Costa Rican lawmaker says the US revoked her visa over alleged ties to Chinese Communist Party
Vanessa Castro of the opposition Social Christian Unity Party, speaking in the Legislative Assembly, denied such ties and said that media outlets allied with President Rodrigo Chaves knew her U.S. visa had been revoked before she did.
Castro was one of several Costa Rican figures who came forward Wednesday to say their U.S. visas had been cancelled, including the president of the Congress, who belongs to the opposition National Liberation Party, and two justices on the Supreme Court's constitutional chamber who have issued rulings that Chaves disliked.
'I went and I checked and they told me in the embassy that they had received information that, among other things, I had connections with members of the Chinese Communist Party,' Castro said. 'You all know me, I have a pretty public life, can you imagine I have a relationship with members of the Chinese Communist Party?'
She also noted that she had supported U.S.-Costa Rica initiatives like a regional free trade agreement and joint patrols against drug traffickers.
Castro said media outlets that support Chaves' administration showed up at her office to ask about the visa before she had even been notified.
The U.S. embassy said its policy is to not comment on individual visa cases.
Chaves played up the visa cancellations Wednesday, saying that 'it seemed extremely embarrassing to him that' such important political figures as Castro and Congress President Rodrigo Arias should be unable to travel to the United States.
In April, former Costa Rican President and Nobel Peace Prize winner Oscar Arias, Rodrigo Arias' brother, said the U.S. had cancelled his visa without explanation. He speculated that Washington may not have liked his comments on the war in Ukraine, the U.S. trade conflict with China, or the situation in Gaza.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio made his first overseas trip as the top U.S. diplomat to Central America in February and curbing China's influence in the region was one of the trip's central talking points.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
House to vote on Trump's demand to claw back foreign aid and public broadcast funds
Advertisement The debate on the measure laid bare a simmering fight over Congress' power of the purse. Since Trump began his second term, the White House has moved aggressively and at times unilaterally, primarily through the Department of Government Efficiency, to expand the executive branch's control over federal spending, a power the Constitution gives to the legislative branch. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Top White House officials, led by Russell Vought, the budget office director, have sought to rein in the size of the federal government, including by freezing funds appropriated by Congress. It is part of a wider campaign to claim far-reaching powers over federal spending for the president. This time, the administration went through a formal process by submitting what is known as a rescissions bill. Those measures are rare and seldom succeed, given how tightly Congress has historically guarded its power over federal spending. The last such package to be enacted was in 1999, under President Bill Clinton. Advertisement GOP leaders said the vote was a symbolic victory that underscored the Republican-held Congress' willingness to cut federal spending that it viewed as inappropriate and wasteful. 'I appreciate all the work the administration has done in identifying wasteful spending,' Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, said in a speech before the vote. 'Now it's time for the Senate to do its part to cut some of that waste out of the budget. It's a small but important step toward fiscal sanity that we all should be able to agree is long overdue.' But the process left even some Republicans who ultimately voted for the bill uncomfortable. A number of senators said the administration had not provided details about what specific programs would be affected. 'If we find out that some of these programs that we've communicated should be out of bounds — that advisers to the president decide they are going to cut anyway,' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who is retiring, said, 'then there will be a reckoning for that.' And even as GOP senators agreed to cancel funding at the White House's request, 10 of them signed a rare public letter to Vought demanding that he reverse a decision to withhold roughly $7 billion in congressionally approved funding to their states meant to bolster educational programs including after-school and summer programs. 'The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump's goal of returning K-12 education to the states,' the Republicans wrote. To win the votes of Republican senators who initially objected, GOP leaders agreed to strip out a $400 million cut that Trump requested to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR. The White House signaled it would not contest the change. Advertisement They also shielded some funding for specific programs, including aid to Jordan and Egypt; Food for Peace, a program that provides food assistance to other countries; and some global health programs. Another holdout, Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., who had previously indicated that he would oppose the request because of the cuts to public broadcasting, decided to support the package. He said he had been assured by top Trump administration officials that they would steer unspent funds 'to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption' for next year. Before the vote, the head of a network of Native radio and television stations privately appealed to Rounds to oppose the package, saying the deal he had made was unworkable. 'There is currently no clear path for redirecting these funds to tribal broadcasters without significant legislative and administrative changes,' wrote Loris Taylor, president of Native Public Media. The vote incensed Democrats, who argued that Republicans were ceding Congress' constitutional powers in the name of cutting a minuscule amount of spending, just weeks after passing their marquee tax bill that would add $4 trillion to federal deficits. They warned that it could have dire consequences for future bipartisan negotiations to fund the government. Lawmakers are currently working to negotiate spending levels before a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline. 'We have never, never before seen bipartisan investments slashed through a partisan rescissions package,' said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. 'Do not start now. Not when we are working, at this very moment, in a bipartisan way to pass our spending bills. Bipartisanship doesn't end with any one line being crossed; it erodes. It breaks down bit by bit, until one day there is nothing left.' Advertisement The vote codified a number of executive actions the administration advanced earlier this year to gut foreign aid programs, many first undertaken by DOGE. The effects on public media are yet to come. NPR and PBS would survive — only a small percentage of their funding comes from the federal government. But the cuts would force many local stations to sharply reduce their programming and operations as early as this fall. Many public broadcasters receive more than 50% of their budgets from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. That means the package could be a death sentence for some stations, which have survived several attempts to choke off funding over the decades. For other broadcasters, it would mean cutting back on local programming. 'We just don't have a lot of fat to trim elsewhere,' Julie Overgaard, executive director for South Dakota Public Broadcasting, said in an interview before the vote. 'On the PBS side of things, I can't just start cherry-picking which national programs I want and only pay for those,' she said. 'So it really leaves me and many others with little choice but to look at the local programming that we self-generate.' This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US passes first major national crypto legislation
Lawmakers in the US have passed the country's first major national cryptocurrency legislation. It is a major milestone for the once fringe industry, which has been lobbying Congress over regulation for years and poured millions into last year's election, backing candidates that included Donald Trump. The bill sets up a regulatory regime for so-called stablecoins, a kind of cryptocurrency backed by assets seen as reliable, such as the dollar. Trump is expected to sign the legislation into law on Friday, after the House passed the bill on Thursday, joining the Senate, which had approved the measure last month. Known as the Genius Act, the bill is one of three pieces of cryptocurrency legislation advancing in Washington that is backed by Trump. The president once derided crypto as a scam but his opinion shifted as he won backing from the sector and got involved in the industry as a businessman, with ties to firms such as World Liberty Financial. Supporters of the legislation say it is aimed at providing clear rules for a growing industry, ensuring the US keeps pace with advances in payment systems. The crypto industry had been pushing for such measures in hopes it could spur more people to use digital currency and bring it more into the mainstream. The provisions include requiring stablecoins, an alternate cryptocurrency to the likes of Bitcoin, to be backed one-for-one with US dollars, or other low-risk assets. Stablecoins are used by traders to move funds between different crypto tokens. The use of these coins, which are viewed as less volatile, has grown rapidly in recent years. From Bitcoin to XRP: Key cryptocurrency terms and what they mean Critics argue the bill will introduce new risks into the financial system, by legitimising stablecoins without erecting sufficient protections for consumers. For example, they said it would deepen tech firms' participation in bank-like activities without subjecting them to similar oversight, and leave customers hanging in a convoluted bankruptcy process in the event that a stablecoin firm should fail. They had also tried to rally opposition to the bill by arguing that voting in favour was effectively condoning Trump's business activities - including his family's promotion of their own crypto coins. But it nevertheless drew significant support from Democrats, about half of which supported the bill, as well as the majority of Republicans. "Some members may believe passage of this bill, even with flaws, is better than the status quo. We believe this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the risks involved with these instruments," a coalition of consumer and advocacy groups wrote in a letter to Congress this spring. They warned that passage would "allow the proliferation of assets that consumers will wrongly perceive as safe". Analysts had expected Congress to pass all three bills earlier this week, but unexpected hiccups led to delays. The two other bills have passed the House and are headed to the Senate, where Republicans hold a narrow majority. Those bills would prevent the US central bank from establishing a digital currency and set up a regulatory framework for other forms of crypto. The advance comes as Trump is reportedly working on an presidential order that could allow retirement accounts to be invested in private assets, such as crypto, gold and private equity. The value of Bitcoin hit a new record this week, passing $120,000 (£89,000). But Terry Haines of Washington-based analysis firm Pangaea Policy, said he did not expect the other two bills, which are more significant, to go further. "This is the end of crypto's wins for quite a while - and the only one," he wrote. "When the easy part, stablecoin, takes ~4 to 5 years and barely survives industry scandals, it's not much to crow about." The Bitcoin hum that is unsettling Trump's MAGA heartlands Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
‘We're tired of this': Cicero residents demand action from town president after Hispanic woman stopped by federal agents
Vanessa Mendoza, an early childhood educator in Cicero, was gathering materials for her classroom in late June when she paused to look at Facebook. What she saw shocked her. Posted on the social media site was a video of her aunt, Rocío, being pulled over by unidentified agents driving black vehicles who questioned her citizenship — despite her legal status to be in the United States. The agents did not specify why they pulled Rocío over or which agency they were affiliated with, Mendoza, 32, who grew up in Cicero, said at a news conference outside the town hall Thursday morning. After Rocío showed identification, she was not arrested or detained, her niece added. 'It was either a legal stop or maybe, I don't want to say, they were targeting her for being Latina,' she said. On Thursday, local officials and community members condemned 20-year Town President Larry Dominick for remarks he previously made about the immigrant community, especially as federal enforcement actions intensify under President Donald Trump. About 90% of Cicero's residents are Latino, a group that has been repeatedly targeted by the Trump administration. Rocío's interaction with the unidentified agents comes at a time of increased news and social media reports of citizens of Latino descent being stopped or detained. After a U.S. Army veteran was arrested during an immigration raid at a Southern California marijuana farm last week, representatives in Congress introduced legislation on Wednesday that would stop U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement from detaining and deporting U.S. citizens. Law-abiding residents aren't supposed to be arrested or detained, and there was no probable cause for Rocío to be pulled over, Mendoza said Thursday. She said her aunt is still shaken and won't go anywhere without her identification. Cicero has a complicated political history toward immigrants, said former U.S. Rep. Luis Guitiérrez, who used to represent the state's 4th Congressional District. Guitiérrez spoke strongly against Dominick, who he said has in recent years publicly spoken in a 'mean, nasty and violent' manner about immigrants. 'Stop destroying families that love each other,' he said. 'We're outraged. We're tired of this. ' At Thursday's news conference, lifelong Cicero resident Diana Garcia played a recording of Dominick allegedly speaking at public town meetings. In the clip, Dominick can be heard lamenting former President Joe Biden's border policies and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's approach to welcoming new migrants. 'You can't go anywhere without people selling candy, soda or water. And they don't even want to sell. Some of them just want money. The Venezuelans are robbing everybody. And what do we do to them? Nothing. It's disgusting,' Dominick was heard saying in the audio, which was also reported by the local newspaper Cicero Independiente from a Feb. 27, 2024, meeting. Dominick did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Garcia asserted that Dominick has chosen to remain silent on the issue of immigration at a time when ICE has been 'tearing families apart.' 'Cicero deserves a leader right now. And we don't have one,' she said. At one point during the news conference, a woman passing by with a grocery bag stopped to stand in the back to listen to the speakers. She nodded her head in agreement. In late February, ahead of the town's municipal elections, Dominick was criticized by opposition candidate Esteban Rodriguez for his failure to advocate for the town to adopt sanctuary status. Dominick maintained Cicero's policy is to treat everyone, documented or in the country without legal permission, the same. He referred to a 'Safe Space Resolution' passed in 2008, which formalized a commitment not to use local law enforcement for immigration matters, preventing Cicero police from asking about immigration status or enforcing federal immigration laws. Meanwhile, Illinois is a 'sanctuary state' under the 2017 Illinois Trust Act, meaning it has rules prohibiting arresting or detaining someone solely due to immigration status. The tension escalated several weeks before the election, when Rodriguez had a rock thrown through his home windows in what he described as a scare tactic. He believed his windows were shattered in retaliation for his public probing of Dominick's immigration stance. Dominick's Cicero Voters Alliance, however, brushed off the incident as a 'political stunt' by Rodriguez to 'get attention and stir controversy.' Rodriguez — who received 43% of the vote for town president over the winter — was at the news conference Thursday, where those in attendance hand-delivered a letter to Dominick's office that requested 'immediate action' to declare Cicero a sanctuary city and stop any cooperation between local law enforcement officers and ICE. The group took an elevator to the town hall's third floor, where Dominick's office is located. The town president's office was closed and locked. 'It's because he's never here,' Rodriguez grumbled under his breath. They knocked and waited several minutes before deciding to slip the letter underneath the door. A Tribune reporter was able to enter the office later in the day and spoke to a receptionist, who directed all media inquiries to Dominick's email. The group also delivered a printed-out Freedom of Information Act request to the town of Cicero for all emails, text messages, letters, memos and notes between top town leaders and trustees including Dominick with several defamatory words and phrases. The request sought all communication from Jan. 20, when Trump was sworn into office, to the present. The goal, the group said Thursday, was to uncover the type of communication about immigration that might happen behind closed doors under Dominick's leadership. Mendoza, who wore a polka-dot dress and earrings in the shape of crayons, said that as an educator in Cicero, she is constantly answering questions from worried families who ask her what to do if ICE pulls them over. She tells them to not talk to anyone who they don't know and to keep their windows up. Ultimately, she said she isn't trying to work against Dominick, but to make sure everyone feels protected leaving their homes and driving through their own neighborhoods. 'Just make this a loving and safe place for everybody,' she urged the town leader.
