Oppn MPs making India's case, ruling MPs at tourist spots—Congress changes tune, praises delegates
The party appeared particularly upset with the government picking Shashi Tharoor, whose relation with the party has soured. It had even dismissed the move to send delegations as a 'diversionary tactic of the government'.
The Congress's praise comes just days after the party clashed with the government over exclusion of names proposed by Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and party president Mallikarjun Kharge from the delegations.
New Delhi: The Congress said Tuesday that Opposition MPs, including its own leaders, have outshone their government counterparts in representing India on the international stage as members of multi-party delegations visiting various countries to make India's case on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor.
Addressing a press conference Tuesday, Congress media and publicity department chairperson Pawan Khera emphasised on the need for a clear comparison between how the Opposition and ruling party MPs have been conducting themselves as members of the seven delegations.
'There are some people going to tourist-attraction spots, some meeting the diaspora. Look at how Congress and Opposition MPs are presenting India's case while a ruling party MP is busy making poisonous posts on social media, attacking the Congress. It seems lost on him that the idea was to attack Pakistan and not the Opposition. Opposition MPs have been more effective than the government in putting forward, in protecting the interests of India,' Khera said.
While Khera did not take any names, he seemed to target BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, who is currently in Kuwait as member of one of the delegations. Even as he travels, Dubey has been posting statements on social media attacking the Congress and Rahul Gandhi over various issues.
'Everything, including foreign and defence policy, has been outsourced to trolls. This government is run by trolls, operated by trolls, inspired by trolls and the results are for all to see,' Khera added.
Responding to Khera's remarks, Dubey made a fresh post Tuesday, saying: 'Explain to your leader Rahul Gandhi. Is he not following your party line? Or has your agenda of opposing Modi taken the form of opposing India?
'This is India's new agenda. If terrorists kill our people, we will also kill them. We will not differentiate between terrorists and the Pakistan Army. Similarly, if your leaders say something wrong, we will point out your mistake with evidence. You keep quiet, we will also keep quiet.'
Earlier this month, Kharge and Gandhi had proposed the names of Congress leaders Anand Sharma, Gaurav Gogoi, Syed Naseer Hussain, and Amarinder Singh Raja Warring for the delegations following a call from Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju.
Apart from Sharma, the government overlooked the other names. It picked Tharoor, Manish Tewari, Salman Khurshid and Amar Singh instead, drawing criticism from the Congress. The Congress also suggested that Tharoor should have sought concurrence of the party leadership before accepting the government's invitation. However, it did not bar the leaders picked by the government to head out as members of the delegations.
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: In naming Gaurav Gogoi as its state chief, Congress rolls the dice in Himanta's Assam
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
New rules to fast-track joint services commands
India has notified new rules under an overarching law to boost jointness, command efficiency and operational synergy in the armed forces at a critical moment when they are charting a path towards theaterisation --- a long-awaited reform for the best use of the military's resources to fight future wars, weeks after the May 7-10 clash with Pakistan that saw the three services work jointly for best battle outcomes. The government notified the rules under the Inter-Services Organisations (Command, Control and Discipline) Act, 2023 in the Gazette of India on May 27, signalling its intent to fast-track the setting up of joint services commands --- a key goal of the ongoing theaterisation drive. Such commands will consist of military elements, assets, and personnel drawn from the three services and placed under a commander-in-chief. 'This significant step aims to bolster command, control, and efficient functioning of Inter-Services Organisations (ISOs), thereby strengthening jointness among the armed forces,' the defence ministry said on Wednesday. Jointness among the three services is an essential prerequisite to the creation of theatre commands and was in focus during Operation Sindoor --- New Delhi's direct military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed. It led to a four-day confrontation that showcased the Indian military's synergy. The moves comes a year after the Act was notified in the gazette, empowering the government to set up ISOs --- including joint services commands --- and bestowing powers on the heads of such organisations to exercise command and control over the tri-services personnel serving under them to ensure discipline and effective discharge of duties. Such personnel were earlier governed by the respective laws of the three services: the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, and the Navy Act, 1957. 'The rules (notified) are a critical enabler for the functioning of ISOs and establish a comprehensive framework for discipline, administrative control, and operational synergy,' the defence ministry said in a statement. The setting up of theatre commands for integrated application of force, operational efficiency, and optimal resource utilisation is among the nine areas identified by the defence ministry for focused intervention in 2025, which the ministry has declared as the 'year of reforms.' Other areas include building indigenous capabilities to strengthen the armed forces, simplifying acquisition procedures for swifter capability development and new domains such as cyber and space. Defence minister Rajnath Singh is conducting a quarterly review of the defence reforms --- including theaterisation --- being driven by the government to boost the armed forces' combat readiness. The theaterisation model being pursued involves raising the China-centric northern theatre command in Lucknow, the Pakistan-centric western theatre command in Jaipur, and the maritime theatre command in Thiruvananthapuram. The earlier legal framework of the armed forces had its limitations when it came to tri-services matters as officers of one service lacked the authority to exercise disciplinary and administrative powers over personnel belonging to another service. For instance, a three-star general heading a joint command could not act against air force or navy personnel serving under him. The lack of such powers had a direct impact on command, control and discipline, officials aware of the matter said. 'With the notification of these rules, the Act is now fully operational. This will empower the heads of ISOs, enable the expeditious disposal of disciplinary cases, and help avoid the duplication of proceedings,' the defence ministry said. The actions of the three services during the May7-10 military confrontation with Pakistan reflected the synergy of the country's armed forces, the information and broadcasting ministry said on May 18, in a backgrounder titled Operation Sindoor: Forging One Force. 'The operation unfolded across land, air, and sea --- a seamless demonstration of synergy between the army, air force and navy,' the I&B ministry said at the time. It added that efforts were underway to restructure forces through the setting up of integrated theatre commands by unifying the capabilities of the three services based on geography and function. Operation Sindoor triggered four days of strikes and counterstrikes with fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the Indian and Pakistani forces reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10. Between the launch of the operation in the early hours of May 7 and the ceasefire, Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), killing at least 100 terrorists, and the Indian Air Force (IAF) struck targets at 13 Pakistani airbases and military installations. The IAF struck two terror sites at Markaz Subhanallah in Bahawalpur and Markaz Taiba near Muridke, while the army hit targets at seven places including Mehmoona Joya in Sialkot, Sawai Nala and Syed Na Bilal in Muzaffarabad, Gulpur and Abbas in Kotli, Barnala in Bhimber, and Sarjal. The IAF also struck military targets in Rafiqui, Murid, Chaklala, Rahim Yar Khan, Sukkur, Chunian, Pasrur, Sialkot, Skardu, Sargodha, Jacobabad, Bholari and Malir Cantt in Karachi. The navy played a critical role during the operation. The forward presence of aircraft carrier INS Vikrant in the northern Arabian Sea, along with its Mig-29K fighters and airborne early warning helicopters, prevented hostile aircraft from coming within several hundred kms of the carrier battle group. 'It compelled the Pakistani air elements to remain bottled up close to the Makran coast, with the Indian Navy denying the enemy any opportunity to be a threat in the maritime space,' a top navy official earlier said. In March, the defence ministry told a parliamentary panel that a raft of complex issues must be addressed before rolling out integrated theatre commands as they have a direct bearing on the proposed force structure, calling it 'a trailblazing reform.' The ministry's response to a pointed question on theaterisation was part of a report tabled by the standing committee on defence in Parliament. 'Deliberations on reorganising the armed forces into integrated theatre commands are in progress and currently being examined at various levels before finalisation of an optimal organisational structure to meet the operational requirements,' the report said. The joint structures would help create and integrate new war-fighting capabilities along with faster assimilation of future technology and tactics, it said. 'The concept of theaterisation seeks to mitigate the shortcomings of single service operations and support modern war fighting,' the report added. The chief of defence staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan is heading the theaterisation drive. The appointment of a CDS was one of the most significant recommendations made by the K Subrahmanyam-led Kargil Review Committee (KRC) that was constituted after the 1999 Kargil war to examine various lapses and suggest measures to boost national security. In 2000, the KRC recommended appointing a CDS to provide single-point military advice to the government and foster synergy in warfighting. A year later, a group of ministers backed the appointment of a CDS, who would bring about much needed jointness among the three services and prioritise defence planning. The need for a CDS was stressed by several committees and parliamentary panels between 2002 and 2016. But successive governments were unable to build political consensus around a CDS until Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the post on August 15, 2019. General Bipin Rawat was appointed the country's first CDS on December 31, 2019. He was killed in a helicopter crash on December 8, 2021.
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Manipur MLAs meet governor, offer to form govt
Imphal: At least 44 MLAs are ready to form a new popular government in Manipur, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) legislator Thokchom Radheshyam Singh said on Wednesday after meeting Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla. Manipur has been under the President's Rule since February 13, four days after BJP leader N Biren Singh resigned as the chief minister, amid criticisms about his government's handling of the ethnic clashes between Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities that broke out on May 3, 2023. Talking to reporters outside the Raj Bhavan in Imphal, Singh said that he, along with nine other MLAs, met the governor to formally inform him of the support for a new government. 'Forty-four MLAs are ready to form a government as per the wishes of the people. We have conveyed this to the governor. We also discussed what solutions can be there for the issue,' he said. 'The governor noted what we had to say and will initiate actions in the best interests of the people.' On a question whether they would stake a claim to form the government, Singh said the BJP central leadership will take a decision on staking claim to form the government. He, however, added that to inform the governor that 'we are ready is similar to staking a claim' to form a government. Singh also said that assembly Speaker Th Satyabrata has individually and jointly met the 44 MLAs, who have expressed willingness to form the government. Th Satyabrata left for New Delhi in the afternoon. The meeting came hours after former CM Biren Singh met the governor at Raj Bhavan on Tuesday evening. 'People are facing too much hardship. In the previous term, two years were lost due to Covid, and in this term, another two years have been lost due to the conflict (ethnic violence),' he said. The 60-member Manipur assembly currently has 59 MLAs following the death of a legislator. Except the five Congress MLAs and 10 Kuki-Zo legislators, which include seven from the BJP, remaining 44 MLAs are likely to be part of the BJP-led coalition. Independent MLA Nishikant Singh Sapam, who was also part of the group of legislators that met the governor on Wednesday, said they have submitted a letter signed by 22 MLAs that they had previously sent to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah last month urging them to form a 'popular government' in the state. 'Some of the MLAs could not reach here, but all are interested in forming a popular government,' Sapam told reporters. A person familiar with the matter told HT that while the MLAs are in favour of forming a government, 'the issue of leadership will be decided after the government formation.' Meanwhile, state Congress president K Meghachandra questioned the BJP-led coalition's move without clarity on leadership. 'The approach is hollow. The process to claim the formation of a government is also flawed. Without the appointment of a legislature leader, how can they stake a claim to form the government? That is a key question,' he said. Alleging that the proposed move was a result of 'pressure from civil society organisations', the Congress leader added: 'They may have the numbers, but they have no guts to form a government. That's the crisis we are facing in the state. The so-called double engine government in Manipur has failed, even under President's Rule. For over two years, no effective steps have been taken to restore peace in Manipur through constitutional means.' The development comes amid massive protests in the Meitei-inhabited Imphal Valley over alleged removal of 'Manipur' name written on the windshield of a government bus by security forces in Gwaltabi on May 20. Meitei groups have been demanding an apology from the governor over the incident and the resignation of the chief secretary, DGP, and security advisor. The incident has added to the tensions, which were waning in recent months because of a slew of measures being taken by the Centre to bring back peace to the northeastern state. At least 250 people died and 60,000 were rendered homeless in the ethnic clashes between Kuki-Zo and Meitei groups that started in May 2023. Since the beginning of the strife, Meitei groups maintain that the territorial integrity of the state is non-negotiable in any peace process, while the Kuki-Zo outfits assert that the only solution to resolve the crisis is creating a separate administration for the hill districts where they live.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
US court blocks Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, citing overreach of power
A U.S. federal court has ruled against former President Donald Trump's plan to impose broad tariffs under emergency powers, declaring the move unconstitutional and beyond presidential authority. The decision was handed down on Wednesday by a three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade in Manhattan. The court's ruling invalidated Trump's April 2 executive orders, which introduced a 10 percent baseline tariff on most imports and steeper duties on countries with large trade surpluses with the U.S., including China and the European Union. The panel found that Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the levies violated the U.S. Constitution. 'An unlimited delegation of tariff authority would constitute an improper abdication of legislative power to another branch of government,' the judges wrote in an unsigned opinion. Court rebukes overreach of emergency powers The court emphasised that Congress holds the exclusive right to regulate commerce with foreign nations. The ruling rejected the argument that the president can impose tariffs under IEEPA unless there is a genuine and extraordinary emergency threat to national security. 'The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President's use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it,' the judges stated. Live Events They added that Trump's 'Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President . . . to regulate importation by means of tariffs.' Lawsuits from states and small businesses The decision came in response to two lawsuits — one from the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center representing five small U.S. businesses, and another from a group of 13 U.S. states led by Oregon. The businesses, including a wine importer from New York and an educational kit maker from Virginia, argued that the tariffs threatened their survival. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield , whose office spearheaded the states' legal challenge, welcomed the court's decision. 'This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can't be made on the president's whim,' Rayfield said. Jeffrey Schwab, a lawyer representing the businesses, accused Trump of an 'unprecedented and unlawful expansion of executive authority' during the hearing. White House pushes back In response, the Trump administration filed an immediate notice of appeal. A White House spokesperson dismissed the ruling, arguing that courts should not interfere with executive actions during national emergencies. 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' the spokesperson said. 'President Trump pledged to put America First, and the Administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American Greatness.' Stephen Miller, then White House deputy chief of staff, added on social media, 'The judicial coup is out of control.' Shaky legal ground, market shocks Trump had cited the IEEPA to declare the U.S. trade deficit a national emergency. He also pointed to foreign practices such as non-reciprocal trade terms and wage suppression, linking them to national security threats. But the law, traditionally used to impose sanctions on hostile nations, had never been used in this way before. At a hearing in Oregon, Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate warned that blocking the tariffs 'would completely kneecap the president.' But Judge Jane Restani responded, 'The court cannot for political reasons allow the president to do something he's not allowed to do by statute.' Markets had reacted sharply to Trump's tariff announcements. Financial turmoil followed the initial orders, with partial relief only coming after Trump delayed several of the steepest levies. A 90-day tariff reduction agreement was reached with China, and a delay was granted to the EU following a call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. 'We had a very nice call . . . and I agreed to move [the date],' Trump told reporters at the time. Despite those pauses, the tariffs had a ripple effect on U.S. businesses and trading relationships. Critics say the legal uncertainty surrounding the emergency justification only adds to the economic harm. Constitutional guardrails The ruling underscores that the president cannot act alone when it comes to trade. While IEEPA does permit emergency action, the court firmly ruled that this does not amount to an unchecked power to restructure the nation's trade relationships through tariffs. 'Any interpretation of the IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional,' the judges concluded. Though the administration insists the trade deficit represents a national emergency, the court found that the law must still be followed, and that constitutional limits on presidential power remain in force — even during economic crises.
