
LGBT+ pride parades held in several of Europe's capitals
Warsaw's pride parade went through the city centre and headed through the Old Town. The "Equality Parade" began on Saturday afternoon, and was attended by thousands of demonstrators.
Under the slogan "Love is the answer", the event's organisers expressed the hope that they could help others to express their LGBTQ+ identity openly and without fear.
"We don't want to talk about such matters somewhere underground, we don't want to hide in basements - we come to the surface to talk about it," said Rafał Dembe, president of the Equality Volunteering Foundation at a press conference ahead of the march.
During the conference, the organisers said that the demonstration in Warsaw is the largest of its kind in the country.
Among the most notable attendees of the parade were mayor of Warsaw Rafał Trzaskowski, who recently found himself on the losing side of the country's presidential election, member of the European Parliament Robert Biedroń and Minister of Equality Katarzyna Kotula.
Four days earlier, Kotula submitted a bill to parliament to introduce civil partnerships, including for same-sex couples.
Speaking to the crowd at the start of the parade, Trzaskowski said "Remember that I have been saying for many years that together we are building Warsaw, which is an open and tolerant city, where these values are not only appreciated but also promoted."
Braving the scorching hot 35 degree weather, thousands of people walked the city of Rome from Piazza della Repubblica to Via Cavour to participate in the Italian capital's pride march. Three motorcyclists with roaring engines kicked off the parade. Right behind them was the leader of the parade, holding a large banner with the word "Outlaw", written on it. The banner is in protest of what organisers see as the conservative incumbent government's lack of support for LGBTQ+ rights.
Among those taking part in the demonstration were the spokesperson of the Capitoline parade, Mario Colamarino, and the mayor of Rome, Roberto Gualtieri.
''We are here for the rights of all, to have a more inclusive and equal Italy, better than the one we have now. 'Outlaws' is what we are in this country today, we must fight and we must be many," said Colamarino.
The event in Rome was held not only to celebrate LGBTQ+ pride, but also to protest the ongoing conflict in Gaza, for which a one-minute silence was held. Many Palestinian flags and banners were waved alongside rainbow flags, as people chanted slogans for free love and equality. Along with house and pop music, the Italian partisan anthem "Bella Ciao" was also sung by the demonstrators.
A float satirically depicting Hungarian Prime Miniser Viktor Orban - whose government was last week denied a request to hold a pride march in Budapest - was also rolled out, an initiative by the Italian +Europa party.
"Today, more than ever, it is important to attend pride at a time when in the world there are autocracies, illiberal democracies, fundamentalist regimes that attack civil rights and individual freedoms in Hungary, as well as in Russia and Trump's United States, where some words, such as 'gay', are banned on institutional websites", said the party's secretary, Riccardo Magi.
2025 marks the 20th year since the first Athens Pride was held, and this year's slogan is "We Count". This has a double meaning in Greek - the phrase can either mean "we matter", but can also mean to take stock of something. The latter is in reference to recollecting everything that has happened since June 2005, when the first Athens pride parade was held.
According to the organisers, this includes joy, such as the pride and liberation of the first years, losses due to hate and homophobic attacks, victories such as same-sex civic union and marriage, but also disappointment such as the stigma that remains, as well as the fight for visibility and rights.
"Now, more than ever, the global context shows us that no acquis (law) can be taken for granted. Instead, our rights and our very existence are being challenged every day. The rise of the far right and the normalisation of hate speech in political and media discourse are a threat to all of us. The exclusion of LGBTQ+ refugees and migrants is intensifying, leading to the exclusion of people on the basis of racist, sexist, homophobic and/or transphobic motives," the organisers say on their website.
"For all this, our presence in the public space will continue to be our undeniable right, a historical duty and an act of resistance against a public discourse of abuse that seeks to erase us. The struggle for equality is ongoing and remains unabated. We are and will be here to keep them going," the organisers say on their website.
Pride month is celebrated in Athens with a variety of cultural events, screenings, performances, parties, shows, panel discussions, workshops and seminars, many of point to the now 20-year history of pride in the Greek capital, with diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives also taking centre stage.
Revolutionary Guard commander Sardar Esmail Kowsari told local media in an interview closing the Strait of Hormuz "is under consideration, and Iran will make the best decision with determination."
"Our hands are wide open when it comes to punishing the enemy, and the military response was only part of our overall response," added Kowsari, who is a member of parliament in addition to his military position.
Iran's short- and medium-range missiles would be capable of targeting oil infrastructure platforms, pipelines in the Strait, or even attacking commercial vessels, and surface-to-surface missiles could target tankers or ports along the Gulf. Airstrikes using aircraft and drones could disable navigation or radar equipment at major shipping ports in the region.
Unmanned drones like Iran's Shahed models could potentially be used to attack specific shipping lanes or infrastructure in the Strait. Iran could attempt to deploy warships to physically block access to the Strait. In 2012, Iran launched a cyberattack on Saudi Arabia's oil industry, showing its growing capability in this domain.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically vital chokepoints in the world, and any blockade by Iran would pose serious risks for Europe.
Blocking the Strait was one of four Iranian responses to the conflict including terrorist acts on mainland Europe which security expert Claude Moniquet cited in an interview with Euronews.
It would be 'a disaster for Europe', the former French intelligence office said.
Here are some of the reasons why.
Roughly 20% of global oil and a significant portion of natural gas pass through the Strait. Europe imports oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Gulf states Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE much of which travels through the Strait. If Iran blocks it, global oil prices would spike, and Europe could face energy shortages, especially in countries dependent on Middle Eastern fuel.
A sudden oil price surge would increase inflation, energy costs, and disrupt industries across Europe. Manufacturing, transport, and agriculture sectors would be especially vulnerable. Market reactions and volatility in European stock exchanges could be a knock-on effect.
A blockade could trigger military confrontations involving the US, EU navies, and Gulf states, risking a broader regional war. Europe might be drawn into the conflict through NATO obligations or alliances, especially with countries like France or the UK maintaining naval presence in the region.
Beyond oil, the Strait is a key route for global shipping. Disruption could delay European imports of raw materials, electronics, and consumer goods, affecting supply chains. Insurance premiums for shipping could spike, raising costs for European businesses and consumers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Tech expert: AI is key to bridging productivity gap between EU and US
Despite cultural similarities and technological progress, the productivity gap between Europe and the United States not only persists – it's growing. Euronews spoke with new technology market expert Dawid Osiecki, who recently co-authored a 40-page report analysing economic development on both sides of the Atlantic, about why this is happening and what might change. "We recently conducted a study that clearly shows: the difference between the US and Europe isn't just about money," Osiecki said. "It's also about the number of large companies that can effectively implement new technologies, including AI" or artificial intelligence. AI: opportunity or challenge in technological revolution? "Comparing data since 1996, we see very clearly that the US has emerged more effectively from successive crises – the 2008 financial crisis, the pandemic, and the current one related to AI transformation," Osiecki said, adding that each crises led to increased production in the US. But in Europe, the response has been "stagnation," he added. The key differences? Investments and the structure of the economy. The US stock market is dominated by the so-called Big Tech companies – the seven largest technology companies that not only generate enormous value growth but also effectively implement the latest technologies. As for Europe, "we didn't seize this opportunity," Osiecki said. The economist and former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi's report on how to improve the European Union's competitiveness indicates that AI could be Europe's chance to close the gap with the US. But even here, the situation is not simple. European workers claim to understand the benefits of AI by a whopping 95 per cent, yet two-thirds fear losing their jobs. Meanwhile, three-quarters indicate they lack meaningful access to AI tools in the workplace. And one-third say they do not have training or education that would allow them to better use new technologies. Fewer giants, more mid-sized companies Data collected in a study of 800 companies from six European countries shows that the largest European companies (valued over $10 billion or €8.68 billion) are adopting AI at a rate comparable to American giants. The challenges begin among smaller companies. "The problem lies at the bottom. Smaller companies, especially those valued between $1 billion and $2.5 billion [€2.2 billion], are three times less likely to successfully implement AI than their American counterparts," Osiecki said. Furthermore, the European economy is more fragmented: there are more mid-sized companies, but fewer global giants. These smaller organisations often have limited access to technology, tools, and specialised staff. Company size isn't the only factor. Sector differences are equally significant. The aerospace, defense, and advanced industries are leaders in AI use in Europe. Meanwhile, the public and energy sectors lag significantly behind, with differences reaching dozens of percentage points. Results vary similarly between countries. Switzerland, Germany, and France lead the way, but after taking into account sectoral structure, the United Kingdom emerges as the leader, with AI adoption rates exceeding 50 per cent. On the other hand, while France has large companies and high technological ambitions, it shows surprisingly low adoption rates – around 30 per cent. Spain and Italy are at the bottom of the rankings. Investment is the biggest challenge, according to Osiecki. Between 2013 and 2023, investment capital in new technologies in the US was 5 to 7.5 times greater than in Europe. At the same time, European companies tried to compensate with organisational differences – to no avail. "You can't just tighten your belt for a decade and expect results. You have to invest, train, and implement new technologies with courage," Osiecki said. How to bridge the gap European bureaucracy is often perceived as a barrier to innovation. According to Osiecki, this is not a problem for the largest players in Europe. "For smaller companies, however, regulations can be an excuse or an obstacle," he added. In his opinion, the key is not only simplifying regulations but faster decisions, greater courage, and mass technological education. The EU has ambitious goals: by 2030, 75 per cent of companies should use cloud technologies and AI, and at least 20 million citizens should possess advanced digital skills. Increasing investment in new technologies, supporting medium-sized companies in adopting AI, bridging the gap between sectors and countries, unlocking tools for employees, and providing them with training will be crucial, Osiecki said. "If we don't do this, European productivity will continue to lag behind. And with it, the competitiveness of the entire continent," he said.


Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Australia will recognise Palestine in September, PM Albanese says
Australia will recognise the Palestinian state, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday, joining the leaders of France, Britain, and Canada in deciding to do so. Speaking to reporters after a cabinet meeting on Monday, Albanese said that Australia's decision to recognise Palestine will be formalised at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The acknowledgement was 'predicated on commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,' Albanese said. Those commitments included no role for Hamas in the Palestinian government, demilitarisation of Gaza and the holding of elections, he said. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,' Albanese said. Albanese: Situation in Gaza 'beyond worst fears' 'The situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears,' he said. 'The Israeli government continues to defy international law and deny sufficient aid, food and water to desperate people, including children.' Albanese's announcement comes after weeks of pressure from his cabinet and many Australians to recognise Palestine, as well as mounting criticism from his government's officials over the suffering in Gaza, something he called a "humanitarian catastrophe". On Sunday, ahead of Albanese's announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticised Australia and other European countries that have moved to recognise a Palestinian state. He has repeatedly stated such a move would only further empower Hamas. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole ... this canard is disappointing and I think it's actually shameful,' the Israeli leader said. Australia's government has also criticised plans announced in recent days by Netanyahu for a new military offensive on Gaza City. Albanese reiterated his government's demands that Hamas return hostages held since 7 October 2023, citing Australia's designation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation.


Euronews
10 hours ago
- Euronews
'Depravity and lawlessness': U2 speak out on Israel's actions in Gaza
Irish rockers U2 have spoken out on the Israel-Palestine crisis, with Bono saying that Benjamin Netanyahu's actions 'now feel like uncharted territory'. In an Instagram post published yesterday, the four members of U2 - Bono, The Edge, Adam Clayton and Larry Mullen Jr. - wrote personal responses to Israel's actions in Gaza. After his condemnation of Hamas' 'diabolical' actions, Bono turned his focus to the Israeli government, which he said 'today deserves our categorical and unequivocal condemnation'. 'There is no justification for the brutality [Netanyahu] and his far right government have inflicted on the Palestinian people… in Gaza… in the West Bank. And not just since October 7, well before it too… though the level of depravity and lawlessness we are seeing now feels like uncharted territory.' He continued: 'And now Netanyahu announces a military takeover of Gaza City... which most informed commentators understand as a euphemism for the colonization of Gaza.' He is referring here to the announcement made by the Israeli government on Saturday 9 August, in which a ground offensive that will aim to take complete control of Gaza City was approved. 'We know the rest of the Gaza Strip… and the West Bank are next,' Bono added. 'What century are we in? Is the world not done with this far, far right thinking? We know where it ends… world war… millenarianism.' He continued: 'As someone who has long believed in Israel's right to exist and supported a two-state solution, I want to make clear to anyone who cares to listen our band's condemnation of Netanyahu's immoral actions and join all who have called for a cessation of hostilities on both sides.' U2 bassist Adam Clayton wrote that 'preserving civilian life is a choice in this war', while drummer Larry Mullen Jr. said: 'It's difficult to comprehend how any civilised society can think starving children is going to further any cause and be justified as an acceptable response to another horror.' He added that 'starving innocent civilians as a weapon of war is inhumane and criminal.' You can read the full statements below: Une publication partagée par U2 (@u2) The recent statements made by U2 follow Bono's comments at the Ivor Novello Awards in May. The band took to the stage to accept the Fellowship of the Ivors Academy, with Bono saying: 'I used to introduce this next song by saying it was not a rebel song. It was because believing in the possibilities of peace was then, and is now, a rebellious act; and some would say a ridiculous one' – referring to the U2 song 'Sunday Bloody Sunday', their 1983 track about the 1972 massacre in which the British army shot at unarmed protestors during the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The singer then criticised both Hamas and Netanyahu: 'Hamas, release the hostages, stop the war. Israel, be released from Benjamin Netanyahu and the far-right fundamentalists that twist your sacred texts,' he said at the time, adding: 'All of you, protect our aid workers – they are the best of us." 'To believe peace was attainable between your country and ours, between our country and itself was a ridiculous idea because peace creates possibilities in the most intractable situations and lord knows there's a few of them out there right now,' he added. UN human rights experts and UN bodies have said that Israel's military actions in Gaza may amount to genocide. The International Court of Justice has found claims of genocide plausible. Israel rejects the accusations and denies committing any war crimes.