Baltic nations disconnect from Russian power grid ahead of linking with EU
The three Baltic states disconnected their electricity systems from Russia's power grid on Saturday, the region's operators said, part of a plan designed to integrate the countries more closely with the European Union and boost security.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania disconnected from the IPS/UPS joint network and, subject to last-minute tests, they will synchronize with the EU's grid on Sunday after operating on their own in the meantime.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will speak at a ceremony on Sunday to mark the switch to the EU system, her office said on Friday.
"We've reached the goal we strived for for so long. We are now in control," Lithuanian Energy Minister Zygimantas Vaiciunas told a press conference.
The operators successfully undertook frequency management trials on Saturday, testing the Baltic grid's stability during interruptions such as sudden shutdowns of power plants, Lithuanian grid operator Litgrid said on Saturday evening.
Further trials on Sunday will test the Baltic grid's ability to manage current.
Immediately after disconnecting, Latvian workers used a crane to reach the high-voltage wires in Vilaka, 100 meters from the Russian border, and cut them. They handed out chopped wire as keepsakes to cheering observers.
"We will never use it again. We are moving on," Latvia's Energy Minister Kaspars Melnis told Reuters in Vilaka.
Plans for the Baltics to decouple from the grid of their former Soviet imperial overlord, debated for decades, gained momentum following Moscow's annexation of Crimea in 2014.
The grid was the final remaining link to Russia for the three countries, which reemerged as independent nations in the early 1990s at the fall of the Soviet Union and joined the European Union and NATO in 2004.
The three staunch supporters of Kyiv stopped purchases of power from Russia following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 but have relied on the Russian grid to control frequencies and stabilize networks to avoid outages.
"By ending the energy dependence of the Baltic states on Russia, we are leaving the aggressor without the option of using energy as a weapon against us," Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said.
An army truck was seen at the Rezekne power substation near the Latvia-Russia border, and officers with guns were patrolling the vicinity and in the nearby town, indicative of Baltic worries of attempted sabotage to disrupt the switch.
The Baltic Sea region is on high alert after power cable, telecom links and gas pipeline outages between the Baltics and Sweden or Finland. All were believed to have been caused by ships dragging anchors along the seabed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Russia has denied any involvement.
"The system is stable, the process is happening smoothly, no one is noticing that something changed," Melnis said.
Maintaining a constant power supply requires a stable grid frequency, which can more easily be obtained over time in a large synchronized area such as Russia or continental Europe, compared to what the Baltics can do on their own, analysts say.
Lithuania's energy ministry said it has drawn up contingency plans whereby some heavy energy users, such as factories, could be temporarily disconnected from the grid in the event of power shortages, to maintain essential supplies during the switch.
For Russia, the decoupling means its Kaliningrad exclave, located between Lithuania, Poland and the Baltic Sea, is cut off from Russia's main grid, leaving it to maintain its power system alone.
The Baltic countries spent nearly €1.6 billion ($1.66 billion) since 2018 to upgrade grids to prepare, while Moscow has spent 100 billion rubles ($1 billion), including on the building of several gas-fired power plants in Kaliningrad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
32 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Is Trump pushing Russian strategy in quest to settle war in Ukraine?
U.S. President Donald Trump recently met his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy and proposed a solution for the war with Russia. The proposal, however, is disadvantageous to Ukraine, the victim of aggression, raising questions about whether it could lead to fair and just peace. What comes into focus is how to achieve a ceasefire and peace, as well as what concrete steps to take for "security guarantees" to prevent Russia's reinvasion of Ukraine. Amid its inferior standing, Ukraine, alongside its European allies, has called for an immediate ceasefire. Trump once agreed to this, but made a turnaround following last week's bilateral summit talks with Russia, prioritizing efforts to achieve peace. This means the Russian offensive against Ukraine could continue until negotiations are settled. Furthermore, Trump appeared to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin's proposal demanding Ukraine withdraw its troops from two eastern regions and cede them to the aggressor. Given the fact the Ukrainian military controls 30% of Donetsk, one of the two regions, the proposal is obviously in favor of Moscow. It is only natural that Zelenskyy has rejected the proposal, claiming that constitutional provisions prohibit territorial transfers or deals. It is worth noting that Trump announced his country's commitment to security guarantees for Ukraine. A framework akin to the right to collective self-defense as defined by NATO is envisaged. While Trump had initially expressed reservations about the initiative, he shifted his stance after Putin did not oppose it during their recent meeting. Trump, however, has not specified how far the U.S. will get involved. To begin with, he has been ambiguous about the obligation to exercise the right to collective defense in the event a NATO member state comes under attack. He must ensure that the security guarantees are viable. What must not be overlooked is that Trump's proposals align with Russia's assertions. With U.S. cooperation essential in continuing the war, Ukraine cannot openly object to Trump. Alarmed, European leaders accompanied Zelenskyy to attend some of the meetings in Washington, yet the best they could do was to ask for keeping pressure on Russia. The war must be quickly brought to an end. But if the U.S. is to fall for a Russian ploy just as Trump is eager to achieve success, it will lead to future problems. It is unacceptable for the president to impose superpower logic.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Eel Regulation Proposal: How should Japan Respond to Demands for Resource Protection?
How should the resource of eels, which are part of Japan's traditional food culture, be protected? As one of the world's top consumers of eels, Japan needs to take the lead in efforts for resource protection and gain the understanding of the international community. In June this year, the European Union and some countries proposed adding Japanese eel to the list of species regulated under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, also known as the Washington Convention. The pact's purpose is to regulate international trade in endangered wildlife. The proposal seeks to classify Japanese eel as a species subject to the second-strictest regulation in a three-tier system. About 180 countries and regions are signatories of the convention. If two-thirds or more vote in favor at the convention's meeting that will start in late November, the regulations on Japanese eel will be strengthened. Japanese eel is found widely across East Asia, including Japan and China. If the regulations are strengthened, exporters in China and elsewhere will be required to obtain written permission from their governments, which could cause delays in exports. Japan, which relies on imports, will likely be significantly affected by issues, including rising transaction prices. European eel has been subject to regulations since 2009. However, there have reportedly been cases of trade involving European eel passed off as Japanese eel, and illegal activities such as smuggling have continued even after the regulations began. For this reason, the EU argues that there is a need to add the 18 remaining species, including Japanese eel, to the convention's regulations. In contrast, the Japanese government strongly opposes this proposal. It argues that the species' stocks are currently recovering, and there is no risk of extinction due to international trade. However, in 2014 the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources designated Japanese eel as an endangered species. Strengthening resource management is a serious issue for Japan. Japan relies on imports from China and elsewhere for about 70% of its domestic supply. In order to gain international understanding for Japan's position, the nation will have to set an example by making its own efforts to manage resources. Japan has experience in taking the initiative to establish an international regulatory framework. Japan, China, South Korea and Taiwan agreed in 2022 on specific upper limits for the number of glass eels, or young eels, to be farmed in aquaculture ponds to prevent overfishing. This is an achievement of Japan's initiative. Japan should promote its adherence to this agreement to the international community in close cooperation with China, South Korea and Taiwan. Although this framework does not include penalties, Japan revised its Fishery Law in 2023 through its independent efforts to impose stricter penalties for illegal fishing. However, illegal fishing of young eels continues, meaning that Japan's arguments against proposed regulations under the Washington Convention lack persuasiveness. Strengthening measures against illegal fishing is an urgent task. As a key measure for resource protection, it is hoped that 'complete aquaculture,' which involves artificially hatching eggs, will be commercialized. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 20, 2025)
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Support for Ukraine: European Unity Restrained United States
A recurrence of the situation was narrowly avoided in which U.S. President Donald Trump, who is rushing to achieve success in his mediation diplomacy and strengthening his pro-Russian stance, might press Ukraine to make concessions. It is significant that Europe united to support Ukraine and halt the U.S.' reckless behavior. Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House. After the meeting, Trump revealed on social media that he had begun making arrangements for a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyy to end Russia's aggression against Ukraine. In addition to a separate meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy, the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization also visited the United States to meet with Trump. It is extremely unusual for seven European leaders to visit Washington by adjusting their schedules in such a short period of time. The European leaders likely had a sense of urgency to prevent Zelenskyy from being isolated. When Trump welcomed Zelenskyy to the White House in February, the two ended up engaging in a heated argument in front of the press, and the talks broke down. Prior to his meeting with Zelenskyy this time, Trump met with Putin in the U.S. state of Alaska and expressed his understanding for Russia's claim of pressing Ukraine to cede some of its territory. However, if Russia's barbaric acts of violating Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in disregard of international law are allowed to become an established fact, stability and order will not be maintained not only in Europe but also in Asia and the rest of the world. Ahead of the meeting in the United States, an online summit took place of the 'coalition of the willing,' a group that supports Ukraine, led by Britain and France. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba also participated in the summit and stated that 'issues related to sovereignty and territorial integrity are extremely important.' In order to prevent the interests of other countries from being infringed upon by the logic of major powers, Europe and Japan must unite and uphold international norms. The issue with the highest priority is how to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump had previously expressed the view that an immediate ceasefire was necessary. However, after his meeting with Putin, he shifted his position to argue that a permanent peace agreement should be sought, rather than a ceasefire. A peace agreement would first require resolving difficult issues, including the question of who has sovereignty over the regions occupied by Russia. It is not acceptable that Russia is trying to buy time by dragging out negotiations while continuing its aggression in an attempt to create a favorable situation for Moscow. In fact, even during talks between Trump and the European leaders, Russia continued its attacks on Ukraine with missiles and drones. It is essential to step up pressure on Russia through economic sanctions and other means. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 20, 2025)
