.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
Fox News tosses softballs at Karoline Leavitt - right after Press Secretary bans sister outlet Wall Street Journal over Epstein bombshell
As has largely been the case since the president filed his $10 billion lawsuit against the WSJ , its parent company News Corp and its owner Rupert Murdoch over the story, Fox News – which is also owned by Murdoch – once again ignored the White House's vendetta against the right-wing network's 94-year-old founder.
Following Trump's concerted effort to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax' amid a MAGA uproar over his Justice Department concluding Epstein had no 'client list,' the WSJ published a much-anticipated report on Thursday evening detailing the president's once-close relationship with the dead sex offender.
The blockbuster story claimed Trump gave Epstein a 'bawdy' card for his 50th birthday that included a hand-drawn sketch of a naked woman with Trump's signature mimicking pubic hair. The report also claimed Trump wrote Epstein a personalized message that concluded: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
Asserting that the sexually suggestive birthday card is a 'fake thing,' Trump – likely emboldened by CBS owner Paramount settling the 'meritless' 60 Minutes complaint – threatened legal action against the WSJ and his on-again/off-again friend Murdoch before filing a libel lawsuit on Friday afternoon.
The defendants 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained,' the president's lawsuit alleges. 'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists,' the complaint adds.
Fox News – which enjoys a symbiotic relationship with the president and has helped staff his administration – has mostly steered clear of reporting on either the WSJ's scoop or the president's subsequent defamation lawsuit against the network's founder and owner.
So far, the WSJ's story has only been mentioned on a handful of Fox News programs – one of which is the Journal Editorial Report, a show co-produced by the WSJ. Fox News media host Howie Kurtz also devoted the opening segment of Sunday morning's MediaBuzz to the lawsuit and the eye-popping report.
On Monday afternoon, the White House followed up by removing reporters from the WSJ from the pool of journalists scheduled to cover the president's upcoming four-day trip to Scotland to tour his golf courses. Tarini Parti, a White House reporter for the WSJ, had been initially slated to serve as the print pooler for the final two days of the visit.
'As the appeals court confirmed, the Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the [13] outlets on board. Every news organization in the entire world wishes to cover President Trump, and the White House has taken significant steps to include as many voices as possible.'
The latest action by the White House echoes its ban of Associated Press journalists from covering Oval Office events after the wire service said it would not refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America' following Trump's executive order renaming the body of water, citing editorial standards. Shortly after Trump took office, Leavitt took control of pool rotation assignments from the White House Correspondents' Association.
Appearing on Fox News' The Story moments after confirming that she had booted the WSJ from the travel pool, Leavitt didn't have to worry about being pressed by anchor Martha MacCallum to explain the latest move against the network's sister publication.
Despite the Trump administration going on the 'warpath' against Murdoch, MacCallum instead conducted a friendly and non-adversarial chat with the White House flack over the five-minute segment.
After devoting the first part of the conversation to the recent shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer in New York City, which featured Leavitt blaming the incident on the former Biden administration, MacCallum then brought up New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani.
'You know, Karoline, we have not heard from Mamdani – who is running for mayor in New York,' the anchor stated, wondering if Trump would endorse another candidate in the race because 'he's a New Yorker and he wants to keep the city safe.' Leavitt, meanwhile, took the opportunity to accuse Mamdani – who has quickly become a leftist boogeyman for the right – of standing for 'allowing illegal criminals and criminals of all kinds to run free.'
MacCallum, meanwhile, took the opportunity to get Leavitt's 'quick reaction' to something that is 'getting a lot of attention.' But rather than the continued fallout over the Epstein saga, the president's lawsuit and the White House's continued retribution against the WSJ, MacCallum instead wanted Leavitt to respond to Hunter Biden profanely blasting Democrats in a recent podcast appearance.
'Clearly, they've learned nothing from President Trump's overwhelming victory on November 5th,' Leavitt responded, leaning heavily on her tried-and-true talking points. 'The American people want deportations. They want secure borders. That's why we had the most successful six months of any administration!'
Adding that it was clear the younger Biden 'wanted to tear down anybody' who veers to the middle on immigration, MacCallum thanked Leavitt for her time before letting viewers know that she would be covering more about Hunter Biden's recent comments later in the program.
It would appear the message is clear to Trump world – Fox News isn't going to defend their colleagues at the WSJ or even stand up for their boss right now. Instead, they will just avoid this entire story while focusing energy on the distractions the president prefers they cover – such as Tulsi Gabbard's reigniting MAGA's long-standing obsession with jailing Barack Obama over the Trump-Russia probe, which the administration served up to Fox as an exclusive.
In the end, Trump-boosting Fox News host Mark Levin perhaps said it best this past weekend. 'We can't waste our time on Epstein, and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us to focus on,' Levin exclaimed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
US, EU trade talks bolstered by Trump's agreement with Japan
BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The European Union and the U.S. are moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU goods and possible exemptions, two European diplomats said on Wednesday, potentially moving President Donald Trump closer to another major trade agreement on the heels of the one he just unveiled with Japan. European negotiators were hoping to reach an agreement to dodge the 30% tariff rate Trump has said he would impose on imports from the 27-nation bloc on August 1. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the U.S. has struck with Japan, which Trump announced late on Tuesday. There could be concessions for sectors like aircraft and lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50% tariff on steel, they said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told Bloomberg News the report from the EU should be taken with "a grain of salt." As talks continued, the European Commission said it would press on with potential counter-measures in case a deal was not reached. EU member states were set to vote on 93 billion euros of counter-tariffs on U.S. goods on Thursday, European diplomats said. A broad majority of members support using anti-coercion instruments if there is no deal, they said. Trump was aiming to secure an agreement on the heels of a complicated deal reached with Japan, the largest foreign investor in the U.S. That deal included a $550 investment and loan pledges from Japan and its commitment to buy 100 Boeing airplanes and boost purchases of U.S. agricultural products. That investment - to be spent at Trump's discretion - would focus on key industries like energy, semiconductors, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and shipbuilding, the White House said on Wednesday. Tariffs on Japan's auto sector will drop from 27.5% to 15% as part of the agreement, reviving hopes for similar treatment for European cars. Asian and European stock markets rallied as investors cheered the U.S.-Japan agreement, but U.S. stocks showed a more modest rise and earnings reports were gloomy. American businesses making everything from chips to steel reported downbeat results on Wednesday, revealing how the Trump administration's chaotic trade policy has hurt profits, added to costs, upended supply chains and weighed on consumer confidence. U.S. automakers signaled their unhappiness with the Japan deal, raising concerns about a trade regime that cuts tariffs on Japanese auto imports while leaving 25% tariffs on imports from their plants and suppliers in Canada and Mexico. "Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers," said Matt Blunt, the president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab, Ford (F.N), opens new tab and Chrysler parent Stellantis ( opens new tab. Automobile stocks led the climb of European shares after the Japan deal spurred hopes that the U.S. was budging over tariffs on EU cars. EU officials have previously said Washington has shown little sign of doing so. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television that Japan received the 15% rate on auto tariffs "because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism" that he did not think other countries could replicate. Trump, however, has appeared open to a range of options as the U.S. negotiates trade deals. "I will only lower tariffs if a country agrees to open its market," Trump wrote in a social media post on Wednesday. The Republican president said late on Tuesday that other countries would be coming to Washington for talks this week. Governments were scrambling to close trade deals before next week's deadline that the White House has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. U.S. and Chinese officials plan to meet in Stockholm next week to discuss extending an August 12 deadline for negotiating a trade deal. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday would not discuss expectations for the meeting, but said Bessent "looks forward to continuing discussions with his Chinese counterparts."
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge rejects Trump administration effort to unseal Epstein grand jury records in Florida
A judge on Wednesday rejected a Trump administration request to unseal transcripts from grand jury investigations of Jeffrey Epstein years ago in Florida, though a similar request for the work of a different grand jury is pending in New York. U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg in West Palm Beach said the request to release grand jury documents from 2005 and 2007 did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions under federal law that could make them public. The Justice Department last week asked the judge to release records to quell a storm among supporters of President Donald Trump who believe there was a conspiracy to protect Epstein's clients, conceal videos of crimes being committed and other evidence. In 2008, Epstein cut a deal with federal prosecutors in Florida that allowed him to escape more severe federal charges and instead plead guilty to state charges of procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche had asked judges in Florida and New York to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, saying 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration.' Federal grand juries hear evidence in secret and then decide whether there is enough for an indictment. Experts say the transcripts likely would not reveal much because prosecutors typically are trying only to present enough material to get charges and don't introduce the entire investigation. Epstein, a wealthy financier, years later was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges, while Maxwell was charged with helping him abuse teenage girls. Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York City about a month after he was arrested. Investigators concluded he killed himself. Maxwell later was convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison. The case attracted attention because of Epstein and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. It also led to some of the biggest conspiracy theories animating Trump's base. The furor over records has been stoked by the Justice Department. In February, far-right influencers were invited to the White House and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified.' The binders contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain. The department on July 7 acknowledged that Epstein did not have a list of clients. It also said no more files related to his case would be made public. A two-page memo that bore the logos of the FBI and Justice Department, but that was not signed by any individual, said the department determined that no 'further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.'
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's freeze on $6 billion in education funds could lead to school closures, lawmakers warn
Democratic and Republican Lawmakers are asking the Trump administration to unfreeze nearly $6 billion in federal education funding, voicing concern that it could force some school districts to close. In a rare bipartisan push across local, state, and federal lines, officials have asked the administration to release billions in federal funding that support essential K-12 and adult education programs – particularly for low-income and English as a second language students. So far, 10 Republican senators and 18 Democratic governors have sent letters to Education Department Secretary Linda McMahon and Office of Management and Budget Secretary Russell Vought encouraging them to release funding. Among the Republicans is Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who told ABC News she was concerned about schools in her home state that have already struggled to stay open. "Many of our school districts have already made really hard decisions about closing schools," Murkowski said. "I wish I could say that we were really solid on the state level, but we're not. And now there's questions on the federal level as well.' On June 30, the Department of Education informed school districts across the country that it would not release $6.9 billion that would typically be done on July 1. The department said it was reviewing federal funding because it had been 'grossly misused to subsidize a radical left-wing agenda.' Nearly two weeks later, on July 18, the administration said it would release $1.3 billion in those federal frozen funds allocated toward after-school programs – but the other $5.5 billion remains in limbo. The Independent has asked the Department of Education and the Office of Management and Budget for comment. Already, school districts are looking at making cuts as they struggle to prepare for the upcoming school year. In Tallahassee, Florida, Leon County School District Superintendent Rocky Hannah said the possibility of school closures is on the table to solve the school district's financial issues – which have only been made worse by federal funding cuts. 'We're going to look at enrollment data and school zones to see if that could potentially be of financial benefit to us,' Hanna told the Tallahassee Democrat. 'Of course, we do not want to do that, but all options are on the table, including the merging of school sites.' A spokesperson for the Palm Beach County School District told WPTV that the 'ongoing delay in releasing these funds poses significant challenges and could necessitate the elimination of essential services for our students and educators.' In their letter to McMahon and Vought, Republicans said freezing funds was 'contrary' to President Donald Trump's desire to shut down the Department of Education in order to return education to the states. 'The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump's goal of returning K-12 education to the states. This funding goes directly to states and local school districts, where local leaders decide how this funding is spent, because as we know, local communities know how to best serve students and families. Withholding this funding denies states and communities the opportunity to pursue localized initiatives to support students and their families,' the 10 Republicans wrote. Multiple school districts in Murkowski's home state have sued the Trump administration for withholding funds, arguing that it violates the Impoundment Control Act, among other constitutional provisions. Murkowski told ABC News she is 'very worried.'
