Who was responsible for The Bombing of Pan Am 103 and the Lockerbie bombing?
The BBC's Lockerbie drama series is a compelling watch
WARNING: This article contains potential spoilers from The Bombing of Pan Am 103
The Bombing of Pan Am 103 starts on BBC One this evening (Sunday, April 18) at 9pm, with the six part series airing over the course of three weeks.
The episodes will be dropping airing on BBC One and streaming on the BBC iPlayer on Sundays and Mondays.
This is the second of two TV dramas about the Lockerbie bombing with Sky's Lockerbie: A Search for Truth fronted by Colin Firth, which came out earlier this year.
Lockerbie: A Search for Truth featured material from Dr Jim Swire's book of the same name. The series followed his attempts to find out the truth behind the terror attack, which claimed the lives of his daughter Flora Swire, along with the other 259 passengers and 11 Lockerbie residents from the bomb explosion and the subsequence aeroplane debris.
Now, Netflix and BBC series The Bombing of Pam Am 103, will show the concerted efforts by teams on both sides of the Atlantic working together in a bid to find out what happened and bring to justice those involved.
Here's a look at those found responsible for the 1988 terrorist attack and the reasons behind the bombing.
Who was responsible for The Bombing of Pan Am 103 in Lockerbie?
The Libyan government and multiple individuals were involved in the Lockerbie bombing, according to Scotland's Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi is the only person convicted over the bombing of Pan Am flight 103.
He was found guilty in 2001 during a trial under Scots Law in the Netherlands at Camp Zeist, considered to be neutral ground for the proceedings.
Al-Megrahi was jailed for life with a minimum of 27 years, initially serving time at Barlinnie Prison in Scotland, before being moved to HM Prison Greenock.
His first appeal in 2001 failed and he ended his second appeal in 2009 because it would affect a Prisoner Transfer Scheme that would allow him to return to Libya.
In 2009, Megrahi was released from prison on compassionate grounds after suffering from terminal prostate cancer. He died at his home in Tripoli, Libya aged 60 in 2012.
A third posthumous appeal came about in 2020 but was rejected by judges in 2021.
According to Libya's former justice minister Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the nation's former leader Colonel Gaddafi ordered the Lockerbie bombing.
The politician told Swedish newspaper Expressen in 2011: "To hide it, he [Gaddafi] did everything in his power to get al-Megrahi back from Scotland."
In 2003, leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi accepted Libya was responsible for the Lockerbie bombing and paid compensation to the victims' families.
However, he never personally admitted to giving the order for the attack.
There's now been a new development. Libyan national Abu Agila Mas'ud is alleged to have helped make the bomb that was detonated on the Pan Am 103 flight.
He was originally due to go on trial in Washington on May 12 this year, but the legal process has now been delayed due to submissions from both the prosecution and defence.
What was the reason for the Lockerbie bombing?
The terrorist attack was aimed at the USA. Of the passengers on the Pan Am flight, 190 were American and the rest were from 20 countries including 43 British people.
There's been speculation that the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 was a retaliatory attack against the USA for bombing Libya's capital Tripoli in 1986.
The bombardment resulted in the death of Gaddafi's infant daughter, who was around five or six months at the time, according to Britannica.
The 1986 US bombings themselves had been in retaliation for Libya's perceived terrorist activities after a bomb exploded in West Berlin at the nightclub frequented by American soldiers.
Relations between the USA and Libya were strained as far back as 1969 after Gaddafi's coup, when the military leader removed American oil companies and nationalised them.
Things deteriorated further in the 1970s when a mob attacked and set fire to the US Embassy in Tripoli in 1979, leading America to designate Libya a a "state sponsor of terrorism" the same year.
During the 1980s, this relationship got worse with the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing and the subsequent US airstrikes and then the Lockerbie bombing.
In 2003, hostile relations between the two nations began to settle and normalise with the lifting of a 23-year travel ban to Libya.
Sadly, things again became strained in 2011 with the Libyan Civil War when the Gaddafi regime was overthrown.
Since 2011, there has been instability in the country following the collapse of Gaddafi's regime with political divisions and violent clashes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a travel expert but Booking.com host scam nearly caught me out'
For years holidaymakers have been losing cash through a scam that targets customers who have made bookings on Milo Boyd takes a look at why it's still catching out people As my thumb hovered over the link, the BBC's Rogue Traders researcher, who was helpfully sitting next to me, said: 'I'm pretty sure that's a scam. Block the number and don't click the link." I did as advised and felt a sense of relief at a bullet dodged, followed by a tinge of embarrassment at having almost fallen for a travel scam. That would be a bad look, given my job title and the fact I was at a travel event surrounded by colleagues when the message came through. In my defence, it was pretty convincing. The WhatsApp message arrived with a name and photo attached just after a bit of back-and-forth with the actual host on the site. The 'guest relations manager' mentioned where and when I was going, and when I made the reservation. All would be well with the booking, they assured me, so long as I could confirm that my card details were not stolen - something the system had flagged to them as a possibility. A quick click of the link to confirm my details and I'd be off on holiday as planned, no problem, they promised. I screenshotted the messages and blocked the account, repeating the process for the 'head administrator of the apartments' who later followed up on her colleague's behalf. In this instance, a scam avoided, but plenty of questions remained. How had they got my details? How much would they've stolen if I had clicked the link? How many others are being targeted this way? The answer to the first question came several days after I explained what had happened to A customer service representative apologised before blaming the security breach on the host, saying that they must have had their own website infected with malware, giving the hackers access to my information. This is an issue for websites such as which send customers to third-party websites. These are often run by B&B owners or holiday let landlords with one property, who are unlikely to have the same security resources as a major travel firm. Potentially adding to the security issues is the fact that it takes less than 15 minutes to set up a host page, with no requirement to show a passport or official ID. In terms of the second and third questions, the amounts stolen and the number of victims are significant. The scam has been bubbling along for years, with the UK's Action Fraud having received 532 reports from individuals, with a total of £370,000 lost between June 2023 and September 2024. Between them, they are more than £370,000 out of pocket. They may also have been victims of a breach of their data rights. Several years ago was slapped with a €475K fine for failing to take action following a GDPR breach. If anything, the problem seems to be getting worse. Last June, admitted that there had been an increase of between 500 and 900 per cent in scams carried out on the platform in the previous 18 months. In 2023 Dr Leigh Jones, a University of Oxford academic, told the Mirror how she had lost more than £1,000 at the hands of scammers after she booked multiple hotel rooms for her family ahead of her wedding day in Vietnam. "It was a really impressive phishing scam. After this, I will be done with Why is there no warning on their website? I'd advise people to switch to another way to booking holidays," she told the Mirror at the time. Earlier this year Which? found that some customers had been contacted by scammers through the company's official app, making it much harder to distinguish it from a genuine message from a host. Not only are customers losing money, the scammers are causing accommodation operators major headaches. Balaram Thapa runs a hotel in Kathmandu, Nepal. Recently, one of his customers fell victim to a phishing scam. "One of our guests booked a room at our hotel through received a confirmation, and then later got a message that appeared to come from us, asking them to reconfirm their payment via a third-party link. It looked completely legitimate, with our hotel name and reservation details included," the hotelier explained. The guest paid through the fake link and only realised it was a scam when they arrived. "It was a frustrating situation for both the guest and our team. Not only did they lose money, but it damaged their trust in the booking process—and in us, even though we had no role in the scam. It's become clear to me that travellers need to be especially cautious about messages they receive, even if they appear to be from official booking platforms." Balaram contacted and was told that the hotel's account may have been compromised. Their advice was to change the password. "They didn't offer any further assistance or compensation," the hospitality manager added. To help the distraught customer, Balaram offered a 50% discount on their stay. "It was a loss on both sides, but we did our best to make it right," he said. Sean Malloy is an American lawyer who has represented phishing scam victims in court and offered some advice for those fearful of being caught out. "I have dealt with numerous instances of phishing scams that resulted in financial or emotional losses. When platforms like are impersonated, consumers are often caught off-guard, especially since the communication can appear so legitimate," he told the Mirror. "To protect themselves, travellers should NEVER CLICK any payment links sent in email or text, and always verify bookings and requests by using the app or site itself. Turn on two-factor authentication when you can, and review your accounts periodically for evidence of hacking." A spokesperson for told the Mirror: "While we can confirm that systems have not been breached, we are aware that some of our accommodation partners and customers have been impacted by phishing attacks sent by professional criminals. Online fraud is unfortunately a battle many industries are facing, and at we are committed to tackling this issue head on. "We have a number of robust security measures in place and continually invest in advanced technologies, including AI and machine-learning, to detect and block the vast majority of threats before they can have an impact. Once a concern has been raised, our security teams will investigate immediately and work with partners to secure their accounts as quickly as possible." The spokesperson advised that customers concerned about payment messages should "carefully check the payment policy details on their booking confirmation to be sure that the message is legitimate. When in doubt, it's always best to contact our customer service team or click on 'report an issue' which is included in the chat function. It is important to note that we would never ask a customer to share payment information via email, chat messages, text messages or phone. If the customer has any concerns relating to credit card payments, they should contact their bank for further assistance. "Like many businesses operating in the e-commerce space, we and our partners can be attractive targets for cybercriminals. However, thanks to our robust measures, considering our global scope and the millions of bookings we facilitate weekly, actual incidents are rare. We continually invest in advanced technologies, including AI and machine-learning, to detect and block the vast majority of threats before they can have any impact. In the event of a confirmed partner account takeover scenario, we inform guests via email providing a warning about the potential of receiving phishing messages. "We take the process of verifying accommodation listings seriously. While partners can register in less than 15 minutes, they are then exposed to multiple controls and checks during sign-up, after submission and before their listings become bookable."
Libya Herald
4 hours ago
- Libya Herald
Aldabaiba hails recent security operations, vows to end militias – warns against illegal eastern parallel spending leading to inflation and LD devaluation
Speaking at yesterday's 2nd Ordinary Cabinet Meeting of 2025 held at Tripoli's Al-Nasser Woods Complex (formerly Rixos Complex), Tripoli based Libyan Prime Minister, Abd Alhamid Aldabaiba, said that the recent security operations (clashes with the Stability Support Apparatus (SSA) militia and Abdelraouf Kara's Special Deterrence Force (SDF) / RADA, and their allies), were successful. He blamed the subsequent disorder, fear and damage caused by these clashes and counter-clashes on the militias. Aldabaiba also called on the Attorney General, the Audit Bureau, and the Administrative Control Authority to investigate the over LD 100 billion of parallel spending by the eastern Libyan administration. This parallel spending, he warned will increase inflation, cost of living and reduce the foreign exchange value of the Libyan dinar. It will lead to the economic ruin of Libya, he warned. Security initiative Aldabaiba hailed the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Defence for their role in imposing security on behalf of the legitimate state. He stressed that the people support state security and not unaccountable militias and that he had received wide international support for the recent anti-militia security operation. On the other hand, he criticised, domestically and internationally, those who supported these militias – implying Hafter and the eastern Libyan administration – militias that engage in illegal activity including illegal detention and imprisonment. Demobilisation of militias, Interior Ministry and Presidency Council forces Speaking at the prompting of his PM on planned security reforms, Acting Interior Minister Imad Trabelsi bemoaned the fact that militias were better armed and stronger (and actually more battle experienced due to their fighting in the February 2011 revolution) than the official Interior Ministry forces. He said there can be no state without security and proposed (to applause from the PM and cabinet members) the demobilization of militias and some Interior Ministry and Presidency Council forces. The plan to demobilise even some Interior Ministry forces implies, and simultaneous confirms, if needed, that some Interior Ministry forces were infiltrated and controlled by militias. He called on all current members of these forces intended for demobilisation to join the Interior Ministry or the Defence Ministry if they wished to continue their careers in the security forces. Interjecting, the PM also vowed to demobilise any security forces under his Office. Continuing, Trabelsi said how can Interior Ministry forces operate and respond to government calls for help and intervention if there are forces operating in the field that are stronger. Trabelsi said how can he be held responsible and accountable if there are other stronger forces operating in the field. Interjecting during Trabelsi's speech again, Aldabaiba stressed that this is the state's project that will be implemented. He warned militias hiding behind tribes and cities, saying that time was over. The Libyan people want a strong state Aldabaiba said the Libyan people want a strong state. He said militias must not be feared and that there is no going back (to a state dominated by militias). There is no other option, he stressed, we must impose the state on them. Militia coercion of Ministers Aldabaiba pointed to various ministers (which the cameras refrained from showing), implying that they were coerced to make decisions by militias. ''No more coercion of Ministers or Ministries like the coercion of the Minister of Health (who is currently under arrest) into importing medicine from a non-medicine origination country (Iraq)'' Aldabaiba revealed that militias even interfered in the Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca. He vowed to refer them to investigation after the pilgrimage is over. He warned his attentive Ministers that there will be no more excuses for them and their officials for giving into militia coercion. Those who cannot perform their jobs (due to militia coercion) should resign, he stated. We will no longer keep quiet on militia coercion, he vowed. We will pursue those who do not give in the state, he explained. Resuming his speech, Interior Minister Trabelsi said his ministry was following up on all crimes from 2012, whether criminal or financial, and referring them to the Attorney General's Office. To which Aldabaiba added ''we will not protect any Minister or his employees against the law''.
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Pictured: Algerian thief who threatened to behead Aled Jones
A thief who threatened to behead Aled Jones with a machete went on to steal a Bridgerton actresses's phone after being released early from youth detention. Zacariah Boulares, an Algerian national who has 12 previous convictions relating to 28 offences, has now been pictured for the first time after turning 18. Aged just 16, he approached Jones, a BBC Songs of Praise presenter, who was walking through Chiswick in west London with his son, and threatened to cut his arm off with a machete unless he handed over his £17,000 Rolex. Wimbledon youth court was told he later threatened to behead the 54-year-old if he continued following him after the mugging on July 7 2023. He had also previously stolen a Rolex worth £20,000 from a 78-year-old man at Paddington station in west London. After stealing Jones's watch, Boulares appeared late to court hearings on several occasions before eventually pleading guilty to robbery and possession of an offensive weapon and was detained in youth custody. Two years later, having served 14 months of his 24-month detention and training order, he snatched the phone of Bridgerton actress Genevieve Chenneour from a coffee shop table in Kensington, west London, in February. Chenneour played Miss Clara Livingston in the third season of the Netflix period drama. Boulares attacked the actress when she confronted him, leaving her with concussion and he also kicked and punched another customer who tried to stop him from escaping from Joe & The Juice. Boulares admitted stealing her phone and assaulting another customer when he appeared at Westminster magistrates' court last week via video link from HMP Wormwood Scrubs. In a separate charge, he pleaded guilty to another theft after he stole a black leather bag from a customer at a pizza restaurant. He has been remanded in custody and will be sentenced at Isleworth Crown Court on June 17.
