logo
Ole Miss' Michael La Sasso wins NCAA title, collects U.S. Open and Masters invites

Ole Miss' Michael La Sasso wins NCAA title, collects U.S. Open and Masters invites

Hindustan Times27-05-2025

Ole Miss junior Michael La Sasso's even-par 72 on Monday at the Omni La Costa Resort and Spa North Course in Carlsbad, Calif., was his worst score in four days, but it accomplished plenty.
Not only did La Sasso hold off Texas A&M's Phichaksn Maichon to win the NCAA's individual title with a 72-hole total of 11-under 277, he earned official invitations to next month's U.S. Open at Oakmont and next year's Masters. He also helped his team edge Florida State for the eighth and final spot in the match play competition that starts Tuesday to determine the NCAA team champion.
La Sasso became the second Ole Miss golfer to win the individual championship - joining 2017 medalist Braden Thornberry, who's currently on the PGA Tour.
"If you would have told me the first tournament of the year that I was going to win a national championship as an individual, I probably would have said you're lying," La Sasso told Golfweek.
La Sasso and the Rebels finished team stroke play at 11, which was one shot ahead of 2024 runner-up Florida State for the final match-play berth. Ole Miss opens match play against Arizona State, which won stroke play at 14 under.
No. 2 Auburn faces No. 7 Virginia , No. 3 Florida takes on No. 6 Texas and No. 4 Oklahoma State battles No. 5 Oklahoma in the other match-play quarterfinals. Auburn is the defending national champion.
Field Level Media

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Last French Open for Djokovic? Serb champion hints at retirement after semifinal exit
Last French Open for Djokovic? Serb champion hints at retirement after semifinal exit

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Last French Open for Djokovic? Serb champion hints at retirement after semifinal exit

Novak Djokovic is unsure he will play at the French Open ever again after losing to top-ranked Jannik Sinner in the semifinals on Friday. The 24-time Grand Slam champion cast doubt on whether he will be back at Roland-Garros next year, when he will be 39. Moments after losing 6-4, 7-5, 7-6 (3), Djokovic took the time to put his bag down and applaud all sides of Court Philippe-Chatrier. 'I mean, this could have been the last match I ever played here, so I don't know. That's why I was a bit more emotional even in the end,' Djokovic said. 'But if this was the farewell match of the Roland-Garros for me in my career, it was a wonderful one in terms of the atmosphere and what I got from the crowd.' He kissed his hand after the defeat, then put it on the clay, as if saying farewell to the French Open, where he was champion three times. He pulled his bags up, looked high up into the stands, and headed down to the tunnel. 'Do I wish to play more? Yes, I do. But will I be able to play here in 12 months' time, I don't know,' Djokovic said. 'I said it could have been my last match (here), I didn't say it was.' Djokovic said he definitely intends to play at Wimbledon, which begins on June 30, and the U.S. Open in August, but is not sure about his plans after that. 'I don't know really what tomorrow brings in a way at this point in my career. You know, I am going to keep on keeping on,' he said. 'Wimbledon is next, which is my childhood favourite tournament. I'm going to do everything possible to get myself ready.' He won a historic 100th singles title just before the French Open, but mainly continues to play to add to his record haul of Grand Slams. He is driven to win a 25th Grand Slam, to have sole custody of the most major titles in men's and women's tennis. But his last Grand Slam title was at the 2023 U.S. Open. He failed to win a Grand Slam last year for the first time in seven years. 'I guess my best chances maybe are Wimbledon, you know, to win another slam or faster hard court,' he said. He won the French Open in 2016, '21 and '23. His last Wimbledon title was in 2022. 'Wimbledon and U.S. Open, yes, they are in plans. That's all I can say right now,' he said. 'But I feel like I want to play Wimbledon, I want to play the U.S. Open. Those two, for sure. For the rest, I'm not so sure.' Sinner hopes Djokovic sticks around a while longer. 'First of all, I hope it's not the case (he retires soon) because tennis needs him. It's so nice and amazing to have someone different from the younger guys,' the 23-year-old Italian said. 'From my point of view, it's great to see him in the locker room and to see his enthusiasm. He is a true role model for all of us.'

Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for U.S. colleges to pay athletes millions
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for U.S. colleges to pay athletes millions

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for U.S. colleges to pay athletes millions

A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday (June 6, 2025), clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement: Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte.

153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know
153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know

The groundbreaking case leading to the transformation of college sports in the United States comes nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House and Oregon basketball player Sedona Prince filed a complaint against the NCAA and the five most powerful conferences alleging they were unfairly being denied of pay for use of their name, image and likeness. The settlement approved by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken resolved three antitrust cases — House vs. NCAA, Carter vs. NCAA and Hubbard vs. NCAA — that became known collectively as the 'House case.' The class-action lawsuits contended the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC violated antitrust law by not providing benefits and compensation to athletes and restraining athletes' ability to make money for endorsements and sponsorships. Incremental gains won by athletes in previous lawsuits against the NCAA set the stage for the House settlement and the all-out professionalization of college sports. A look at key numbers associated with the case: Athletes who played an NCAA sport between 2016-24 and could be eligible for back payments Class members who submitted a claim form or updated their payment information, which represents approximately 26.2% of the 389,700. Athletes who opted out of the settlement and could pursue their own remedies. Back damages to be paid to current and former college athletes who were denied the opportunity to profit from the use of their NIL rights. The amount will be paid in $280 million installments over 10 years. The NCAA will use reserves and insurance to cover about 40% of the payments. The rest will be covered by the NCAA reducing its annual distributions to Division I schools. Estimated amount of the $2.8 billion that will be paid in back damages to football and men's and women's basketball players in the power conferences. The 2025-26 pool of money each Division I school can distribute in direct payments to athletes beginning July 1. The amount represents 22% of the average revenue generated by each school from the five defendant conferences and Notre Dame. NCAA rules that had to be eliminated to allow schools to provide additional benefits to athletes under the settlement. All Division I athletes will be required to report to their schools and the Deloitte clearinghouse any and all third-party NIL contracts with a total value of $600 or more, if payment occurs after July 1, 2025. The clearinghouse will determine whether the amount is commensurate with the athlete's fair market value. The widely accepted estimate by University of San Francisco sports economist Daniel Rascher of additional direct compensation athletes will receive over the next 10 years. The estimated amount of damages faced by the NCAA and the five conferences if they avoided a settlement and lost at trial. Plaintiffs attorneys' request for legal fees. The figure is based on attorneys receiving 20% of the NIL settlement fund and 10% of the additional compensation settlement fund as well as an injunction relief award of $20 million paid by the defendants. That does not included about $9 million in expenses attorneys are claiming. college sports: /hub/college-sports

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store