logo
Inside The Rise Of Search Funds: Private Equity's Hidden Gem

Inside The Rise Of Search Funds: Private Equity's Hidden Gem

Forbes30-06-2025
Krishan Arora is the Managing Partner at Novastone Capital, a PE group with over $440M in capital deployed across 23 global acquisitions.
In the landscape of private equity and entrepreneurship, search funds have emerged as an innovative asset class. Originally conceptualized at the Harvard Business School in 1984 and further developed at the Graduate School of Business at Stanford, the search fund model has matured into a proven pathway for entrepreneurs, investors and mid-career professionals alike. The latest data from the Stanford 2024 Search Fund Study underscores the resilience and appeal of this model, even amidst larger global macroeconomic forces at play.
For those entrepreneurs interested in pursuing this model, it's vital to understand the nuances and challenges.
Understanding The Search Fund Model
A search fund is an investment vehicle where mid-career professionals or entrepreneurs raise capital from a search fund program or private investors to search for, acquire, operate and then scale a privately held company. This business model offers an opportunity for these professionals or entrepreneurs to step directly into the role of the CEO of an existing small-to-medium-sized enterprise (SME). These SMEs are on average typically generating between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 in EBITDA, so they sit on the lower end of the lower-middle market private equity world. These SMEs usually have around 30-50 employees, and have been in existence for over 10-plus years.
What makes the search fund model unique is the hands-on nature of the investment. Unlike traditional private equity or turnaround initiatives, where operators are hired post-acquisition or post-distress, here it's the entrepreneur (searcher) who finds the deal and steps in to run the business. This creates a deep alignment of incentives between the operator and investor, and it also attracts a different kind of talent—the one that is hungry to build, not just manage.
These searchers and mid-career operators are not buying high-growth startups; they are acquiring steady cash-flowing businesses that have been around for decades, and are then breathing new life into them. It is this unique mix of entrepreneurial grit and investor support that helps explain why this model has gained popularity.
The Business Impact
Based on the findings of the 2024 Stanford Search Fund Study (download required), which reviewed 681 search funds across the U.S. and Canada, these investment vehicles have the potential to deliver strong financial performance for investors. The report cites an average internal rate of return (IRR) of 35.1% in 2023 and 35.3% in 2022. The return on investment (ROI) for investors averaged 4.5 times.
But these figures tell only part of the story. Behind each data point are real entrepreneurs and operators stepping into real leadership roles and transforming real SMEs.
The consistency of returns across the many global market cycles suggests that this search fund model is more than a trend. It's starting to look like a unique path for investors and operators who are willing to take a long-term view and roll up their sleeves. The average hold period post acquisition is generally around 5-7 years, so it's generally in line with the holding period of many other appealing asset classes to investors.
Growth And Evolution
Over the past few years, the search fund landscape has undergone a massive transformation, sending a clear signal that a once-niche model is now gaining greater widespread traction and awareness. What's even more compelling is that the shifting profile of who is driving this momentum. The latest waves of searchers include more women than ever before, as Stanford found that 17% of all new fund managers in 2023 were women.
At the same time, we are seeing a diversification in how these funds are structured as well. New variations like self-funded efforts, operator-led program-backed searches and long-term hold fund models are emerging, each offering tailored approaches to various groups of investors. Taken together, these trends point to a maturing high-IRR asset class that is becoming more inclusive, flexible and relevant in the volatile world of entrepreneurship.
Challenges
Of course, the road to success in this space is far from guaranteed. While the search fund asset class and model offer investor metrics and upside, not every searcher's journey ends with a closed deal. Roughly 60% of searchers acquire a business, meaning that the other roughly 40% try hard to land a deal but are not able to finalize their acquisition. And even when the acquisition happens, the real work is just beginning.
Leading an SME through a transition and then a value creation plan is no small task; it's riddled with late nights and an uphill battle. For investors, this variability reinforces the need for a portfolio approach. Spreading capital across multiple searchers is a recognition that outcomes can vary based on industry, timing, the searcher and just good, plain old lady luck.
Still, for many entrepreneurs and investors, the risk is part of the appeal. Search funds represent a rare blend of entrepreneurship and hustle, allowing operators to earn their way into equity and ownership while giving investors early access to often overlooked businesses with real IRR potential. As the search fund model continues to grow across geographies and adapts to new macroeconomic climates, it's attracting investors and entrepreneurs.
Opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not reflect the views of their employer.
The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

John Paulson's Strategic Moves: A Closer Look at Perpetua Resources Corp
John Paulson's Strategic Moves: A Closer Look at Perpetua Resources Corp

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

John Paulson's Strategic Moves: A Closer Look at Perpetua Resources Corp

Insights from the Second Quarter 2025 13F Filing John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted the 13F filing for the second quarter of 2025, providing insights into his investment moves during this period. John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) is the President and Portfolio Manager of Paulson & Co. Inc. Paulson was ranked by Absolute Return Magazine as the 3rd largest hedge fund in the world managing approximately $29 billion in merger, event, and distressed strategies. Mr. Paulson received his Masters of Business Administration with high distinction, as a Baker Scholar, from Harvard Business School in 1980. He graduated summa cum laude in Finance from New York University's College of Business and Public Administration in 1978. Prior to forming Paulson in 1994, John was a general partner of Gruss Partners and a managing director in mergers and acquisitions at Bear Stearns. John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio), a former mergers and acquisitions banker, established his firm as a merger arbitrage hedge fund manager, seeking to make money from situations when one public company announces plans to take over another. Merger arbitrage hedge funds primarily study equity markets, but they also research the market for credit default swaps, a form of insurance that starts paying out as soon as a credit security falls in value. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with MDGL. Summary of New Buy John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of 2 stocks, among them: The most significant addition was Juniper Networks Inc (JNPR), with 250,000 shares, accounting for 0.5% of the portfolio and a total value of $9.98 million. The second largest addition to the portfolio was Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG), consisting of 9,000 shares, representing approximately 0.08% of the portfolio, with a total value of $1.60 million. Key Position Increases John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of 2 stocks, among them: The most notable increase was Perpetua Resources Corp (NASDAQ:PPTA), with an additional 7,575,757 shares, bringing the total to 32,347,299 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 30.58% increase in share count, a 4.57% impact on the current portfolio, with a total value of $392.70 million. The second largest increase was Bausch Health Companies Inc (NYSE:BHC), with an additional 6,352,667 shares, bringing the total to 32,791,702. This adjustment represents a significant 24.03% increase in share count, with a total value of $218.39 million. Summary of Sold Out John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 1 holding in the second quarter of 2025, as detailed below: Intra-Cellular Therapies Inc (ITCI): John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) sold all 21,500 shares, resulting in a -0.16% impact on the portfolio. Key Position Reduces John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced his position in 1 stock. The most significant changes include: Reduced Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:MDGL) by 10,000 shares, resulting in a -0.48% decrease in shares and a -0.19% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $298.48 during the quarter and has returned 26.58% over the past 3 months and 19.71% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview At the second quarter of 2025, John Paulson (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 15 stocks, with top holdings including 31.44% in Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:MDGL), 19.53% in Perpetua Resources Corp (NASDAQ:PPTA), 15.68% in Acadian Asset Management Inc (NYSE:AAMI), 10.86% in Bausch Health Companies Inc (NYSE:BHC), and 5.54% in Novagold Resources Inc (NG). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 6 of the 11 industries: Healthcare, Basic Materials, Financial Services, Communication Services, Industrials, and Technology. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Harvard researcher unearths data airlines don't want you to notice: Three-hour flight delays are 4x more common now than 30 years ago
Harvard researcher unearths data airlines don't want you to notice: Three-hour flight delays are 4x more common now than 30 years ago

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Harvard researcher unearths data airlines don't want you to notice: Three-hour flight delays are 4x more common now than 30 years ago

On one sweltering summer afternoon in June, thunderstorms rolled over Boston Logan International Airport. It was the kind of brief, predictable summer squall that East Coasters have learned to ignore, but within hours, the airport completely shut down. Every departure was grounded, and flyers waited hours before they could get on their scheduled flights. Among those stranded were Maxwell Tabarrok's parents, in town to help move him into Harvard Business School, where he is completing an economics PhD. Tabarrok told Fortune he was fascinated by how an entire airport could grind to a halt, not because of some catastrophic event, but due to a predictable hiccup rippling through an overstretched system. So, he did what any good statistician would: dive into the data. After analyzing over 30 years—and 100 gigabytes—of Bureau of Transportation Statistics data, he found out his parents' situation wasn't bad luck: Long delays of three hours or more are now four times more common than they were 30 years ago. Not only that, but Tabarrok found airlines are trying to hide the delays by 'padding' the flight times—adding, on average, 20 extra minutes to schedules so a flight that hasn't gotten any faster still counts as 'on time.' Thus, on paper, the on-time performance metrics have improved since 1987, even as actual travel times have gotten longer. 'For 15 years, from 1987 to 2000, the actual and scheduled times stayed very close together,' Tabarrok said. 'Then, starting right around 2000, they started diverging—a pretty clear sign airlines made a decision to start padding their schedules to avoid shorter delays.' The padding carries a hidden economic cost. Using average U.S. wage data, the extra minutes built into flights add up to roughly $6 billion in lost passenger time annually, the researcher calculated. There are far more users in the National Airspace system today than there were decades ago, industry sources say. U.S. Department of Transportation data shows weather is the most common cause of non-airline delays. An ongoing shortage of air traffic controllers, combined with recent FAA equipment outages, has also disrupted operations worldwide. A structurally unsound system For Tabarrok, the root of the problem isn't just bad weather, outdated infrastructure, or even airline strategy: It's incentives. He argues the FAA has little reason to respond quickly to rising delays because the agency doesn't bear the cost of stranded passengers, nor are they rewarded when airports run smoothly. 'I think the costs of delays can double, triple, quadruple over the next 10 years. But is anyone's career negatively affected at the FAA? Probably not,' Tabarrok said. He pointed to the shortage of air traffic controllers as an example. Hiring and training more staff would ease congestion and reduce cascading delays—a very simple solution that many people have called for. However, doing so requires sustained effort and leadership that is actually willing to push through bureaucratic inertia. 'You need somebody at the FAA who really cares about improving service. That's not so easy to do because there's really no incentive for somebody at the FAA to care a lot about this… they don't get paid more,' Tabarrok said. 'They don't really get rewarded at all.' A FAA spokesperson told Fortune the organization prioritizes safety, which sometimes necessitates delays. They pointed to a chart showing the top five causes of delays—with weather being 'by far' the largest cause. They declined to answer questions about airlines padding schedules and incentives to improve airport quality. Expanding airport capacity, for Tabarrok, is the most obvious long-term solution to reduce the cascading delays. But the U.S. hasn't opened a major commercial airport since Denver International in 1995, and runway construction at existing hubs has been minimal, he said. Passenger traffic, meanwhile, has grown by about 50% since 2000, meaning more travelers are concentrated in the same physical space. While we have built larger aircrafts to help carriers move more people, that's also created new bottlenecks, he added. Bigger planes take longer to fly at every turn. They take longer to board, unload, and turn around at the gate, so the disruption continues to ripple into the schedule. 'The infrastructure at airports is fixed, especially season to season,' Tabarrok said. 'So when you have more demand with fixed infrastructure, there's going to be more delays.' 'Pessimistic story' Further, Tabarrok argued big-ticket fixes like building a new airport or runways face environmental reviews and legal challenges that can drag on for a decade. That leaves staffing as the most realistic solution, but even that will require changing how the FAA recruits, licenses, and trains controllers. 'It's kind of a pessimistic story,' Tabarrok said. 'We have these two constraints that aren't that responsive to the market pressures of people's demand for more reliable travel, and they've been around for a long time.' Without those changes, Tabarrok predicts the U.S. will be locked into a cycle where every summer thunderstorm or mechanical hiccup crashes airports and wastes millions of hours of Americans' lives. 'If you just do some rough estimation of the value of people's time, multiplied by how much time they're spending waiting around in airports or waiting around for delays, you can easily get billions of dollars lost every year.' Tabarrok said. 'And that cost will keep growing.' This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword

Corporate boards are dropping the ball on their No. 1 job
Corporate boards are dropping the ball on their No. 1 job

Fast Company

time7 days ago

  • Fast Company

Corporate boards are dropping the ball on their No. 1 job

Hello and welcome to Modern CEO! I'm Stephanie Mehta, CEO and chief content officer of Mansueto Ventures. Each week this newsletter explores inclusive approaches to leadership drawn from conversations with executives and entrepreneurs, and from the pages of Inc. and Fast Company. If you received this newsletter from a friend, you can sign up to get it yourself every Monday morning. 'CEO succession is the board's No. 1 job,' says leadership expert and Harvard Business School executive education fellow Bill George. 'In my experience, across hundreds of companies, businesses rise or fall with decisions on CEO succession.' Yet according to a new report by executive search firm Heidrick & Struggles, only 26% of directors and CEOs say that chief executive transition is among their top priorities. Another 40% don't consider it a priority at all. Tom Monahan, CEO of Heidrick & Struggles, says succession can get 'crowded out' if boards get pulled into crises or are distracted by other issues. 'As a leader, you have days where you say, 'the most important thing today is do this,' and you look up and [realize] 'I spent two hours on [my] coffee selection,'' he says. 'It turns out boards seem to have some of that as well.' And when they do turn to succession, too often directors are trying to figure out who could step into the role immediately in the event of an emergency, such as the unexpected death of a CEO. Instead, Monahan says boards should remember that CEO succession is a strategy exercise. 'We do see more boards and leadership teams treating succession as a process, not a project,' he says. 'If you look at companies where it's a project—CEO says I'm retiring, board says it's time to move, we kick into place a project—that compresses a lot of important strategic activity into probably too narrow a timetable.' The Berkshire Hathaway model Heidrick & Struggles's 'Route to the Top' report praises the CEO succession process at Berkshire Hathaway. CEO Warren Buffett earlier this year announced his plans to retire at the end of 2025. But Buffett, 94, had been talking about his replacement for more than a decade, and in 2021, the company anointed Greg Abel, who currently serves as chair of Berkshire Hathaway Energy and vice chairman of the conglomerate's non-insurance businesses. 'In a time when CEO transitions often spark volatility or uncertainty, Berkshire's process delivered confidence, continuity, and clarity to the market,' the report concludes. CEO succession has become something of a parlor game in investor and media circles, especially at high-profile companies such as Apple and Disney. (Please check out my colleague David Lidsky's surprising take on who should succeed Bob Iger at Disney.) The founder-CEO challenge Replacing founder-CEOs can be especially challenging because the entrepreneur is so personally tied to the company and can have a hard time letting go. A founder is also one of a company's largest shareholders and may feel compelled to step in when the company struggles. Michael Dell, for example, returned to the top job at his eponymous tech company in 2007 after the computer maker started to lose market share, among other issues. 'If you have a founder who has been able to conceptualize an idea and scale a company, that's a rare set of talents, and you're not going to be able to replicate that,' Monahan says. Monahan encourages boards to make clear which committee will be responsible for succession planning and then to make sure the topic is on the agenda. He says boards should have a process for meeting with executives in the C-suite, as those leaders are candidates to take over for the sitting CEO. And directors need to constantly assess the link between leadership and strategy to make sure they're looking at candidates who can support the business in the future. And what is the role of the sitting CEO? CEOs should play an active role in training their successors, but 'don't groom people in your own image,' cautions George, who has served on the boards of Goldman Sachs, ExxonMobil, Target, Novartis, Mayo Clinic, and Medtronic, where he was CEO for 10 years. 'Figure out what [the company] is going to need for the next 10 years, and find people with the mental agility and courage to look at it differently than you looked at it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store