This California city spent $1.7M on unauthorized overtime as it marched toward a massive $280M budget shortfall
Unauthorized overtime payments cost the City of Oakland nearly $1.7 million over a period of several years, the city's auditor reported. Meanwhile, the California city faces an estimated budget shortfall of $280 million over the next two years, according to CBS News Bay Area.
An investigation was kicked off following a whistleblower complaint in July 2023. It was found, between January 2018 and May 2024, the city overpaid 526 employees across two departments due to an incorrect formula in the payroll system.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
Americans with upside-down car loans owe more money than ever before — and drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to cut your monthly costs ASAP
"This issue of excessive overtime pay warrants the city's immediate attention because taxpayers have essentially been incurring significant costs that were never approved," City Auditor Michael Houston said in a news release Feb. 20.
Here's what the situation means for taxpayers.
Houston added the overpayments are especially troubling due to current budget shortfalls, which have prompted the city to look "under couch cushions for spare coins."
Lifelong Oakland resident Dion Baker says it's hard to hear about years of overspending while the city lays off workers and slashes public safety spending.
"A bit of frustration and a bit of sadness because trust for leadership in general, I'd say, is a little low," he shared with CBS News Bay Area.
Read more: Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
The city has also cut off millions in funding to community organizations who provide social services to those in need, according to the local broadcaster.
"What I read and see on the TV, what's going on right now, people like me, I'm scared to death," John Hutchinson told CBS News Bay Area. The 88-year-old resident is homebound and says he relies on Meals on Wheels not only to feed himself but for social interaction.
Interim Oakland Mayor Kevin Jenkins vowed to get to the bottom of the situation.
"What I'm going to do is have a talk with the auditor and see what the best course of action is moving forward," Jenkins told reporters.
There's concern the overpayment discovery may simply be the tip of the iceberg. Houston fears even more excessive overtime pay might be found outside of the two departments and the specified time frame named in the report.
City officials were unable to explain the nature of the incorrect payment formulas, the report says. Houston recommended city officials review overtime formulas for all employees.
And the money itself?
"I don't know if we can recoup the money or not," Oakland Public Works Director Josh Rowan told CBS News Bay Area. "But I think the bigger issue is the perception damage."
One dozen eggs in America now costs a record high of $4.95 — here are 3 simple ways to inflation-proof your retirement portfolio
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Protect your retirement savings with these 5 essential money moves — most of which you can complete in just minutes
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
4 Nonessential Bills To Pause ASAP If You Need To Catch Up Financially
Expenses quickly add up, making the minutia of daily and monthly bills difficult to deal with if you're living paycheck to paycheck. If you don't have enough to cover your essential bills, you can reduce your nonessential spending by pausing subscription services and cutting back on unnecessary expenditures. For You: Up Next: Here are four nonessential bills to pause ASAP if you need to catch up financially. Streaming services, food delivery memberships and software subscriptions typically come with a monthly fee that you can pause or cancel at any time. However, even a single subscription adds up over the course of a year but go seemingly unnoticed thanks to autopay. For example, the standard Netflix subscription with ads costs $7.99 a month or nearly $96 per year. However, most people have more than one streaming subscription, and it's estimated that on average people are spending about $69 a month on multiple subscriptions. That's around $828 a year. Find Out: Based on most recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Americans spend roughly $3,933 per month on dining out categorized as food away from home. This means just by eating outside of your home you spend about $328 on a monthly average. JourneyFoods also found that the average price per serving of a home-cooked meal was $4.31, while the average cost of eating out was $20.37. Consider pausing professional services that you can do yourself instead, such as house cleaning, lawn care or pet grooming. For example, how much homeowners pay for a lawn care plan can be between $500 and $800 per year. This is a great edit down for your budget when trying to catch up on your finances. You can temporarily adjust recurring allocations, such as 401(k) contributions and insurance, as well if you need some wiggle room financially. For instance, if you automatically contribute 10% of your paycheck to your 401(k), consider adjusting it to 7% for a few months to build up your savings. The bottom line is that there are more ways to save in addition to pausing nonessential bills. Here are some key takeaways: Use up gift cards: Dig into your wallet and look for unused gift cards. You probably have at least one unused card. You can even sell them on third-party marketplaces for up to 85 cents on the dollar. Get an energy audit: Cut back on your energy bills by getting a professional energy audit or doing one yourself. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, Americans waste up to $400 per year due to drafts, air leaks and outdated heating and cooling systems. Negotiate lower bills and interest rates: Many customers who ask for a lower interest rate on one of their credit cards succeed so it's at least worth trying to negotiate costs as you have more power over your money than you realize. Josephine Nesbit contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on 4 Nonessential Bills To Pause ASAP If You Need To Catch Up Financially Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Over 30 More Countries Could Be Put on Travel Ban by US—Reports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is floating the idea of adding 36 more countries to its travel ban that began earlier this month, according to an internal State Department cable reviewed by The Washington Post and Reuters. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in a Sunday email: "The Department does not comment on internal deliberations or communications, but we are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws." Why It Matters Earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation restricting travel by foreigners from 12 countries and partially restricting entry from an additional seven countries. The ban, which Trump said is to "protect the nation from foreign terrorist and other national security and public safety threats," went into effect on June 9. Since his inauguration on January 20, Trump has cracked down on foreign nationals in the United States, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration enforcement as a key pillar of his agenda. During his first administration, Trump imposed a ban that barred people from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S. Critics then and now, have called out the restrictions as xenophobic and racist. What To Know The internal cable, which was signed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, "identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days," as reported by Reuters. The weekend memo was first reported by The Washington Post and includes 25 African nations, as well as several Pacific Island nations, Caribbean, and Central Asian. The countries mentioned in the cable that may face a potential partial or full ban are: Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Bhutan Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Cote D'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Djibouti Dominica Ethiopia Egypt Gabon The Gambia Ghana Kyrgyzstan Liberia Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Sao Tome and Principe Senegal South Sudan Syria Tanzania Tonga Tuvalu Uganda Vanuatu Zambia Zimbabwe Some of the countries under consideration, such as Egypt, are key U.S. diplomatic partners and receive American military aid. When asked earlier this month why Egypt wasn't on the original list, Trump responded, "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control." Djibouti hosts Camp Lemonnier, the only permanent U.S. military base in Africa. The countries would be in addition to the 12 fully restricted countries of Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, and the seven partially restricted, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, that Trump already limited. There are, however, some exceptions to the restrictions, including certain visas. The Washington Post identified the benchmarks in the memo as regarding lack of "competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents," or experiencing "widespread government fraud." Immigration also played a role in their potential selection, with some reportedly having large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the U.S. The memo also touched on ideology, reportedly saying, there were accounts of "antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States" by some people from those countries. Trump announced the first version of the ban earlier this month after citing national security concerns following a recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, when Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, carried out a firebombing attack at a pro-Israel rally, injuring 12 people. Trump has detained several vocal pro-Palestinian voices, most notably Mahmoud Khalil. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. AP Photo/Alex Brandon What People Are Saying A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in an email Sunday: "The Department of State is committed to protecting our nation and its citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process." Amnesty International's Secretary General Agnès Callamard said in a press release on June 5: "President Trump's new travel ban is discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel. By targeting people based on their race, religion, or nationality, from countries with predominantly Black, Brown and Muslim-majority populations, this blanket ban constitutes racial discrimination under international human rights law. It also spreads hate and disinformation, reinforcing the misleading idea that certain populations are more likely to pose security risks or engage in acts of violence." Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, wrote in a June 4 X, formerly Twitter, post: "This is Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again. Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the U.S. from the rest of world. Bigotry is not a national security strategy." What Happens Next? It remains unclear whether the State Department will move forward with the additions or when the countries might face restrictions if they fail to meet certain requirements.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Sen. Padilla says Noem clash was not to 'manufacture a viral moment'
Sen. Alex Padilla, D-CA, speaks to reporters after a second failed vote that would have codified federal protections for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments at the U.S. Capitol in 2024. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 15 (UPI) -- Days after Sen. Alex Padilla was handcuffed and removed for interrupting a news conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the Democratic lawmaker insisted the clash was not a calculated move for attention. Noem held the news conference Thursday to provide an update on the federal government's enforcement actions in Los Angeles pertaining to protests against recent raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. Padilla, D-Calif., interrupted the news conference and demanded that Noem answer questions. In the moment, Noem called his interruption "inappropriate" and said she would speak with him after concluding the news conference. The lawmaker was asked about the clash during an interview with Dana Bash on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Padilla revealed he had been in the federal building for a scheduled briefing with representatives of the U.S. Northern Command, which had deployed troops to the city, when he learned Noem was having the press conference a few doors down. His briefing was delayed and so he asked if he could listen in on the news conference. "Surprise, surprise, no substance came from that press conference, just political attacks. And when I heard the secretary, not for the first time in that press conference, talk about needing to liberate the people of Los Angeles from their duly elected mayor and governor, it was at that moment that I chose to try to ask a question," Padilla said Sunday. Padilla said he "needed to speak up" because Americans have seen numerous stories of hardworking people who are maybe undocumented but "otherwise law-abiding, good people" who are being subjected to the "terror" of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement operations. "I couldn't get a couple of words out before obviously you saw agents respond, hands on me pretty much immediately," Padilla said. "And, look, everybody's seen the video. You know what happened after that." Bash noted that DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin later accused Padilla of trying to "manufacture a viral moment." "Nothing could be further from the truth," Padilla said. "... It was an opportunity to ask a question and do my job as a senator, right, do my job as a senator in questioning the Cabinet secretary." Bash noted that CNN security correspondent Josh Campbell, who was an FBI agent, said that Noem's security acted appropriately by removing him from the news conference. But Padilla disagreed. "If that's how they treat a senator trying to ask a question -- here's one of my big takeaways -- then imagine not what they can do, what they are doing to so many people without titles," Padilla responded. Bash suggested that those who removed him might not have known has identity, even though he said early in the exchanges that he is a senator. "Look, the whole Los Angeles press court -- this is Los Angeles. This is my hometown. They know who I was," he said. "And what does it say about the secretary to not know who the senator from California is, the ranking member of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration? .... She came through the Senate for confirmation at one point."
