logo
What's driving up gas prices in Washington and 4 ways you can save

What's driving up gas prices in Washington and 4 ways you can save

Yahoo28-04-2025

Drivers in Washington are frustrated at the high price of gas and the condition of the state's highways. Despite the Evergreen State having the third-highest gas tax in the country, our roads consistently rank among the top 10 for worst roads in the country.
Construction Coverage ranks Washington as the #10 state with the worst roads, and U.S. News and World Report ranks Washington #7 for worst road quality.
State lawmakers are pointing the finger at inflation.
'We see egg prices at the grocery store. Well, concrete prices have been going up even faster,' said Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee. 'So buying power for our transportation investments is falling short each year. And that means we're repaving less and less highway,' he said.
That was the biggest driver behind lawmakers passing an additional six-cent tax per gallon on gasoline over the weekend. But the factors making fuel so expensive in the Evergreen State go far beyond taxes - and will continue to drive up costs for drivers.
GAX TAX:
The change in the gas tax will kick in July 1, 2025, increasing the rate from 49.4 cents to 55.4 cents per gallon. Making fuel even more expensive, the gas tax will also increase by 2% every year.
Diesel drivers will see a hike too - 3 cents in July, and another 3 cents in 2027, then a 2 percent hike annually starting the following year.
Over six years, the new tax will raise $3.2 billion for the state's transportation budget.
Drivers KIRO 7 spoke with are somewhere between furious and disappointed.
'Yeah, it sucks,' said Joel Garland, a driver from Federal Way. 'The regular people were struggling just to try to survive already,' he said.
Gas taxes in Washington state are the third highest in the country already, behind California and Pennsylvania. The six-cent increase keeps us in third place, but it doesn't count in other factors driving up the price.
Why is gasoline already so expensive in Washington? Our state has no income tax, so lawmakers heavily rely on the gas tax to fund road projects.
The state constitution mandates that gas tax funding be used for things like building and repairing roads and Washington State Patrol policing highways.
'The highest portion of our revenues is the gas tax. It's unfortunate that it's that way, but the reality is if you're going to raise money, you have to raise the gas taxes,' said Rep. Jake Fey, D-Tacoma, who chairs the House Transportation Committee.
GEOGRAPHY:
Another reason for our more expensive fuel: Washington's primary petroleum supplier is pricier, coming from Alaska and Canada instead of the South or Southeast because of geography - the mountain ranges block easy transport of crude oil to the west. The bulk of Washington's crude oil is turned into gasoline at one of our state's five refineries.
CAP AND TRADE:
Plus, Washington's Climate Commitment Act, or cap and trade program, charges the state's biggest carbon emitters for carbon credits past a certain level. Companies end up passing that cost along to you.
'Anytime a gallon of gas is sold in Washington State, whether it is produced in state or out of state, it gets taxed,' said Todd Myers, vice president of research at the Washington Policy Center. The think tank has been critical of Washington's cap and trade policy.
It says currently, cap and trade adds about 40 cents per gallon for the consumer (though the Washington Department of Ecology believes the number is lower).
And brace yourselves - soon, you'll be shelling out even more. In 2030, Washington is dramatically lowering its carbon emissions target, which means companies will have to pay even more for credits - and you'll likely pay more to fill up.
'Should people really be preparing to pay significantly more at the pump?' KIRO7's Deedee Sun asked Myers.
'Yeah, absolutely,' he said. 'The only question is how much more,' Myers said.
People say the gas prices are surging at a time when they're already concerned about making ends meet.
'What would you say to your constituents who are worried?' KIRO7's Deedee Sun asked Sen. Liias, D-Edmonds.
'Construction inflation has moved faster even than inflation,' Liias said. He says that's part of the reason why the state's transportation budget faced such a big budget gap. 'I'm seeing more potholes than I can remember in my lifetime on our highways,' he said.
He points to aging infrastructure – like the Fairfax Bridge to Mount Rainier that had to be shut down this month, to things like repair work such as Revive I-5.
'That's what the gas tax pays for. So we're trying to balance that with the reality that folks are having a tough time affording,' Liias said.
However, KIRO7 discovered, cap and trade is generating more money than expected.
'Why can't we use that money for roads instead?' Sun asked Rep. Fey.
'We made a promise about how this money was going to be spent,' Fey said. Lawmakers say cap and trade money is intended for things that lower greenhouse gases – like electrifying ferries, getting kids free rides on public transit, and adding bike lanes.
'To do a substitution, I think, goes against promises that we made,' Fey said. 'We're doing the best we can,' he said.
SAVING AT THE PUMP:
So what can you do to save money at the pump? KIRO7 checked in with AAA Washington for tested ways to cut down on spending.
1) You must price compare. Gas Buddy or AAA's apps both help you do that. For example, a Chevron in Renton last week was charging $4.57 per gallon when you pay with credit or debit. A few blocks away, the Fred Meyer was charging $4.19 – or 38 cents less. That's a difference of $300 dollars per year!
2) Remember some stations offer a discount if you pay with cash. That same Renton Chevron was charging 14 cents less per gallon for cash purchasers.
3) Slow down: AAA Washington says, 'reducing highway speeds by 5 to 10 mph can increase fuel economy by as much as 14 percent.'
4) Avoiding excessive idling. AAA says a car engine uses up to half a gallon per hour when idling. Starting up a warm engine uses about 10 seconds worth of fuel. So if you're going to be stopped for more than a minute and it's safe to turn off your car, you'll save fuel if you do so.
Meanwhile some drivers say what would help most?
'Well, just quit taxing us,' said Nelson Vitous, a driver in Renton.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform
Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform

State lawmakers left a large pile of major issues on their agenda for the waning hours of the 2025 spring session. Very few of them were addressed other than the must-pass budget for fiscal 2026. Color us unsurprised. Despite a $1 billion shortfall that had to be plugged, the $55 billion budget proved to be anticlimactic, largely hewing to the outline Gov. JB Pritzker offered in February. So what passed for news in the capital emanated mainly from what didn't happen rather than what did. At the top of that list was the fiscal crisis the Chicago-area's public transit agencies are facing, which those agencies have said will mean substantial service reductions if Springfield doesn't act in the coming months. Following the end of the session, Pritzker and legislative leaders said the General Assembly likely would take the unusual step of acting over the summer on the issue. That's good. For the sake of commuters and the region's economy, they should act well before what would normally be the next opportunity — the fall veto session in November. Springfield should learn from the mistakes of the just-concluded session. Everyone has known for over a year that a transit overhaul and rescue needs to happen, and yet the effort still turned into the equivalent of an all-nighter for a student who hasn't done the coursework over the semester. The mad scramble for funding sources to plug the transit agencies' $770 million budget hole foundered, as rank-and-file lawmakers, stakeholders and most importantly the public were given no time for due consideration and feedback. The typical Springfield gambit of waiting until the eleventh hour to spring controversial initiatives on the public in order to keep determined opposition from forming backfired spectacularly. First, late last week state Senate Transportation Committee Chairman Ram Villavalam, D-Chicago, proposed a package of revenue generators including a 50-cent surcharge on tolls, a redirection of suburban sales taxes to transit, higher suburban real estate transfer taxes and a region-wide tax on Ubers and Lyfts. Suburban officials predictably balked at the lopsided nature of that 'deal,' creating the need for an immediate Plan B. Villavalam pivoted with only hours to spare to a $1.50 charge on delivery of most retail products. The Senate approved the so-called pizza tax, the derisive sobriquet effectively wielded by opponents, by a 10-vote margin, but the House left town without acting, an acknowledgement the votes weren't there. That proposal deserved to die. Among other things, there's no logical reason downstate Illinoisans should pay an extra $1.50 on deliveries mainly to bail out bus and train service in the Chicago area. Making the idea worse was that Democrats in the Senate added a provision forbidding retailers (yes, like pizza makers) from showing the tax in a separate line item on their receipts. Nothing says confidence in your own policy-making like doing your utmost to keep consumers (most of whom double as voters) from understanding why their costs have risen so much. It was the Democratic version of President Donald Trump's temper tantrum in late April when news surfaced that Amazon was considering showing customers the cost of tariffs in their product purchases from its low-cost website dubbed Haul. So when lawmakers reconvene to take another stab at transit reform and funding, they should learn from this setback and embrace transparency. They must be more open with the public about the tax and fee mechanisms on the table and allow time for feedback. As we said last week before the unproductive weekend in the capital began, safe and reliable public transit is critical to the region and the state. And the need for more revenue is inescapable. But public acceptance of whatever funding solution emerges, even if grudging, is critical to ensuring this rescue mission succeeds. And to win that support, Springfield must break with the cloak-and-dagger machinations and engage the public. For the lawmakers, there's really nothing to lose at this point by being transparent given that people now have seen the sausage-making. Thirty-two senators are on record having voted for the pizza tax and have nothing to show for it. While we acknowledge that settling on an appropriate source of money is delicate and complicated, we believe it's not impossible to find a means the public can accept. But to achieve that, a proposal must have two attributes. First, it has to be broadly and fairly distributed among constituencies who have a legitimate stake in the future of public transit — including, by the way, those paying CTA bus and train fares that could stand to rise a little, if only to $3 or $3.50. Second, it must be related as directly as possible to the issue at hand. Part of the problem here is that Chicago's disastrous privatization of parking meters and the Chicago Skyway has reduced some of the logical levers and private garages already are drowning in some of the highest tax rates in the nation. Still, ride-share taxes are clearly in the same world. So for that matter is congestion pricing. Congestion pricing in New York, even though it has been the subject of controversy, has the virtue of generating revenue for public transportation in a city that is traffic-choked by any definition. That is not to say we're advocating congestion pricing for Chicago; indeed, we have editorialized against such a charge out of concern for the massive potential harm to downtown Chicago, which needs more activity, not less. But at least congestion pricing in support of public transit can be defended on grounds that the two are related. To its credit, Springfield made substantial progress on giving regional transit officials far more power over local systems such as the Chicago Transit Authority. Those governance provisions, which appeared to have broad support in both chambers, are crucial to giving Illinoisans outside Chicago confidence that they're not bailing out an unpopular city government without appropriate safeguards. We also see the logic of sending some money from whatever Springfield raises to improve transit downstate. That's only fair. Failure isn't an option. Come back to Springfield this summer, lawmakers, and get this needed transit reform done the right way. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@

Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform
Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform

Chicago Tribune

timea day ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Editorial: Strapped for time, Springfield punts on transit funding and reform

State lawmakers left a large pile of major issues on their agenda for the waning hours of the 2025 spring session. Very few of them were addressed other than the must-pass budget for fiscal 2026. Color us unsurprised. Despite a $1 billion shortfall that had to be plugged, the $55 billion budget proved to be anticlimactic, largely hewing to the outline Gov. JB Pritzker offered in February. So what passed for news in the capital emanated mainly from what happen rather than what did. At the top of that list was the fiscal crisis the Chicago-area's public transit agencies are facing, which those agencies have said will mean substantial service reductions if Springfield doesn't act in the coming months. Following the end of the session, Pritzker and legislative leaders said the General Assembly likely would take the unusual step of acting over the summer on the issue. That's good. For the sake of commuters and the region's economy, they should act well before what would normally be the next opportunity — the fall veto session in November. Springfield should learn from the mistakes of the just-concluded session. Everyone has known for over a year that a transit overhaul and rescue needs to happen, and yet the effort still turned into the equivalent of an all-nighter for a student who hasn't done the coursework over the semester. The mad scramble for funding sources to plug the transit agencies' $770 million budget hole foundered, as rank-and-file lawmakers, stakeholders and most importantly the public were given no time for due consideration and feedback. The typical Springfield gambit of waiting until the eleventh hour to spring controversial initiatives on the public in order to keep determined opposition from forming backfired spectacularly. First, late last week state Senate Transportation Committee Chairman Ram Villavalam, D-Chicago, proposed a package of revenue generators including a 50-cent surcharge on tolls, a redirection of suburban sales taxes to transit, higher suburban real estate transfer taxes and a region-wide tax on Ubers and Lyfts. Suburban officials predictably balked at the lopsided nature of that 'deal,' creating the need for an immediate Plan B. Villavalam pivoted with only hours to spare to a $1.50 charge on delivery of most retail products. The Senate approved the so-called pizza tax, the derisive sobriquet effectively wielded by opponents, by a 10-vote margin, but the House left town without acting, an acknowledgement the votes weren't there. That proposal deserved to die. Among other things, there's no logical reason downstate Illinoisans should pay an extra $1.50 on deliveries mainly to bail out bus and train service in the Chicago area. Making the idea worse was that Democrats in the Senate added a provision forbidding retailers (yes, like pizza makers) from showing the tax in a separate line item on their receipts. Nothing says confidence in your own policy-making like doing your utmost to keep consumers (most of whom double as voters) from understanding why their costs have risen so much. It was the Democratic version of President Donald Trump's temper tantrum in late April when news surfaced that Amazon was considering showing customers the cost of tariffs in their product purchases from its low-cost website dubbed Haul. So when lawmakers reconvene to take another stab at transit reform and funding, they should learn from this setback and embrace transparency. They must be more open with the public about the tax and fee mechanisms on the table and allow time for feedback. As we said last week before the unproductive weekend in the capital began, safe and reliable public transit is critical to the region and the state. And the need for more revenue is inescapable. But public acceptance of whatever funding solution emerges, even if grudging, is critical to ensuring this rescue mission succeeds. And to win that support, Springfield must break with the cloak-and-dagger machinations and engage the public. For the lawmakers, there's really nothing to lose at this point by being transparent given that people now have seen the sausage-making. Thirty-two senators are on record having voted for the pizza tax and have nothing to show for it. While we acknowledge that settling on an appropriate source of money is delicate and complicated, we believe it's not impossible to find a means the public can accept. But to achieve that, a proposal must have two attributes. First, it has to be broadly and fairly distributed among constituencies who have a legitimate stake in the future of public transit — including, by the way, those paying CTA bus and train fares that could stand to rise a little, if only to $3 or $3.50. Second, it must be related as directly as possible to the issue at hand. Part of the problem here is that Chicago's disastrous privatization of parking meters and the Chicago Skyway has reduced some of the logical levers and private garages already are drowning in some of the highest tax rates in the nation. Still, ride-share taxes are clearly in the same world. So for that matter is congestion pricing. Congestion pricing in New York, even though it has been the subject of controversy, has the virtue of generating revenue for public transportation in a city that is traffic-choked by any definition. That is not to say we're advocating congestion pricing for Chicago; indeed, we have editorialized against such a charge out of concern for the massive potential harm to downtown Chicago, which needs more activity, not less. But at least congestion pricing in support of public transit can be defended on grounds that the two are related. To its credit, Springfield made substantial progress on giving regional transit officials far more power over local systems such as the Chicago Transit Authority. Those governance provisions, which appeared to have broad support in both chambers, are crucial to giving Illinoisans outside Chicago confidence that they're not bailing out an unpopular city government without appropriate safeguards. We also see the logic of sending some money from whatever Springfield raises to improve transit downstate. That's only fair. Failure isn't an option. Come back to Springfield this summer, lawmakers, and get this needed transit reform done the right way.

Business owners blast ‘weakened leadership' as blue city ranks among most dangerous in US
Business owners blast ‘weakened leadership' as blue city ranks among most dangerous in US

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Business owners blast ‘weakened leadership' as blue city ranks among most dangerous in US

Business owners in Kansas City, Missouri, are fed up with the city's response to a string of crimes downtown, with one person saying they've had to "take matters into our own hands." Kansas City was named the eighth-most dangerous city in the country in 2024 based on murder and property crime rates per 100,000 people, according to U.S. News and World Report. The city ranks twentieth on the outlet's list for 2025. So far in 2025, there have been 61 homicides, versus 52 at this point in 2024, the Kansas City Police Department said. Between 2019 and 2023, property crimes in Kansas City spiked by 31%, according to KCUR. Homicides in Kansas City are lower than they were in 2023, when the city saw its deadliest year with 182. Andrew Cameron, founder of Donutology, told Fox News Digital in an interview that it feels like crime in Kansas City is "at an all-time high as far as we're concerned." New Report Pushes For Permanent Pedestrian-only Bourbon Street To Boost Mardi Gras Safety After Terror Attack "We do see some weakened leadership within the city, whether it be bureaucracy saying their hands are tied because the state controls the police or the prosecution declining to press charges just because there are so many instances and the police are understaffed," he said. Read On The Fox News App Cameron said there have been two incidents over the past year when Donutology locations were either vandalized or robbed. "We've experienced multiple break-ins of our store. Sometimes they will take items inside the store. In our Trolley locations, they took our safe with cash in it. Just a few months later, we were broken into at our Westport location, where they just decided to kick the door in and not take anything," Cameron said. In video provided to Fox News Digital, two men are seen breaking into a Donutology store and leaving with a safe. In another incident at a separate Donutology location in Kansas City, a man is seen repeatedly throwing objects at the windows. Cameron told Fox News Digital he filed a police report on both incidents but didn't hear anything back. He said the city has offered money to help repair damage, but they don't cover anything taken from the store. "The city has also offered money to fix any vandalism, but their program doesn't cover the actual contents that were taken from the business. They're hoping insurance will cover it, but a lot of us small businesses have high deductibles, and it's almost – we're still out a lot of money. And when we're selling doughnuts at a couple dollars each, when you lose thousands of dollars, that's a lot of doughnuts to make up and a lot of customers. It really hurt us and set us back," Cameron said. Chicago Alderman Slams The Murder Capital's 'Disregard For Human Life' Personal injury attorney Suzanne Hale-Robinson told Fox News Digital she has seen an exponential increase in vehicle break-ins in the past six to nine months. On one occasion, Hale-Robinson said someone squatted in an office located in her building. "One time, the floor above us had left their door unlocked over a weekend and somebody just had a nice, like, staycation in their office and then left with a couple laptops. So that's been like the break-ins in our building. Aside from that, we have a parking lot to the rear of our building and, yeah, luckily, my car, knock on wood, has not been broken into. I try not to leave anything in there, but you know probably 10 to 15 vehicles have been broken into," Hale-Robinson said. She said it's frustrating when police don't show up after a break-in, adding that her law firm has had to hire private security. "Initially, over the winter, we paid personally for private security to come because we couldn't get a response from the city. One thing that has been frustrating is the lack of them sending anybody out when there's an issue. So when we have a break-in, there's no police presence at all. We're being asked to go down to the station to make a report. And so that creates, I think, an inherent non-deterrent for criminals because there's no fear of immediate police reaction," Hale-Robinson said. Hale-Robinson said that while she recognizes there should be a better law enforcement response, the city needs to do more to address homelessness. "I do think there's blame that should be placed ... on the Kansas City government and how we're handling it and not just a focus on these individuals who, a lot of times, are houseless people that are [committing] crimes of desperation that is then fueled by the city's inability to help," she said. In an effort to fight property crime, Democrat Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas put forward a $1 million proposal in January to increase off-duty law enforcement presence in areas of the city with higher crime, according to Kmbc. Fox News Digital reached out to Lucas for article source: Business owners blast 'weakened leadership' as blue city ranks among most dangerous in US

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store