even childcare costs. Could I see this man as president someday? Yes, I could. Would he admit he was in the early stages of a campaign? No, he would not. Khanna's greatest asset is perhaps his youth (he's 48), in a party where the average age of Democratic leadership in the House is a death-defying 72 years old. 'The Baby Boomers love to serve,' Khanna said. 'And I get it, but you know, there should have been a transition a few years ago….I think there is a new generation in Congress. My view is… you are going to see a new generation of leaders emerging in the party. It's sort of the last hurrah for the old guard.' So, too, would his vocal enthusiasm for taxing high-income earners be popular on the presidential campaign trail, should he pursue it. 'The argument is pretty simple: You can't be providing tax breaks for billionaires while gutting Medicaid,' Khanna said. '(Democrats) are the party that's going to uphold the Constitution (and the) rule of law, but also make sure that people don't lose their Medicaid or lose their Social Security, all for tax breaks for the billionaires. We need to have a more affirmative economic message of what we're going to do, but for right now, people are just angry at what they see as an assault on basic social protections.' 'People see the costs of child care, of health care, of college and they're struggling to get by. I don't think we addressed that well enough, empathetically enough, with a vision of how to solve it.' Khanna's ready and concise answers made for a compelling conversation, and reminded me of a quote from one of my favorite movies, 1995's 'The American President': '(People) want leadership. They're so thirsty for it they'll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand.' Life is never so neatly tied up in 129 minutes, but the point still rings true some 30 years later: The American people are truly desperate for leadership. We want it so much that we have once again attached ourselves to a caricature of a strongman — and now I fear we are drinking the sand. Call me naive, but the last time this country felt united was during the Obama campaign, when hope and optimism were the order of the day. Perhaps it's no coincidence that Khanna worked in the Obama Administration. Americans crave a youthful, energetic, smart leader to unite behind once more. I fear the lack of one will doom us to an impossible situation, like trying to climb out of a sand pit. I don't know if Khanna is the leader America needs, because no one is going to be perfect for the role. But as a child of immigrants, a man who can move and speak just as easily in a crowd of billionaires as he does among the working class, follows through on his promises to fairly tax high income earners, protect social programs, rebuilds America's factory towns and shows the Democratic Party that its future lies not in staid gerontocracy, but in idealism and hope? He at least has a fighting chance.