logo
Tampa Bay leaders see anxiety, confusion over White House funding pause

Tampa Bay leaders see anxiety, confusion over White House funding pause

Yahoo30-01-2025

From college campuses to city halls to nonprofit offices, leaders across Tampa Bay were left unsettled by the possibility of losing billions in federal funding Wednesday evening after a frenetic 48 hours of confusing and contradictory messaging from Washington D.C.
The White House budget office on Monday ordered a pause on all grants and loans disbursed by the federal government, calling in a memo for federal agencies to perform a 'comprehensive analysis' to ensure that grant and loan-funded programs were aimed at diversity, equity, inclusion and 'woke gender ideology.'
Until that review was complete, federal agencies were instructed to 'temporarily pause' all financial assistance.
The White House rescinded the order Wednesday after a D.C. court temporarily blocked the move. But not before a swath of organizations that rely on federal funding had to spend a couple of days wondering what might happen if they lost it.
'We are breathing a sigh of relief this afternoon,' said Clara Reynolds, president and CEO of Crisis Center of Tampa Bay whose federally funded services range from sexual assault counseling to support groups for veterans and first responders.
The week's chaotic messaging highlights how much federal spending touches every corner of the state, and how tenuous that funding now feels for those who rely on it.
Roughly 40% of Florida's state revenue in 2022 came from federal funds, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, including Medicaid, income security and COVID-19 aid. The programs and agencies up for review, outlined in a 52-page memo from the White House Tuesday, touch on issues ranging from early childhood learning to cancer research.
As soon as the executive order was announced, the phones started ringing at Metro Inclusive Health, a Tampa Bay health services nonprofit that specializes in HIV care.
'It's of grave concern to patients and clients who have been calling frightened and confused,' spokesperson Brian Bailey said. 'Staff are equally concerned about their patients, including the most vulnerable, as well as their own jobs should funds for critical programs be cut.'
The memo's lack of clear details and agencies' confused responses indicated that the decision had been made without input from stakeholders, said Jonathan Fansmith, senior vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education.
'(It's) the exact opposite you'd hope to see in terms of decision making,' Fansmith told an online panel of higher education experts Tuesday. 'Agencies themselves are catching up to what the (budget office) memo is saying'
On Tuesday night, administrators at Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services received an email from their parent organization directing staff to cease all services to newly arrived refugees.
Although the budget office's directive noted that it would not halt support to individuals and that immigration efforts would be on those engaged in criminal acts, the federal government's 'confusing language' had put the organization's funding at risk, said president and CEO Sandra Braham.
'Refugees are not undocumented immigrants (and) did not enter the United States illegally,' President and CEO Sandra Braham wrote in an email to the Tampa Bay Times.
'This cease work order is not only inhumane, but it also puts the onus on nonprofits that are already underfunded while doing the work of our state and federal governments,' Braham wrote.
The confusion highlighted just how deeply federal funds reach into Floridians' daily lives.
Last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services alone approved more than $27 billion in funding in Florida. That includes nearly $58 million for research at Tampa's Moffitt Cancer Center and $1.7 million for health centers across Pinellas County, according to federal data.
Alayne Unterberger, executive director of the Tampa-based Florida Institute for Community Studies, was worried Wednesday that her organization could lose access to a key federal grant.
The nonprofit, which provides youth mental health training, was approved last year for a 4-year, $125,000 annual Health and Human Services grant. In her application, she wrote about accommodating Spanish speakers and people with disabilities.
The Trump administration's specific target on government programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion made Unterberger wary.
'When you write these federal grants, you have to have a plan for equity and accommodating disabilities,' Unterberger said. 'And that is not DEI. That is a good program.'
The freeze may be on hold for now, but more disruptions may be coming. On Monday, the National Institute of Health and National Science Foundation canceled workshops to review grants for the rest of the week to ensure funding decisions meet with new federal guidelines.
And Wednesday afternoon, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt posted on X that President Donald Trump's executive orders on federal funding' remain in full force and effect and will be rigorously implemented.'
For now, local leaders have adopted a 'wait and see' approach to the coming days.
'We are not currently planning anything in reaction to this because we are under the impression that it has been rescinded,' Hillsborough County spokesperson Chris Wilkerson Wednesday evening.
St. Petersburg Mayor Ken Welch said in a statement that he understood the uncertainty was 'frustrating for our community,' but that city leaders were 'working across all levels of government to gain clarity on any presidential executive orders.'
Until then?
'Right now, it's business as usual,' said Tampa Mayor Jane Castor.
Times staff writers Juan Carlos Chavez, Jack Evans, Divya Kumar, Colleen Wright, Colbi Edmonds, Christopher O'Donnell, Shauna Muckle and Jeffrey S. Solochek contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kansas Senator believes ranked choice voting is good for Kansas, despite ban
Kansas Senator believes ranked choice voting is good for Kansas, despite ban

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kansas Senator believes ranked choice voting is good for Kansas, despite ban

TOPEKA (KSNT) — A Kansas lawmaker is pushing back on the state's ban of ranked choice voting. The system allows voters to rank the candidates on their ballot based on preference. In March, the legislature passed Senate Bill 6, which prohibited the use of ranked choice voting in all Kansas elections. 'The Kansas Democratic Party used ranked choice voting in the 2020 presidential primary, and even though they say it's complicated, it turns out people seemed to understand how to use their ballot,' Senator Marci Francisco, D-Lawrence, told Nexstar's Kansas Capitol Bureau on Monday. Marci was one of 10 senators, mostly democrats, who voted not to ban ranked choice voting in Kansas. Those in favor of a ban on ranked choice voting say that the system makes the voting process more complicated. Additionally, it can be difficult to implement due to high costs associated with updating voting machine software. Activists protest possible Medicaid cuts outside KS Rep. Derek Schmidt's Topeka office However, those against a ban believe ranked choice voting is the best way to find the most popular candidate in any given election. They believe it also helps third party candidates who are often not represented in a one choice voting system. 13 other states have banned ranked choice voting, and all bans have taken effect within the past 4 years. For more Capitol Bureau news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk
Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) – Health bill SB 217 advanced in the Nevada legislature last week and is now on Governor Lombardo's desk awaiting his signature. The bill includes coverage for treatments like IVF, as well as fertility preservation for those who have been diagnosed with extreme illness. 'I had arthritis for most of my life. That drug that I was on, while helpful to my arthritis, was severely damaging to my egg reserves,' shared Stephanie Capellas-Glascock, who has been struggling with her infertility journey for years. 'I knew that it wasn't going to be something that I could accomplish on my own, so therefore I needed to look into fertility treatments for myself,' she explained. If signed, Nevada could become the first state in the nation to offer fertility coverage for Medicaid. However, the bill does face pushback for its cost and certain language in it. 'One of my concerns, just looking at it, so I may reserve my right to change my vote, is just the financial impact on our public employee benefit program that can go down to increasing premiums,' said Democratic Assembly Member Shea Backus, who did vote in favor. Meanwhile, the Nevada GOP party called on the governor to veto the bill. Their website cited their opposition because it 'declares embryos prior to implantation as non-human.' 'I don't think fertility treatments are a political issue. I think it's a health and medical issue,' Capellas-Glascock responded when asked about the opposition. 'We know that the GOP has some thoughts and feelings on that too, but I think the tremendous thing about IVF is that it is a miracle in medicine and science that really affords individuals the option to have a family, so when they're ready to start a family, they have that option.' When asked about the fiscal implications, she responded, 'There's always a cost associated. I think it's knowing that the pros supremely outweigh the cons.' The state estimated the cost would be about $38 million over the next two years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump budget proposal could tighten access to housing vouchers in Nevada
Trump budget proposal could tighten access to housing vouchers in Nevada

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump budget proposal could tighten access to housing vouchers in Nevada

Trump budget proposal could tighten access to housing vouchers in Nevada More than 15,000 households in Nevada rely on federally funded housing vouchers, with thousands more waiting years to access vital rental assistance. Representatives from the local housing authorities worry many would be locked out of vouchers and other assistance under President Donald Trump's proposed budget, which calls for billions of dollars in cuts to housing programs. 'Based on our current average monthly subsidy in our Housing Choice Voucher Program, we've estimated that for every million-dollar reduction in housing assistance, it would be approximately 93 fewer households that we would be able to serve,' said Dr. Hilary Lopez, the executive director for the Reno Housing Authority. An estimated 15,300 people in Nevada rely on housing choice vouchers, formerly known as section 8 vouchers, which provide rental assistance subsidies for low-income people, seniors and people with disabilities, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The number doesn't include other types of specialized vouchers, such as emergency solutions housing vouchers designed to pay rent for people and families at risk or experiencing homelessness. Another 2,500 people live in public housing throughout the state, according to data from CBPP. Trump's budget requests, which have been formed into the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' were passed overwhelmingly by House Republicans in late May and are currently being debated in the Senate. The proposal, which aims to slash Medicaid and food assistance programs, would reduce the Department of Housing and Urban Development's budget by more than 40% amid a national housing and homeless crisis. The cuts to homeless assistance dollars include a $27 billion reduction in funding to the State Rental Assistance Block Grant, which funds housing vouchers. The recommendations released by the White House in May said the proposed cuts 'would encourage States to provide funding to share in the responsibility to ensure that similar levels of recipients can benefit from the block grant.' If these proposed cuts are approved it 'would be staggering in both scale and impact,' Renee Willis, the president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, said in a press call last week. 'Rather than preserving and strengthening the federal rental assistance program that serves as a lifeline for these communities, the budget proposed consolidating HUD's five largest rental assistance programs into a single state-run block grant,' Willis said. 'It also imposed a two-year time limit on assistance.' She added that the budget proposal is not only 'misguided but fundamentally unjust' but that it 'abdicates the government's responsibility to address poverty and housing stability.' While the full scope of these cuts, or the state and local impact of reductions, has yet to be determined, social service providers and local governments fear any cuts to HUD funding would reduce Nevada's already fragile social safety net to tatters. The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority declined to answer questions about the proposed budget cuts as well as how it currently used federal funding dollars. 'While federal funding changes are uncertain at this time, we remain laser focused on our mission to provide safe, sanitary and affordable housing to eligible residents within our jurisdictions – housing that will provide an environment that fosters independence, self-sufficiency and community pride,' Lewis Jordan, executive director of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority said in a statement. Bill Brewer, the executive director for the Nevada Rural Housing Authority, said he is still waiting to see what the final budget will look like. Any amount would mean less people in rural areas being served. '​​Worst case scenario, if we took a 40% cut to our vouchers, then we would be looking at cutting about 500 households off of assistance out of our approximately 1,275 voucher holders,' he said. 'If it was just 12% or 10%, then we're still looking at losing 120 to 130 households' 'They'll simply lose their support' The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority currently oversees the lion's share of housing assistance, around 12,000 vouchers for low income residents. Reno Housing Authority, which provides assistance throughout Washoe County, allocated around 2,094 housing choice vouchers last year. Nevada Rural Housing Authority oversaw about 1,100 vouchers, not including specialized housing assistance. Reno Housing Authority relies on two main federal funding sources: $32 million from the federal government to provide housing vouchers along with $3 million to administer public housing. 'It does fluctuate on an annual basis and really depends upon federal appropriations,' Lopez said. Of the more than 2,000 households – roughly 3,600 people – that rely on housing choice vouchers in the Reno area, Lopez said close to three-quarters of clients who receive housing choice vouchers are seniors or disabled households. The breakdown is similar for the 600 households living in a public housing unit. Average income for those relying on housing vouchers is roughly $18,000, according to the authority's 2025 annual report. Nevada's housing shortage and skyrocketing rent prices have made it difficult for the authority to meet the demand for services, Lopez said. 'Over the last several years, we've seen those rents consistently rise,' Lopez said. 'What that means is that the average rental subsidy that we're providing has also been increasing over time and that also impacts the number of clients that we can assist.' The rural authority gets about $12 million for its housing choice vouchers, which funds its 1,077 vouchers throughout the rural areas. Additionally it received last year $786,340 for Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers, which provides assistance for 76 veterans experiencing homelessness. Similar to the Reno authority, Brewer said roughly two-thirds of housing voucher recipients are elderly or disabled. 'They're not the kind of folks that can go out and get a job and take care of themselves,' he said. 'They're already living on Social Security or supplemental Social Security, and they simply can't afford a $1,500 a month rent payment. That's all the money they get in most cases.' Demand for housing assistance is growing. Reno's authority has about 4,000 people waiting to apply for housing vouchers while the rural authorities have 2,248 applicants waiting. 'What we try to do for households on our wait list, we try to serve them within anywhere from about 18 to 36 months,' Lopez said. The waitlist in rural Nevada opened last year and 'within a week's time, we had about 5,000 applicants on there,' according to Brewer. 'We had to close the list.' 'It will take us at least two years, if not longer, to work through that list,' he added. 'I think we still have a couple thousand names on there that we will work through.' Nevadans wait an average of 38 months, more than three years, to receive housing vouchers, according to 2021 data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. In addition to housing choice vouchers, communities across the country, including those in Nevada, also began receiving funding for emergency housing vouchers through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 signed by President Joe Biden. Funding for that is expected to be depleted by the end of 2026. Willis from the National Low Income Housing Coalition said Trump's current budget request doesn't provide additional funding for these emergency vouchers and could 'put more than 60,000 households at risk of losing their assistance and being pushed into homelessness.' The rural authority received $455,616 for Emergency Housing Vouchers, which support 36 people. Washoe County previously told the Nevada Current 137 people rely on emergency housing vouchers in the county. In a 'normal year,' Brewer said the rural authority would just roll people relying on emergency housing voucher holders 'onto a regular Section 8 voucher.' He doesn't know if that would be possible if the proposed cuts are passed. 'If our voucher program overall is cut, we won't have any room to bring those people on to the (housing choice) vouchers,' he said. 'They'll simply lose their support.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store