Hospital staff concerned about combined cleaner-security officer roles
LDR
Combining the roles of cleaners and security guards into one job at two rural Waikato hospitals has left staff worried about their own safety and that of patients.
And the scheme's cost savings haven't been as much as predicted.
These are among findings in a report obtained by
Checkpoint
about the introduction of the scheme - which Health New Zealand calls integrated cleaning, attendant and security services - at Te Kuiti and Tokoroa hospitals.
It was previously introduced in Thames and Taumarunui hospitals.
As
Checkpoint
revealed last month, the combined roles
began a year ago
and Health NZ did a post-implementation review in April.
It found while the cleaning side of the arrangement is going well, hospital staff say they're not getting the level of security services required and they hold safety concerns.
Staff said security officers-cleaners from a cleaning background weren't trained for the job, and that the two jobs conflicted, meaning pre-emptive action during an escalating situation was impossible if a worker was away cleaning.
A rural Waikato nurse, who RNZ has agreed not to name, said she wanted the jobs to separate again.
"I'd like for them to listen to us and hear our cries for help," she said.
"We've put in complaints and concerns about our security issues and how we feel the security guards are actually unfit to proceed with the job they're meant to be doing, or they aren't doing their job."
Although some were reliable, she said staff held concerns about others.
RNZ has previously reported that at Te Kuiti Hospital one cleaner-security officer is on duty overnight, with two nurses.
The Waikato nurse said it was impossible to expect the cleaner-security officers to be in two places at once.
"I don't think [cleaning] should be a role integrated with security. It literally makes no sense. They've got nothing to do with each other. It just baffles my mind.
"It's like making someone who works at a gas station pump gas but also pack your groceries all at the same time. Why would you do that?"
The Health NZ report said the move was partly about cost efficiency. It was expected to save $207,300 in its first year, but only shaved $137,300.
The reports cited some benefits, such as flexibility of work roles, lower costs and consistency among the rural Waikato hospitals, but recommended improving security after deficits were identified.
Among the "lessons learned" was the definition and responsibilities of the new roles weren't clearly stated or understood.
It also recommended consideration of a future review, which the nurse hoped would be more thorough.
"Pretty much every nurse that I work with does not like it. It doesn't function as well as they think it might," she said.
"Reading the report, I feel like there were actually quite a few issues that weren't mentioned that I remember writing as a response to the questions [when staff were surveyed]."
That included the preference to break up the jobs.
The report said there was a perception there wasn't enough communication and consultation before the change.
The nurse agreed.
"It's pretty much someone sitting at a desk and saying: 'We can do this.' They talk about how they should have gone to us and given us more information beforehand instead of just springing it on us.
"Yes, we definitely agree [this] needed to be done. There needed to be more notice, but also I think there should have been: 'This is the job we're thinking of putting in. Do you think it's going to work?'"
Now, if the security officer-cleaner wasn't around when an incident unfolded, medical staff had to try to make it to a phone to call for help, leaving a potentially unsafe situation.
The report said staff were issued with personal duress alarms, although it noted there was limited staff understanding of this, and the devices weren't maintained or used.
There were also security improvements made to the hospitals, such as clearing vegetation.
The E Tū union represents hospital workers such as security officers and cleaners.
Its director responsible for health, Mat Danaher, said not having enough staff, and inadequate facilities, due to a lack of funding meant the combined roles didn't have a chance.
"What happens if you've got one operative who's supposed to be doing an urgent clean to make something safe and in the meantime a fight's breaking out and you need two people to go and help deal with that?
"It can't be done and I think that's what we're seeing the effect of here."
No one was happy with the current arrangement, he said.
"It's a matter of time before someone dies - we have a death that could be prevented. That's literally what we're talking about.
"It is a life and death matter."
Health NZ senior manager Stephanie Doe said it was committed to providing an environment where staff and visitors felt safe, and it received advice from its national chief security adviser on improvements to the rural Waikato arrangement.
The review was of the scheme's implementation, not the model itself, and its roll out had achieved its objectives, she said.
There hadn't been any recent significant security incidents at Waikato hospitals.
"At Te Kuiti and Tokoroa, security staff are onsite 24-7, including within the vicinity of ED [the emergency department] and ward at night. We encourage staff faced with a hostile situation to call police."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Bowel screening uptake in Bay of Plenty appalling
It is a similar story in the Lakes health district, covering Taupō and Rotorua, where 27,694 were sent between August 1, 2022, and May 26, 2025. Of those, only 15,039 were returned. These figures are alarming because New Zealand has one of the world's highest bowel cancer rates, and it is the second-highest cause of cancer. That means an average of about eight people a day are being told they have it. It's not just an older person's cancer either, because more than 350 people under 50 are diagnosed annually. Many people know someone who has survived bowel cancer or died from it, and much has been done over the past eight years to try to get in front of the problem. The National Bowel Screening Programme started in July 2017 and has been introduced by all the former 20 district health boards, with Bay of Plenty being the last. People are invited to join the programme at 60, and are then sent a free home-test kit every two years until the age of 74. The Government is lowering the eligibility age to 58 nationwide from March. It has, however, been criticised for axing plans to lower the age for Māori and Pacific people to 50. The national charity Bowel Cancer New Zealand wants the screening age lowered to match Australia, where it is 45. It is, understandably, unhappy with the Government's slow progress. The media and advertising also play important roles in raising awareness. There are countless news articles in the media, and the national bowel screening multimedia campaign launched in July 2022 encourages people to take part in screening, emphasising it is free, quick and simple, 'and you can do it at home'. The good news is that Health NZ credits the campaign with raising awareness. But perhaps among the most powerful weapons for raising awareness are the individual patient stories. Kiwis such as Tauranga survivor Rachael Ferguson, who was 32 when she was diagnosed with stage 4 bowel cancer in December 2020. She has been 'clear' since surgery in February 2021. Then there's Rotorua father Matthew Keogan, who was 49 when he was diagnosed in 2021. He was told to get his affairs in order and say goodbye to his family as he might live only another three to six months. He has made a miraculous recovery after chemotherapy and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (Keytruda). Last month, Northland's Cheryl Waaka, a former Black Fern and mother of two teenagers, talked about facing her toughest opponent yet: stage 4 bowel cancer. There are plenty of other personal stories on Bowel Cancer NZ's website, each offering an insight into that person's journey, each offering hope and each helping drive a greater understanding. All these people are brave and inspirational. So, given there's been a national screening campaign, heightened awareness, personal stories, and a lowering of the screening age, a reasonable question remains: Why would people fail to do something simple that costs them nothing but could save their lives? Reasons could include fear, stigma and people simply not wanting to go through what they perceive as the unpleasant procedure of having to collect samples and send them off. However, it would be fair to say some people probably can't be bothered, are ignorant or believe it won't happen to them. Whatever the reasons, the Bay of Plenty and Lakes figures are appalling. As survivor Rachael Ferguson rightly says, there are 'so many people under the age of 60 that are screaming out to have those kits' that eligible people not returning them is simply 'wasted resources'. The Government needs to lower the screening age further. At the same time, everyone eligible needs to take up the offer. It could save their lives. Bowel Cancer NZ chief executive Peter Huskinson has the final word. 'That free test in your mailbox doesn't just detect cancer – it can stop it before it starts,' he says. 'Don't leave it in a drawer. Put it by the loo and get it done.' Wise words indeed. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Health NZ board costs could triple amid deficit and staffing woes
The Cabinet signed off on the exceptional fees; Health Minister Simeon Brown said the contingency would be drawn on only in 'exceptional circumstances' and approval is at his sole discretion. The pay levels are extraordinary and far outstrip the Government's recently increased fees guidance for board work; however, the amount of work on which the Health NZ fees are predicated is also extraordinary. Health NZ was established in 2022 through the combination of the country's district health boards (DHBs). It is the largest Crown-owned entity, its budget tops $27 billion, and it's responsible for either delivering or funding the vast majority of the country's healthcare. It is also struggling with deficit spending and poor financial management, specialist staff shortages, widespread complaints of burnout by clinical staff and long wait times for patients. Health NZ board chairman Lester Levy is up for a maximum payment of $450,000. Photo / Mark Mitchell Union representatives greeted the news of the extraordinary fees with incredulity. The New Zealand Nurses Organisation, which represents the single largest chunk of the Health NZ workforce, has highlighted what it calls 'cost-cutting' and 'staff shortages' in ongoing contract negotiations – a further strike of two days is planned for September. President Kerri Nuku said the high board fees are in stark contrast to the Government's attitude toward the nurses, midwives and other healthcare assistants who provide New Zealanders' healthcare. 'At a time when understaffing at hospitals has actually become the norm, and patients' safety is a serious concern, these figures defy belief.' Public Service Association national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons echoed the sentiment. 'Health workers are seeing their own wages kept low, as well as the continued and deliberate underfunding of the whole health system. The hypocrisy is palpable – there's no money for care and support and mental health workers helping our most vulnerable, but there is plenty for those at the top?' Brown emphasised the new board receives the same daily rates that were set under the previous Labour Government, albeit for a far higher time commitment and total spend. He said the board has a governance role that is 'more extensive than in previous years', noting the entity's 'significant, ongoing challenges'. Those difficulties are both substantive and political. The Government has staked considerable credibility on eliminating Health NZ's deficit spending – estimated at $1.1b in the past financial year – and reaching a series of health performance targets, soon to be embedded in law. Nurses Organisation co-leader Kerri Nuku says the board pay figures defy belief. Photo / Paul Taylor Pay breakdown Chair Lester Levy receives a day rate of $2500 for up to 130 days' work, with a further 50 days' work provided for in the contingency. His term covers only the current financial year. Deputy chair Dr Andrew Connolly receives a day rate of $2000 for up to 80 days' work, with a further 50 days' work provided for in the contingency. And five board members – Roger Jarrold, Dr Frances Hughes, Parekawhia McLean, Peter McCardle and Terry Moore – receive a day rate of $1750 each for up to 80 days' work, with a further 30 days' work apiece provided for in the contingency. The board also includes Crown observer Hamiora Bowkett, who heads the small but important 'health assurance unit' – now housed in the Ministry of Health – providing advice directly to Brown. Bowkett is a public servant and not covered by board fees. Public sector board pay is typically predicated on 50 days' work a year for the chair, and 30 days for other board members – extensive reading and preparation is not often included in this total. Brown said the current fees are fixed for 18 months, to reflect 'the additional work required' during the board re-establishment phase, and the arrangement will be reviewed toward the end of 2026. He claimed the Health NZ problems flow from 'a botched merger' of DHBs under the last Government, during the Covid-19 pandemic. A Deloitte review of the entity's financial performance, done in October 2024, found myriad problems, including that the agency relied largely on a single, error-prone Excel spreadsheet (in fiscal 2023/24) to track and report on some $28b of expenditure. Comparisons with other public sector boards Even without the half-million-dollar contingency, the underlying $1.185m board cost appears to rank as the highest in the public sector. By comparison, board costs at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and the Financial Markets Authority come in well below the $1m mark – both are reckoned to be among the sector's best paid. Board costs for other large Crown entities such as Kāinga Ora (Homes and Communities) and ACC (Accident Compensation Corporation) are closer to half a million dollars. In June last year, the Government declared a loss of confidence in the Health NZ board, which it dissolved and replaced with Levy as commissioner and two deputy commissioners. A year of commissioners In fiscal 2024/25, Levy earned $320,000 as Health NZ commissioner, with additional expenses of $20,400, including: $10,600 for flights, $4855 for accommodation, and $2599 for taxis (parking and mileage made up the balance). Levy is Auckland-based and the work entailed frequent travel to Wellington, a Health NZ spokeswoman said. He worked alongside deputy commissioners Ken Whelan and Roger Jarrold; Health NZ has not yet released their fees and expenses. Levy is a professor of digital health leadership at the Auckland University of Technology and a medical doctor. His AUT workload is 15 hours per week, divided between research and teaching four courses (two per semester). Labour health spokeswoman Ayesha Verrall during a select committee hearing. Photo / Mark Mitchell Levy is also chair of the Health Research Council, a commitment of about five hours per week, a Ministry of Health spokesperson said. Labour's health spokeswoman, Ayesha Verrall, criticised the new board arrangements as a 'licence for Lester Levy to act like he is the executive director of the board, rather than its chair, centralising power to enact cuts and a hiring freeze'. Verrall also said Levy played politics when, as Health NZ commissioner, he attempted to shift some $130m in financial costs from fiscal 2024/25 into the previous financial year. The move was blocked by the Office of the Auditor-General, she said, but, if allowed, would have made HNZ's current financial predicament appear less dismal. There is little doubt that Levy's tenure to date has been one of highly centralised control. A May report on Health NZ's financial performance by the Treasury for Finance Minister Nicola Willis highlighted 'the commissioner's tight top-down financial controls' and his 'highly centralised' regime. The document, released under the provisions of the OIA (Official Information Act), also indicated that Levy has had some success this calendar year in reducing Health NZ's monthly overspend, but that his managerial controls may be 'unsustainably tight' as Health NZ shifts to a new operating model, including devolved budget accountabilities for regions and districts. Underscoring the political risk Health NZ's performance poses to the entire Government, the Treasury highlighted a new series of monthly health joint ministers meetings with Willis, aimed at keeping her abreast of 'financial performance, capability, and risk at Health New Zealand' over the next year. Fees guidance The Health NZ board fees eclipse those provided for in the Government's guidance. The fees framework for board pay was updated at the end of last month, and provided for an 80% pay increase for the boards of the largest and most complex Crown entities. The maximum fee for board chairs is now $162,200, and the maximum fee for board members is $80,400. The framework provides only guidance to ministers for setting fees, to provide consistency across Crown-owned bodies and to 'contain expenditure of public funds within reasonable limits'.

RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Christchurch nurses regularly in tears over staff shortages
Nurse Bruce MacIntosh joined other nurses on strike in Christchurch today. Photo: RNZ/Rachel Graham A Christchurch nurse, who joined others on strike this afternoon , says staff shortages are so bad he is regularly seeing colleagues in tears. Nurses from theatre, post-anaesthetic care and radiology wards at Christchurch Hospital walked off the job from 2 to 4pm on Friday over a breakdown of collective bargaining. About 80 supporters and nurses gathered in Hagley Park, across the road from Christchurch Hospital, waving flags and posters calling for safe staffing. New Zealand Nurses Organisation delegate and operating theatre assistant Bruce MacIntosh said he is constantly seeing the impact of the staffing shortages. "Its incredible when you go around the wards, and see it like we do and meet with the delegates regularly. It is a crisis. Some of the delegates are crying on the night shift when they can't fill the (staffing) spots," said MacIntosh. "It is risky for the nurses, because if something goes wrong their name is on the block, which is a risk to their practice. So, not only is there risk to the patients, but also risk to the practitioners, the nurses." Nurse Averil Cooper said she too was making a stand for the safety of the patients and nurses' registration. "We have no staff, very little staff. They are run ragged and putting their scope of practice and registration on the line," said Cooper. She said the staff are dealing with chaos every day. Gayl Marryatt, a registered nurse and NZNO delegate, said the strike was part of a rolling strike being taken by the union. She said it was to highlight that multiple parts of the hospital are being affected by the short staffing. Nurses planned to hold nation-wide industrial action on 2 September and 4 September. Health NZ said contingency plans were in place during the strike. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.