
The future of fuel retail in South Africa: NEVs and solar panels
Image credit: Kindel Media on Pexels
Rapid international developments, regulatory pressure, and consumer demand for greener mobility are reshaping the fuel retail landscape.
The global state of NEVs
The global NEV space is evolving rapidly: The European Union is working to phase out combustion engines by 2035 and is shifting focus to autonomous NEVs.
China remains dominant, controlling most of the global NEV supply chain and having built battery capacity exceeding global demand by 500%.
But according to the Automotive Business Council (Naamsa), South Africa is lagging for several reasons: Without access to Euro-5 and Euro-6 compliant fuels, South Africa cannot authorise or legally sell many modern vehicles.
Currently, 38% of petrol and 67% of diesel are imported, but the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy has committed to making Cleaner Fuel 2 available by 1 July 2027, with indications it may arrive slightly earlier.
The South African NEV market is small but growing, dominated by traditional hybrids like the Toyota Corolla Cross and Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
Full battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales remain limited due to affordability, which is the biggest barrier to growth in this market: most BEVs are priced over R900,000, yet 74% of new car sales in South Africa are under R500,000.
How fuel stations can benefit
More affordable options are coming, with one original equipment manufacturer scheduled to launch a sub-R400,000 battery electric vehicle (BEV) this year.
However, even affordable BEVs face practical challenges. Many consumers – particularly in the lower end of the market – lack solar, inverters, or batteries to charge vehicles at home.
In addition, range anxiety persists, even though most BEVs offer over 200km per charge, and concerns about resale value and long-term performance deter buyers.
Another issue for South African NEV sales is that existing public charging infrastructure is limited, poorly maintained, and inconveniently located: A Joburg to Cape Town EV convoy last year exposed major gaps, with vehicles stranded due to faulty charging stations.
To address these challenges, Naamsa is engaging with the private sector to build a national charging network of 120 sites, providing accessible, reliable charging along key routes throughout the country.
The network will leverage existing fuel stations instead of building new sites, ensuring that drivers can find a charging site within easy travelling distance, which will be public and free to access, without hidden costs.
These strategic partnerships with fuel stations are preferable because of their proximity to main national routes and their existing vehicle-refuelling and alternate revenue stream infrastructures.
To reduce the cost of the NEV charging infrastructure build and increase the speed of installation, these sites will initially operate largely through the national electricity grid, supported by renewable energy.
Fuel stations are, in fact, ideally suited for solar PV installations because they have sizable areas of roof space over their buildings and forecourts, which are generally located in full sun.
So, as increased income streams generated by the new infrastructure boost profits, fuel station owners can increase the renewable energy component of their sites to decrease their reliance on the national grid and thus boost profitability further.
Fuel stations to evolve
EV charging facilities certainly offer great potential for fuel retailers.
It's a natural progression for them as it uses their experience and already-expanding forecourt product offerings while providing the highest potential margin.
A recent study on the future of fuel stations in South Africa by commercial real estate company Cushman & Wakefield | Broll, indicates that fuel stations will evolve into 'mobility' stations within the next 5 to 15 years, offering a wider range of energy sources (electricity, natural gas, petrol, diesel, biofuels, and green hydrogen).
As Fuel Connect points out, fuel forecourts offering much more than fuel is nothing new – as far back as the 1960s, fuel stations have incorporated restaurants, convenience stores, car workshops, tyre fitment centres, and even hotels, and fuel stations have always been an important midway destination on long journeys for family holidays.
But because recharging an NEV takes significantly more time than filling up the fuel tank of a vehicle with an internal combustion engine, extended services such as pharmacies, laundry services, gyms, and co-working spaces will become more common at these sites.
Operators will then become less reliant on income from fuel, as it will account for just 20% of the forecourt's revenue, compared with the 90% it has contributed historically.
A further consideration is that, going forward, successful retailers won't just operate a single site, but instead own between five and 10.
But managing multiple sites brings complexity – more employees, more systems, more human error.
The only real solution? Leveraging smart technology, which prevents fraud, boosts efficiency, and further increases profitability.
The future of fuel retailing lies beyond the fuel pump. As NEV adoption grows and cleaner fuels become standard, traditional forecourts will evolve.
Embracing the opportunities this transition promises, together with smart technology and renewable energy, fuel station operators can future-proof their businesses and thrive in the rapidly changing mobility environment.
All rights reserved. © 2022. Bizcommunity.com Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
EU Can't Ban Non-Member India From Buying Russian Oil
By Nantoo Banerjee The European Union seems to have arrogated itself with extrajudicial power to prevent outside nations from purchasing Russian oil. It has no locus standi to impose its will on countries which are not members of EU. Thus, the latest expansion of the EU sanctions targeting Russian energy exports can legally cover only its 27 member countries and entities operating within the EU and not beyond. It is free to implement such decisions as fixing price caps and restrictions on shipping and insurance for Russian oil sold to EU countries, it cannot legally prohibit non-EU countries from buying Russian oil on the global market using non-EU flag carriers and insurers. The EU has no jurisdiction over countries such as India and China. Together, the two countries accounted for around 85 percent of Russia's crude oil exports in the month of June, last. It is also illegal if the EU tries to shut down the Gujarat-based Nayara Energy (formerly Essar Oil), in which Rosneft, the Russian oil giant, holds a 49.13 percent stake, or tries to prevent Indian oil refineries from importing crude oil from Russia. Reliance Industries (RIL) is India's largest importer of Russian crude oil for processing and exporting refined products. RIL shipped an average of 2.83 million barrels of diesel and 1.5 million barrels of jet fuel per month to Europe in the first seven months of this year, according to London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) ship tracking data. Rosneft is present in Singapore through its subsidiary, Rosneft Singapore Pte. Ltd., to manage regional projects and develop international trade in oil and petroleum products as part of Rosneft's strategic focus on the Asia-Pacific region, which is expected to see significant growth in energy consumption. It also has a joint venture with PetroChina to build a refinery and petrochemical complex in Tianjin, China. The EU, in its 18th package of sanctions against Russia, approved on July 18, has banned imports of refined petroleum products made from Russian crude coming from third countries although it excluded a handful of Western nations, including Norway, the UK, Switzerland, Canada and the US. It banned vessels from accessing EU ports and docks, or undertaking ship-to-ship transfers of oil in a bid to shut down the so-called 'shadow fleet' of older oil tankers which are reportedly used to transport Russian oil and circumvent sanctions. It may be noted that the US has somewhat resisted the action, leaving the EU to move forward on its own, with limited power to enforce the measure because oil is largely traded in dollars, for which payment clearing is controlled by US banks. The EU's new package of sanctions is most unlikely to hit Russia's oil and gas exports. India and China are expected to continue buying discounted Russian crude although some Indian refineries, such as RIL, will find it difficult to re-export processed Russian crude to EU member countries. RIL may have to find new ways or new destinations to re-export processed Russian crude which may be further discounted after the fresh EU sanctions or face a big financial blow. As a whole, the Indian refinery industry will have to find ways to re-export refined Russian crude oil if they desire. This may not be an easy task. India was a supplier of refined petroleum products worth $15 billion annually to Europe. India imported crude oil worth US$50.3 billion from Russia in 2024-25. The share of Russian oil in India's crude oil basket is more than 44 percent. Several non-EU countries import processed crude oil, particularly refined petroleum products derived from Russian crude. India, China, and Turkey are significant buyers of Russian crude oil and refined products. Other notable processed crude oil importers include South Korea and Taiwan. The latest EU package of sanctions will make Russian crude oil even cheaper. It lowers the price on Russian crude to $47.60 a barrel from $60. The new cap, which takes effect on September 3, also includes a mechanism to ensure it is always 15 percent below average Russian crude prices. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), Russia earned around $192 billion last year from selling oil. Cutting a part of that may mean a loss to the country's export revenue, but it could also be at the cost of the rest of the world with spiking oil prices globally if the export of Russia's more than seven million barrels of oil per day abruptly disappears. Anyway, India and China, the two top importers of Russian oil, are most unlikely to go by so-called universal ban on import of Russian oil imposed by the EU or the US threat to order such a ban in due course to force a truce in the Russia-Ukraine war. Incidentally, both India and China continue to have good relations with Ukraine. Last year, India's imports from Ukraine were valued at $1.036 billion, while India's exports to Ukraine were $0.187 billion. The total trade turnover between the two countries for the same period was $1.224 billion. China's imports from Ukraine totalled US$2.68 billion, according to the UN COMTRADE database. So far, both India and China appear to be unfazed by the EU ban on Russia's oil and gas exports. India's Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri thinks the market would more or less continue to operate as usual. The EU lens on Rosneft is a concern. Rosneft was believed to be in talks with some potential Indian buyers, including RIL, to sell off its majority stake in Nayara Energy, even before the EU contemplated further tightening the ban on Russian oil exports. The Indian petroleum minister seems to be generally happy that oil markets have not hardened following the announcement of fresh EU sanctions on Russia. Although India's $15-billion refined petroproducts export to the EU will take a hit, the country is already exploring new markets for the export of refined petroleum. The export earning, last year, was worth as much as $85 billion. Given the current geopolitical situation, import-based India needs to work out a strong strategy to protect its energy security as well as export trade. (IPA Service)


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
European Commission considers suspending Israel's access to EU funding for tech start-ups
The European Commission (EC) on Monday said it is considering suspending Israel's access to European Union (EU) funding for tech start-ups, following pressure over the humanitarian situation in Gaza, AFP reported. A string of EU countries have pushed for concrete action against Israel in the face of growing fears of mass starvation in the war-ravaged territory. The proposed action would involve partially suspending Israel's involvement in the Horizon research programme and will be discussed by the EU's 27 countries on 29 July. It would need the approval of the majority of member states to go into force. "The situation remains severe," the EC said in a statement. "The proposed suspension is a targeted and reversible action," it added. The EU has been criticised for not doing enough to end Israel's war on Gaza.

Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
Ghana: Finance Minister Chairs New 13-Member Public-Private Partnership Working Committee
The Minister for Finance, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, has been inaugurated as Chair of a newly constituted 13-member Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Working Committee aimed at deepening collaboration between the government and the private sector to fund critical infrastructure and development projects. The inauguration was conducted by Deputy Finance Minister, Hon. Thomas Ampem Nyarko, who underscored the importance of the committee's work in the context of limited fiscal space. He stressed that enhanced private sector engagement is now essential to meeting the country's development needs. In his remarks, Dr. Forson emphasized the need to reform how PPPs are designed and executed in Ghana. He said the era where government-dominated projects are called public-private partnerships must end. True PPPs must involve real risk-sharing between government and the private sector. According to him, what has been seen over the years does not reflect what a proper PPP should be. The committee is tasked with streamlining Ghana's PPP framework to ensure that future projects are sustainable, transparent, and deliver value for money. Members of the Committee: 1. Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, MP – Minister for Finance (Chairperson) 2. Dr. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, MP – Attorney General and Minister for Justice 3. Hon. Elizabeth Ofosu-Adjare, MP – Minister for Trade, Agribusiness and Industry 4. Dr. Audrey Smock Amoah – Director-General, National Development Planning Commission 5. Mr. Simon Madjie – CEO, Ghana Investment Promotion Centre 6. Mr. Frank Mante – CEO, Public Procurement Authority 7. Prof. Nana Ama Brown Klutse – Executive Director, Environmental Protection Agency 8. Prof. Anthony Owusu-Ansah – Executive Secretary, Lands Commission 9. Mr. Samuel Manu Asiama – Chartered Institute of Bankers Representative 10. Ing. Festus Ofoli Odametey – Ghana Institution of Engineers Representative 11. Mad. Nana Oye Bampoe Addo – Deputy Chief of Staff, Office of the President 12. Mad. Shamima Muslim – Deputy Presidential Spokesperson 13. Mr. Patrick Nomo – Chief Director, Ministry of Finance (Secretary) The committee is expected to provide technical guidance and oversight to ensure that PPPs are properly structured and aligned with Ghana's development goals. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Ministry of Finance - Republic of Ghana.