Pope Leo makes AI's threat to humanity a signature issue
Pope Leo XIV is making the threat of AI to humanity a key issue of his legacy, challenging the technology industry that has spent years courting the Vatican.
The new American pope's namesake, Leo XIII, stood up for the rights of factory workers during the Gilded Age, a period from the late 1870s to the late 1890s of swift economic change and extreme wealth inequality led by corrupt industrial robber barons.
Speaking to a hall of cardinals last month, the pope said he would rely on 2,000 years of church social teaching to 'respond to another industrial revolution and to innovations in the field of artificial intelligence that pose challenges to human dignity, justice, and labor,' reports The Wall Street Journal.
In attempts to shape Rome's dialogue on AI and, by association, influence governments and policymakers, leaders of Google, Microsoft, Cisco, and other tech giants have flown to the Vatican to preach the good word of emerging technologies.
The Vatican has pushed for a binding international treaty on AI, something most tech CEOs would say threatens to stifle innovation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GMS (NYSE:GMS) Surprises With Q1 Sales
Building materials distributor GMS (NYSE:GMS) reported Q1 CY2025 results topping the market's revenue expectations , but sales fell by 5.6% year on year to $1.33 billion. Its non-GAAP profit of $1.29 per share was 15.9% above analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy GMS? Find out in our full research report. Revenue: $1.33 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.30 billion (5.6% year-on-year decline, 2.9% beat) Adjusted EPS: $1.29 vs analyst estimates of $1.11 (15.9% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $109.8 million vs analyst estimates of $104.5 million (8.2% margin, 5.1% beat) Operating Margin: 4.5%, down from 7.1% in the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow Margin: 13.7%, similar to the same quarter last year Organic Revenue fell 9.7% year on year (5.5% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $2.81 billion 'We reported solid results for our fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2025 despite deterioration in end market conditions as we moved through the year,' said John C. Turner, Jr, President and Chief Executive Officer of GMS. Founded in 1971, GMS (NYSE:GMS) distributes specialty building materials including wallboard, ceilings, and insulation products, to the construction industry. Examining a company's long-term performance can provide clues about its quality. Any business can put up a good quarter or two, but the best consistently grow over the long haul. Over the last five years, GMS grew its sales at an impressive 11.2% compounded annual growth rate. Its growth beat the average industrials company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. We at StockStory place the most emphasis on long-term growth, but within industrials, a half-decade historical view may miss cycles, industry trends, or a company capitalizing on catalysts such as a new contract win or a successful product line. GMS's recent performance shows its demand has slowed significantly as its annualized revenue growth of 1.7% over the last two years was well below its five-year trend. GMS also reports organic revenue, which strips out one-time events like acquisitions and currency fluctuations that don't accurately reflect its fundamentals. Over the last two years, GMS's organic revenue averaged 2.4% year-on-year declines. Because this number is lower than its normal revenue growth, we can see that some mixture of acquisitions and foreign exchange rates boosted its headline results. This quarter, GMS's revenue fell by 5.6% year on year to $1.33 billion but beat Wall Street's estimates by 2.9%. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to decline by 1.2% over the next 12 months, a slight deceleration versus the last two years. This projection is underwhelming and implies its products and services will face some demand challenges. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. GMS was profitable over the last five years but held back by its large cost base. Its average operating margin of 7.5% was weak for an industrials business. Analyzing the trend in its profitability, GMS's operating margin decreased by 1.1 percentage points over the last five years. This raises questions about the company's expense base because its revenue growth should have given it leverage on its fixed costs, resulting in better economies of scale and profitability. GMS's performance was poor no matter how you look at it - it shows that costs were rising and it couldn't pass them onto its customers. This quarter, GMS generated an operating margin profit margin of 4.5%, down 2.6 percentage points year on year. Since GMS's operating margin decreased more than its gross margin, we can assume it was less efficient because expenses such as marketing, R&D, and administrative overhead increased. We track the long-term change in earnings per share (EPS) for the same reason as long-term revenue growth. Compared to revenue, however, EPS highlights whether a company's growth is profitable. GMS's EPS grew at a spectacular 15.7% compounded annual growth rate over the last five years, higher than its 11.2% annualized revenue growth. However, this alone doesn't tell us much about its business quality because its operating margin didn't improve. We can take a deeper look into GMS's earnings quality to better understand the drivers of its performance. A five-year view shows that GMS has repurchased its stock, shrinking its share count by 8.5%. This tells us its EPS outperformed its revenue not because of increased operational efficiency but financial engineering, as buybacks boost per share earnings. Like with revenue, we analyze EPS over a more recent period because it can provide insight into an emerging theme or development for the business. For GMS, its two-year annual EPS declines of 18.1% mark a reversal from its (seemingly) healthy five-year trend. We hope GMS can return to earnings growth in the future. In Q1, GMS reported EPS at $1.29, down from $2.01 in the same quarter last year. Despite falling year on year, this print easily cleared analysts' estimates. Over the next 12 months, Wall Street expects GMS's full-year EPS of $6.16 to stay about the same. We were impressed by how significantly GMS blew past analysts' organic revenue expectations this quarter. We were also glad its revenue outperformed Wall Street's estimates. Zooming out, we think this was a solid print. The stock remained flat at $73.50 immediately after reporting. Sure, GMS had a solid quarter, but if we look at the bigger picture, is this stock a buy? The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold price today, Wednesday, June 18, 2025: Gold opens strong ahead of Fed projections
Gold (GC=F) futures opened at $3,409 per ounce Wednesday, up 0.7% from Tuesday's close of $3,386.60. The price of gold has opened above $3,400 three times this month but has stopped short of beating its all-time high of $3,485.60, set in April. Economic and geopolitical factors favor ongoing gold demand. Conflict in the Middle East, plus President Donald Trump's changing tariff demands, create uncertain outlooks for oil prices, inflation, and the overall health of the U.S. economy. While stock prices are still up for the year, investors may react to the Fed's Summary of Economic Projections, to be released Wednesday. Any sign the Fed expects rates to remain high this year could trigger lower stock prices. Gold demand, and thus gold prices, typically rise when investors are pessimistic about stocks. The opening price of gold futures on Wednesday is up 0.7% from Tuesday's close of $3,386.60 per ounce. Wednesday's opening price marks a gain of 2.4% over the past week, compared to the opening price of $3,328 on June 11. In the past month, the gold futures price has risen 5.6% compared to the opening price of $3,227.70 on May 16. In the past year, gold is up 47.5% from the opening price of $2,311.80 on June 18, 2024. Don't forget you can monitor the current price of gold on Yahoo Finance 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Want to learn more about the current top-performing companies in the gold industry? Explore a list of the top-performing companies in the gold industry using the Yahoo Finance Screener. You can create your own screeners with over 150 different screening criteria. As we've been saying all week, investing in gold is a four-step process, and today, we'll explore step 3, choosing a form. Once you define your target gold allocation, you must choose a form of gold to hold. Your three options are: Physical gold Gold mining stocks Gold ETFs Physical gold includes jewelry, gold bars, and gold coins. The advantages of physical gold include: Readily accessible for use. If you keep your physical gold at home, it is easily available for you to use as a medium of exchange in an economic emergency. No added volatility or ongoing fees. Gold mining stocks tend to rise and fall with gold prices, and business-related factors enhance their volatility. Gold ETFs charge administrative fees in the form of expense ratios. Learn more: Take a deeper dive into the gold sector The disadvantages of physical gold include: Risk of theft or loss. Physical gold must be properly secured. Whether you store it in your home or with a depository, gold can be stolen. Lower liquidity. Physical gold is less liquid than stocks or ETFs. If you are not using the gold as a medium of exchange, you may need to locate a dealer and pay a markup on the sale. Owning shares in gold mining stocks provides indirect gold exposure. The advantages of mining stocks over physical gold include: Greater liquidity. Large-cap gold mining stocks like Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) generally enjoy a narrow bid-ask spread, which is a sign of liquidity. The bid-ask spread is the difference between what buyers will pay and what sellers will accept. Easy to store. Stocks live in your brokerage account and do not consume physical space. In normal times, this is an advantage. In an economic catastrophe, this could be a disadvantage if brokers or the stock market are temporarily shut down. Learn more: The top performing companies in the gold industry The disadvantages of owning gold mining stocks include: Greater volatility. Since 2000, gold mining stocks have risen and fallen faster than gold spot prices. And in recent years, gold mining stocks have trended down even as gold has gained value. No utility as a medium of exchange. Gold mining stocks can appreciate, but they have no direct utility as a medium of exchange. Gold ETFs are funds that invest in gold mining stocks or physical gold. Their advantages include: Easy to store. Like gold mining stocks, ETF shares are essentially digital assets with no storage requirements. Greater liquidity. Shares of the most popular gold ETFs, like SPDR Gold Shares ($GLD), are heavily traded which implies good liquidity. Tied directly to gold prices. ETFs backed by physical gold can be less volatile than gold mining stocks or gold mining ETFs. The disadvantages of gold ETFs include: Fund fees. Funds charge fees, which dilute returns over time. For context, the expense ratio of SPDR Gold Shares is 0.40%. This translates to $4 in fees annually for every $1,000 invested. No utility as a medium of exchange. As with gold mining stocks, you probably cannot use ETF shares to trade for food in an economic emergency. Whether you're tracking the price of gold since last month or last year, the price-of-gold chart below shows the precious metal's steady upward climb in value. Historically, gold has shown extended up cycles and down cycles. The precious metal was in a growth phase from 2009 to 2011. It then trended down, failing to set a new high for nine years. In those lackluster years for gold, your position will negatively impact your overall investment returns. If that feels problematic, a lower allocation percentage is more appropriate. On the other hand, you may be willing to accept gold's underperforming years so you can benefit more in the good years. In this case, you can target a higher percentage. The precious metal has been in the news lately, and many analysts are bullish on gold. In May, Goldman Sachs Research predicted gold would reach $3,700 a troy ounce by year-end 2025. That would equate to a 40% increase for the year, based on gold's January 2 opening price of $2,633. Rising demand from central banks, along with uncertainty related to changing U.S. tariff policy, are the factors driving the increase. If you are interested in learning more about gold's historical value, Yahoo Finance has been tracking the historical price of gold since 2000.
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Edmunds: The best SUVs for under $30,000, ranked
Just about every automaker these days offers an entry-level SUV. Though they are smaller than the most popular SUVs, such as the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, their appeal is obvious. They are affordable, good on gas, and are easy to drive and park. They also provide many of the attributes shoppers love about SUVs, such as a more commanding view of the road than a sedan offers and available all-wheel drive for extra traction on icy or snowy roads.
