Ukraine's drone attack halts work at electronic plant in Chuvashia, Russia says
Production was temporarily suspended at an electronics company in Russia's Volga river region of Chuvashia, some 1,300 km (800 miles) from the border with Ukraine, after two drones fell on the plant's territory, the head of the region said on Monday.
The strike - among the deepest into Russia by a Ukrainian drone in more than three years of the war - caused no casualties, Chuvashia Governor Oleg Nikolayev said in a statement on the Telegram messaging app.
But "the responsible decision was made to temporarily suspend production to ensure the safety of employees" of the VNIIR enterprise where the drones fell, Nikolayev said.
It was not immediately clear whether the drones caused any damage. Nikolayev said that another drone fell onto some fields in the area of the capital of the region, Cheboksary.
The Russian defence ministry - which reports only how many drones were destroyed not how many Ukraine launched - said on Telegram that its units downed two drones over Chuvashia. In total, it said, air defence systems destroyed 49 Ukrainian drones overnight over Russia.
According to photos and videos on unofficial Russian and Telegram news channels, the drones sparked a fire at the VNIIR plant that they said produces components for electronic warfare. Reuters could not independently verify the reports.
There was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Kyiv has often said that its attacks inside Russia are aimed at destroying infrastructure key to Moscow's war efforts and are in response to the continued Russian strikes on Ukraine.
The VNIIR Russian Scientific Research Design and Technological Institute of Relay Engineering with experimental production in Chuvashia is on the U.S. sanctions list, according to the U.S. Treasury website.
A Ukrainian drone attack on the Voronezh region that borders Ukraine damaged a gas pipeline, cutting off gas supplies to 22 clients, the region's governor, Alexander Gusev, said on the Telegram. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Sunnova files for bankruptcy amid rooftop solar struggles
The US residential solar industry is reeling from a torrent of headwinds, including high interest rates. PHOTO: ST FILE SAN FRANCISCO – Sunnova Energy International, one of the largest US rooftop solar companies, filed for bankruptcy in Texas following struggles with mounting debt and diminishing sales prospects. The company listed US$10 billion to US$50 billion (S$64.33 billion) of both liabilities and assets, according to a court filing. Sunnova had been negotiating with creditors to fix its capital structure since March, when it issued a going concern warning and cited 'stubbornly high interest rates, along with regulatory and political uncertainties' making consumers and capital providers more cautious. Sunnova also recently terminated most of its US$3 billion partial loan guarantee with the US Energy Department, which was intended to help provide panels to low-income customers. In early June, it said it was firing about 55 per cent of its workforce, following the bankruptcy filing of a subsidiary. The US residential solar industry is reeling from a torrent of headwinds, including high interest rates, rising tariffs on imported equipment and reduced state incentives in California, the nation's biggest rooftop market. Republicans in the US House have advanced a tax and spending bill that would would end tax credits for companies that lease rooftop systems as well as homeonwers who buy them. If those provisions become law, it would devastate the sector, analysts say. Sunnova became the second major publicly traded rooftop company to file for bankruptcy in the past year, following SunPower in August 2024. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Auto companies ‘in full panic' over rare-earths bottleneck
Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets could cripple production. PHOTO: REUTERS BERLIN/LONDON/DETROIT - Frank Eckard, chief executive of a German magnet maker, has been fielding a flood of calls in recent weeks. Exasperated automakers and parts suppliers have been desperate to find alternative sources of magnets, which are in short supply due to Chinese export curbs. Some told Mr Eckard their factories could be idled by mid-July without backup magnet supplies. 'The whole car industry is in full panic,' said Mr Eckard, CEO of Magnosphere, based in Troisdorf, Germany. 'They are willing to pay any price.' Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets – crucially needed to make cars – could cripple production. US President Donald Trump said on June 5 that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earths minerals and magnets flow to the United States. A US trade team is scheduled to meet Chinese counterparts for talks in London on June 5. The industry worries that the rare-earths situation could cascade into the third massive supply chain shock in five years. A semiconductor shortage wiped away millions of cars from automakers' production plans, from roughly 2021 to 2023. Before that, the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 shut factories for weeks. Those crises prompted the industry to fortify supply chain strategies. Executives have prioritized backup supplies for key components and reexamined the use of just-in-time inventories, which save money but can leave them without stockpiles when a crisis unfurls. Judging from Mr Eckard's inbound calls, though, 'nobody has learned from the past,' he said. This time, as the rare-earths bottleneck tightens, the industry has few good options, given the extent to which China dominates the market. The fate of automakers' assembly lines has been left to a small team of Chinese bureaucrats as it reviews hundreds of applications for export permits. Several European auto-supplier plants have already shut down, with more outages coming, said the region's auto supplier association, CLEPA. 'Sooner or later, this will confront everyone,' said CLEPA secretary-general Benjamin Krieger. Cars today use rare-earths-based motors in dozens of components – side mirrors, stereo speakers, oil pumps, windshield wipers, and sensors for fuel leakage and braking sensors. China controls up to 70 per cent of global rare-earths mining, 85 per cent of refining capacity and about 90 per cent of rare-earths metal alloy and magnet production, consultancy AlixPartners said. The average electric vehicle uses about .5 kg of rare earths elements, and a fossil-fuel car uses just half that, according to the International Energy Agency. China has clamped down before, including in a 2010 dispute with Japan, during which it curbed rare-earths exports. Japan had to find alternative suppliers, and by 2018, China accounted for only 58% of its rare earth imports. 'China has had a rare-earth card to play whenever they wanted to,' said Mark Smith, CEO of mining company NioCorp, which is developing a rare-earth project in Nebraska scheduled to start production within three years. Across the industry, automakers have been trying to wean off China for rare-earth magnets, or even develop magnets that do not need those elements. But most efforts are years away from the scale needed. 'It's really about identifying ... and finding alternative solutions' outside China, Joseph Palmieri, head of supply chain management at supplier Aptiv, said at a conference in Detroit last week. Automakers including General Motors and BMW and major suppliers such as ZF and BorgWarner are working on motors with low-to-zero rare-earth content, but few have managed to scale production enough to cut costs. The EU has launched initiatives including the Critical Raw Materials Act to boost European rare-earth sources. But it has not moved fast enough, said Noah Barkin, a senior advisor at Rhodium Group, a China-focused US think tank. Even players that have developed marketable products struggle to compete with Chinese producers on price. David Bender, co-head of German metal specialist Heraeus' magnet recycling business, said it is only operating at 1 per cent capacity and will have to close next year if sales do not increase. Minneapolis-based Niron has developed rare-earth free magnets and has raised more than US$250 million (S$322 million0 from investors including GM, Stellantis and auto supplier Magna. 'We've seen a step change in interest from investors and customers' since China's export controls took effect, CEO Jonathan Rowntree said. It is planning a US$1 billion plant scheduled to start production in 2029. UK-based Warwick Acoustics has developed rare-earth-free speakers expected to appear in a luxury car later this year. CEO Mike Grant said the company has been in talks with another dozen automakers, although the speakers are not expected to be available in mainstream models for about five years. As auto companies scout longer-term solutions, they are left scrambling to avert imminent factory shutdowns. Automakers must figure out which of their suppliers – and smaller ones a few links up the supply chain – need export permits. Mercedes-Benz, for example, is talking to suppliers about building rare-earth stockpiles. Analysts said the constraints could force automakers to make cars without certain parts and park them until they become available, as GM and others did during the semiconductor crisis. Automakers' reliance on China does not end with rare earth elements. A 2024 European Commission report said China controls more than 50 per cent of global supply of 19 key raw materials, including manganese, graphite and aluminum. Andy Leyland, co-founder of supply chain specialist SC Insights, said any of those elements could be used as leverage by China. 'This just is a warning shot,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
The case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the US and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models. PHOTO: REUTERS LONDON - Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on June 9 , with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI. The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to 'train' its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs. Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion. Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights. A Stability AI spokesperson said that 'the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas', adding: 'Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression.' Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the US and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Wider impact Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists. Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI. 'Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI,' Ms Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said. She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits. Ms Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling 'could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development'. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
