Rape, POCSO trials stretch in several states
As per the Ministry of Law and Justice, 725 FTSCs, including 392 exclusive POCSO (e-POCSO) courts, are currently operational across 29 States and Union Territories. These courts, created under a Centrally Sponsored Scheme funded through the Nirbhaya Fund, have together handled 5,38,772 cases since inception. Of these, 3,34,213 cases have been disposed of - roughly 62% of the total.
However, the average time taken by these courts paints a grim picture. Delhi tops the list of delays, with FTSCs taking 1,562 days (over four years) for rape cases and 1,717 days for POCSO cases. On the other end of the spectrum, Puducherry has reported the fastest POCSO trial completions, averaging just 180 days, while Chhattisgarh took an average 300 and 365 days to dispose POCSO and rape cases respectively.
Among the states, Uttar Pradesh has recorded the highest number of cases under the Fast Track Special Courts scheme, with 1,84,159 cases instituted and 91,459 disposed, marking a disposal rate of just under 50%.
The state-wise performance shows significant variation. Kerala has emerged as a top performer, disposing of 26,202 out of 32,494 cases, marking an impressive 81% clearance.
Among southern states, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh report moderate efficiency - Karnataka has cleared about 73% of cases, while Andhra Pradesh trails with 54% disposed. In contrast, West Bengal shows the worst disposal ratio, having cleared only 457 of 5,611 cases - an abysmal 8%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
New I-T Bill: No ITR filing exemptions for small taxpayers, late filers can claim refunds
New Delhi: The new Income Tax Bill, 2025, passed by the Lok Sabha, clarifies that late-return filers are eligible for refunds on excess taxes deducted in a financial year. Analysts said on Tuesday that the bill was missing the proposal to eliminate the requirement for small taxpayers to file returns just to claim tax refunds. The new I-T Bill kept section 433 intact, which required that 'every claim for refund under this part shall be made by furnishing a return as per section 263'. So, effectively, the law still requires a return of income to claim a refund, with no alternative methods allowed. Taxpayers who file late or revised returns after the due date will still be eligible for refunds, the new bill suggested. Small taxpayers, including senior citizens, must file returns solely to claim a refund for excess taxes deducted at source (TDS), even if their income is below the basic exemption threshold. The committee had recommended that taxpayers should not be required to file a return just to avoid penalties. 'The current mandatory requirement solely to claim a refund could inadvertently lead to prosecution, particularly for small taxpayers whose income falls below the taxable threshold but from whom tax has been deducted at source. In such scenarios, the law should not compel a return merely to avoid penal provisions for non-filing,' the parliamentary panel had earlier suggested. Preeti Sharma, Partner, Global Employer Services, Tax and Regulatory Services, BDO India, said, "The biggest advantage of the new law is that the common man may easily understand it with lesser efforts as compared to the old law. The revised bill has incorporated most of the changes recommended by the Select Committee. Taxpayers still have to undergo the process of assessing the right regime to follow while filing a tax return. Similarly, no changes are proposed in tax rates as introduced in Budget 2025." The new bill was passed, incorporating the recommendations of a 31-member parliamentary panel led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda.
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Deadlock over SIR continues for another day, Lok Sabha adjourned till 12 noon
New Delhi: The Lok Sabha was adjourned till 12 noon today following a fresh wave of protests by Opposition members demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. As Speaker Om Birla entered the House at 11 a.m., Opposition members rose to their feet, shouting slogans and displaying placards, plunging the chamber into chaos. Despite the din, Speaker Birla initiated Question Hour and began calling names. BJP MP Manoj Tiwari from Delhi posed a supplementary question regarding the implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY). Minister of State for Rural Development Dr Chandrasekhar Pemmasani attempted to respond, but his remarks were largely inaudible amid the pandemonium. Tiwari had sought details on whether the government had achieved saturation of eligible households identified through the SECC-2011 (Socio-Economic and Caste Census) and the Awaas+ 2018 survey, and whether any targets were set or houses sanctioned under PMAY-Gramin in the National Capital Territory of Delhi -- particularly in North East Delhi. He also requested district-wise data. In a brief but pointed reply, Dr Pemmasani stated: 'Under PMAY, based on SECC-2011 and the 2018 Awaas+ survey, we sanctioned 3 crore houses. Following the 2024 Awaas survey, the Cabinet approved another 2 crore houses. In total, 5 crore houses have been sanctioned. Of these, 4.12 crore have already been allocated to states, and 3.8 crore have already been given to the states. Out of them, 2.9 crore houses have been constructed.' He contrasted the current government's performance with the previous UPA regime, noting that the central share released under the present administration stood at Rs 2.7 lakh crore, compared to just Rs 66,000 crore during the UPA years. 'We are working in saturation mode,' he added, before his voice was again drowned out. Dr Pemmasani also highlighted two unique features of the 2024 Awaas survey: e-KYC authentication -- implemented for the first time in India -- and self-registration via mobile application. The disruptions intensified before the Minister of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare could respond to a question from Dhairyasheel Sambhajirao Mane. Opposition members demanded an immediate debate on the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision exercise in Bihar, rendering the minister's remarks inaudible. With no signs of order being restored, the Speaker adjourned the House till noon, marking yet another stalled morning in the ongoing Monsoon Session, which has seen repeated disruptions over the SIR issue.
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Kerala Woman Discovers Nine Fraudulent Voter Registrations At Her Thrissur Address
A resident of Thrissur district in Kerala has lodged a formal complaint after discovering that nine unauthorized voter registrations were fraudulently added to her residential address without her knowledge or consent. The incident has sparked broader allegations of electoral irregularities in the constituency that became the Bharatiya Janata Party's only Lok Sabha victory in Kerala during the 2024 elections. Prasanna, who owns flat 4C in Capital Village Apartments located in Poonkunnam, revealed that she is the sole registered voter from her household in Thrissur constituency. Her family comprises four adults and two children, with the remaining adult family members maintaining their voter registration in their ancestral village of Poochinipadam. The unauthorized additions only came to her attention when an individual approached her seeking verification of the registered names. The apartment owner expressed her dismay over the situation, stating that her family had been residing in the property for four years and had no knowledge of any of the individuals whose names were fraudulently registered at her address. She emphasized that such unauthorized additions violated their consent and privacy rights, prompting her to sign a formal complaint that was subsequently submitted to the district collector. Communist Party of India (Marxist) workers have alleged that similar electoral irregularities have occurred across multiple residential complexes in the Poonkunnam area, including Water Lily and Capital Village apartments. According to their claims, vacant residential units were systematically exploited as fictitious addresses to facilitate the transfer of voter registrations from other districts throughout Kerala. The party representatives highlighted the severity of the situation, noting that the legitimate property owners had no knowledge of the individuals whose names were fraudulently registered at their addresses. This pattern suggests a coordinated effort to manipulate voter rolls rather than isolated incidents of administrative error. These revelations have provided additional credibility to allegations made by Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader and former Thrissur candidate VS Sunil Kumar, who has accused the Election Commission of India of permitting widespread irregularities during the voter registration process. Kumar claimed that in a single polling booth, 280 registration applications arrived simultaneously, raising suspicions about the authenticity of the submissions. The former candidate further alleged that the names of individuals from other constituencies as well as migrant workers were improperly added to Thrissur voter rolls. He attributed these irregularities to the Election Commission's decision to streamline the registration process by accepting postal cards as sufficient address verification, which he argued created loopholes for manipulation. Thrissur constituency holds particular political significance as it became the only Lok Sabha seat in Kerala captured by the BJP in 2024. Actor-turned-politician Suresh Gopi secured victory for the party, defeating both Sunil Kumar representing the Left Democratic Front and K Muraleedharan from the United Democratic Front in a closely contested election. Opposition Leader VD Satheesan has demanded a comprehensive investigation into these allegations, accusing the BJP of employing improper methods to inflate voter numbers and compromise the integrity of free and fair elections. He commended Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for bringing attention to alleged electoral manipulation tactics and urged citizens to resist what he characterized as authoritarian and divisive political practices. The incident has raised broader questions about the security and verification processes governing voter registration in India. The ease with which unauthorized names were allegedly added to electoral rolls without property owner knowledge suggests potential systemic vulnerabilities in the current registration system. Electoral integrity advocates argue that such incidents undermine public confidence in democratic processes and highlight the need for more robust verification mechanisms. The allegations come at a time when concerns about electoral manipulation and voter roll irregularities have become increasingly prominent in Indian political discourse. The district administration has yet to announce specific measures in response to the complaint, though the formal submission to the collector suggests that an investigation may be initiated. The outcome of any inquiry could have implications for understanding the scope of alleged irregularities and determining appropriate remedial actions. The controversy surrounding Thrissur's voter rolls reflects broader tensions in Kerala politics, where the BJP's breakthrough victory challenged the traditional two-party dominance of the Left Democratic Front and United Democratic Front. The allegations of electoral manipulation add another layer to the political significance of the constituency's changing dynamics.
