‘Going to bash me': Man involved in Paul Kent brawl claims self defence
Tamer Uzun, 37, on Monday appeared in Manly Local Court for a hearing after pleading not guilty to one count of affray stemming from his altercation with Kent outside Totti's Rozelle in April last year.
In footage which quickly went viral on social media, Kent pushed past several people before trading blows with Mr Uzun on the public street, with the fight ending when Kent was thrown into a tree.
The prosecution has argued Mr Uzun threw punches and failed to de-escalate the incident when he continued to trade verbal barbs with Kent and took off his jumper.
Police prosecutor Sergeant Adrian Walsh told the court on Monday that Mr Uzun threw punches before grabbing and throwing Kent into a tree.
However Mr Uzun's solicitor Bryan Wrench told the court his client was acting in self defence.
He said that Mr Uzun, who was sober at the time, was wrongly accused of making comments towards Kent.
'Mr Kent is the person provoking the incident and our client has had to defend himself,' Mr Wrench told the court.
Mr Wrench told the court that a 'thoroughly intoxicated' Kent had consumed 21 beers over 11 hours at the nearby Sackville Hotel and was walking home at the time of the confrontation.
Mr Uzun told the court on Monday that he was at the popular restaurant for a birthday and was waiting outside for his partner.
Video played to the court showed Kent and another man walking past but they doubled back and accused Uzun and his friend of 's---potting' him.
In court on Monday, Mr Uzun denied that either he or his friend made a comment to provoke Kent.
'At the start I thought it was a joke,' Mr Uzun told the court.
'I didn't know what he was talking about, we were laughing about the accusations.'
Mr Uzun said he told Kent to 'f--k off' and 'keep going'.
He said that backed up as Kent was 'swearing and carrying on'.
Mr Uzun told the court that Kent took off his watch and pushed past several people to ignite the brawl.
Asked what his state of mind was at that point, Mr Uzun said: 'This bloke's going to bash me.'
He said he attempted to strike Kent as the brawl spilled onto the roadway.
'And that's when he ended upside down in the tree,' Mr Uzun said.
He said that he was crash tackled into the gutter by a man who was with Kent.
When he got up, Mr Uzun told the court that Kent abused him again and spat at him.
He told the court that he went back into the restaurant, asked for the manager and requested they preserve CCTV footage.
He suffered bruises on his neck and head and grazes on his shoulder.
Sgt Walsh told the court that Uzun 'beckoned' Kent and moved towards him on a number of occasions despite the presence of a security guard.
'I didn't want a fight,' Mr Uzun told the court.
He also asked him why he had taken off his jumper and handed it to his friend and had not walked back into the restaurant.
'That was you throwing Mr Kent into a tree,' Sgt Walsh asked.
'Push Mr Kent away,' Mr Uzun replied.
'You agree it was more of a throw,' Sgt Walsh asked.
'A bit of both,' Mr Uzun said.
The hearing before Magistrate Michael Blair continues.
Kent in July last year failed in his bid to have a one charge of affray dealt with on mental health grounds before he pleaded guilty.
Kent did not have a conviction recorded against him and he was sentenced to a two-year good behaviour bond.
He departed Fox Sports and The Daily Telegraph following the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
NSW Labor government unsuccesful in condemnation of independent MP Mark Latham
Mark Latham has escaped parliamentary condemnation after the former federal Labor leader was accused of sharing secret government information. The NSW Labor Party put forward a condemnation motion against Mr Latham after accusing him of "disclosing authorised information" under parliamentary privilege about a fellow MP. But the motion was adjourned after being blocked by the opposition until October 13. The condemnation was defeated 22 to 16 after a fiery debate. It is alleged Mr Latham referenced confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) in proceedings brought by independent MP Alex Greenwich, a claim Mr Latham denied. On Tuesday night, he told the chamber that the remarks were based on publicly available information, including several affidavits signed by Mr Greenwich. "This is not a state secret," he said of the information. He said when he viewed the information, it was only under a non-publication order, not formally under parliamentary privilege. During the debate, Mr Latham went on to further criticise Mr Greenwich and journalists present at the NCAT hearing. He said if he had the chance, he would share the information again. Penny Sharpe, leader of the government in the upper house, moved the motion to condemn the independent MP. Ms Sharpe said that revealing deeply personal medical records about a fellow member meant the house should take a stand over Mr Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. "If you don't draw this line, I don't know what line you are going to draw," Ms Sharpe said, calling on her parliamentary colleagues to support the condemnation. However, Mr Latham again insisted he had not broken standing orders in parliament. Despite the failure of the condemnation motion, Mr Latham was later successfully referred to the Privileges Committee over the alleged sharing of information in a privileged report by the NSW Police Force in a separate incident. On the prospects of a parliamentary committee investigation into his actions on that matter, which relates to former police commissioner Karen Webb, Mr Latham said: "Bring it on." "I'm happy for these things to go to privilege … I wouldn't mind if this matter went to the High Court," Mr Latham said. Last month, it was revealed Mr Latham's former partner, Nathalie Matthews, had sought an apprehended violence order against him in a NSW court, with media reports that she accused him of a "sustained pattern" of abuse and pressuring her into "degrading" sex acts. The independent MP has vowed to defend himself in court, and labelled Ms Matthews's claims as "comically false and ridiculous". Police are not investigating the matter. In the wake of the application being made public, it also emerged that Mr Latham had sent disparaging photos and comments about some female MPs to Ms Matthews, which he said was part of an "in-joke" taken out of context. He has apologised to the MPs at the centre of the photos, describing them as "ill-advised". Mr Latham released a lengthy public statement last month, addressing allegations of inappropriate behaviour in state parliament.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Former WA Police officer Gary Edward Fitzgerald has charges of improper sexual relationship dropped
A former WA Police officer accused of having an improper relationship with a 16-year-old girl has had the case against him dropped during his trial. Gary Edward Fitzgerald was a serving officer when he started a sexual relationship with the girl about 25 years ago, after meeting her during his policing duties. The prosecution alleged the girl, who was over 16, could not give consent to sex because she was under his authority. Mr Fitzgerald was charged with five counts of sexual penetration of a child over 16, under their care, supervision, or authority. But the prosecution has been discontinued in the District Court. Prosecutor Danya Borkowski said there had been legal discussions regarding the element of "care, supervision, or authority". "We concluded that we were unable to establish that element to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt," she told the court. Judge Michael Bowden told the jury the discontinuance had been accepted by the court. "This is a court of law, not of morality," he told the jurors. He said it would only have been an offence if the sexual relationship was with a girl aged over 16 who was under care, supervision, or authority. The court heard from the complainant on Monday, who had described sexual encounters in detail, including threesomes, and sex in the interview room of Fremantle Police Station. The defence lawyer had put it to her that the sex in the police station did not happen, to which she responded: "That's completely incorrect." She told the court the sex they had was consensual and there was a "mutual attraction" from the time they first met, which led to flirtatious phone messages, including sexual innuendo. The pair first met when Mr Fitzgerald attended the teenager's home on duty, when her housemate was reported to have run away. The complainant said the sexual relationship stopped when she was about 17, and "definitely" was not continuing when she was 18. But she admitted that Mr Fitzgerald never presented himself as her "personal on-call police officer", and the sex had nothing to do with any ongoing investigation.
The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Roxanne Tickle says Sall Grover must pay damages for misgendering her in 50 media interviews
Giggle app founder Sall Grover should have to pay hefty damages to trans woman Roxanne Tickle because she 'misgendered her' in media interviews, Ms Tickle's legal team has pleaded in a bombshell submission to the Federal Court. In a submission which, if accepted, would have far-reaching implications for free speech, Ms Tickle's lawyers argued that Ms Grover's description of Ms Tickle as a man in at least 50 interviews should make her liable for 'significant' aggravated damages. Ms Grover is appealing a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle for Girls female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man. Justice Bromwich had awarded $10,000 damages because Ms Grover had laughed in court at a satirical piece of merchandise – a scented candle – which appeared to mock Ms Tickle. Ms Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich's decision, asking for a finding of direct rather than indirect discrimination and that the damages be increased to at least $40,000. Ms Tickle had sought $200,000 in damages at the previous trial. The Giggle v Tickle appeal has gained global attention, with author and prominent women's rights activist J.K. Rowling expressing support for Ms Grover in an overnight post on social media platform X. Rowling retweeted a post by Ms Grover of The Australian's story revealing a submission by the Sex Discrimination Commissioner that trans women 'should have legal protections available to pregnant or potentially women'. Ms Grover had captioned the post: 'This is how insane gender ideology is.' Rowling also sent her support to Ms Grover. 'Good luck, Sall. May the best woman (haha) win x,' she wrote in a post on X. On Tuesday, counsel for Ms Tickle, Briana Goding, said the $10,000 damages award was insufficient, in part because the beliefs Ms Grover held privately were also being made publicly and expressed in dozens of media interviews. 'There was evidence that Ms Grover had participated in some 50 interviews in relation to this case, and in each of those she used the male pronouns for Ms Tickle, and that on at least 10 occasions she referred to being scared or threatened or harassed by Ms Tickle,' Ms Goding said. Ms Grover's conduct 'has at the very least been seriously aggravating and has caused Ms Tickle injured feelings', Ms Goding said. 'The aggravation and injured feelings have mounted up, blow by blow.' Ms Goding said Justice Bromwich had found the satirical candle to be so offensive that he didn't repeat the content in his written judgment. 'However, it's our submission that His Honour ought to have gone beyond that single act of laughing in court and awarded aggravated damages for much broader conduct in the proceedings. Those matters included the statement that Ms Tickle was a man, but should also include the fact that in her opening submissions Ms Grover and Giggle stated they 'do not know, and cannot admit, whether the applicant is a natural person capable of being sued in the name of Roxanne Tickle'. 'This is not just a delegitimising of gender, but a delegitimising of humanity,' Ms Goding said. 'There's further, the overall conduct of crowd funding for the case using the demeaning material, the promoting of others to purchase material from the Etsy store as well as the laughing in court,' Ms Goding said. Ms Grover has previously stated that she did not have any role in producing or selling the candle merchandise. Ms Goding asked the appeal court to reject Justice Bromwich's finding that Ms Grover's views were genuinely held and bona fide because of the 'continued public misgendering and denial of gender identity of Ms Tickle'. 'This is not a case of asking anyone to change their opinions, it is not policing the opinions that someone can hold,' Ms Goding argued. Given the purpose of the Sex Discrimination Act in eliminating gender identity discrimination, the 'continued misgendering of Ms Tickle' could not be considered bona fide, proper or justifiable, she said. Earlier in the hearing, Ms Tickle's legal team had contested Ms Grover's claim that her rejection of Ms Tickle from the app was on the basis of her perceived sex – that she appeared to be a man – not because she was transgender. 'It was proved that not only did Giggle have a policy of excluding transgender women, they did exclude transgender women, and not only Ms Tickle,' said Georgina Costello KC, also appearing for Ms Tickle. 'Ms Grover has a policy that is not a secret. In fact, it's spoken about with some confidence and pride,' she said. 'Ms Tickle provided a selfie to the Giggle app in which she had a low-cut T-shirt on and a female haircut. She used the name Roxy, and that's important because they now say that they didn't know she was a transgender woman. We say that you shouldn't accept that evidence. 'The fact that (Ms Grover and Giggle) deny that they knew that Ms Tickle was a transgender woman when they excluded her from the app is not a defence to direct discrimination.' Counsel for Ms Grover, Noel Hutley SC, noted in relation to the demand for additional damages that the trial judge had found that although the denial of her gender identity had upset Ms Tickle, he was unable to attribute responsibility to Ms Grover for her 'finding this exhausting and draining'. 'Ms Tickle's evidence as to loss or damage is slight, if not minimal, and does not rise higher than a modest degree of hurt,' Justice Bromwich found. Politics Treasurer's marathon consultation with Australia's business elite faces being relegated to a talkfest as government backs away from major economic reforms. Politics Jim Chalmers has abandoned major tax reform for his economic roundtable, instead focusing on deregulation and housing productivity amid rising business sector anxiety.
