De Beers pushes for zero-tariff entry of cut and polished Indian diamonds into US
Representational image
De Beers Group is working with the Indian government to create a zero-tariff policy for diamonds entering the United States after being cut and polished in India. The group has already met with commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal and urged him to speak with his US counterpart to enable the 'free flow of diamonds'.
Al Cook, CEO of De Beers Group, told ToI that 90% of diamonds are exported from India, and it is vital for the country to finalise a deal before 9 July. 'Britain and India seem to be doing very good jobs on working with tariff deals with the US. I am very confident that India will reach a deal ahead of July 9. We have already seen a deal in the UK,' he said.
Cook mentioned that apart from India and the US, most of the world allows the 'free flow of natural diamonds', as these are produced only in a few places globally, mostly in Africa. Since diamonds are mined in the US and then cut and polished in India, a zero-duty entry into the American market would not lead to any job losses, he said. 'We don't think there should be a tax on love,' the De Beers CEO said.
Cook also spoke of changing trends in the diamond trade. He said that earlier, the focus used to be on diamonds 'from India' and 'by India', but now it is shifting to 'for India' and 'to India', referring to the growing demand within the country. India is now the second-largest market for natural diamonds in the world.
Read More China to investigate fashion firm PVH for suspected boycott
The British-born CEO said that the Indian natural diamond market is set to double to $20 billion by 2030, up from $10 billion at present. He said this growth is driven by rising aspirations among Indian buyers. According to him, India's natural diamond consumption rose by 12% year-on-year in 2024.
Commenting on the growing division between natural and lab-grown diamonds (LGDs), Cook said that with LGD wholesale value falling below $60 per carat, the importance of diamond testing technology has gone up. He said that India, which has overtaken China as the world's second-largest natural diamond market, is becoming more valuable to De Beers.
Cook said Indian consumers, unlike their US counterparts, are not shifting in large numbers towards LGDs. 'One can buy 20 LGDs for the price of 1 carat of natural diamond,' he told ET. He added that LGDs will continue to be 'mass-produced, low-cost, pretty and fun jewellery to wear.' He said Indian buyers prefer natural diamonds because they value uniqueness. 'Indian consumers are more sophisticated, and they like natural things. They believe in the uniqueness of natural diamonds and therefore the demand is growing,' he said.
De Beers recently closed its LGD jewellery brand Lightbox, which was launched in 2018. This move reflects the group's renewed focus on natural diamonds. Meanwhile, prices of some grades of rough diamonds are going up due to tight supply in the market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Labour has wiped out Thatcher's legacy
The Thatcherite dream finally died this month. Margaret Thatcher's 11 years in office had a long afterlife, perhaps longer than that of any prime minister other than Clement Attlee. She reimagined both her own party and indeed that of her Labour opponents. There would have been no Blairite interregnum in the socialist party's relentless 'egalitarianism before all else' philosophy without her. Even more significantly, Mrs Thatcher transformed British society – at least for a while. But 35 years after leaving Downing Street for the last time, Thatcherism has finally expired. The Iron Lady's legacy has not managed to survive the vicissitudes of Keir Starmer's Government. With the renationalisation of South Western Railway as the next step towards the full state ownership of Britain's railways, that moment has come to an end. Rail privatisation, only enacted in 1993 when John Major was prime minister and implemented amid the last gasps of 18 years of Tory rule, was a late flowering of the valiant attempt to roll back the frontiers of the state. Its implementation was bodged and the infrastructure soon fell back into public ownership in 2002. The privatisation programme started slowly in Mrs Thatcher's first term with various sell-offs, most notably the flotation of 51pc of British Aerospace in 1981. It really took off and grabbed the public imagination with the float of British Telecom in 1984. Millions of people on ordinary incomes caught the bug for investing in shares and these sales were hugely oversubscribed. Privatisation was not just an attempt to inject dynamism into the British economy, although it undoubtedly achieved this. Thatcherism has been denounced by the Left as an attempt to transform the very ethos of the UK, to dismantle the collectivist assumptions that had taken hold since the Second World War. They pillory Mrs Thatcher for declaring that there is no such thing as society (she never said it) and that we owe our fellow citizens nothing in terms of social solidarity (she did not believe that either). The Left are wrong in this caricature, but they are right to say that Thatcherism was an attempt to fundamentally change our country's character. And privatisation – alongside council house sales – was a cornerstone of this mission. At the 1985 Tory party conference Mrs Thatcher declared that she hoped a day would come 'where owning shares is as common as having a car'. She saw that by spreading the benefits of ownership, both of people's homes but also of the country's assets, Britain could become an entrepreneurial society; a country where bosses and workers saw themselves as in conflict could become one where all strived for affluence. In short, Mrs Thatcher hoped Britain would have an American future, where the accumulation of wealth was seen as a virtue, not a sin. She believed that once people have a proprietorial stake in the country – be that via owning their council house or possessing a few hundred shares in BP or British Steel – old class antagonisms would over time wither away. The Left saw these privatisations as a bribe; just as council house sales were discounted, shares were deliberately underpriced so the public could make a quick buck. And they are right in this analysis, but it was not an electoral bung but rather a strategy to change public attitudes. Perhaps the apotheosis of this was the 1986 'Tell Sid' advertising campaign for the sale of British Gas. Its message was unapologetic: these flotations are for everyone. And it worked, those owning shares directly rose from around three million people in 1979, or around 7pc of adults, to over 12 million, or nearly a quarter of adults, when Mrs Thatcher left office. This was further augmented by the big demutualisations of the late 1990s – Abbey National in 1989, Northern Rock in 1997 and Standard Life in 2006. This trend has reversed. The proportion of UK-listed shares directly owned by UK-resident individuals was 10.8pc at the end of 2022, down from 12pc just two years earlier. Today 57.7pc of UK shares by value are owned by overseas investors, a record high. If you go back to the 1960s, those figures are reversed with 54pc of shares owned by British individuals. This had fallen to 28pc by 1981. Mrs Thatcher did not reverse the overall trend in a declining percentage of the stock market being directly owned by individuals, but did vastly increase the number of people owning those shares. The long-term decline is not an entirely negative one. The days when the well-off would buy, say, £10,000 of Marks & Spencer shares and then hold them for 40 years are gone. And that is not a bad thing; pooled investment funds are clearly a far wiser and less risky route for investment for most people than simply buying individual blue chip stocks and holding them for the long term. Additionally, it is inevitable as so many of the privatised and demutualised companies have been taken over, bought by private equity or are no longer with us for other reasons. But more broadly, the agenda of popular capitalism has been reversed. The decline has been long and gradual, but has been vastly accelerated by Starmer's Government. One of its early actions in office was to hugely cut the discount that council tenants receive on buying their home. In London the maximum discount was reduced in November from £136,400 to £16,000. Mrs Thatcher's 1980s dream of making Britain more laissez-faire and more American in attitude is now sadly dead. Labour has deliberately extinguished it. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK backs Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara, Lammy says
By Ahmed Eljechtimi RABAT (Reuters) -Britain's foreign minister, David Lammy, said on Sunday that the UK considers Morocco's autonomy proposal as the most feasible basis to resolve the conflict over Western Sahara. The long-frozen conflict pits Morocco, which considers the territory as its own, against the Algeria-backed Polisario front, which seeks an independent state in the desert autonomy plan submitted by Morocco in 2007 stands "as the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis for a lasting resolution of the dispute," Lammy told reporters after talks with Morocco's foreign minister. "The UK will continue to act bilaterally, including economically, regionally and internationally in line with this position to support the resolution of the conflict," Lammy said on a visit to Rabat. The position places Britain as the third permanent U.N. Security Council member to endorse Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara, following the United States and France. Morocco's foreign minister, Nasser Bourita, hailed the UK's position as historic, saying it was part of "a momentum to speed up the solution of the conflict."UK investments in the territory were under examination, Bourita said. The two countries signed deals to cooperate in healthcare, innovation, port and water infrastructure and procurement. Lammy said the deals would "ensure British businesses score big on football's biggest stage," as Morocco pushes for infrastructure investment in preparation for the 2030 World Cup, which it will co-host with Spain and Portugal.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fastest AI Deployment in History? Enrique Abeyta Says Elon Musk's Dojo Is Moving at a Pace No One Can Match
BALTIMORE, June 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- While Big Tech labors over AI models behind closed doors, Elon Musk is doing something radically different: deploying his AI in the real world at full speed. And according to former hedge fund manager Enrique Abeyta's recent briefing, that changes everything. 'This isn't a software project anymore,' Abeyta says. 'This is a live system — hardware, data, chips, and a nationwide rollout happening right now.' From Lab to Street in Record Time At the center of this acceleration is Dojo, Musk's custom-built AI training platform. Fed by 160 billion video frames daily from Tesla's global fleet, Dojo adapts and evolves without human oversight. Its breakthrough? A proprietary chip, built in-house, that's now said to be six times faster than Nvidia's most popular AI processor. Musk didn't just move quickly — he skipped the usual supply chains, built his own infrastructure, and is now poised to launch a fully autonomous robotaxi by June 1st. No pedals. No steering wheel. No fallback controls. Government Is Already in Motion The U.S. government isn't far behind. Just weeks ago, President Trump issued an executive order titled 'Removing Barriers to American AI Innovation' — aimed at accelerating systems just like Dojo. One company tied to Dojo's infrastructure is reportedly 'expecting to receive billions of dollars' in federal support. 'If you want to see what real AI deployment looks like — not theory, not code — watch Musk. He's doing it first,' Abeyta notes. The First-Mover Advantage Now Belongs to Tesla Abeyta believes we're witnessing the moment AI leaves the lab and enters the world — not in years, but in weeks. With hardware, data, and government alignment all converging, Dojo may not just be a Tesla advantage — it could become a national one. About Enrique Abeyta Enrique Abeyta is a former hedge fund manager who spent 25 years tracking major industrial and infrastructure transformations across global markets. After overseeing nearly $4 billion in institutional capital, he now runs Breaking Profits, a strategic research platform focused on uncovering the systems that move faster — and more powerfully — than headlines ever reveal. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@
