
Before hashtags and headlines: Students who fought for Mattoo
Priyadarshini Mattoo
barely rings a bell, but for those who know, it echoes with pain, injustice, and a haunting silence. Her case was not just about a brutal crime — it was about a nation's collective heartbreak.
It was the sheer emotions of many that fuelled the long, relentless battle for justice.
Priyadarshini was just 25 when she was found strangled in her home in 1996. A decade later, in 2006, a group of students — many still in school or college — came together to lead the 'Justice for Priyadarshini' campaign. They rallied together, knocked on doors, held vigils and demanded answers. They may not have known Priyadarshini personally, but her story felt personal. Their movement reignited public memory, and under growing pressure,
Delhi High Court
took up the case for day-to-day hearings.
"The brutality of the case sparked national outrage. But over the years, that outrage faded — overshadowed by new headlines and collective forgetting," said Vivek Raina, who was part of the campaign.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Another member was Aditya Razdan, now working with an MNC, who still remembers the weight of the Mattoo family's pain. "They were Kashmiri Pandits, displaced migrants who built their lives back from scratch. They had no power, no influence.
But they believed in the system. They got their daughter into law school, thinking education would empower her. And then this happened. In her own home. In the capital."
For Dhruv Suri, then a law student and now a lawyer, the memory of Priyadarshini's father, Chaman Lal Mattoo, remains vivid. "His determination was the only reason the case stayed alive. Even when he was exhausted, he never gave up. He believed the judicial system existed for the common man.
He used to say, 'It must deliver justice.' But when the trial court acquitted the accused, despite acknowledging his likely guilt, he was devastated.
"
Despite this, Mattoo never stepped away. "Even in his old age, he would show up for every hearing, speak to the media, and meet activists like us," said Suri. "The public support gave him hope. People came out on the streets, and journalists ensured his voice was heard."
That year, HC overturned the trial court's acquittal and convicted Santosh Singh of rape and murder. A few months later, it handed down a death sentence. "That judgment mattered," said Raina. "It showed justice could be delayed but not denied. But then came the twist."
In 2010, Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment. "We were heartbroken," said Suri. "We connected with the family… it felt like justice slipped again.
Still, we took some comfort in the fact that a conviction was upheld."
Raina remembers meeting Priyadarshini's father once toward the end. "He was frail. His pain was unmistakable. I wasn't married back then. Now I have a daughter. Now I understand his desperation, his helplessness… What justice did he really get?"
Priyadarshini's family slowly withered away in the long, painful fight for justice. Her mother died first, then her father — without getting closure.
Her siblings, perhaps worn down by grief, remained distant from the struggle.
What remains of Priyadarshini today is not just a name in a legal file, but the memories her father clung to. Suri recalls how he always carried her photos, spoke of her smile, her dreams. "Her legacy was his only reason to live. And now he's gone too."
Aditya Razdan also met Mattoo during those years. "He barely spoke. He was just… broken. The system failed him."
As talk of the convict's potential release resurfaces, those who once led the charge are watching in disbelief. "Ask an 18-year-old today, and they probably haven't heard of Priyadarshini," said Raina. "What message are we sending if he walks free?"
Suri added, "He wasn't some misguided youth. He was a law student, the son of an influential man. What are we telling society — that such a person gets another shot at life while the girl he killed gets forgotten?"
Razdan said Priyadarshini's father feared this exact moment. "He knew once he was gone, the case would slowly be forgotten. And here we are."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi High Court dismisses Jacqueline Fernandez plea in money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar
New Delhi: In a setback to Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez , Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed her plea to end criminal proceedings in a Rs 200-crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar, currently imprisoned for fraud. Justice Anish Dayal dismissed the plea that also sought to quash the chargesheet by the Enforcement Directorate and proceedings pending before the special court under the stringent Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against her and others. A copy of the detailed judgment is awaited. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Fernandez had challenged ED's case against her over allegations she received lavish gifts from Chandrasekhar and was part of alleged money laundering. She appeared before ED for questioning in the investigation launched after Delhi Police booked Chandrasekhar for extortion and cheating Aditi Singh, wife of former Ranbaxy promoter Shivinder Singh, of Rs 200 crore. While police investigated Chandrasekhar's activities of alleged extortion and fraud from inside jail, ED named Fernandez as an accused in the money laundering probe. In her defence, the actor contended that if as per ED's claims, money was distributed among other individuals too, then everyone involved, be it a grocery vendor, court officials or lawyers, could be deemed guilty of money laundering. She questioned the premise that any financial transaction involving a criminal automatically constitutes money laundering, suggesting such an interpretation would create undue fear. The actor said that she was an innocent victim of Chandrasekhar's "maliciously targeted attack". "There is absolutely no indication she had any involvement whatsoever in aiding him to launder his purportedly ill-gotten wealth. Hence, she cannot be prosecuted for the offences under sections 3 and 4 of PMLA," her plea said. However, ED opposed any relief, submitting Fernandez continued to enjoy Chandrasekhar's gifts despite being aware of his criminal antecedents. The agency also pointed out a special court took cognisance of the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) and prima facie found a case. The cognisance order was not challenged, ED said, adding there are other ongoing investigations against Chandrasekhar across the country. Chandrasekhar and his wife Leena Paulose, facing proceedings in a money laundering case of ED, were arrested by Delhi Police, which invoked MCOCA. The duo allegedly used hawala routes and created shell companies along with other accused persons to park the money earned as proceeds of the crime.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Lilavati Trust FIR: SC grants urgent hearing to HDFC Bank chief
New Delhi: The on Thursday agreed to grant an urgent hearing on CEO and managing director Sashidhar Jagdishan's plea challenging an FIR lodged against him on a complaint by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, and listed the case for July 4. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi mentioned the case before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Vinod Chandran and the case has been listed before a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and R Mahadevan. Rohatgi submitted that hearing on Jagdishan's plea before the Bombay High Court was getting delayed as three judges so far recused themselves in the case and pleaded that he was left with no option but to approach SC, as the case had now been posted to July 14. The FIR was lodged in Bandra Police Station and as per the complaint filed by the Trust, Jagdishan allegedly accepted a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore in exchange for providing financial advice to help the Chetan Mehta Group retain illegal and undue control over the Trust's governance. The Trust claimed that Jagdishan and his family received free medical treatment from Lilavati Hospital. The matter was mentioned before the HC on June 30, when Jagdishan's counsel pressed for interim relief. However, noting that there is no urgency in the matter, the HC listed the matter for July 14. This prompted him to move the SC for relief. tnn


Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Shocking that well-placed educated persons ‘illegally' reside in Tardeo high-rise risking lives, BMC can't shut eyes: HC
The Bombay High Court on Thursday expressed 'shock' over how 'well-placed educated' persons continue to reside 'illegally' in the 34-storey high-rise in Tardeo in south Mumbai having no fire NOC and part-Occupation Certificate (OC), by putting lives of their families in risk. The HC questioned BMC whether it was going to 'shut its eyes' to the violations and 'casually' consider the issue. It asked the civic body to file an affidavit detailing an action proposed by it against the violations and steps to be taken against such occupiers, after which it will pass an order which will set precedent for such buildings across the city. A bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor was hearing a batch of pleas pertaining to the tower of Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society, Tulsiwadi, Tardeo occupied by 50 flat purchasers of total 62 flats. On June 30, the HC had noted that there were 'glaring illegalities' in the building as it did not have any fire NOC or any approval from the Chief Fire Officer (CFO) of the BMC and there was no Occupation Certificate (OC) granted for nearly half of the floors (from 17 to 34). The HC had slammed the BMC for failing to take drastic action against 'daylight violations' and had said that prima facie the families were living 'illegally' at their own risk and consequences. On Thursday, senior advocate S U Kamdar for BMC submitted that as far as fire NOC was concerned, there cannot be any 'compromise' or 'regularisation' and the society will have to remove the offending portions and correct the same as per fire requirement. He added that in case of OC, certain approvals are required to be availed from Commissioner, after which there can be a regularisation if permissible. 'If fire NOC is non-negotiable, then what would be the status of the present residents? It is a 'serious issue' on which we really want to pass appropriate orders. What would be the stand of the corporation on a building which is being occupied without fire NOC? What should be the status of all such occupiers and what steps should be taken? Can they continue to reside? This is going to set an example to all those buildings and high-rises across the city,' the bench orally remarked. The judges added, 'We want to hear from the BMC whether it should consider this casually by saying that you (occupiers) please continue… Is BMC going to shut your eyes or are going to take some action? We want BMC to be impeccable in implementing rules and regulations.' Kamdar said that BMC had taken action and had issued several notices to the society. 'We want a statement on affidavit as to what should be done as on date when the fire NOC is not there. If clear stand is not there, we will interpret that it is a tacit approval and this appears to be the general policy of the Municipal Corporation and all buildings which are occupied without fire NOC, they can continue to do so and lives of the people can be risked in this manner,' the bench said. 'They (occupiers) are a society of well-placed educated people who continue to reside in a building, which poses such a grave risk to the lives of their families…it is shocking. We are concerned with a larger issue…. We are not going to permit any illegality to happen in any building. Because, things ought not to be looking as if it is beyond a municipal corporation to handle this situation in the city. Every time it should give an impression that SRA, MHADA, BMC or other municipal corporations are least bothered about law and everything comes to the court,' the bench added. It said it would not permit occupation without OC and suggested the flat owners make 'alternative arrangements for temporary residence.' The HC posted the matter to July 10.