Tearful ICAC witness recalls 'very improper' meeting with transport official
The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) is investigating allegations that Ibrahim Helmy, who worked for TfNSW for 15 years, received $11.5 million in payments for helping contractors secure roadwork jobs, often at inflated prices.
Mr Helmy failed to appear at ICAC earlier this month and a warrant has been issued for his arrest.
On Thursday, operations manager at Direct Traffic Pty Ltd, Adam Spilsted, became emotional, telling the commission he would pass cash to Mr Helmy "under the table" at a Merrylands restaurant to help secure contracts for the business.
"I was scared of not getting any work," he said
"Working for a government agency such as Transport for NSW is a privilege," he said, choking back tears.
"I've done the wrong thing ... It's something I should have … reported."
Mr Spilsted told the hearing that Mr Helmy initially offered to help him win state government contracts because he knew Mr Spilsted's father.
The ICAC earlier heard that about $48 million in contracts had been awarded by TfNSW to Direct Traffic Pty Ltd between 2018 and 2025.
Mr Spilsted said Mr Helmy gave him tender evaluation criteria, as well as confidential information on other companies' bids.
However, during one of their meetings at Merrylands library in 2018, Mr Helmy allegedly asked for money.
"In order for me to give you this work, I would expect some type of payment," Mr Helmy allegedly said.
Counsel Assisting, Rob Rob Ranken SC, asked Mr Spilsted whether he understood the gravity of that request.
"Did you appreciate that what he was proposing was improper?" Mr Ranken asked.
Adam Spilsted said he later told his wife, Mechelina Van Der Ende-Plakke, who is a director of Direct Traffic Pty Ltd, that Mr Helmy had asked for money.
"She didn't want to give him any money whatsoever," he told the hearing.
According to Mr Spilsted, Mr Helmy threatened to stop helping him win contracts unless he got paid.
"So, what I did was went behind my wife's back," he told the commission.
Mr Spilsted said he initially paid Mr Helmy using gift cards, but was soon told "the gift cards aren't cutting it".
He later made several large cash withdrawals and handed them to Mr Helmy both in his car and "under the table" at an Egyptian restaurant in Merrylands.
However, as the relationship continued and more contracts were awarded to the business, Mr Spilsted said the transport official wanted more money.
"Every time that I'd see him, he'd ask for money all the time," he said.
Mr Spilsted told the hearing that Mr Helmy ultimately asked him to pay about $600,000.
He said that when his wife found out about that demand, she threatened to "dob" Mr Helmy in to TfNSW.
Mr Spilsted said he warned her against going to authorities, saying they would both get into a "lot of trouble" because "we'd already paid him".
The hearing was then played a phone conversation allegedly between Ms Van Der Ende-Plakke and Mr Helmy, recorded by Mr Spilsted.
In the recording, she told Mr Helmy she was "shocked".
"If we would go ahead with this [and] it would ever come out, it would not be good," she said.
She told Mr Helmy she only wanted her company to win contracts based on merit.
The man — allegedly Mr Helmy — responded by trying to reassure her.
"I don't see it as badly as you're seeing it," he said.
However, he later conceded "it is not 100 per cent legal".
The hearing continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Needs to change': Thousands support Speak Up for Kids campaign after childcare abuse exposed
Thousands of Aussies are jumping on board a new petition demanding an urgent safety overhaul to our early childcare industry, after exposed yet another alarming case of widescale sexual abuse within a family day care service. This morning exclusively revealed the horrifying case of David Neil Tuck: a family day care owner who is suspected of sexually abusing up to 55 children in Batemans Bay alone. Tuck had already been charged with 10 counts of child sexual abuse in NSW when Eurobodalla Shire Council licenced him to operate a family day care service run out of his remote property on Bluemoor road in Batemans Bay. Tuck, who also operated two other childcare facilities in the region, was able to continue running his licensed service despite multiple additional children coming forward to authorities with complaints of sexual abuse at his centres. Laura-Jane Singh (LJ) and Hailey* were just seven and five years old when they were first sexually abused by Tuck at his overnight child care centre. The women, who have tracked down around 30 other survivors of Tuck, are now using their experience as a platform to push for national reform to Australia's Working With Children Check scheme. More than 5000 people have already jumped on board to sign their petition, which launched just a few hours ago. 'What could be more important than protecting our children?' wrote one signee named Tarek. 'Stop protecting child predators. We need to do everything possible to keep our kids safe. This isn't just for people who have kids, we were all kids once. Give every child a voice, and sign now.' 'What are our politicians doing here? Working with Children Checks are totally useless and a joke,' wrote Valerie. 'This needs to be changed now. We know there's a problem, there's no excuse to leave it any longer,' added Sarah. According to the petition, more than one million Australian families currently have at least one child attending a registered childcare service. And alarmingly, every day there is at least one report of sexual misconduct coming out of a child care facility in this country. 'The children who are impacted are far too young to speak. As adults, we must use our voices to demand their safety,' reads the petition. The campaign is titled Speak Up for Kids and is calling for an overhaul to Australia's widely derided Working With Children Check (WWWC) scheme. The campaign has the backing of experts, advocates, academics, and survivors. One issue of concern is that each state and territory has an entirely different WWCC scheme with its own legislation, operating system, eligibility criteria, and administrative processes. According to the petition, this creates 'inconsistency, confusion and loopholes which offenders can easily exploit'. The fragmented approach also leads to poor information sharing between the various states and territories and offenders who move between jurisdictions can then easily evade detection. Another concern is that once a WWCC is issued, it is valid for five years with no interim monitoring. As a result, families can be lulled into a false sense of security, particularly since complaints that don't result in criminal charges may not necessarily be enough to trigger the high threshold for action. Currently more than 5.8 million people in Australia hold a valid WWCC and no training or exam is required to get one. 'Children need to be protected from these mongrel predators, it's abhorrent what they do to the kids let alone the psychological damage they cause,' wrote Colin who signed the petition. 'Why isn't there a national database for convicted offenders? Each state doesn't talk to each other and an offender can be convicted in Queensland and then move to NSW and their offence will not follow them. This is ludicrous,' added another signee, Kerry. 'Our youngest and most vulnerable voices in society need to be heard RIGHT NOW! To the lawmakers and lawbreakers, how can you sleep at night knowing that your actions and inaction have destroyed innocent lives? Enough is enough!' wrote one individual who signed off 'L'. The petition is calling for a suite of reforms including national harmonisation of legislation and standards across all jurisdictions; the establishment of a centralised WWCC database to facilitate cross-border information sharing; a one strike policy for breaches; increased monitoring of WWCC holders; and finally a $2 million government investment to develop mandatory training which would then become a compulsory component for all WWCC holders. 'Do this now. My next vote depends on it,' wrote Jason. 'I 100 per cent support the petition,' added Peter. 'It chills me to the bone that this could happen in our society. Let's get these monsters away from our children.' 'How on earth we are not already doing absolutely everything to protect our children,' added Alan. LJ and Hailey have been incredibly moved with the response so far and hope more people continue to join the fight. The women, who are now both mothers, say they are speaking out on behalf of all children - including the little girls they once were. 'As children we were defenceless. We did not have the language and we were too young to understand - let alone speak out about - the sexual abuse we were experiencing in childcare,' wrote the women. 'Now we are raising our voices for all those children who can't. We were not safe. But we hope that your children will be. 'Australia, please sign this urgent petition. All children deserve safety. The time for action is now.' Nina Funnell is a Walkley award winning journalist who specialises in reporting sexual violence. She is the creator of the Speak Up for Kids campaign.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Going to bash me': Man involved in Paul Kent brawl claims self defence
A man who was involved in a wild brawl with Paul Kent has told a court that he was afraid the rugby league journalist and commentator was going to 'bash' him during a now-infamous incident outside a Sydney restaurant. Tamer Uzun, 37, on Monday appeared in Manly Local Court for a hearing after pleading not guilty to one count of affray stemming from his altercation with Kent outside Totti's Rozelle in April last year. In footage which quickly went viral on social media, Kent pushed past several people before trading blows with Mr Uzun on the public street, with the fight ending when Kent was thrown into a tree. The prosecution has argued Mr Uzun threw punches and failed to de-escalate the incident when he continued to trade verbal barbs with Kent and took off his jumper. Police prosecutor Sergeant Adrian Walsh told the court on Monday that Mr Uzun threw punches before grabbing and throwing Kent into a tree. However Mr Uzun's solicitor Bryan Wrench told the court his client was acting in self defence. He said that Mr Uzun, who was sober at the time, was wrongly accused of making comments towards Kent. 'Mr Kent is the person provoking the incident and our client has had to defend himself,' Mr Wrench told the court. Mr Wrench told the court that a 'thoroughly intoxicated' Kent had consumed 21 beers over 11 hours at the nearby Sackville Hotel and was walking home at the time of the confrontation. Mr Uzun told the court on Monday that he was at the popular restaurant for a birthday and was waiting outside for his partner. Video played to the court showed Kent and another man walking past but they doubled back and accused Uzun and his friend of 's---potting' him. In court on Monday, Mr Uzun denied that either he or his friend made a comment to provoke Kent. 'At the start I thought it was a joke,' Mr Uzun told the court. 'I didn't know what he was talking about, we were laughing about the accusations.' Mr Uzun said he told Kent to 'f--k off' and 'keep going'. He said that backed up as Kent was 'swearing and carrying on'. Mr Uzun told the court that Kent took off his watch and pushed past several people to ignite the brawl. Asked what his state of mind was at that point, Mr Uzun said: 'This bloke's going to bash me.' He said he attempted to strike Kent as the brawl spilled onto the roadway. 'And that's when he ended upside down in the tree,' Mr Uzun said. He said that he was crash tackled into the gutter by a man who was with Kent. When he got up, Mr Uzun told the court that Kent abused him again and spat at him. He told the court that he went back into the restaurant, asked for the manager and requested they preserve CCTV footage. He suffered bruises on his neck and head and grazes on his shoulder. Sgt Walsh told the court that Uzun 'beckoned' Kent and moved towards him on a number of occasions despite the presence of a security guard. 'I didn't want a fight,' Mr Uzun told the court. He also asked him why he had taken off his jumper and handed it to his friend and had not walked back into the restaurant. 'That was you throwing Mr Kent into a tree,' Sgt Walsh asked. 'Push Mr Kent away,' Mr Uzun replied. 'You agree it was more of a throw,' Sgt Walsh asked. 'A bit of both,' Mr Uzun said. The hearing before Magistrate Michael Blair continues. Kent in July last year failed in his bid to have a one charge of affray dealt with on mental health grounds before he pleaded guilty. Kent did not have a conviction recorded against him and he was sentenced to a two-year good behaviour bond. He departed Fox Sports and The Daily Telegraph following the incident.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Doctor Douglas William McCarthy admits sexually assaulting two teenage girls
A doctor charged with sexual offences against underage teenage girls has pleaded guilty to assaulting two of his accusers, as his court trial continues. WARNING: This article contains details some readers may find distressing. Douglas William McCarthy, 63, is on trial in the WA District Court on sex charges related to eight girls, most of whom were aged 14 and 15 at the time of the alleged offending. The court had heard Mr McCarthy allegedly paid girls for photos, and engaged in sexual acts with them, even keeping a "video library". On Monday morning, he pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual penetration involving one victim, and two counts of sexual penetration involving another victim. Both girls were aged between 13 and 16 at the time. But Mr McCarthy is maintaining he is not guilty of "persistent sexual conduct" involving those girls, which requires three or more separate incidents to be proven. His trial on those charges, and others involving other alleged victims, is continuing. Mr McCarthy largely practised as a GP in the state's South West region when he committed the alleged offences but has since been suspended. The pleas in front of the jury trial came after several days of evidence from alleged victims, both in police interviews and direct testimony to the court. One alleged victim who gave evidence to the court said she had "non-consensual sex" with Mr McCarthy three times and went on to describe one instance in a bathroom. "He didn't ask, he just told," she said. Another alleged victim said she was 15 when she went to see Mr McCarthy at his home, where he allegedly sexually assaulted her on a massage table.
