HC asks Delhi government to give 2 months' notice to mohalla clinic staff before termination
The high court's order came while dealing with a petition by AAMC staff, who were hired on a contractual basis by the previous Aam Aadmi Party government, seeking directions against their termination and replacement with other contractual employees.
Justice Prateek Jalan disposed of the petition with the direction, "In the event the respondents [Delhi government] propose to terminate the petitioners' engagement before March 31, 2026, on the ground that new manpower has been engaged..., they are directed to give two weeks' notice to the concerned... [staff]," the court said in its August 6 order.
The court passed a similar order on Tuesday on a plea by doctors, who were engaged on a contractual basis to work in AAMCs and their engagement was extended from time to time, seeking to restrain the authorities from illegally terminating them.
In the present case, the petitioners are working as pharmacists, mohalla clinic assistants and multitask workers on a contractual basis in AAMC under the Delhi government. They sought directions against their termination and replacement with other contractual employees.
Advocate Amar Nath Saini, representing the staff members, submitted that there was a distinction from the case of the doctors, as some of the petitioners have been telephonically instructed not to report to duty.
The counsel for the Delhi government submitted that no decision has been taken by the authorities to dispense with the services of any of the employees of AAMC.
The issue comes in the wake of the recent decision to phase out mohalla clinics in areas where Ayushman Arogya Mandirs, which also offer primary healthcare, are being operationalised under the new BJP government.
As of August 2023, 533 mohalla clinics were operational in Delhi.
However, at least seven have already been converted into Arogya Mandirs under the Centre's Ayushman Bharat scheme.
Following a protest on May 17 by AAMC staff, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta had assured that existing paramedical and support staff would be adjusted within Arogya Mandirs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Telangana high court denies official's appeal for call data records & diary entries in corruption case
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court recently dismissed an appeal filed by a govt employee facing corruption charges. He sought call data records of the complainant in the case and also copies of the entries from the general diary of the office of superintendent of police, ACB Ranga Reddy Range. The accused official, who was was booked on corruption charges in 2019, requested the records under the RTI Act. A division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice P Sam Koshy observed that the information sought by the accused official could impede prosecution or threaten witnesses and, therefore, cannot be provided under the RTI Act. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The case is currently pending before the ACB Court, Hyderabad. The official claimed he sought the records to defend himself before the concerned trial court. Claiming that the CDRs and the GD entry records were needed to prove his innocence, the accused official argued that the investigation in the case was completed. Moreover, since a charge sheet was filed, there was no scope for further investigation. Initially, he requested information from the public information office of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). When the PIO denied the information, and subsequent appeals were unsuccessful, he approached the HC, which also turned down his petition. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Challenging the single judge's order, he filed an appeal. The HC, after examining his argument and that of the govt counsel, upheld the PIO's response of denying the information and the subsequent responses to the first and second appeals. When he challenged the same before the division bench, the bench ruled that the accused could not seek the requested information under the RTI Act, as it was exempt under Section 8(1)(h). "Such investigation material, meant to be used against the accused, can only be obtained under Section 207 of the CrPC through the trial court at the appropriate stage," ruled the bench. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Fast-track courts in Delhi fail to fulfil promise of providing speedy justice
The Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs), meant to speed up trials in rape and child sexual abuse cases, are underperforming in Delhi, according to data recently presented in the Lok Sabha by Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. The national capital figures in a list of States and Union Territories with delayed trials in FTSCs. In a bid to curb crimes against women and children, the Central government had enacted the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018, introducing stricter provisions. By March that year, 1,66,882 rape and POCSO cases were pending in courts across the country. Concerned by the backlog, in July 2019, the Supreme Court directed that any district with more than 100 pending POCSO cases must have an exclusive special court to handle them. Acting on this direction, the Central government, in August 2019, launched FTSCs exclusively for cases related to rape and child sexual abuse. Under the scheme, each FTSC is tasked with disposing of at least 165 cases annually. As of June 30 this year, 725 FTSCs, including 392 exclusive POCSO courts, are functional in 30 States and Union Territories. Delhi currently has 16 FTSCs, including 11 exclusively for POCSO matters. Since its inception, 6,278 cases have been institutedin these courts, but only 2,718 have been disposedof as of June 30. Toll on survivors Unnecessary delay in the legal process involving rape cases only serves to prolong the victim's suffering, according to jurists. 'The trauma experienced by survivors of sexual assault is profound and enduring, and each moment spent waiting for justice exacerbates their pain,' Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court had observed in a March 2024 ruling related to a rape case. 'This delay in the administration of justice not only interferes with their healing process but also prolongs their journey towards closure and recovery from such a traumatic experience,' Justice Sharma noted. 'Needless delays' Advocate Shilpi Jain, who secured a conviction in just 11 days in a high-profile German tourist rape case in Alwar, Rajasthan, in 2006, says the delays are 'avoidable'. 'Fast-track special courts are not fast at all. These cases rarely have many witnesses. They could conclude in two months if there's seriousness,' Ms. Jain stated. 'As far as rape cases are concerned, there is rarely any eyewitness. Cross-examination is never lengthy. So it should conclude in two months,' she said. 'The spirit behind setting up FTSCs was that these courts must finish the cases much before regular courts. But, they end up becoming the same,' she commented, attributing delays to a lack of seriousness, which has to come from the State. 'Political gimmick' Meanwhile, senior advocate Rebecca John questioned the very premise of FTSCs, calling them a 'political gimmick'. 'I have been a long-term opponent of FTSCs. How many cases can you fast-track? The docket is overflowing with cases. When you fast-track one case, it is at the cost of another case,' the senior advocate told The Hindu. 'It is nothing but a political gimmick which is employed from time to time to satisfy public outrage, but nothing comes out of it. There is no substitute for more infrastructure. You can't pull out the same judges from the same pool and give them a few cases, and say fast track it,' Ms. John underscored.
Deccan Herald
4 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Drop harsh provisions against teen sexuality
At the heart of the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012 is the question of the age of consent for sexual relationships. A strong case has been made to reduce the age of consent from the present 18 to 16 in view of the current realities of adolescent behaviour, social change, and the consequences of the existing law. The law criminalises a sexual relationship between those under 18 in any circumstance. The Act aims to protect children from sexual abuse and prevent crimes like child trafficking. But the law is also used for parental and social control of children and to inhibit their natural growth and punish them for it. .During the hearing, the Central government opposed the lowering of the age and granting of any exception for consensual sexual relationships between adolescents as it would dilute 'the statutory presumption of vulnerability' underlying the POCSO Act. It said that an exception would increase the risks of trafficking and other forms of child abuse. The government has taken a hard patriarchal position in line with its socially conservative thinking on man-woman and family relationships. Senior lawyer Indira Jaisingh, the amicus curiae appointed by the court, has told the court that consensual sexual relationships between adolescents should not be criminalised. She has urged the court to read a close-in-age exception into the law. The Law Commission, in a recent report, said some changes were required in the law, though it did not recommend the lowering of the age of consent. .No law should be rigid, and laws should move with the times. Adolescents now attain puberty earlier than in the past and form romantic and sexual relationships of their choice. It is wrong to curb their freedom and natural development. But such relationships lead to criminal prosecution with boys being sent to jail and girls to shelter homes. Going by the law, a kiss between a boy and a girl can lead to a 10-year jail term for the boy. Parents of girls usually lodge complaints when the boy and the girl elope. The law needs softening--consenting physical relationships should be decriminalised. In 2022, the Dharwad bench of the Karnataka High Court sought a review of the criteria in view of 'ground realities''. The Justice J S Verma commission report, which led to changes in the POCSO Act, favoured the lowering of the age of consent. The legal age of consent is 16 or lower in many countries. The law needs to be more human and realistic.
