Premier Danielle Smith, Alberta Next panel to get feedback at third town hall
Premier Danielle Smith and 15 other members of her Alberta Next panel are scheduled to be in Edmonton to brainstorm with people about possible future referendum questions.
The premier has said one of the reasons for the panel is to address concerns that are inspiring separatist sentiment in the province.
Its agenda focuses on six policy ideas, including pulling out of the Canada Pension Plan and creating a provincial police force to replace the RCMP.
Earlier events were held last month in Red Deer and Edmonton.
At those town halls, some Albertans offered support for the proposals, some protested at the gates and others dismissed the panel as a self-serving political exercise meant to stir up discontent and division.
It is set to host events in Fort McMurray and Lloydminster in two weeks.
The panel has also faced criticism for presenting online survey questions that left no option to disagree.
The government later added options to some survey questions. The changes were made after 32,000 people had already filled out the surveys.
The premier's office has said the survey results for the different versions will be separated.
Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi has dismissed the panel as a way for Smith to curry favour with extreme elements of her United Conservative Party to keep them from splintering off.
He's also said the government is using it to conjure up unreliable data to support things it already wants to do.
Alberta public opinion pollster Janet Brown has said the government's effort is not a polling exercise but a public engagement exercise and that changing the survey questions midstream underscores that.
She has said the survey will offer a good idea of who participated in the process but it's not a random representative sample that reflects public opinion.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. asks feds to step in and pay drug lab cleanup costs
B.C.'s public safety minister has written to the federal government requesting assistance in paying the multi-million tab for cleaning up fentanyl and methamphetamine labs uncovered in recent months. Postmedia recently revealed that the RCMP's federal policing program in B.C. is stuck with a $3.6 million bill for removing deadly chemicals found in several illicit labs, including the record-setting Falkland operation raided last October. Asst. Commissioner David Teboul said the hefty bill would have to be paid out of the RCMP's operational funds meaning fewer investigations in this province. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. David Karn, spokesperson for the B.C. Environment Ministry, confirmed in a statement this week that the letter was sent to the federal government on May 23, 'asking it to consider alternative funding arrangements supplemented by the expertise at Health Canada to cover costs for the safe cleanup of criminal drug labs so police can focus their efforts on further enforcement.' Karn also said that the ministry had incurred its own costs in the past for drug lab cleanups 'where hazardous materials posed a risk to human health or the environment — particularly when substances had left the site or were at risk of migrating off-site.' In those cases, the ministry 'pursued recovery through established legal mechanisms, such as the site remediation program or spill response provisions under the Environmental Management Act.' But he said the act 'does not provide a mechanism for the ministry to retroactively reimburse third-party agencies like the RCMP for their incurred costs.' Conservative MP Frank Caputo, his party's critic for public safety, said in an interview Thursday that the federal government's lax approach to the fentanyl crisis has led to the rise of synthetic drug labs in this province. 'When I look at these massive enterprises of fentanyl production, of drug production, of drug trafficking, clearly people see that the juice is worth the squeeze, meaning that they will not face significant enough consequences to deter them from injecting a deadly supply of drugs into the community and we need to change that,' said Caputo, who represents Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo. 'I don't look at this issue in isolation. I think it's part of a greater problem. Obviously, if we didn't have mass fentanyl producers creating the substance, we wouldn't be dealing with the cleanup.' And while civil forfeiture proceedings and restitution orders are existing tools that can be used to eventually recoup cleanup costs, they don't help with the massive RCMP bill in the short term, said Caputo, who was a prosecutor before he was elected. 'The fact is, the RCMP don't have the money for this because the government has put us in a deficit of around $90 billion and they're cutting back in the wrong places,' Caputo said. 'Maybe while they figure out a better funding formula to deal with this stuff in the short term, they should cough up this cash to pay the B.C. RCMP,' he said. The federal Public Safety Department did not respond to a request for information from Postmedia about the B.C. government letter. In an earlier emailed statement, spokesperson Max Watson said only that 'the cleanup of illegal drug labs is typically the responsibility of property owners. In cases where ownership is unclear or public health and safety are at risk, local governments may be required to step in and manage the cleanup, to ensure the health and safety of their residents.' There was no direct response to questions about the fact the RCMP in B.C. is stuck with a $3.6 million bill. B.C.'s civil forfeiture office has filed several lawsuits against owners of properties where synthetic drug labs have been found, including the Abbotsford electrician who owns the rural Falkland property where record amounts of fentanyl and precursor chemicals were located. Michael Driehuyzen filed a statement of defence , saying he was only the landlord and 'did not participate or acquiesce in any unlawful activity at the property done by his tenant or his tenant's agents.' kbolan@ Blueksy: @
Global News
4 hours ago
- Global News
Older Canadians want fewer legal immigrants to relocate to Canada, poll finds
More Canadians over the age of 55 think fewer legal immigrants should be allowed to relocate to Canada, compared to their younger counterparts. A new poll by Research Co. asked people across the country about their perceptions on immigration and the results highlighted a generational divide. Forty-three per cent of Canadians believe immigration is having a mostly positive effect in the country, which is up one point since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2024. A smaller portion of Canadians, 39 per cent, think immigration is having a mostly negative effect on the country, while 18 per cent were undecided. Among Canadians who voted in the federal election for the NDP, 59 per cent, or the Liberal Party, 55 per cent, believe immigration is having a positive effect on Canada but among those who voted Conservative, only 27 per cent felt that way. Story continues below advertisement Residents of different provinces also had varying views on immigration. In B.C., 52 per cent of those polled said it has been mostly positive for Canada, but only 49 per cent said that in Quebec, 44 per cent in Alberta, 40 per cent in Ontario, 35 per cent in Saskatchewan and Manitoba and only 30 per cent in Atlantic Canada. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Forty one per cent of those asked, or two-in-five Canadians, would like to see a decrease in the number of legal immigrants who are allowed to relocate to Canada, while 34 per cent, or just over one-third, would maintain the current levels. Sixteen per cent said they would increase immigration levels. 0:39 Manitoba government poll suggests concerns over health care, crime and immigration People between the ages of 35 and 54 were the second age group to support a decrease in immigration levels, with 40 per cent saying they were in favour of it, however, only 30 per cent of those aged between 18 to 34 said they were in favour. Story continues below advertisement 'By a seven-to-one margin, Canadians aged 55 and over prefer a decrease in legal immigration levels over an increase,' Mario Canseco, president of Research Co., said in a statement. 'The gap is significantly closer among their younger counterparts.' Half of Canadians of European descent ( 50 per cent) would like to reduce legal immigration to Canada. The proportions are lower among Canadians whose ancestry is Indigenous (36 per cent), South Asian (28 per cent) and East Asian (26 per cent). When it came to the concept of Canada as a 'melting pot,' a slightly larger proportion, 44 per cent, favoured the idea that immigrants assimilate and blend into Canadian society. About 40 per cent endorsed the mosaic where cultural differences within Canadian society are valuable and preserved. Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from July 26 to July 28, 2025, among 1,000 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.
Toronto Star
5 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Alberta separatist group suffers setback after judge orders review of referendum question
An Alberta separatist group has suffered a setback in their attempt to put a referendum to Albertans, after a judge confirmed that its proposed question must be first reviewed by the courts to determine whether the question violates the Constitution. 'A referendum on Alberta independence that could lead to the breakup of Canada is serious business,' Court of King's Bench Justice Colin Feasby wrote in a decision released Thursday. Despite arguments from Alberta Prosperity Project (APP) that there was never any harm in just asking if Albertans wanted to be a 'sovereign country,' Feasby countered that it's not 'plain and obvious' that the proposal was constitutional, and that arguments on both sides needed to be heard. 'Democracy demands nothing less,' he concluded.
