Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro review: A stylish Apple Watch alternative for Android users
The Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro combines flagship smartwatch features with a slimmer, lighter design, making it perfect for all-day wear, including sleep tracking.
Design and build
The Watch Fit 4 Pro feels great on the wrist, thanks to its premium materials, slim profile, and lightweight design. Picture: Noel Campion.
The Watch Fit 4 Pro weighs only 30.4 grams (without the strap) and is just 9.3mm thick; it's even slimmer than the standard Fit 4 model. At a glance, you'd be forgiven for thinking this is an Apple Watch Ultra. However, when placed side by side, the differences become much more noticeable.
For someone like me, who has mostly worn the Apple Watch Ultra 2 for the past year, the Fit 4 Pro feels slimmer and lighter, especially at night. In everyday use, I hardly notice it on my wrist.
The rotating crown matches the band colour perfectly, a clever design detail. Picture: Noel Campion
Huawei offers the Pro model in black, blue, and green. I tested the green version with nylon strap, which not only stays secure during activities but also impressively resists sweat and moisture. This is a beautiful watch that both looks and feels premium. It's the small details that make a difference, like the matching green accent on the rotating crown, the lightweight metal body, and the sapphire glass screen, which I found to be impressively resistant to scratches.
Display
The 1.82-inch AMOLED display features a peak brightness of 3,000 nits, is protected by sapphire glass, and a titanium alloy bezel. Picture: Huawei.
The Watch Fit 4 Pro boasts a 1.82-inch AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 3,000 nits, which is 50% brighter than the non-Pro version. Visibility is flawless outdoors, even in direct sunlight. In the recent sunny weather, I keep brightness maxed out and always-on display enabled, and it still holds up well on battery.
The screen is sharp and vivid, and interacting with it feels smooth. Navigation is aided by a responsive rotating crown that lets you scroll without needing to swipe on the screen. The lower side button acts as a quick shortcut to apps like activities, and is customisable.
Features and battery life
Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro. Picture: Noel Campion.
Huawei's HarmonyOS 5.1 powers the watch and will feel familiar to anyone who's used a recent Huawei wearable. You can swipe to access widgets, scroll through apps in either list or grid view, and choose from hundreds of watch faces, including animated or custom photo options. Battery life is solid. Huawei claims up to 10 days of battery life with light use, and I've averaged 4–5 days with the always-on display and maximum brightness, plus around 30 minutes of daily activity. The 400mAh battery takes about 60 minutes to fully charge. The new magnetic dock is a significant improvement over the old pogo-pin system, offering greater security and user-friendliness. The wireless charging is Qi-compatible, although I found it a bit tricky to locate the sweet spot on a standard wireless charging pad.
Activity and smart features
The Watch Fit 4 Pro is EN 13319 certified, with 40-metre dive-grade water resistance and an IP6X dustproof rating. Picture: Noel Campion.
The watch offers a comprehensive suite of health and fitness tracking. It includes Huawei's new TruSeen 5.5+ system for heart rate and SpO2 monitoring, with added support for ECG and Heart Rate Variability (HRV). The latter offers insights into stress and cardiovascular health.
The Fit 4 Pro provided me with a detailed breakdown of light, deep, and REM sleep, along with practical recommendations for improving my sleep quality. Thanks to its lightweight design, I've worn it nightly without issue. Compared to the Apple Watch Ultra 2, Huawei's sleep analysis tends to report higher amounts of deep sleep, although both devices generally agree on the total time spent asleep.
The Watch Fit 4 Pro features a five-system GNSS setup, providing enhanced positioning accuracy that Huawei claims is 30% better than the Fit 3. It supports trail running with offline contour maps, diving mode up to 50m (5 ATM), and even golf tracking, with support for over 15,000 courses globally. I used the watch to track my cycling trips, and while it accurately recorded the route, I noticed it also counted steps while I was cycling. On a 10km ride, it logged around 3,500 steps, which suggests the step tracking isn't fully optimised for cycling activity.
Water sports mode tracks speed, heart rate, and route, making it suitable for swimmers or kayakers. And for everyday users, there's support for over 100 workout types. The bottom button quickly launches workouts, or you can use voice control to start one using AI voice.
The Watch Fit 4 Pro is equipped with a range of sensors, including an accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, optical heart rate sensor, barometer, temperature sensor, ECG sensor, and depth sensor. Picture: Noel Campion.
Unfortunately, although the watch features NFC, the Wallet app isn't available under the Devices tab in the Huawei Health app, and it doesn't appear to support contactless payments in this region. I'm a huge fan of using my watch for payments and love the convenience it offers, so the lack of support for contactless payments is a noticeable drawback. I suspect this missing feature could be a deal-breaker for some users.
When paired with an Android device, you also get access to a full keyboard for quick replies. However, voice dictation is only available if you're using a Huawei smartphone.
The Watch Fit 4 Pro works great with Android and iOS. I was able to switch between Android and iOS phones, and the Health app syncs everything, including sleep and activity data, across platforms. There are a few minor feature gaps on iPhone (e.g. no full keyboard or Petal Maps), but nothing deal-breaking.
Verdict
The Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro combines flagship health and fitness features with a sleek, comfortable design that feels more like a fitness band than a bulky smartwatch. It's the perfect hybrid for serious tracking and everyday comfort.
€249 Currys
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Final warning for 40million Brits as major mobile brand to DELETE accounts in days unless users act now
A MAJOR mobile brand has warned that it will offload all of its inactive accounts at the end of the month. The 2 Samsung has sent emails to users who the company believes have inactive accounts Credit: Samsung So, if you haven't used your Samsung account in a while - it's best you do so now. The phone maker is having a big clear out of its Galaxy user accounts , which are used to access apps such as the Galaxy Store and Samsung's native apps like Health and Galaxy Wearables. On 31 July, Samsung will delete Galaxy accounts that haven't been accessed in 24 months - or two years. Samsung has sent emails to users who the company believes have inactive accounts. READ MORE ON SAMSUNG The warning message issued to users reads: "Samsung is implementing an inactive Samsung account policy to protect the data of users who have not used their account for an extended period of time. "Once this policy is implemented Samsung accounts that have not been logged in to or used for twenty-four months will be considered inactive and will be subject to deletion." It means some mobile users may lose their account data - anything from their step count to apps they paid for. Once the data has been deleted, it will not be recoverable. Most read in Tech Users need to log into their Samsung Galaxy account just once in the past 24 months - or between now and the 31 July - to save their accounts. If you're unsure whether your account is at risk, check the email the account is tied to. Receiving Samsung's warning message likely indicates that your account has been inactive for nearly 24 months and should be While Samsung Galaxy accounts can sometimes be tied to a Google account, the Google account will not be affected by the shutdown. Google announced a similar change in 2023, warning account holders that if their profiles hadn't been accessed in two years then they would be deleted. Inactive accounts tend to be jackpots for hackers, so it is wise to delete them in order to protect user data. How to save your Samsung account Simply log into your Samsung account before 31 July. This will mark the account as active to Samsung, and spare it from deletion. Galaxy users who haven't logged in for a while should receive an email from Samsung notifying them of the change. Though, as 2 Users need to log into their Samsung Galaxy account just once in the past 24 months - or between now and the 31 July - to save their accounts Credit: Getty Images - Getty
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Barry O'Sullivan: ChatGPT is not your friend
Artificial intelligence is a broad umbrella term for computer systems that perform tasks that we think of as requiring human intelligence – and, despite all the fuss about it lately, we've been using it for decades. There are AI systems that learn, that can process natural language, that can play complex games and be strategic, that can interpret visual scenes and images, and so on. We use AI systems every day. Some examples include satellite navigation systems in cars and mobile phones, voice assistants such as Amazon's Alexa, the features of streaming platforms such as Netflix or Spotify that suggest what you might enjoy next, news items on social media feeds are selected for us using AI, and even the Google search engine itself. AI is ubiquitous in our lives. The term itself was coined in 1955 by John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude Shannon, in a proposal for a summer project at Dartmouth. An interesting connection to Ireland: McCarthy's father, John Patrick, was from Cromane in County Kerry and emigrated to the USA where his genius son was born. Since its widespread release in November 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT has probably become the most widely talked about artificial intelligence technology in the world. It is an example of a Large-Language Model – an LLM - which can generate plausible text in response to a question or search query, often referred to as a prompt, on every conceivable topic. ChatGPT, and other similar chatbots, such as Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, can write very sophisticated answers in terms of content style. For example, one could ask for an essay on the 1916 Rising written in the rhyming style of Dr Seuss, and ChatGPT will generate a response instantly and rather brilliantly. ChatGPT is a cutting-edge chatbot, built using state-of-the-art machine-learning AI methods. It has been trained on everything one can possibly read in electronic form: the entire worldwide web, digitally available books, research papers, policy documents, newspapers, and many other electronic materials. In a sense it has read everything humans have ever written and which can be accessed online or in digital form. The technical achievement in producing LLM-based chatbots, like ChatGPT, is astonishing. They seemingly have read everything that the entirety of humankind has produced and they can instantly respond with sophisticated and plausible answers to any question we would like to pose. Does that mean that these systems have superhuman understanding and expertise? Are these systems truly artificially intelligent? In a word: No. The problems of chatbots While ChatGPT and other LLMs can instantly generate sophisticated answers, they suffer from a number of problems. They don't really understand what they have read. Instead, informally speaking, they have learned that particular sequences of words tend to occur with other sequences of words. In the AI world we say that these systems lack a commonsense understanding of the world. Whether the text is true or false means nothing to them. They often generate text that is misleading or downright incorrect. They 'hallucinate', meaning they invent things that are not true. There is no harm intended, but because they don't understand the world or what they are saying, they are essentially 'stochastic parrots', as a well-known research paper has described LLMs. The analogy I like to use comes from Killinaskully and specifically Pat Shortt's character Dan Clancy who sits between his friends in Jacksie's Bar. Ask Dan anything you want. He'll answer you earnestly and to the best of his ability. He might make up a few details along the way, unintentionally of course. Maybe you'd prefer him to close his eyes and recite his answer poetically with his hand on his heart and in the style of Padraig Pearse. No problem. While this analogy is somewhat facetious, it demonstrates the challenges that arise when one uses ChatGPT and other LLMs in specific settings. Barry O'Sullivan: 'If a user believes in a conspiracy theory, for example, the user could use a chatbot like ChatGPT to engage in a dialogue that has the consequence of confirming the user's beliefs.' Picture: LinkedIn The purpose of an LLM is to generate plausible text, ideally that the user will engage with so it can be refined further. One can get into a conversation with an LLM by tweaking the original prompt. For example, ask ChatGPT to tell you how to prepare a roast chicken, it will respond with detailed instructions, but you might feel that you'd prefer the skin to be a little crispier and articulate that. ChatGPT will offer up a revised response, hopefully a more acceptable one. It is easy to see how one can direct a conversation to get a desired outcome. While this is helpful to make sure that we have a good chance of cooking our dinner the way we would like it, if we are asking questions about things that are troubling us, or we're seeking advice, or we're trying to get reassurance about our perspective on things, using an AI tool that does not have an understanding of what it is saying can have significant consequences. AI chatbots, LLMs and systems such as ChatGPT, are being increasingly used to find information about personal matters, offer life advice, or even as personal therapists. The ELIZA effect refers to the tendency to project human characteristics onto chatbots. ELIZA was a chatbot developed at MIT in 1966 and simulated a Rogerian psychotherapist by rephrasing statements made by the user into questions which had the effect of prompting the user to offer up increasingly more emotional and personal details. 'AI psychosis' Recently, there has been a growing focus on 'AI psychosis', where users with mental health issues like schizophrenia can have paranoid delusions fuelled by chatbots, although there is yet no clinical literature on this. Chatbots based on LLMs can be prompted by users in a way that increases the chances of inaccurate information being presented to them. If a user believes in a conspiracy theory, for example, the user could use a chatbot to engage in a dialogue that has the consequence of confirming the user's beliefs. An LLM-based chatbot doesn't understand what it is generating as output, and is trying to find a response that the user will be satisfied with. There is no intentional manipulation at play but, nonetheless, this can be a harmful recipe. LLM-based chatbots can be used to re-confirm a harmful perspective that no real person would confirm unless they had a malicious intent. Adding in the narrative that these AI systems are approaching superhuman capabilities can give them a god-like status in the minds of vulnerable users. AI technology is extremely powerful and impactful, and, therefore, comes with enormous responsibility on those making it available to ensure that it can be used safely and ethically. There is much excitement and hype around AI at the moment. It is important that hype is challenged, that we keep our feet on the ground, and that we maintain a watchful eye on its impacts. Gaining literacy in AI is now an important life skill and one of the reasons that under the European Union's AI Act there are specific obligations on the providers and deployers of AI technology on this very topic. AI, in my opinion, has been an overwhelming positive technology, but we must pay attention to the risks and deal with these matters through technological advances as well as education and literacy initiatives. Barry O'Sullivan is a professor at the School of Computer Science & IT at University College Cork, founding director of the Research Ireland Centre for Research Training on Artificial Intelligence, a member of the Irish Government's AI Advisory Council, and former Vice Chair of the European High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence Read More Gen Z Student: Knowing my own essays will be graded against the work of AI is disheartening
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Alphabet boosted by AI, cloud demand as spending needs skyrocket
Alphabet said demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products boosted quarterly sales, and now requires an extreme increase in capital spending – heightening pressure on the company to justify the cost of keeping up in the AI race. Google's parent company said 2025 capital expenditures will be $85 billion (€72 billion), or $10 billion greater than an earlier forecast. Although Alphabet beat expectations for second-quarter revenue and profit, its stock initially sank in after-hours trading, then rebounded after chief executive Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary in order to keep up with customer needs. 'Our AI infrastructure investments are crucial to meeting the growth in demand from cloud customers,' he said on a call Wednesday following the report. As Microsoft, start-up OpenAI, Meta Platforms and others continue to pour money into AI, Alphabet has little choice but to follow suit, analysts said. The race is particularly urgent for Google: competitors are building chatbots that may eventually appeal to consumers more than its flagship search product. 'Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications,' said Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester. The recent quarter was strong almost across the board for Alphabet. Sales, excluding partner payouts, climbed to $81.7 billion, Alphabet said in a statement, topping analysts' projections of $79.6 billion on average, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Alphabet is counting on its core search advertising juggernaut and growing cloud computing business to support its spiralling spending on AI. Employees are under pressure to bring AI products to market faster, from new modes of search to tools for cloud customers. 'We are seeing significant demand for our comprehensive AI product portfolio,' Pichai said. Chief financial officer Anat Ashkenazi said capital expenditures will rise yet again next year, without providing details. The strain of the AI race could be spotted elsewhere in the company's results. Ashkenazi attributed the company's 16% jump in spending on research and development to increases in pay packages for key employees. Meta has been making unprecedented compensation offers as it seeks to woo researchers for its superintelligence lab, driving up the price for key employees across the industry. Earlier this month, Google struck a deal to pay about $2.4 billion for top talent and licensing rights from artificial intelligence coding start-up Windsurf. Yet money isn't the only consideration for researchers when deciding where to work, Pichai said. Top talent in the field want 'to really be at the frontier driving progress,' in addition to craving access to computing power and talented peers, Pichai said. 'It's a combination of all of that and using it to drive impact. And I think we are pretty competitive on all those fronts.' Google's cloud-computing unit reported quarterly revenue of $13.6 billion and operating income of $2.83 billion, topping analysts' projections. Google remains in third place in this market, after Microsoft and Amazon, but the company's prowess in AI has helped it score client wins. The unit is widely viewed as Alphabet's strongest source of growth as the main search business matures. The centrepiece of the cloud offensive is Gemini, the AI model that Google is rapidly weaving across its vast product portfolio, and pushing to enterprise clients. Many AI experts were impressed by the release of a new version of the Gemini model earlier this year, but it still trails OpenAI's ChatGPT in adoption by most estimates. As Google faces mounting competition, it's also facing penalties for being dominant. Google's primary businesses are under threat of a break-up after US federal judges ruled that the company is maintaining illegal monopolies in search and some ad technology. Next month, Judge Amit Mehta is expected to deliver an order on the measures Google must take to restore competition in online search, though Google has said it plans to appeal the ruling. YouTube, Google's video site, posted $9.8 billion in second-quarter ad revenue, exceeding analysts' estimates of $9.56 billion. The unit, which draws most of its revenue from advertising, was expected to perform well thanks to its lead in livingroom streaming and heavy investments in podcasts. Alphabet's Other Bets, a collection of futuristic businesses that includes the self-driving car effort Waymo, generated $373 million in revenue, missing estimates for $429.1 million. Ashkenazi said Alphabet will continue devoting more resources to Waymo. Alphabet has been aggressively expanding the operations of Waymo, which may soon face increased competition as Tesla ramps up its robotaxi business. Earlier this month, Waymo more than doubled its service area in Austin, Tesla's home base, and said it would start collecting data in New York City in pursuit of a permit for testing. 'The team is testing across more than 10 cities this year, including New York and Philadelphia,' Pichai said. 'We hope to serve riders in all 10 in the future.' Google isn't alone in feeling pressure to show success from AI investment. Shortly after Pichai's Waymo comments, on the Tesla earnings call, chief executive Elon Musk started slamming Google's AI prowess. He said Tesla was 'actually much better than Google.' Investors might disagree; Tesla's shares fell. – Bloomberg
