Proposal to allow outdoor drinking area in Evansville to be discussed on Monday
Evansville coffee shop to offer free drinks to CenterPoint customers, employees
The proposed area would begin at the corner of northwest 1st Street and Riverside Drive following the curve of the riverfront up to the Pigeon Creek Greenway Passage until Mickey's Kingdom Park. Businesses and vendors permitted to sell beverages within the DORA would be required to use cups that have the DORA logo purchased from the economic improvement district.
The proposal states the DORA would be operational seven days a week, with hours of operation between 4:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. on week nights and 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. on weekends. If approved, the DORA hours of operation would be 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily between the months of June and July.
The City Council is expected to address the proposal during Monday's meeting.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
5 hours ago
- Business Journals
St. Charles data center dead after developers withdraw their proposal, mayor says
The developers of a massive, secretive and controversial data center project in St. Charles have withdrawn their offer from the city. St. Charles Mayor Dan Borgmeyer told KSDK on Monday that City Council members will no longer vote on "Project Cumulus" after the application's withdrawal. "The vote was whether or not they could use diesel generators for power. That's all the vote was about. As soon as people heard diesel fuel a million gallons in the well field, they became upset. Well, there's 125 generators, so it's not a million gallons someplace. Disrespectful of all that, we don't want one generator to leak. They had measures in place to take care of a lot of that, but the fact of the matter is that it was a lack of information. The culprit was transparency," Borgmeyer said. The data center has received widespread pushback from over 5,500 residents over concerns of water pollution, energy bill increases, and general community impacts. Two members of the City Council recently . GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events Councilmember Justin Foust, who represents Ward 6 in the city, previously said it would be "nearly impossible" for him to support the project. He expressed disappointment after the developers pulled their offer. "Residents deserve better communication, real transparency, and the chance to have their voices recorded through an open vote," Foust said in a statement. "Unfortunately, the decision to pull the application was made by the applicant, not the City Council." Foust urged residents to still attend Tuesday's City Council meeting to make their voices heard on the matter, in case "this applicant returns or another comes forward." The council meeting is scheduled to be held at the St. Charles Convention Center's Junior Ballroom on the first floor. Developers were having little success in convincing residents that the data center would be an ultimate good for the community. Many residents have shown up to give passionate speeches against the data center at past City Council and planning and zoning meetings. A petition to "Stop the Hazardous Data Center" was signed by nearly 5,000 residents a week after it launched. "No Data Center" fliers were recently sent out across St. Charles. The fliers claimed the project was dangerous and wrong for the city for numerous reasons, along with listing numerous data center projects that have been stopped across the country, including in Arizona, Virginia and Tennessee. The flyer was paid for by the "Good Government Committee" and urged people to contact their council members. Some residents said that the format of a recent open house made it difficult to get exact answers about the project, in part because everyone needed to talk over each other to be heard. Others had hoped for the opportunity to speak publicly on their issues, but officials didn't give them a chance to do so. "I think it's very important that people understand, we listened and even if they hadn't withdrawn it, I'm almost positive it would not have made it on Tuesday," Borgmeyer said. Tim Kline, a longtime farmer in the St. Charles area, has been watching the area for years. "The contaminated area is on the far east end of the protected area and this was going to be developed on the far west end of the area, which is over a mile away from where the contamination was from UE and Findett corporations, and I just hope we can get this stopped down here," Kline said. Kline wanted to thank everyone who signed the petition and showed up at the open house. And while he's gotten his wish for now, he's worried the industrial zoning of the area will allow Project Cumulus or another company to try again. "It's our protected water source. So, we need to get together and see if we can get it re-zoned back to agricultural and stop the filling on top of our water source," Kline said. After the open house, Borgmeyer decided to withdraw his support from the project. He added that the non-disclosure agreement went much further than the ones they "do all the time." "This one went to the point where it was just ridiculous. And they needed to step back, and there's a lot of good things about the project, but there's a lot of bad things about the project. And I think until the full scope of it's understood, they've withdrawn. I don't know if they'll come back or not," Borgmeyer said. He also addressed rumours that the original land owners are his cousins, which he says was brought to light by his last opponent for the mayor's office. "I think it's a second or third cousin. I have no idea who the people are. I'm related to just about everybody in St. Charles, the Boscherts, the Echols, and everybody else. I've talked to [St. Charles County Executive] Steve Ehlmann. We had lunch yesterday. He said, 'Yeah, we are,' I'm even related to Steve Ehlmann. So it was a political shot," Borgmeyer said. Project Cumulus attorney Korb Maxwell said he wants residents to know they were heard and that's part of why they pulled the application. "It was time to re-evaluate the approach that we made to the site and look at really focusing on what changes can we make to the site that may garner more support, but also what changes can we make to the process," Maxwell said. KSDK's Laura Barczewski asked Maxwell if they are looking elsewhere or if they will try again on the same site. "I think the project fellows team is always keeping our options open and looking at options all across the nation and in the Ameren service territory, but we really like this site. I think it has a lot to offer. I think it could be a incredibly compelling opportunity for the St. Charles region and for us, if we're able to get out our message effectively and communicate with both the businesses and the city," he said. This is the full statement released by Project Cumulus: "The Cumulus team announced today that it is withdrawing its conditional use permit application from consideration at the August 19th St. Charles City Council meeting. The decision will allow the team to incorporate recent community feedback and prepare a revised proposal for future review. "Over the past months, Project Cumulus has conducted extensive analyses of the project, its impacts, and its anticipated community benefits. While this work has been substantial, the team recognizes the importance of strengthening its outreach process to ensure information is accessible and clearly communicated to the public. "Project Cumulus is committed to working hand-in-hand with the City of St. Charles and its residents. Cumulus believes this project has the potential to deliver significant benefits to the city and the greater St. Louis region, and we want to ensure it is done the right way — with open dialogue and meaningful collaboration. "The Cumulus team will continue working closely with city officials and the public in the coming months to develop a proposal that reflects shared priorities and delivers long-term value to the community." Representatives for the project will still be at the council meeting on Tuesday, and the council will still take public feedback on the issue despite the withdrawal. View KSDK's full report and video here.
CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
Amid layoffs, Denver City Council prepares for $26,000 mountain retreat
Ten of Denver's 13 city council members are planning to attend a $26,000, two night, one day retreat in Colorado's foothills next week for team building and professional development, at the same time the city is laying off workers and trying to find ways to cut costs and save money. "We signed this contract prior to knowing of any budget shortfall," said Council President Amanda Sandoval, who pushed for the trip at the Lone Rock retreat ( in Park County. "We signed this contract prior to knowing of any furlough days, we signed this contract prior to knowing of any layoffs," said Sandoval. She said the council retreat had been in the works since December 2024, and the contract was signed May 8. Two weeks later, Mayor Mike Johnston revealed the depths of the city budget problems that would necessitate city workers being laid off, others needing to take furlough days and belt-tightening across city agencies. "I would never have done any of this had I known any of this information prior to signing that contract," said Sandoval. The council president said she tried to void the contract and get the city's money back or change the date of the retreat, but could not, so council members will travel to the location near Bailey the evening of Aug. 27 and return the morning of Aug. 29 -- a city furlough day. The city will pay $16,000 for facility use, meals and rooms, $2,600 for transportation with ADA accommodation and $7,600 for a facilitator and assessment tool. The money will come out of the Denver City council central budget. Three council members have conflicts and will not attend, said Sandoval, but three council staff members will attend. Sandoval said she previously went to a retreat at the facility and was impressed by its ADA accommodations. On its website, the Lone Rock says it has 60 individual cabins each with an "oxygen enrichment system," a fitness center and yoga room along with meeting spaces, restaurants and 'breathtaking views." While the timing may not be ideal, Sandoval maintains that the retreat is still appropriate. "So just because we're having a time of crisis doesn't mean council shouldn't learn to work better together. It really doesn't." Asked if city council could have found a less expensive option for a retreat, Sandoval said, "I've done research on places ... and there's not a lot of options. We do not have a facility like that in Denver." "Ultimately," said Sandoval, "this is about bringing council together to work better together so we can serve the residents of Denver."
CBS News
17 hours ago
- CBS News
Ceres approves new gas station despite local push back
A new Maverik gas station is coming to Ceres after city leaders rejected an appeal to block the project. The City Council voted 4 to 0 last week to approve the travel center at Mitchell and Rohde roads near Highway 99. City officials say the project will generate as much as $700,000 a year in sales tax, create about 15 jobs, and bring new amenities -- including the city's first RV dump station. "This is not a truck stop, it's a truck refueling station or travel center," City Manager Doug Dunford said. "Get your gas, use the restroom, and go." Opponents argued the project would bring safety issues. Appellant Sunny Ghai said the fueling station is too small to safely serve commercial trucks and should be located at a larger truck stop. He emphasized the appeal was not about protecting existing businesses. "We offered to withdraw our appeal if they removed the truck fueling," Ghai said in a statement to CBS News Sacramento. "Trucks need to fuel at truck stops and not at gas stations, where an accident between a car and a truck could cause disaster." Ceres Police Chief Trenton Johnson said his department does not anticipate higher crime or traffic problems. He pointed out the site is currently a dirt lot where police often respond to illegal vending. "Building this out gives people a place to go," Johnson said. Mayor Javier Lopez said filling the long vacant lot had been a city priority. "We're not a monopoly," Lopez said. "We need to give other businesses and entrepreneurs the opportunity. Healthy competition is part of that." The project could break ground as early as 2027. Ghai said he is considering a lawsuit against the city.
