logo
These Car Brands Make The Least Reliable Cars, According To Consumer Reports

These Car Brands Make The Least Reliable Cars, According To Consumer Reports

Yahoo26-05-2025

You probably have a lot of questions when you're looking at which new car to buy. Is it fast? Can you take it off-road? Electric, hybrid, or gas? Will all of your children fit inside of it? Then of course, there are the simple pocketbook questions of price, insurance, and maintenance costs.
At the end of the day, though, one of your top considerations should be reliability. Because the point of a car isn't just to get you where you're going -- it's to get you back home again, too. Over the decades, certain badges have developed reputations for dependability, whether through precision engineering or raw brute toughness. But car companies change ownership and priorities all the time in their hunt for the bottom of the bottom line, and what once was true may no longer be. Which carmakers make reliable vehicles these days?
Fortunately, the good people at Consumer Reports have combed through their massive list of member surveys, averaging out problem rates with a focus on more recent models. According to them, these are the least reliable car brands on sale today.
Read more: The Least Reliable Cars, Trucks And SUVs You Can Buy In 2025, According To Consumer Reports
"German engineering" used to be a byword for dependable engineering, especially for vehicles, especially for cars. While the likes of Mercedes-Benz and Porsche are often out of reach for the wallet of the everyman, Volkswagen, the "People's Car," was the carmaker whose mission was to bring that engineering excellence to the masses. Over the decades, trusty models like the Golf and the Jetta have been great all-around options for buyers, and they can be found on any road in the world to this day.
Unfortunately, they might be broken down on the side of that road. The People's Car manages only a very plebeian 18th place out of 22 CR's predicted reliability ranking, a bottom-five finish. By contrast, Audi, a sibling within the Volkswagen Group, sits in the upper third with a 7th-place rating. The people do deserve an affordable car, but they should not have to sacrifice dependability for it.
If you're going to beat the Nazis, you need a 4x4 that can get you anywhere. Whether through freezing snow or muddy tracks, in the woods or across rivers, that car just has to work. The humble Jeep might not be the reason the good guys won World War II, but they sure wouldn't have won it without the Jeep.
Good thing the Allies weren't using modern Jeeps, then. The original design's descendants only average out to 19th place out of 22 on CR's predicted reliability ranking, which rather cuts against its branding as go-anywhere vehicles. And it only gets worse with age, as Consumer Reports ranks Jeep at a lowly 25th place out of 26 on its reliability ranking for used cars, or second-to-last place. While still an iconic American brand with that distinctive seven-slot grill, the marque's sales have been in decline since 2018 as prices have surged. Still, if ever there was a car brand that could be the plucky underdog making a comeback against impossible odds, it's Jeep.
GMC builds its reputation on being rugged and tough. Its trucks are supposed to be muscular workhorses that could haul a space rocket up a mountain and not complain about it. Even the cheapest SUV in its current lineup is called the Terrain, in case you had any doubts about what it's meant to tackle. GMC even brought the Hummer back as an EV, both in SUV and truck trim, to make toughness environmentally friendly.
Surely such swole vehicles must be bulletproof, right? Well, according to Consumer Reports, it just isn't so. GMC vehicles average out to a rather dim 20th place out of 22 on predicted reliability, making the brand seem like something of a paper tiger. The GMC Canyon was cited for especially poor reliability, meaning you might not want to drive one into an actual canyon any time soon, at least if you'd like to drive it back out again.
More than any other brand, Cadillac has defined American automotive luxury through the decades. Once famous for crafting beautiful land yachts, these days the marque makes sporty luxury cars like the CT4-V and CT5-V Blacking, as well as gigantic road hogs like the Escalade. While it may have lost its ultra-luxury status to the likes of Rolls-Royce and Bentley, it's trying to reclaim their right to that crown with the all-electric $350,000 Celestiq (pictured), which might as well be a land superyacht.
Sadly, if Cadillacs were boats, they might be likely to sink. Consumer Reports rates the brand's predicted reliability at a woeful 21st place out of 22, putting it second-to-last overall. In particular, the EV Lyriq was cited as being a problem child among all modern cars. This does appear to be a more recent problem, as CR ranks Cadillac a commendable 10th place out of 26 on its ranking of used-car reliability. Here's hoping the make can get its modern cars back up to that standard.
All-electric carmaker Rivian first began delivering vehicles in the form of vans exclusively for Amazon in 2019, before offering the R1S SUV and the R1T pickup truck for consumers in 2022. The latter have been widely well received; we praised the R1S in our original review as a fantastic blend of fast, rugged off-road, and luxurious. In addition, Consumer Reports cites it as the No. 1 brand for owner satisfaction, and the only brand to gain a perfect satisfaction score.
Sounds pretty good! Sadly, the brand also has a pretty big catch: Rivian ranks dead last on CR's predicted reliability scores, 22nd place out of 22. Of course, this might not be a huge shock, given that its Amazon vans keep catching on fire. As a newer manufacturer, hopefully these are just teething pains that will get worked out. Otherwise, while Rivians might be nice to take off-road, they might not make it back onto the roads again.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercedes CEO Has a Trump Tariff Deal That Could Reshape US-EU Auto Trade
Mercedes CEO Has a Trump Tariff Deal That Could Reshape US-EU Auto Trade

Miami Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Mercedes CEO Has a Trump Tariff Deal That Could Reshape US-EU Auto Trade

Hours before an event in Michigan on April 29, President Trump signed two executive orders aimed at reducing the impact of trade tariffs on the automotive industry. One order prevents automakers, who face 25% tariffs on auto imports, from being subject to additional levies on materials. The other order allows automakers to apply for tariff relief, which will reduce a portion of the costs associated with their imported components. However, these benefits will be gradually phased out over the next two years. During a rally that night in Michigan, Trump described this move as providing "a little flexibility" to the automotive industry, hoping to persuade automakers to produce their cars and components in the United States. He said, "We gave them a little time before we slaughter them if they don't do this. They're going to make so much money. They're going to have so many jobs." Despite the developments, German luxury car manufacturer Mercedes-Benz withdrew its earnings guidance for 2025 during the announcement of its Q1 results. This decision was driven by uncertainty regarding the potential impact of President Trump's tariffs on imported vehicles. The company also stated that if auto tariffs remained at their current levels, it would decrease profit margins by 300 basis points on cars and 100 basis points on vans. In a new interview with German business publication Der Spiegel, Mercedes-Benz CEO Ola Källenius said that while he is looking at different scenarios, the kind of investments he has to make are ones that could last for decades, rather than ones made "in response to a volatile situation" such as the current US-EU tariff situation that is currently unfolding. Recognizing that the current administration has the impression "that we in Europe are closed to certain issues and only demand openness where we have strengths," the CEO proposed a deal meant to balance its imports and exports. In his proposal, Källenius would allow duty-free imports of U.S.-built cars into Europe in exchange for tariff waivers on an equal number of vehicles exported by EU automakers to the U.S., adding that it would alleviate and fulfill its desire to reindustrialize and become an attractive destination for companies to set up factories for exported goods. "For every car that leaves the USA or Europe, a car from the other side comes in duty-free," Källenius told Spiegel. "We have put this idea to both sides, and it is a possible component of the negotiations between the USA and the EU." Such a solution would work for a company like Mercedes-Benz. In the same interview, Källenius noted that Mercedes "is a major producer" of cars in the United States, adding that the company builds and sells around 350,000 vehicles in the country, which could count for consideration in trade talks. "But the models we build and sell [in the U.S.] are not the same," Källenius told Spiegel. "Two-thirds of the vehicles from our plant in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, are exported to 150 countries worldwide. We therefore contribute to a more balanced trade balance for the USA. We believe this should be taken into account in the negotiations." Källenius's idea of rewarding U.S. exports is roughly on the same wavelength as similar ideas proposed by other automotive CEOs. Previously, Ford CEO Jim Farley raised the idea that automakers like Ford should get credit for building cars in the United States that are shipped overseas for international consumption, noting that it is "essential" that the federal government come up with policies that encourage manufacturers to build cars for export, adding that it exports nearly as many vehicles as its brings in. "So many of the vehicles we build here are exported around the globe," Farley said. "Shouldn't we get credit for that?" Around the same time Farley made those comments, the export of some high-ticket models to China, including the F-150 Raptor, Mustang, Bronco, and Lincoln Navigator, was halted due to retaliatory tariffs as high as 150% on imported vehicles. For what it's worth, German automakers like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz have a lot of leverage for a potential U.S. tariff deal, especially if they propose that German automakers receive credits based on the number of vehicles they produce in the United States. These aren't small potatoes, either. BMW alone manufactures some of its highest-volume models, such as the BMW X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, and XM, at its Spartanburg, South Carolina, plant, which serves both U.S. and international markets. According to data from the U.S. Department of Commerce, BMW is the largest automotive exporter by value in the U.S., shipping "more than $10 billion" of cars in 2024. American hands assemble these cars, no matter the badge or its supposed country of origin. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump ridicule each other
Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump ridicule each other

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump ridicule each other

One day after seeing their largest-ever one-day drop, Tesla shares recovered some losses Friday as the spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump that exploded into public view Thursday took appeared to take a breather heading into the weekend. Shares in the electronic vehicle maker gained as much as 5% amid broader market gains following a report showing the U.S. added more jobs in May than forecast. Even with Friday's rally, Tesla shares are still down approximately 21% in 2025 — a decline that accelerated last week following Musk's departure from the Trump administration. Musk, the world's richest person and until recently Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, said last week he was leaving as the head of his Department of Government Efficiency project to refocus on his businesses. Those companies — Tesla, the satellite and space-launch company SpaceX, the social media platform X and the brain tech startup Neuralink — have faced growing criticism as Musk oversaw deep cuts to the federal workforce. Tesla sales around the world have fallen sharply this year. Trump and Musk traded escalating insults Thursday afternoon, with the president threatening on his Truth Social platform to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." Yet there was no sign of any follow through on the threat Friday. At the same time, a senior White House official told NBC News that Trump is 'not interested' in a call with Musk. Tesla stock closed more than 14% lower Thursday. The automaker is Musk's only publicly traded company — and one that the president tried to boost as recently as March, drawing sharp criticism on ethical grounds for turning the White House driveway into a car showroom just as the company's stock was plunging. The Trump-Musk rift has dented Tesla's stock anew after Musk slammed the GOP spending bill as "a disgusting abomination' in a post on X last week. "Bankrupting America is NOT ok!" he wrote in another post, part of an ongoing barrage of public ridicule. Musk began speaking out after an electric-vehicle tax credit that would help incentivize Tesla purchases was not included in the bill, which is estimated to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over 10 years. Musk has lobbied congressional Republicans for that tax credit, NBC News reported Wednesday. "I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk told "CBS Sunday Morning" over the weekend. As Trump spoke about the former DOGE chief in the Oval Office on Thursday alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Musk began firing off dozens of posts on X. "Whatever," he wrote. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" Trump pushed back further on Musk's criticism. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it,' he said during the meeting with Merz. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair.' As Trump continued speaking, Musk posted another comment: "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Tech analyst Dan Ives said the EV tax credit isn't the main factor behind Tesla's stock slide. 'The reason Tesla stock's off the way it is — and I think overdone — is because of the view that this means that Trump is not going to play nice when it comes to regulatory' issues, he told CNBC on Thursday. The feud between the two men is 'not what you want to see as a Tesla shareholder,' Ives added. "Where is this guy today??" Musk added Thursday in yet another post, resharing a compilation of Trump's past tweets including one in which Trump called the federal debt "a national security risk of the highest order." "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk added on social media. "Such ingratitude." Musk is the richest person on the planet, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires index. His net worth of $368 billion is $125 billion more than that of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is ranked second. Musk spent $250 million supporting Trump's most recent campaign. The president quipped from the White House that he thinks Musk "misses the place." "I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," Trump said. "He's got nice offices too, but there's something about this one." The president's own publicly traded company, Trump Media & Technology Group, has also suffered in the market. Shares of the Truth Social parent company fell more than 8% Thursday and are down over 41% so far this year. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

How the Trump-Musk divorce could crush California's green-car dreams
How the Trump-Musk divorce could crush California's green-car dreams

San Francisco Chronicle​

time9 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

How the Trump-Musk divorce could crush California's green-car dreams

After 24 hours of spiteful, online mudslinging with Elon Musk, President Donald Trump fired a new salvo Friday morning: According to reports from the New York Times, Trump vowed to sell the sleek red Tesla he'd bought in March and flaunted on the White House South Lawn, in one of his few concessions to green energy. Musk's electric vehicle company had evidently driven a wedge between the two billionaires, revealed when Trump introduced a 'big, beautiful bill' that would remove the $7,500 tax credit for buyers of Teslas and other zero-emission cars. Although Musk had counterintuitively supported ending the tax credit in December, he appeared to course-correct this week, lambasting Trump's tax bill on social media. 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump said Thursday, during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that got subsumed by the Trump-Musk feud. 'And you know, they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles,' Trump continued. 'And they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy.' The ugly divorce battle that ensued pitted the world's richest man, who as Tesla's chief executive has built an empire from clean cars and trucks, against a president whose base largely denies climate change. As Tesla's shares whip-sawed in the stock market, questions swirled not only for Musk's brand, but for the electric vehicle market more broadly. The sparring caused a particularly rough jolt for California, where Tesla had long been key to an ambitious environmental platform. Given California's mandate to convert 35% of new car sales to EVs by next year, leaders have tried to promote these automobiles, offering rebates and free access to carpool lanes while cities steadily expand their charging infrastructure. But the Trump-Musk bromance threw the plodding electric vehicle movement into chaos. People who had once embraced Tesla rushed to boycott the company with such fervor that Tesla sales dropped 21 % in the first quarter of this year. 'It's hard to think of any company whose public image is more closely tied to its chief executive than Tesla,' said Lucas Davis, a professor at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business who specializes in energy economics. He noted that, in the U.S., vehicle purchases have become tightly intertwined with political ideology. Democrats who in the past reliably bought Teslas to signify their environmental values are now shunning the cars, and they haven't embraced other brands fast enough to compensate. Overall, EV sales in California dipped 3% year-over-year in the first quarter. With the GOP-controlled federal government now pushing to revoke the EV tax credit, sales are likely to plunge further. If Musk had thought he might have won back the liberal environmentalist crowd by attacking Trump this week, he made a grave miscalculation, said Bill Pearce, a marketing expert at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business. 'This was a classic marketing miscue,' Pearce said, explaining that Musk alienated his original audience by going all in for the president. Although Tesla gained a smaller conservative fan base, Musk has now repelled those people as well with his sniping on social media. He derided Trump's 'big beautiful' tax bill for being 'massive, outrageous' and 'pork-filled,' and alleged a connection between Trump and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'I think he was trying, at least partly, in his criticism of Trump, to get his traditional buying base to say, 'OK, Elon's back on our side,'' Pearce said. 'But that's not the way consumers think.' Even before Trump and Musk's relationship began unraveling, Professor James Sallee of UC Berkeley's agriculture and resource economics department predicted a full-frontal assault by the Trump Administration on electric cars. In a UC Berkeley Energy Institute blog post provocatively titled 'Three Ways to Kill an Electric Vehicle,' Sallee laid out 'three big pieces of the Trump agenda that could threaten the future of electric vehicles': rollbacks of California's zero-emission mandate and federal clean car standards; unwinding of subsidies for EV buyers and manufacturers of batteries or other parts, and tariffs associated with the U.S.-China trade war. Whether Californians' belief in a clean energy future is strong enough to overcome these hurdles remains to be seen. But that financial argument won't hold for the rest of the country, Pearce said. 'And it will definitely slow adoption.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store