Is Jennifer Love Hewitt expecting? The truth behind the "9-1-1" fan theories
Following the recent broadcast of a new episode of the popular ABC series '9-1-1,' a segment of the show's dedicated fanbase has been actively speculating about whether actress
Jennifer Love Hewitt
, who portrays the character Maddie Buckley, is currently pregnant in real life. This curiosity has been primarily fueled by her character Maddie's ongoing pregnancy storyline within the show, where the dispatcher is expecting her second child with Chimney Han, played by
Kenneth Choi
.
Online Speculations and theories on the '9-1-1' star's pregnancy:
The online '9-1-1' community, particularly on platforms such as Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram, has been abuzz with discussions and inquiries regarding Hewitt's potential real-life pregnancy status.
One user on X humorously commented on the recurring pregnancy storylines in Hewitt's shows, writing, 'I feel like
Jennifer
Love Hewitt is always pregnant on these shows she looks good pregnant though", accompanying the comment with laughing emojis. Another user on the same platform confidently stated, 'When Jennifer Love Hewitt is pregnant on 9-1-1 that means she's pregnant in real life,' indicating a belief that her on-screen pregnancies often mirror her off-screen experiences.
Is Jennifer pregnant in real-life?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency
Planet Spark
Learn More
Undo
Despite the widespread fan speculation and fervent online discussions, Jennifer Love Hewitt has unequivocally stated that she is not currently pregnant in real life. In a November 2024 interview with Us Weekly, Hewitt directly addressed the numerous messages she had received from friends and fans inquiring if Maddie's pregnancy on the show meant she was expecting again. With a laugh, she clarified, 'No, I can do one real one and one fake one, people. I am not pregnant again. I am too tired. I have three children, I'm good.'
Hewitt, who shares three children – daughter Autumn (11), son Atticus (9), and son Aidan (3) – with her husband Brian Hallisay, has indicated that her family feels complete. This sentiment echoes a 2021 interview with People magazine where she stated, 'I'm pretty sure [three is it]. I think five is a great number,' suggesting that she and her husband are content with their current family size. Therefore, the ongoing pregnancy storyline for her character Maddie Buckley in '9-1-1' is purely fictional and does not reflect Hewitt's real-life circumstances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BTS' V replies to fan's countdown post: ‘You waited… now what?'; from solo concerts to FESTA and art exhibits, here's what's next for the K-pop stars
BIGHIT has confirmed plans for BTS members V, Jungkook, RM, and Jimin once they finish their military service, and fans have already kicked off a wave of welcome projects. The excitement is clearly mutual. Recently, Kim Taehyung hopped on Weverse, and when a fan reminded him, 'Only nine days left before discharge — are you ready, Taehyung?' he instantly replied with, 'Yes! What should we do now? What do you want to do?' Meanwhile, HYBE is gearing up for solo concerts, fresh tracks, and a massive fan festival, though a full group comeback and album will take some time. V, aka Kim Taehyung, enlisted in the military alongside group leader RM and joined the counter-terrorism unit (SDT), keeping a low profile on social media since. Now, just days away from his return, he reacted to a screenshot of his military countdown app showing 'Sergeant Elio D-9.' Fans asked him what the deal was with the name Elio and the photo where he's feeding grass to a sheep. Taehyung explained, 'It's my English name from when I went to an English fairy tale school,' and joked, 'Yes, I even bought grass.' Asked if he planned to meet fans like Jin and J-Hope, he said, 'Of course, I need to see ARMY as soon as possible.' Then added, 'You waited, so what do you want now? Tell me everything.' Also read: 'When BTS members got shares…': Fired BIGHIT director's explosive post reveals 'evil' HYBE let 'alcoholics' devour shareholders' stocks Here's the military timeline: RM and V will finish their service on June 10, followed by Jimin and Jungkook on June 11. They will greet fans from Chuncheon and Yeoncheon, respectively. Suga, who is serving in a social service role as an alternative to active duty, will be discharged on June 21. The mandatory military enlistment of the group started back in December 2022 with Jin, who, along with J-Hope, already completed their service last year and has resumed solo activities. After Suga and J-Hope, the oldest member of the group, Jin his first solo fan concerts called '#Runseokjin_EP.Tour'. The Epiphany crooner made his comeback with the second full-length album Echo in April 2025. The concert is an extension of his solo variety show 'Run Seokjin'. After his Seoul concerts, Jin will hit the road with 18 shows across nine cities worldwide. J-Hope is wrapping up his global world tour, where he ruled sold-out stadiums with his latest solo singles. His final encore concert, 'Hope on the Stage Final,' is set for June 13-14 in Osaka. During the concert, J-Hope will also debut a new digital single, 'Killin' It Girl (feat.. GloRilla).' 'We're preparing thoroughly so that J-Hope's signature explosive energy and immersive performance can be felt to the fullest,' BigHit said earlier. 'Given how both J-Hope and Jin have showcased more mature versions of themselves, it's likely that BTS' new music will reflect that evolution. The members' individual identities will likely stand out even more in the group's next chapter,' Grace Kao, a sociology professor and expert on K-pop from Yale, told Korea Herald. Also read: BTS' RM, V, Jimin and Jungkook to greet fans at designated locations post-discharge; BIGHIT says, 'Refrain from visiting' BTS FESTA is set for June 13-14 at Kintex, Goyang, Gyeonggi Province. For those not in the know, it's the annual bash marking BTS's debut anniversary every June. This year, BTS hits 12. The festival promises to be bigger than ever, with over 20 exhibition booths and a massive 'Army Bomb' light show. While surprise appearances by the members aren't confirmed yet, fans can expect a 'Voice Zone' featuring recorded messages, a 'Trophy Zone' showcasing BTS's awards, and a 'BTS Locker' displaying personal items from the group. Apart from FESTA and solo tours, the agency is also set to debut Presence in Absence: Chapter 2, BTS Art. It will open in Seoul's Seongdong District and run until June 29, featuring works by 20 artists from 13 countries. Organisers say it's the largest independent BTS fan art exhibition ever, both in terms of international participation and the number of artists. The exhibition will focus on the individual personalities of each BTS member.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Akhil Akkineni and Zainab Ravdjee's Hyderabad wedding: FIRST PICS OUT: A starry yet intimate affair
(Picture Courtesy: Facebook) The first photos from Akhil Akkineni and Zainab Ravdjee's wedding ceremony have officially surfaced online. The couple tied the knot on Friday, June 6, 2025, in an intimate yet star-studded ceremony in Hyderabad. The dreamy wedding, attended by close friends, family, and top celebrities, has become the talk of the town. Fans and well-wishers have been flooding Instagram and X with heartfelt wishes and celebratory posts as the radiant photos of the couple made their way online. One picture that's winning hearts shows Akhil and Zainab smiling blissfully while holding hands, posing with guests. Another frame captures an emotional moment from the rituals—Nagarjuna seated beside his son during a puja, with Akhil offering prayers with folded hands. Regal in tradition The couple turned heads with their elegant traditional attire. Zainab looked breathtaking in a pastel ivory silk saree paired with a golden blouse, completed with heavy temple jewellery that reflected grace and heritage. Akhil matched her serenity in a simple ivory kurta and dhoti, radiating understated charm and poise. The ceremony showcased rich Telugu wedding traditions and was beautifully intimate despite the presence of many high-profile guests. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo From the décor to the rituals, everything echoed warmth and family love. Akhil Akkineni spotted at Mumbai airport Fans react Netizens are sharing wishes for the young couple. One comment read, 'Akhil Weds Zainab Pair Chala Cute Undi Kadaaa.' Another one wrote, 'Congratulations @akkineniakhil.' A third one wrote, 'Best wishes for a lifetime of love and laughter together.' Celebrity guests and baraat revelry The wedding was graced by stars including Naga Chaitanya, Sobhita Dhulipala, Chiranjeevi, Ram Charan, and Prashanth Neel, making it a star-studded celebration. Videos from the baraat went viral, capturing a jubilant Nagarjuna and Naga Chaitanya dancing their hearts out, celebrating Akhil's big day. Akhil and Zainab got engaged in November 2024. Zainab, 39, is not only known for her work as a painter of abstract art but also for her short acting stint in M.F. Hussain's Meenaxi: A Tale of Three Cities. She is the daughter of industrialist Zulfi Ravdjee, and splits her time between Mumbai and Hyderabad. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Review: The Nobel Prize and the Formation of Contemporary World Literature
We might consider the Nobel Prize for Literature to be a holy pulpit that canonises a writer. It ordains the pantheon of all-time greats who have attained literary divinity and is where 'industrial money is gilded with royal glamour, scientific benefits, and cultural sophistication'. But the intimate connection between the 'the cultural capital of high-brow literature… dynamite money from the donor and…the feudally rooted status of the old Swedish monarchy' has meant that the Nobel Prize has always been under scrutiny. However, most of the books on the subject have been rich in myth but poor in scholarship. The process of the selection of laureates and how that has shaped the idea of 'universal' literary values and defined literary quality across languages and cultures has rarely, if ever, been discussed. But what mechanisms made it possible for 18 Swedish intellectuals – 'randomly chosen persons in the remote town of Stockholm' – to become the world's most influential literary critics with a power to exert an almost godlike influence on the literary world? Paul Tenngart's well-researched book The Nobel Prize and the Formation of Contemporary World Literature scours the history and future of the prize to explain the complex alchemy of how the Nobel Prize in Literature has shaped (and continues to shape) the world literary canon. Apart from fame, the Nobel Prize comes with a larger sum of money than most prizes. Alfred Nobel donated more than 30 million Swedish crowns, which is the approximate equivalent of 245 million US dollars in today's currency. Having money makes one earn more money, not only through interest and other capital gains, but also through the social and cultural attraction of economic success. This is how Nobel's generous donation empowered 'an outdated and elitist closed circle of cultural power' to judge the excellence of human endeavour. The cultish effect of the Nobel Prize for Literature has led other well-known prizes with a fundamentally international perspective on literature to be modelled on it – the Formentor, the Neustadt Prize, and the International Booker Prize, a spin-off of the Booker that, from 2005 onward, has awarded literature originally written in any language but available in English translation. That Rabindranath Tagore received the prize in 1913 because of the English translations of his Bengali poetry confirms Heilbron's notion of Anglophone hyper-centrality in literary traffic across markets and languages and accounts for English being the most awarded literary language. The book raises questions about what constitutes world literature that the donor, Nobel himself, probably had no means to answer. Drawing from a wide range of contemporary theories and methods, this multifaceted history of the Nobel Prize questions how the Swedish Academy has managed to uphold the global status of the prize through all the violent international crises of the last 120 years. It also looks at the impact the prize has had on the distribution and significance of particular works, literatures and languages. Over the years, in its strenuous attempt to 'recognize true and durable literary quality', the Swedish Academy has often awarded writers who have soon become outdated. The weighing and ranking of the literary merits of contemporaries is an almost hopeless undertaking. As a result, the Swedish intellectuals have missed the chance to award literary giants like Marcel Proust and James Joyce. Looking at the back list of laureates, in 1951, Henri-René Lenormand concluded that 'it is disturbing to have witnessed the disregard for universal geniuses like Joseph Conrad of England, Ibsen and Strindberg for the Scandinavian countries' and 'Chekhov, Tolstoy, Andreiev and Gorky of Russia'. The subjectivity of the selection process, and its propensity to be run by high-minded literary cabals has raised questions, laying the prize open to criticism of oversight and bias. Admittedly, canonization points readers to authors whom they might not have cared to read without the Nobel tag. Tagore's literature prize sparked the most intense reactions in The New York Times to any single Nobel Prize until the outbreak of the First World War. But it did also lend widespread expediency to the act of reading him. Many writers have been 'discovered' by readers, not on account of the epiphany of their greatness, but because they had been awarded the Nobel. As many deserving writers have been ignored, the Nobel Committee has been accused of holding Eurocentric attitudes toward literatures produced in non-European and non-Western contexts, resulting in authors and texts from such 'remote parts' not being 'consecrated'. 'The academy is often reproached for thus neglecting the literatures of Asia and Afric. Artur Lundkvist, an influential member of the Academy, infamously said in Svenska Dagbladet in 1977, 'But I doubt if there is so far very much to find there.' It was a comment as prejudiced as Thomas Macaulay's statement that 'A single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia'. Not that the Nobel committee is unaware of this, but diplomacy has a role to play amongst languages, cultures, and nations 'struggling for recognition and dominance'. From 1901 to 2022, of the 119 laureates, more than 80 have been born in or have been long-standing residents in European countries. Thirteen of the awarded authors have been US citizens, and nine of them have been born in Africa or have lived in African countries. Interestingly, sitting on the northern fringes of Europe, Stockholm and Sweden (its language is spoken by only 0.1 percent of the world's population) do not enjoy a central position in the world, either politically, economically, or culturally. Yet, in 'awarding the Nobel Prize in Literature, the semi-peripheral Stockholm is the middle sibling of world literature, a space of compromises between self-sufficient firstborns and defiant lastborns,' writes Tenngart. He believes the Nobel will 'always' be a European prize that will never be able to 'balance out the hierarchy between cultures, languages, and literatures,' reinforced further by its 'international importance'. He adds that the Swedish Academy is fundamentally an 'elitist' and 'undemocratic' assembly. In its zeal to remain politically neutral, in the wake of the death-edict issued by Ayatollah Khomeini against Salman Rushdie, the Swedish Academy decided not to condemn the fatwa and thereby not to officially and univocally support Rushdie. In protest, three Academy members – Kerstin Ekman, Werner Aspenström, and Lars Gyllensten – refused to continue their work in the Academy. It is impossible to officially resign so Aspenström's and Gyllensten's chairs remained empty until their deaths in 1997 and 2006. Kerstin Ekman's chair remained empty until the rules were changed in 2018. Interestingly, an intense political controversy ensued in 2019 when Peter Handke was awarded. The Austrian writer was accused of being sympathetic to Serbian nationalism, and denying the Srebrenica massacre and was strongly criticized for speaking at Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic's funeral in 2006. Over the years, the Academy has also drawn flak over its selections of Gao Xingjian, VS Naipaul, Imre Kertész, Orhan Pamuk, Herta Müller, Mario Vargas Llosa, and Mo Yan – all of whom have been accused of painting a false picture of their home countries. Many believed that their consecration reinforced the authors' assumptions. And that's not all. Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen was disqualified due to his 'negativity' in relation to traditional institutions; Ezra Pound's 'fascist' opinions during the Second World War disqualified him. It is clear that moral and political considerations often gained precedence over merit. Language often has been a barrier. During the first three decades of the prize, no Russian author was awarded, because none of the early twentieth-century members knew Russian. The book tries to prise open an institution that has been overshadowed by its cultish culture of secrecy ('a leftover from the cultural practice of closed circles of power'). One of its rules is that critics and scholars have to wait for 50 years until committee discussions of nominated authors are made public. Tenngart believes the origins of this great secrecy is firmly rooted in 18th-century Freemasonry. While it ushered in Rabindranath Tagore's Bengali, Sinclair Lewis' American, Gabriela Mistral's Chilean, and Yasunari Kawabata's Japanese moorings, besides including politically entrenched writers like Winston Churchill, Boris Pasternak, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and Gao Xingjian in the World Republic of Letters, the Republic was built, Tenngart reminds us, on western liberal ideology. Prasenjit Chowdhury is an independent writer. He lives in Kolkata.
