Karnataka HC Refuses Pleas Against Mandatory Smart Meters, Cites Judicial Discipline
Judicial Discipline Cited
"Judicial discipline requires hierarchy, and propriety necessitates this Court to display judicial hands-off to the current petitions. Hence the subject petitions are not entertainable," Justice Nagaprasanna said in his observation. He further observed a previous commitment by Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty that the State would not require smart metering of the petitioners' residential premises, as their connections were not new."
Court's Earlier Fears About Meter Price
The court's denial comes notwithstanding its stern verbal observations during previous hearings on the exorbitant price of these smart meters in Karnataka as against states around it. Justice Nagaprasanna had earlier asked, "All over (other states) it is at Rs 900 for the very same smart meter, and you are charging Rs 8,900. Where will poor people go sir? You have outsourced the things, this is dangerous. You are quenching from all the poor people."
In following these issues, the court had passed an interim order instructing the State not to make smart meters compulsory for power supply/electricity connections, especially in violation of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Pre-paid Smart Metering) Regulations, 2024.
Petitioners Claim Hardship, Challenge Tender Process
The petitions were initiated by persons such as Jayalakshmi, who received a notice on April 2, 2025, instructing her to buy a Smart Energy Meter. Senior Counsel Lakshmy Iyengar, for one of the petitioners, contended that the mandate will ultimately drive all consumers to move to smart meters. The tender process and the "extreme hardships" caused to consumers by paying a very high price for meters in Karnataka were specifically challenged by the petitioners, drawing a contrast with the about Rs 900 charged in other states.
Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty, who appeared on behalf of the State, had earlier explained to the court that smart meters were meant to be installed only in new house connections and not for existing consumers.
ALSO READ: 'BrahMos Hai Humare Paas': Owaisi Slams Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif's Water Threat | VIDEO
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bihar SIR row hearing LIVE: Supreme Court to continue hearing of pleas today
The Supreme Court will continue on Thursday (August 14, 2025) its hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. In the previous hearing, Justice Joymalya Bagchi summarised the petitioners' argument that it was a battle between Constitutional entitlement and Constitutional right. The petitioners argued that the Election Commission did not have the right to decide on citizenship, nor de facto remove an elector for the list. Also read: Bihar draft rolls are not helpful in finding new, existing voters The draft roll was published on August 1, with the final list scheduled for release on September 30, amid Opposition allegations that the exercise will disenfranchise crores of eligible voters.
New Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Will not publish or circulate commission report: Karnataka government tells HC
BENGALURU: The State Government on Wednesday gave an undertaking before the Karnataka High Court that it will not publish or circulate the report submitted by the Commission of Inquiry headed by Justice John Michael D'Cunha into the stampede that claimed 11 lives outside M Chinnaswamy Stadium during the RCB victory celebrations on June 4. Recording the submission made by Advocate General K Shashikiran Shetty that the report will not be published or circulated till September 4, the next date of hearing, the division bench of Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice Umesh M Adiga adjourned the hearing of the petition filed by DNA Entertainment Networks Private Limited to September 4 to enable the State Government to file its objections. Accusing the commission of not following the procedure laid down in the Commission of Inquiry Act by not giving sufficient opportunity of hearing and also to cross-examination, DNA alleged that its reputation has been affected adversely because of the report. DNA contended that the commission contended that it is a company that falls under the category 'person' appearing in Section 8(b) of the Act, and therefore, the reputation and goodwill have been affected adversely because of the report, which was leaked to the media. The commission has finalised the report without recording the statements of the witnesses, DNA alleged. Raising preliminary objections about the maintainability of the petition, Advocate General submitted that the commission is empowered to set up its own procedure and the commission is not against any individual but into the incident, and therefore, the question affecting the individual's reputation does not arise. 'Some observations shocking' When the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the report of the commission has been given to the Criminal Investigation Department, which is investigating the crimes registered over the incidents, the court orally observed that some observations recorded in the report are shocking... 'but we are not making any observations at this stage,' the court said.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court on Stray Dogs Live Updates: Three-judge bench to review Delhi-NCR stray dog order today
Supreme Court hearing on Stray dogs: The Supreme Court has constituted a three-judge bench to hear the stray dog matter on Thursday, August 14, following widespread outrage over an earlier direction for blanket 'removal' of strays in Delhi-NCR. The matter was listed a few hours after it was mentioned before Chief Justice BR Gavai in open court. 'I will look into it,' the CJI More The case will now be taken up by Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria. This comes three days after a two-judge bench ordered authorities to remove all stray dogs to shelters and fixed its next hearing for four weeks later. However, the order did not sit well with many including animal lovers in Delhi NCR, it drew immediate criticism from politicians, public figures, animal rights groups who argued that longer-term, scientific approaches such as sterilisation, vaccination and community care, are more humane and effective. On August 11, a top court bench comprising Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan had directed authorities to round up stray dogs, starting with 5,000 in six to eight weeks. It said that no captured dogs should be released back onto the streets under any circumstances. The court further recorded that 'The stray dogs shall be captured, sterilized, dewormed and immunized as required by Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023,' according to the detailed order uploaded on the Supreme Court website on Wednesday. Protests, detentions in Delhi after Stray dogs judgement On the night of the order, several dog lovers, animal rights activists and other protesters were detained near India Gate, Delhi, while demonstrating against the 'remove all strays' directive. Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Varun Gandhi and Maneka Gandhi also flagged concerns. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India termed the order 'impractical, illogical, and illegal.' Rahul posted on X: 'Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted and strip us of compassion.. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination and community care can keep streets safe — without cruelty… We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand.' What all happened after the SC directive on Delhi NCR stray dogs: 5 key points 1. Several animal lovers and activists were detained near India Gate while protesting against the order. 2. PETA India termed the order 'impractical, illogical, and illegal.' 3. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi picked up over 100 stray dogs and converted 20 Animal Birth Control centres into shelter homes. 4. The MCD identified an 85-acre plot in Ghoga Dairy, outer Delhi, for large-scale shelters and is scouting for more land. 5. MCD Mayor Raja Iqbal Singh said the relocation will start with aggressive and rabies-infected dogs before expanding.
