
How Chinese scientists fought 74 years for world's most powerful dam
In 1951, the Chinese government established the first scientific expedition to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. More than 50 researchers, equipped with barometers, compasses and other basic instruments, accompanied the army on their pioneering quest.
It took them nearly three years to complete the expedition from the Jinsha River in the east to Mount Everest in the west, and to the Yarlung Tsangpo River in southern Tibet.
They compiled a geological survey, highlighting key mining areas along the route, complemented by the collection of scientific data on soil, meteorology, hydrology, agriculture, language and history.
This marked the beginning of plans for the Yarlung Tsangpo dam. The project marked another milestone on July 19 when Premier Li Qiang announced the launch of the river's downstream hydropower project during its groundbreaking ceremony in the Tibetan city of Nyingchi.
It is the world's most ambitious dam project, with a total installed power capacity of 60,000 megawatts (MW) – three times that of the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze in central China.
'The Yarlung Tsangpo River is the highest in China, with a length of 2,057km (1,280 miles). Its hydropower potential is only slightly less than that of the Yangtze River, but when calculated per unit length, it ranks first in the country,' Guan Zhihua, who led the second expedition to Tibet in 1973, said in 2010 during an interview with Southern Weekly.
Now in his mid-80s and retired, Guan used to be part of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).
Scientific research related to Tibet was halted due to the national economic difficulties caused by the Great Leap Forward, the Dalai Lama's rebellion and subsequent flight, the border war with India and the ensuing political struggles.
It restarted only in 1972 – when CAS established a comprehensive scientific expedition team for the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with Guan serving as the leader of the Yarlung Tsangpo River leading stream group, responsible for assessing its hydropower potential.
Guan made 22 further trips to Tibet and nine Yarlung Tsangpo River expeditions during his working life.
The Yarlung Tsangpo, which courses through central and southern Tibet, flows through the world's deepest canyon, which has a drop of over 6,000 metres (19,700 feet).
Originating from the icy peaks and snowy ridges between the Himalayas and the Gangdise Mountains, the river extends eastwards before cascading down at a huge bend in the eastern Himalayas to flow into the Indian plains near the town of Pasighat where it later becomes the Brahmaputra River.
In 1980, authorities launched a nationwide survey of hydropower resources, which included the Yarlung Tsangpo River.
Based on the survey data collected by the expedition team, around 12 potential sites for hydropower stations were identified along the main stream of the river.
During the late 1980s, the Tibet provincial government made two attempts to divert and dam the main stream of the Yarlung Tsangpo; however, neither dam project was able to start because of a lack of funds and technology.
In 1981, Chen Chuanyou, another researcher at the same CAS institute as Guan, published a special investigation report on water resources in Tibet.
Chen suggested building a reservoir on the main stream of the Yarlung Tsangpo, raise the water level and then drill a 16km tunnel to divert water to the Duoxiong River, a tributary with a drop of more than 2,300 metres. 'For the sake of safety and the environment, hydropower stations can be built underground,' he said at the time.
CAS repeatedly studied and demonstrated the Yarlung Tsangpo River water conservancy development projects. In September 1997, it published an article in the state-run Guangming Daily: 'Can Tibet build the world's largest hydropower station?'
In 2002, Chen published an article in the Engineering Science journal on the positive impact of a Yarlung hydropower development project. He argued that power could then not only be exported to Southeast Asia but also transmitted via high-voltage queues to Guangdong and Hong Kong.
'These were all just scientific discussions, very advanced plans,' Chen said in an interview with Southern Weekly in 2014. 'We just laughed and didn't do it in detail.'
But 20 years later, these scientific investigations and concepts are being put into reality.
The published technical details for the Yarlung Tsangpo project – development methods such as straightening bends and tunnel water diversion, underwater construction of power stations, and cascade power stations – are fundamentally similar to Chen's plan, but on a much larger scale.
The electricity is mainly for external transmission and consumption, while also taking into account demand within Tibet. There is no longer a shortage of funding.
China will bear these costs on its own, with a projected total investment of 1.2 trillion yuan (US$168 billion).
Shortly before the announcement of the project's launch, related supporting projects had already begun.
On June 23, the ±800 kilovolt ultra-high voltage direct current transmission project from southeastern Tibet to the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area, known as the Tibet-Guangdong DC project, was approved by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC).
Construction is expected to be in full swing within the year, and once completed, clean energy from Tibet can be 'delivered instantly' to the Greater Bay Area, according to an NDRC report.
The Yarlung Tsangpo was once the last central river in China that had not been dammed, but in October 2015, the Zangmu hydropower station was fully commissioned for power generation. It is located in the middle reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo.
It is now the largest hydropower station in Tibet, with a total installed capacity of 510MW – less than one-hundredth of that expected from the Yarlung Tsangpo dam. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
US tariffs a wake-up call for smarter trade for India
STARTING this month, American consumers shopping for Indian goods and Indian exporters shipping to the United States will feel the sting of a new 25% tariff slapped by the Trump administration, on top of an earlier 25%. In a move framed as protecting domestic manufacturing, Washington's latest trade salvo imposes up to 50% duties on a range of Indian exports – including on certain textiles, auto components and categories like generic pharmaceuticals and machinery parts. But while headlines focus on diplomatic retaliation and political posturing, the real story here is about consumers, on both sides of the trade wall. Whether it is a small apparel brand in Gujarat, a turmeric exporter in Erode, or a US importer sourcing affordable generics from Hyderabad, this tariff hike doesn't just punish trade, it punishes choice. Instead of a knee-jerk reaction, India should treat this moment as a strategic wake-up call. The global trading order is shifting fast. Protectionism is making a comeback under the 'national interest' banner, but everyday people bear its actual cost. Consumers pay more, get less, and lose access to innovation. Take the example of Indian pharma. The US relies on India for 40% of its affordable and high-quality generic medicines, a lifeline that keeps drug prices affordable for millions. With tariffs, those prices could spike, leaving American consumers and insurers to pay significantly more for basic medicines. That's bad business for both sides. Or consider Indian textile SMEs that export cotton garments to US retailers. These businesses already operate on razor-thin profit margins. Tariffs could render them uncompetitive overnight, leading to lost orders, layoffs, and reduced production. And American retailers won't absorb the shock; they'll pass it down to consumers through higher prices. This is the domino effect of protectionism: fewer options, higher prices, and stalled innovation. That's bad news for anyone who cares about affordability and variety, whether buying shoes in Chicago or selling saris in Surat. Rather than retaliating with blanket duties on US imports, India should seize the moment to make its economy more open, competitive, and consumer-friendly. — AFP The solution, however, is not to mirror America's tariff war with one of our own. Rather than retaliating with blanket duties on US imports, India should seize the moment to make its economy more open, competitive, and consumer-friendly. That means lowering our import tariffs, especially on consumer goods where global competition drives better quality and prices. It means signing trade deals that aren't just about political alliances but about securing cheaper medicines, cutting-edge tech, and better value for Indian consumers. It means slashing red tape at customs so Indian exporters can survive, not just US tariffs, but future global disruptions. Most importantly, it means putting consumer welfare at the heart of our trade policy – not treating it as a side effect. If the cost of a trade war is higher prices, fewer choices, and shrinking markets, the goal of trade reform must be the opposite: greater access, lower prices, and more freedom to choose. India has long spoken about becoming a global manufacturing hub. However, that ambition will remain half-baked unless we build an economy where producers and consumers benefit from openness, not protectionism. Trump's tariff bombshell is a challenge, but also an opportunity. Instead of playing defence, it is time India went on offence, with policies that protect not just producers, but also the millions of consumers who stand to gain from a freer, fairer global marketplace. Shrey Madaan is an Indian Policy Fellow with the Consumer Choice Center.


Focus Malaysia
4 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Kedah MIC-UMNO rift widens over PN cooperation motion
THE rift between Kedah MIC and Kedah UMNO widened after MIC's state chairman S.K. Suresh defended a motion to consider cooperating with PN in the next general election, accusing UMNO of hypocrisy for working with DAP while criticising MIC's move. In a widening of the row, S.K. Suresh said MIC does not need anyone's permission to make decisions regarding its political future. 'The future of the nation and the Indian community is our priority, and we always welcome cooperation with all parties for the benefit of the party and the community,' he said. Suresh accused Kedah UMNO of hypocrisy for partnering with DAP despite past hostility and criticism, noting that some Umno leaders had defected and that DAP had previously insulted UMNO before now openly cooperating with it. Earlier, Kedah UMNO information chief Datuk Shaiful Hazizy Zainol Abidin said Kedah MIC's move was a clear indication that it no longer wished to be part of BN's efforts to rebuild its political strength. Shaiful Hazizy also said that if that was the wish of Kedah MIC's grassroots, then Kedah BN wished them all the best. 'Kedah BN has never been intimidated by any change in the political landscape, especially if it involves parting ways with any component party. 'History has proven that Kedah BN can stand firm, move forward, and continue to gain the people's mandate even without the help of those who choose to turn away,' he said in a statement on Saturday. Shaiful Hazizy also warned that parties leaving BN should not expect to return seeking seats or privileges. 'Let it be clear to everyone — when this door is opened for you to leave, do not one day come back demanding space, seats, or privileges in BN after having raised your hand in support of the opposing side. 'Loyalty is not a toy that can be pawned during election season and reclaimed when the situation becomes desperate,' he said. In a statement on Friday, Kedah UMNO Youth chief Raqib Abu Hassan said Suresh was being a hypocrite, while the latter's response to Shaiful was 'shallow'. 'Taking a swipe at Kedah UMNO for 'cosying up' with DAP is trite. 'The reality is that it is MIC that has lost its allies and influence in Kedah, not UMNO.' Raqib also said that Kedah MIC should stop playing 'hero', adding that Kedah BN would not be cowed by such threats. However, warning Kedah UMNO not to provoke MIC, Suresh hinted at exposing 'past incidents' if tensions continued. The motion, passed at Kedah MIC's annual meeting attended by party president S.A. Vigneswaran, will be referred to the central leadership for a final decision. It paves the way for Kedah MIC to work with PN in the next general election. On August 2, MIC president S.A. Vigneswaran had said the party was open to talks with any political group to ensure its survival and better serve the Indian community. MIC's future has been questioned after deputy president M. Saravanan said its direction would be decided at the October AGM, noting the party felt like an 'unwanted guest' in the unity government, holding no posts despite having senior leaders. —Aug 10, 2025 Main image: Free Malaysia Today


New Straits Times
17 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Kedah MIC hits back at Umno over PN cooperation criticism
ALOR STAR: Kedah MIC has hit back at Kedah Umno over claims that its motion to cooperate with Perikatan Nasional (PN) signals the party's intention to quit Barisan Nasional (BN). Kedah MIC chairman S.K. Suresh said MIC does not need anyone's permission to make decisions regarding its political future. "The future of the nation and the Indian community is our priority, and we always welcome cooperation with all parties for the benefit of the party and the community," he said in a statement today. Earlier, Kedah Umno information chief Datuk Shaiful Hazizy Zainol Abidin said Kedah MIC's move was a clear indication that it no longer wished to be part of BN's efforts to rebuild its political strength. He said Kedah BN had never been intimidated by changes in the political landscape, including parting ways with any component party. Suresh, however, questioned Kedah Umno's stance on loyalty, pointing to its cooperation with DAP. "The message from Umno grassroots to your leadership is that they do not like Umno working together with DAP. Yet you are happy to enjoy all the privileges from the federal government and continue embracing them," he added. He also took aim at recent defections from the party, including Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz, who joined PKR. "Tengku Zafrul left the party, and even Umno members themselves have left BN and Umno. You could do nothing about it, so what is there for you to say? Suresh cautioned Kedah Umno against provoking MIC further. "It would be better for you to remain silent before we start revealing past incidents that will only worsen the situation and when that happens, do not regret it," he said. Yesterday, Suresh announced that the party had approved the motion to work with PN and did not rule out the possibility of leaving BN. He said the final decision on the matter would be determined by the MIC central leadership, led by its president, Tan Sri S A. Vigneswaran.