logo
How caste shaped the rise of Maharajs in Indian kitchens

How caste shaped the rise of Maharajs in Indian kitchens

Time of India5 days ago
When scammers today target a food business, they plant a bone in a vegetarian dish and try to blackmail on that basis. In 19thcentury Calcutta, their equivalent was bhoj pandeys , feast spoilers, who would threaten to come to a big community feast, like a wedding, and spread rumours that the food was made by low-caste cooks. Those who ate it would feel the need for purification, while the hosts would lose community status.This story, quoted in Swapna M Banerjee's book Men, Women & Domestics — from an original account in Mahandranath Dutta's Kolikatar Puratan — explains how Brahmin cooks got a boost. They had long existed in temples and royal courts, thanks to the logic of caste hierarchies: If food made by lower castes was seen as impure, the safest option was having a cook from the highest caste.Business communities were acutely aware how their wealth made them targets. This, rather than an obsession with caste, was what led to Brahmin cooks becoming fixtures in their kitchens. In Gujarati families, they were called maharaj , a termusually seen as connoting respect, but possibly with some irony as well. Like the pandits employed to run their home temples, the caste status of the cooks earned them respect, but the businessmen ensured that they knew they were employees as well.There was an echo of this in a recent social media post by an employer in Mumbai marvelling at her maharaj's productivity. She wrote that he charged her ₹18,000 per month for half-anhour's work every day, and that he managed to work at 10-12 houses daily, getting free food in the process. The implication was that he made nearly ₹2 lakh profit a month, which might match the salary of many employers.A friend with connections to the maharaj network is sceptical. She says it's more likely to be around ₹12,000 a month, with an hour per house though only two-three times per week. A maharaj would be fine with five regular clients and did not expect to get free food and chai. Rent and transport in a city like Mumbai was a significant cost, so while it was a decent job, it was far from the highly desirable one described.The real hope for most maharajs is a job abroad, with significantly increased pay and a place to stay with the employer. Cooks have always followed traders, for reasons of convenience as much as caste. In an unfamiliar place, with wives left in their hometowns, feeding oneself comfortably was a challenge and expensive. Vegetarians, like Gujaratis and Marwaris, faced particular problems. Traders usually learned a few basic recipes, but as they became more established, it was easier to sponsor a maharaj to join them.Diamond traders are particularly known for employing maharajs — at least, according to embittered Gujarati families in India, who have lost out as employers. Some of the most lavish Gujarati food in the world is said to be served in Antwerp, the global diamond trading hub. These globetrotting maharajs havediversified their repertoire, now making food from around the world, adapted to the dietary requirements and tastes of their employers. The most successful ones have started catering businesses or restaurants.Yet, for all their success, it's questionable how many maharajs want their sons to follow them (and the fact that only sons can qualify underlines the gender, as well as caste, problems with the profession). If demand stays strong, some norms might get relaxed, and Banerjee's book documents how this happened in Calcutta. When demand for Bengali Brahmin cooks outstripped the supply, Odia Brahmins were substituted — until this supply also ran dry. A scheme was then devised by an unscrupulous Brahmin to teach non-Brahmins some recipes and shlokas and pass them off as high-caste cooks. Kitchens, it seems, can also be places to help cook up caste.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kin of AI-171 crash ground victims hire US law firm
Kin of AI-171 crash ground victims hire US law firm

Hindustan Times

time21 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Kin of AI-171 crash ground victims hire US law firm

Families of 10 people killed on the ground in the Air India Flight AI-171 crash have hired Beasley Allen, the prominent US aviation law firm that secured billions from Boeing over the 737 MAX disasters, as the firm expands its representation of those affected by the tragedy in Ahmedabad on June 12. Kin of AI-171 crash ground victims hire US law firm The firm, led by aviation attorney D Michael Andrews, is exploring product liability claims against Boeing in US federal courts and Montreal Convention claims against Air India in UK courts, though no lawsuits have been filed yet. Andrews travelled to India in August to meet families across Gujarat and Mumbai, signing his 10th ground victim family on August 11. Among those killed was Maheshbhai Kalavadia, a Gujarati film producer from Naroda who had attended a meeting at Law Garden before calling his wife at 1:15 pm to say he was heading home. His remains were found 700 metres from the crash site and identified through DNA matching. 'These were innocent people who had nothing to do with the flight - they weren't even passengers,' said a relative who met Andrews. 'They were just going about their normal day when this tragedy struck.' The Boeing 737 MAX cases that established Beasley Allen's reputation involved crashes that killed 346 people between 2018 and 2019. Boeing ultimately paid $2.5 billion under a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement and settled more than 90% of claims, acknowledging liability for crashes caused by the faulty Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) it built into the jets. Andrews has taken on the case of victims killed in the medical college hostel where the plane crashed, including two people in the food preparation area and medical students in the mess hall, and also represents the family of a husband and wife killed while on a scooter for document verification. The firm is pursuing a water leak theory, focusing on the Boeing 787-8's electrical and equipment bay beneath the cockpit that houses flight computers including FADEC and TCMA systems capable of autonomous aircraft control. 'Above that and in those same areas, there are water lines and couplings that are known to have leaked on prior 787-8 aircraft,' Andrews explained, referencing Boeing service bulletins about coupling leaks that can allow water into computer equipment. The firm is filing Right to Information requests in India and Freedom of Information Act requests in the US to obtain complete flight data recorder information for independent expert analysis, Andrews told HT. Andrews met the sole survivor Ramesh and other families during his India visit, saying conversations were brief and private. He plans to file cases separately for each victim but has no fixed timetable pending data collection.

'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court
'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court

Producer has been granted anticipatory bail by the Patiala House court in Delhi with regard to an FIR lodged by . Rajinder had alleged that he transferred money to the tune of INR 75 lakhs for the dubbing of 'Drishyam 2' for its release in the Chinese market, including China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court found no substance in the allegations against Kumar Mangat Pathak after considering the facts, circumstances, and evidence on record. The court observed in the ledger entries that the payment made to the corporate account of Panorama Studios International Limited by Rajinder Goel was for a Gujarati film, and not for 'Drishyam 2.' The producer's legal team said in a statement, "It is categorically stated that Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak on behalf of his company Panorama Studios International Limited (PSIL) has never entered into any transaction or agreement with Mr. Rajinder Goel, and as such, he has never invested any money with Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak or PSIL. His allegations are false, baseless, concocted and appear to be an afterthought designed to create a misleading and malicious narrative with intentions to malign the reputation of Kumar Mangat Pathak and PSIL. It is further clarified that any dealings , transactions done by Mr. Rajinder Goel were solely with a third party and not with Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak or his company. Any attempt to link Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak to such transactions is wholly unfounded and malicious." Following the bail, Kumar Mangat Pathak has instructed his legal team to initiate Rs 100 crore defamation suit against Rajinder Goel. The producer's advocate, Vineet Dhanda, said, "We also urge members of the press to act with responsibility and refrain from publishing or circulating unverified and false narratives that can cause unwarranted harm to Mr. Pathak's reputation and standing in the film industry." "The legal team will take all necessary steps, including legal proceedings, against any individual or entity found propagating such falsehoods," he added.

Delhi court grants protection from arrest to Bollywood film Drishyam 2 producer
Delhi court grants protection from arrest to Bollywood film Drishyam 2 producer

Hindustan Times

time2 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

Delhi court grants protection from arrest to Bollywood film Drishyam 2 producer

A Delhi court has granted protection from arrest to Bollywood film Drishyam 2's producer Kumar Mangat Pathak in a case of alleged cheating of a businessman by luring him to invest over ₹4 crore to get the Chinese dubbing and release rights of the movie. The producer's lawyer argued that the complainant made no payment to his client personally. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Pathak's lawyer, Vineet Dhanda, argued that the complainant made no payment to his client personally. He added that the money was transferred to the corporate account of the Panorama Studios for a Gujarati film. Additional sessions judge Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler said the money transfer is not shown at this stage to the applicant in his personal capacity. '...it is reflected in the corporate ledger as an advance against a different this project transaction is unconnected to the alleged cheating is a matter for trial, but prima facie it reduces the justification for custodial interrogation...' The court observed that Pathak's role is referred mainly in the context of the alleged forged term sheet and the presence in certain telephonic conversations, which could be investigated without custodial detention, especially where the documentary trial has been largely collected. Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing booked Pathak, who owns the Panorama Studios, and his associate Bharat Sevak.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store