Garda who was shot in leg by his own gun sues State
A garda who was shot in the leg when his sub-machine gun discharged after it allegedly snagged on his bulletproof vest has sued the State in the High Court.
He has brought an action against the Garda Commissioner, the Minister for Justice and the Attorney General.
Advertisement
The garda's ankle was shattered after he claimed he was required to manoeuvre himself within the confined space of a patrol vehicle, leading to the safety selector switch and the trigger of his firearm allegedly snagging on his bulletproof vest and the gun discharging one round.
In evidence, the garda told the court he had never experienced pain like it and nearly passed out.
In the proceedings, it is claimed that there was a failure to provide the garda with a safe place of work, and he had been caused to carry his firearm in close proximity in a confined space while wearing allegedly inappropriate personal protective equipment.
Ms Justice Denise Brett ruled that the garda or any garda witness in the case cannot be identified.
Advertisement
His counsel, Liam Reidy SC, instructed by solicitor Brigid O'Donnell, told the court that liability was admitted in the case but initially there was a full denial of liability and allegations of contributory negligence were made against the garda that he had been the author of his own misfortune.
This was distressing for the garda and he could not believe it, Ms O'Donnell said.
In his evidence, the garda, who was in the force for over 15 years at the time of the incident, said he had been on patrol in July 2019 with colleagues in an area where there had been serious incidents, including shootings.
He said he was the driver of the jeep and he was wearing a bulletproof vest and had a pistol in a holster and a sub-machine gun in a sling around his neck, pointing down.
Advertisement
He said he turned around to check the back seat when his sub machine gun discharged.
'I felt immediate excruciating pain, and I saw smoke from the weapon and blood squirting up to the seat,' he said.
He added: 'The pain really kicked in; it was so bad, I nearly passed out. I never experienced that type of pain,' he said.
He said his colleague made his weapons safe, and he was brought to hospital.
Advertisement
'The ankle was shattered. I remember the doctor saying my leg was a mush before I went into surgery,' he told the judge.
The bullet had gone through the back of his left leg and ankle joint, and his left ankle had shattered. He had to have surgery and later physiotherapy. He was out of work for 18 months after the incident.
Ireland
Annual Garda memorial day made 'more poignant' by...
Read More
The garda told the court he did everything he could to build up his leg afterwards ' but the pain never really left.'
He had further surgery to the ankle in January this year, and he told the court he is still in pain, and he lost a lot of muscle mass in his leg, and he will have to build his leg back up again.
The Garda told the judge he did everything in accordance with procedures in relation to the handling of his firearm. He said he prided himself in relation to safety with firearms. He said he was devastated when the claims of contributory negligence were initially made by the State parties.
The case before Ms Justice Denise Brett continues on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
'I thought I was going to die in Southport attack'
A 14-year-old girl who survived the Southport attack that claimed the lives of three girls and left others injured has recalled the moment she feared she was going to die, as the first anniversary teenager was left with life-threatening injuries when Axel Rudakubana, then aged 17, walked into a Taylor Swift-themed dance and yoga workshop on 29 July and attacked the girls taking part as well as the adults running teenager, who the BBC is calling Sarah to protect her identity, said she had been making bracelets with the other girls when Rudakubana walked into the room. "He stabbed the child in front of me and then he was coming for me," she told BBC Radio Merseyside. Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, Alice da Silva Aguiar, 9, and Bebe King, 6, died in the attack, while eight other children and two adults were said: "He stabbed my arm and, as I turned, he must have stabbed my back but I didn't realise it at that time."She recalled how she managed to flee to the landing before leading a number of girls to safety outside."I thought I was going to die. I didn't think I was going to live through it," she said."I did think it was a joke and then further on into it happening it just kind of felt like a movie set you were on."It's you but you're watching yourself do it – like a nightmare." Sarah said she had been left feeling angry after Rudakubana changed his plea to guilty on the first day of his trial."He's just a coward at the end of the day, targeting kids in the first place," she added the aftermath and the outpouring of support in the wake of what had happened had shown her "the worst and the best of humanity".Sarah said she now wanted to make a difference by setting up a charitable clothing brand – alongside her sister, who also survived the attack - called GABA, which stands for "Go Anywhere Be Anything".She said a percentage from the sales would help charities that focus on mental health, would fund bleed packs and help to tackle knife crime. 'Proud father' "Everyone that is carrying knives or hurting each other is getting younger and younger," she said. "It's annoying that it's people who are my age."It comes after yoga instructor Leanne Lucas, who also survived the attack, recently said she wanted to drive a cultural shift in which people swapped their traditional pointed-tip blades with blunt-ended knives, which presented a much lower risk of causing serious added she would also like pupils to be first-aid trained by the time they left high father said he was proud of both his daughters' determination to bring about change."We get our strengths as father and as parents from our children," he said."What they're doing, what they are coming out with and how they want to help support local community is just inspiring."A list of organisations offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Claims that UK spy agencies aided CIA torture after 9/11 to be heard in rare trial
The UK government's decades-long efforts to keep details of its intelligence agencies' involvement in the CIA's notorious post-9/11 torture programme hidden will face an 'unprecedented' challenge this week as two cases are brought before a secretive court. The cases, filed by two prisoners held at the US military prison at Guantánamo Bay, will be heard across a rare four-day trial at the investigatory powers tribunal (IPT), which has been investigating claims the UK's intelligence agencies were complicit in their mistreatment. Starting on Tuesday, the trial will place a spotlight back on what is considered one of British intelligence's darkest chapters, reviving longstanding questions about the extent of the UK's involvement in the CIA's kidnapping and detention of terrorism suspects in a global network of secret prisons known as black sites. The hearings begin six years after ministers shelved a judicial inquiry into alleged UK complicity, which David Cameron, the prime minister who ordered it, once said was necessary as 'the longer these questions remain unanswered, the bigger the stain on our reputation as a country'. The claims before the IPT have been brought by Mustafa al-Hawsawi, who is accused by the US of aiding the hijackers behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who is alleged to have plotted al-Qaida's bombing of an American naval ship in 2000. Captured by the CIA in the early 2000s, the men were rendered between black sites, where they were systematically tortured and subjected to brutal and degrading treatment. Methods included what the CIA referred to as 'rectal feeding', a form of sexual assault according to medical experts. After several years in CIA detention, Hawsawi and Nashiri – who were among a group of 120 of the CIA's 'high-value detainees' – were transferred to Guantánamo Bay in 2006. They have been there since. Both men face charges carrying the death penalty, though neither of their cases at a special US military court have yet gone to trial. Lawyers for the men have told the IPT there is credible evidence to infer that UK spy agencies, including MI5 and MI6, unlawfully 'aided, abetted, encouraged, facilitated, procured and/or conspired' with the US in their torture and mistreatment. Working in secret, the IPT has been examining the allegations over the past two years. Led by a senior judge, the tribunal is an unusual court that can adopt an inquisitorial process and has unique powers to obtain classified information from the intelligence agencies. So far, the government has successfully prevented any findings from the investigation being disclosed, even to the complainants' lawyers. But the trial is expected to compel the government to confront, in open court, uncomfortable legal questions about what constitutes complicity in torture. 'This level of judicial scrutiny is unprecedented,' said Chris Esdaile, a senior legal adviser at Redress, an NGO that works with torture victims and which represents Hawsawi. 'Until now, efforts to lift the veil of secrecy and consider the full extent of the UK's involvement in the CIA's black site programme have been thwarted.' When Cameron announced the judge-led public inquiry into allegations of UK complicity in the mistreatment of terrorism suspects in 2010, he told parliament: 'Let me state clearly: we need to know the answers.' Nine years later, the government abandoned that commitment. This was despite parliament's intelligence and security committee concluding that British intelligence officers had been involved in 'inexcusable' activities, including hundreds of cases in which prisoners were mistreated, and scores of rendition operations. Publishing its findings in 2018, the committee emphasised its work had been 'terminated prematurely' due in part to obstruction by ministers and spy chiefs. It insisted there were 'questions and incidents' that 'remain unanswered and uninvestigated'. Among its findings, however, were key details that Hawsawi and Nashiri's lawyers used to persuade the IPT to investigate. Crucially, the committee had highlighted instances in which MI6 had supplied questions to be used in CIA interrogations of two other high-value detainees it knew were being mistreated. On the eve of the trial, evidence has now emerged that in 2003, while Hawsawi was held by the US in a black site in Afghanistan where he was repeatedly tortured, CIA headquarters sent a cable to interrogators, telling them Hawsawi should be 'pressed' for information about alleged terrorist activity in the UK. The cable, which Hawsawi's lawyers are understood to have shared with the IPT, was declassified by the US in 2017 but only recently identified by Unredacted, a research unit at the University of Westminster that investigates UK national security practices. Its director, Sam Raphael, who has spent years researching the torture programme, said the cable suggested there had been a 'clear interest in interrogating Hawsawi about specific UK-based operatives and plots at a time when he was being subjected to the worst kind of treatment'. He added: 'It raises an obvious and important question the tribunal should address: was British intelligence, which we know was directly and deeply involved in post-9/11 prisoner abuse, feeding the questions to the CIA?' A spokesperson for the government declined to comment on the claims before the IPT. The government previously said that it 'does not confirm or deny allegations, assertions or speculation about the activities of UK intelligence agencies'.
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
'Ordering a woman to be sexually exploited is as easy as ordering a takeaway': How trafficking victims are being sold online
*Sarah thought she was going to a job interview to become a waitress. Warning: This story includes graphic descriptions of sexual exploitation and abuse, including rape Instead, she was lured to a strange man's flat and held against her will for six months. "One of the very first things he did was ask for me to hand over my passport to check that I had the right to work," she says. "I remember him asking me kind of odd questions, like, 'do you like sex?' "I remember him taking me into another room within this flat and closing the door behind him, then locking the door. And then I was raped." She says her passport was used to create an online profile to advertise her for sex. She had no control over the adverts, no access to the accounts, and was repeatedly abused by her trafficker and the men who booked her through the website. "My abuser would say: 'This man would like to see you, he's booked you, but he's requested sloppy seconds. Okay? I am going to rape you again so that when you go and see this man, you will take that to that man'," she tells Sky News. Sarah says she was forced to take on different names to match her trafficker's rotating online personas. She ultimately escaped after threatening to scream unless her abuser let her go. "He just glared at me, furious," she recalls. "But he opened the door. That was the moment I had. That was the moment I took. I ran out and never saw him again." Sarah's abuser is now in prison. But the website that he used to facilitate her abuse is still operating. A Sky News investigation has uncovered thousands of potential indicators of sexual exploitation on two of the UK's most prominent adult service websites, raising serious concerns about how traffickers may be using these platforms to advertise and abuse victims like Sarah. Analysis of more than 50,000 adverts on AdultWork and Vivastreet - two of the country's largest escorting platforms - revealed a high concentration of red flags linked to organised exploitation, including repeated use of the same contact numbers, and/or duplicated advert text, across adverts for different women in different geographical locations. These patterns, highlighted by the Sex Trafficking Indication Matrix (STIM), a research tool used to identify signs of trafficking, suggest some profiles may be linked to coercive networks. In one case, the same phone number appeared in eight separate adverts for at least five different women, all listed with identical ages, nearly identical descriptions, but different photographs and spread across multiple UK regions. Neither platform is accused of criminal activity, but experts and campaigners say the scale and nature of these indicators are red flags for potential abuse. Prostitution is legal in England and Wales. But the controlling of prostitution for gain, sometimes called pimping, and the more severe crime of trafficking, are not. "These platforms make it as easy to order a woman to be sexually exploited as it is to order a takeaway," said Kat Banyard, director of campaign group UK Feminista. "There are big questions for national policing to answer about why it is that this important investigation has had to be done by Sky News, and why it wasn't national policing that was launching an investigation to uncover the scale of potential criminality on these sites." Over several months, Sky News used STIM indicators to assess escorting adverts across two platforms. On Vivastreet alone, more than 7,000 were linked to phone numbers that appeared multiple times - more than half the total number of listings at the time. On AdultWork, over 1,000 ads were found to contain duplicated descriptions. In one example on AdultWork, the same wording was used in 357 different listings - a sign that content may have been copied and pasted to cover for multiple individuals under a single operator. The websites told us duplication can reflect legitimate activity, such as touring sex workers using aliases. However, opponents say their structure allows abusers to hide in plain sight. Sky News can also reveal that officials at the Home Office met representatives from escorting websites 25 times between 2017 and 2024, under the previous Conservative government. Critics argue these discussions have failed to lead to meaningful safeguards or regulation. A Home Affairs Committee report in 2023 was highly critical of this kind of engagement. And in parliament, pressure is building to take stronger action. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi has tabled an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill that would seek to ban such websites altogether. "This is a thriving, multibillion-pound industry, and we're acting like there's nothing to see here," she says. "It's horrific, and I think more people need to be speaking out about it - this gives parliamentarians the opportunity to discuss and debate it on the floor of the house." In a statement, a Vivastreet spokesperson said: "Experts are clear that indicators that may suggest exploitation can have innocent explanations. "For example, it is a fact that many sex workers use different names and personas, and 'touring' - moving for short periods of time to different areas to take bookings - is a well-known practice. "We take safety extremely seriously and deploy industry-leading security measures to detect, report, and remove potentially exploitative content, including new requirements that all adult category advertisers must undergo age and ID verification." AdultWork said: "Sexual exploitation is not tolerated in any form. "We have strict internal policies in place to reinforce this and we are continually updating our internal systems for detecting accounts and requesting additional documents for evidence of legitimacy. "We make it a priority to fully cooperate and comply with all law enforcement requests. Additionally, any indications or reports of trafficking are fully reviewed and if we find them to be suspicious, we proactively contact law enforcement." Whether escorting platforms can be better regulated - or whether they should be outlawed entirely - remains a point of national debate. But with mounting evidence of potential exploitation and growing political scrutiny, campaigners say inaction is no longer an option. "These platforms are so poorly moderated and poorly regulated," Sarah says. "No one can sit behind a screen and know if someone's being coerced or is at the mercy of a predator."
