Body of missing Mfazazana fisherman recovered after suspected shark attack
'On Sunday during ongoing search and recovery operations, police K9 search and rescue and water policing and diving services (WPDS) located and recovered the body of a man believed to be that of a man who went missing in the sea on Friday afternoon in an apparent shark incident,' said the NSRI.
While the body showed 'obvious shark wounds that are being investigated' formal identification processes are under way.
The man was reported missing on Friday after a dramatic incident in the ocean involving three fishermen. The group had been in the water near a school of sardines when a shark reportedly surfaced where the missing man was fishing.
According to the NSRI, one of the friends tried to intervene but was forced to retreat when confronted by at least two sharks.
'It is believed the sharks were feeding on the school of sardines,' the NSRI said.
This prompted police and diving teams from WPDS with K9 search and rescue units to launch a search on Friday but were unable to locate the man.
The search resumed on Saturday, with assistance from the NSRI Shelly Beach crew and culminated in the recovery of the body on Sunday.
An inquest docket has been opened by police.
Shark Spotters, a marine safety and conservation group, said the incident highlights the real but rare danger posed by sharks in South African waters.
'Since records started for South Africa in 1905, there have been a total of 248 unprovoked attacks. Of these, most have occurred in the Eastern Cape with 103 cases, followed by KwaZulu-Natal with 90 cases and the Western Cape with 55 cases,' the organisation said.
They noted three species, the great white, bull (Zambezi) and tiger sharks, are responsible for most shark attacks in South African waters.
'2015 saw the highest number of unprovoked shark attacks recorded in a year, with 98 attacks and six deaths. Though shark attacks occur throughout the world, the US, Australia and South Africa remain the main hotspots,' said Shark Spotters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
6 minutes ago
- The Citizen
How cheap alcohol keeps hurting SA's poorest
The alcohol industry profits while heavy drinking causes widespread harm in poor South African communities. Recent comments by the South African Breweries (SAB) CEO Richard Rivett-Carnac, reported in Business Day, that minimum unit pricing for alcohol will punish the poor and turbocharge the illicit market, harming both the industry and public safety, must be challenged by fact. The fact is that the legal liquor industry is a major contributor to injury, disease and death in South Africa. Alcohol is a factor in about half of all homicides, traffic accidents and gender-based violence in this country. If the results of the SAB study into illicit alcohol are true – that illegal trade represents about a fifth of the total market – that still means that legally manufactured alcohol contributes up to four-fifths of the total alcohol harm in South Africa. The major damage is not occasional death from the wrong chemicals in illicit brews, but widespread harm from heavy drinking of all liquor products – whether they're legal or not. If the upper daily limit of what could be regarded as 'responsible drinking' is two standard drinks per drinker then, on average, drinkers consume 2½ times more than this and most of the excess is manufactured by the companies that now appeal to public safety as a reason not to introduce minimum unit pricing. ALSO READ: Saps probes officers after video shows police offloading beer bottles at liquor store SAB undercuts its words with its actions. Just one of its one-litre bottles of Castle Lager contains enough pure alcohol to push a drinker's blood alcohol content well above the legal driving limit of 0.05%. Those bottles are sold 2½ times cheaper per litre than the equivalent amount in three 330ml containers. This price difference is so large that it cannot be due to cost-savings in the manufacturing process and suggests a deliberate design to promote excessive consumption. There is evidence from South Africa that bigger containers encourage people to drink more. It is the price of these larger containers that will be most affected by the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol. We must challenge the assertion that minimum unit pricing will punish the poor. ALSO READ: KZN woman arrested for R120 000 illicit alcohol A 2018 study of alcohol-related mortality in South Africa found that the death rate from alcohol in poorer communities is 4½ times higher than wealthier ones. Many people in poorer communities drink to escape the hardships of daily life in the absence of recreational alternatives. High rates of misery make it far harder for a person to 'drink responsibly' than someone experiencing the good life. The alcohol industry capitalises on their misery, flooding their communities with large quantities of liquor at lower prices. It is this behaviour that punishes the poor, not the proposed introduction of minimum unit pricing. Where minimum unit pricing has been introduced in other countries like Scotland and Wales, it has achieved its aim of reducing the prevalence of heavy drinking, with positive health benefits for poorer consumers. ALSO READ: Mlindo The Vocalist releases his long-awaited album on Mandela Day as a way of 'giving back' With the introduction of minimum unit pricing, there may be some growth of the illicit market, which could affect tax revenues but that must be dealt with in the same way that illicit cigarettes should be – with effective enforcement of a track-and-trace system from the point of production to the point of sale. However, the liquor industry's claim of massive growth in illicit sales is dubious, given that legal alcohol sales have grown substantially over the past decade. There is no evidence of significant erosion of the market. The role of extra taxation of the liquor and tobacco industries is to make them pay for the damages they cause to society. Government should not be confused by perverse logic. If the liquor industry caused less harm to our society in the first place, Treasury would need less money to pay for its damages. NOW READ: Report reveals 1 in 5 alcoholic drinks are fake: Here's how to spot them

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
POLL: Should Minister Gayton McKenzie resign over the K-word controversy?
Amid growing calls for Sports Minister Gayton McKenzie to resign from his Cabinet position after a series of racist tweets where he used the k-word in the past, the Patriotic Alliance leader has said he will not resign. The likes of celebrated media personality Sizwe Dhlomo and the Economic Freedom Fighters, are among those who have called for McKenzie to step down over the controversy wherein a series of k-word calling tweets, most at least 10 years old, were uncovered. McKenzie had vocally came out in defence of the Coloured community when a group of young young Black African podcasters from the Open Chats Podcast made vile, regressive and racist comments about the Coloured community recently. They have since apologized, but they too are now subject of a formal complaint to the Human Rights Commission, while McKenzie's political party, the Patriotic Alliance, formally opened criminal cases with the SA Police Services through its Joburg councillor Liam Jacobs. McKenzie has been vocal in speaking out against the racist comments made by the podcasters, saying they needed to be taught a lesson, but in so doing, he hosted a Facebook Live wherein he repeatedly made use of the K-word. This led some social media users to turn the attention on the minister, unveiling a series of equally denegrating and racist comments from McKenzie, who at the time was not a politician, but an ordinary South African. In an attempt to address the K-word comments, the minister hosted another Facebook Live session speaking to his Patriotic Alliance constituency on Sunday evening. He apologized for being a troll and stupid, cringed at the remarks he had made and apologized on that aspect, however, he vehemently denied he was a racist, saying his mother was Black African and he also had children with a Black African woman. McKenzie firmly denied ever calling anyone by the K-word slur and dared any victim to come forward, labeling the allegations a politically driven 'campaign' orchestrated by the EFF and social media influencers. He also accused the ActionSA of using the saga to get its foot in the Government of National Unity at the expense of the PA. McKenzie challenged critics to produce concrete proof, arguing that without a specific victim or direct quote, claims of racism against him were baseless. McKenzie also reiterated his lifelong fight for equal treatment of Black African and Coloured South Africans, calling any suggestion to the contrary 'hilarious.'


The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Major dagga bust, arrest highlights zero tolerance for SA's dealers
This zero-tolerance policy was evidenced by a major dagga bust in Fisantekraal, Western Cape over the weekend. On Saturday, 9 August, Metro Police officers arrested a suspect after seizing more than four kilograms of dagga (marijuana) from a private residence. Officers acted on a tip-off and were granted permission to search the premises, where they discovered a black bag containing 3.39 kilograms of dagga, a 221-gram parcel, 92 'bankies,' 93 dagga cigarettes, and an undisclosed amount of cash. The homeowner was arrested on charges of dealing in dagga. This arrest was part of a broader crackdown: the City of Cape Town's enforcement services made 241 arrests and issued over 62 000 fines for traffic and by-law violations in the past week alone. Metro Police accounted for 42 of those arrests and issued 2 129 fines. 'The devastating impact of drugs on our communities continues long after we've taken the dealers off the streets,' said Mayco Member for Safety and Security, Alderman JP Smith. 'Not only are families destroyed, but drugs fuel many other crimes and illicit dealings.' During the search, a black bag containing 3.39 kilograms of dagga was seized. Image: CoCT South Africa's cannabis laws have evolved significantly since the Constitutional Court's landmark 2018 ruling, which legalised the private use and cultivation of cannabis for adults. The Cannabis for Private Purposes Act, passed in 2024, formalised this right – allowing individuals to possess and consume cannabis in a personal capacity. However, selling, buying, or distributing cannabis remains illegal. Earlier this year, The South African reported on a beloved nursery in Cape Town that was selling cannabis plants to the public. This story highlighted a 'loophole' in the legislation, as the Act does not explicitly ban the sale of cannabis seeds or seedlings. Medicinal marijuana meanwhile was legalised in South Africa in 2017. To that end, the nursery's offering addressed a range of ailments. In March the South African government did a quick U-turn on banning the sale, importation and manufacture of food products containing hemp and cannabis. Local laws claim to draw a firm line between personal use and commercial activity. Anyone caught dealing – especially with large quantities or packaged products – faces criminal charges, fines, and potential imprisonment. This latest bust is a reminder that while private use is protected, authorities maintain a zero tolerance approach to cannabis dealing, viewing it as a gateway to broader criminal networks and social harm. 'Despite arrests, the suspects are often back on the street a few days later, to continue their criminal dealings,' Smith added. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.