Ex-FBI agent and Pentagon contractor sues over secret recording showing him criticizing Trump
Jamie Mannina says in his lawsuit that he was misled by a woman he met on a dating website who held herself out as a politically liberal nurse but who was actually working with the conservative activist James O'Keefe in a sting operation designed to induce Mannina into making 'inflammatory and damaging' remarks that could be recorded, 'manipulated' and posted online.
Clips from their January conversations were spliced together to make it appear that Mannina was 'essentially attempting to launch an unlawful coup against President Trump,' and an article released online with the videos defamed Mannina by painting him as part of a 'deep state' effort with senior military officials to undermine Trump's presidency, according to the lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court in Washington.
Mannina does not deny in the lawsuit making the comments. He says his words were taken out of context and were misrepresented in a description of the video that was posted on YouTube.
O'Keefe founded Project Veritas in 2010
but was removed from the organization in 2023
amid allegations that he mistreated workers and misspent funds. He has continued to employ similar hidden camera stings as part of a new organization he established, O'Keefe Media Group, which also is named in the lawsuit.
O'Keefe told The Associated Press that Mannina 'voluntarily' offered up the comments in the recording and that it was important for the public to hear Mannina's remarks. O'Keefe pointed out that the District of Columbia only requires the consent of one party, not both, for a conversation to be recorded. O'Keefe said the lawsuit was an 'attack on the First Amendment' and that he was prepared to fight it in an appeals court if necessary.
'He said what he said. We did not take him out of context. The words that we reported came out of his mouth,' O'Keefe said, adding, 'We stand by our reporting.'
The lawsuit includes claims of defamation, false light, fraudulent misrepresentation and violations of the Wire Tap Act. Though the lawsuit acknowledges that the city's consent law for recording conversations, the filing asserts that the law nonetheless prohibits 'the interception and recording of a communication if it was for the purposes of committing a tortious act.'
A recording that O'Keefe released shows Mannina being asked at one point by the woman, whose name was not disclosed in the lawsuit, about his 'overall assessment of Trump.'
'He's a sociopathic narcissist who's only interested in advancing his name, his wealth and his fame,' Mannina can be heard saying. Asked in the recording whether there was anything he could do to 'protect the American people,' Mannina replied that he was in conversation with some retired generals to explore what could be done.
The lawsuit was filed by Mark Zaid, a prominent Washington lawyer who routinely represents government officials and whistleblowers. Zaid
himself sued Trump last week after the president revoked his security clearance
.
'Lying or misleading someone on a dating app, which no doubt happens all the time, is not what this lawsuit seeks to address,' Zaid said in a statement to The Associated Press. 'The creation of a fake profile for the specific purposes of targeting individuals for deliberately nefarious and harmful purposes is what crosses the line.'
The complaint arises from a pair of dates that Mannina had in January. During their first date, the lawsuit alleges, the woman expressed her distaste for Trump and repeatedly pressed Mannina on his political views and about his work with the government. Mannina told her that included working as a 'spy catcher' several years earlier when he was an FBI counterintelligence agent.
The lawsuit says Mannina and the woman met for lunch the following day, and as they left the restaurant, a man with a microphone approached Mannina and said, 'Jamie, you're a spy hunter, you say. Well, I'm a spy hunter, too, but I'm evidentially a better spy hunter than you.' The man was O'Keefe, the lawsuit says.
The complaint says Mannina was swiftly fired from Booz Allen, where he worked as a contractor, after O'Keefe contacted the press office and presented at least parts of the videos.
O'Keefe then released a video on his organization's YouTube channel titled, 'Pentagon Advisor Reveals Conversation 'to Explore What We Can Do' to 'Protect People from Trump.''
The lawsuit says the O'Keefe Media Group painted Mannina in a false light by misconstruing his words and his title, including by referring to him as a 'Top Pentagon Advisor' when he was actually just 'one of a countless number of defense contractors.' It says that characterization was intended to support 'fabricated claims that Mr. Mannina was essentially attempting to launch an unlawful coup against President Trump.'
The lawsuit does not directly say why Mannina was targeted, but it does note that in 2017, when he was working at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, he published three articles in the Huffington Post and The Hill newspaper that were critical of Trump.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Federal judge blocks parts of Mississippi ban on DEI in public schools
JACKSON, Miss. — A federal judge blocked portions of Mississippi's ban on diversity, equity and inclusion practices in public schools from being enforced while a lawsuit against it is underway. The provisions blocked by U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate on Monday seek to prohibit public schools from discussing a list of 'divisive concepts' related to race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation and national origin. They would also prevent public schools from maintaining programs, courses or offices that promote DEI or endorse 'divisive concepts' and ban diversity training requirements. The law, which took effect in April , aims to prevent public schools from 'engaging in discriminatory practices' by banning DEI offices, trainings and programs. Any school in violation of the act could lose state funding. A group of teachers, parents and students is suing the state, alleging the law violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Wingate's ruling follows a temporary restraining order he granted to the plaintiffs in July . At an Aug. 5 hearing, lawyers representing the plaintiffs argued that the law is too confusing, leaving parents, teachers and students wondering what they can and cannot say and whether they could face consequences as a result of their speech. Cliff Johnson, a professor at the University of Mississippi Law School and Mississippi director of the MacArthur Justice Center, testified that he and his students often discuss what could be considered 'divisive topics.' In an exchange with Wingate, Johnson said he did not believe the law would allow him to teach about the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments; the court case that paved the way for the internment of Japanese citizens during WWII; portions of the Civil Rights Act; or the murders of Emmett Till and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. 'I think I'm in a very difficult position. I can teach my class as usual and run the serious risk of being disciplined, or I could abandon something that's very important to me,' Johnson said. 'I feel a bit paralyzed.' The Mississippi Attorney General's Office argued that public employees do not have First Amendment rights. 'They are speaking for the government and the government has every right to tell them what they need to say on its behalf,' said Lisa Reppeto, an attorney at the state attorney general's office. She added that the First Amendment does not give students the right to dictate what their school does or does not say. Reppeto also said the consequences of the law are aimed at the schools — not students or teachers — and that the plaintiffs' 'argument is not consistent with what is in the statute.'
San Francisco Chronicle
3 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Mexico says there's no agreement with DEA for new border enforcement collaboration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Hours after the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration announced 'a major new initiative' for United States and Mexico collaboration targeting gatekeepers who control illicit trafficking routes across the countries' shared borders, Mexico's president said Tuesday there was no such agreement. President Claudia Sheinbaum was referring to 'Project Portero,' an effort announced Monday by the DEA, calling it a "flagship operation' against smuggling routes that move drugs, guns and money across the border. 'The DEA put out a statement yesterday saying that there is an agreement with the Mexican government for an operation called Portero,' Sheinbaum said during her morning news briefing. 'There is no agreement with the DEA. The DEA puts out this statement, based on what we don't know. We have not reached any agreement, none of the security institutions (have) with the DEA.' The U.S. embassy in Mexico and the DEA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Sheinbaum said the only thing happening was a workshop in Texas attended by four members of Mexico's police force. The DEA statement mentioned that workshop, saying it had brought Mexican investigators to one of its intelligence centers to train with U.S. prosecutors, law enforcement, defense officials and members of the intelligence community. The visibly annoyed president made her comments just days after generally positive exchanges between the two governments following another extension to ward off threatened U.S. tariffs and another shipment of 26 drug cartel figures to the U.S. from Mexico. Mexico had seemed to be repairing the security relationship with the United States after six years of tension under Sheinbaum's predecessor, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who had reined in DEA agents operating in Mexico and accused the agency of wholesale fabrication when it arrested Mexico's former defense secretary. Sheinbaum's administration had taken a more aggressive stance toward pursuing Mexico's drug cartels and sent dozens of cartel figures sought by U.S. prosecutors to the United States. Sheinbaum did say that members of her administration had been working for months with U.S. counterparts on a broader security agreement that was practically finished. She said that agreement was based on four principles her administration has stressed for months: sovereignty, mutual trust, territorial respect and coordination without subordination. The DEA statement included a comment from agency administrator Terry Cole, who was recently tapped to lead the Trump administration takeover of the Washington D.C. police. 'Project Portero and this new training program show how we will fight — by planning and operating side by side with our Mexican partners, and by bringing the full strength of the U.S. government to bear,' Cole said in the Monday statement.
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
SUV crashes into restaurant during food influencers' review: Watch video
A viral video shows the moment two food influencers had a near-death experience while filming content inside a restaurant. Patrick Blackwood told USA TODAY in a statement that he and fellow creator Nina Santiago were eating salmon sliders at Cuvée's Culinary Creations in Houston when an SUV crashed into the glass window next to them. "Tomorrow Is Not Promised," Santiago, also known as @ninaunrated online, wrote in an Instagram post. The video shows the duo sitting on the same side of the booth when the vehicle struck the restaurant, resulting in broken glass shattering over them. Blackwood, who was sitting closer to the window, pushed Santiago out of the way. According to documents from the Harris County Sheriff's Office obtained by Chron, the incident happened on the afternoon of Saturday, Aug. 16 when a motorist thought she had placed her SUV in park, but didn't, and the vehicle "rolled into the business." Watch the jaw-dropping video Watch: Dramatic video shows small plane crash on golf course in Australia 'This could've been our last meal' According to Blackwood, the two did not have any life-threatening injuries, noting only minor scratches. Santiago shared the photos of her in the hospital after the incident. "This experience showed who truly matters; life's too short for grudges or anger. Let go, forgive, live in the now, and cherish those around you this could've been our last meal," she wrote. Blackwood and Santiago were filming for their YouTube food and eating channel, Unrated Ex Files, which has more than 20,000 subscribers. Cuvée's Culinary Creations reposted the video on their Instagram story on Monday, Aug. 18. "It was definitely a crazy weekend at Cuvée's," the restaurant said. "We're just thanking God everyone is safe!" Taylor Ardrey is a news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at tardrey@
