Mobey Forum 25 years: By Bo Harald
What was the original vision for Mobey Forum, and how has it evolved over time?
Driving paradigm shifts:
E-banking – the fundamental paradigm shift – started for our part in 1982 New ways of interconnecting customers – not only with payments, trade finance, treasury and capital markets services – but also with e-identification, e-signatures, e-invoicing and e-salary was the next good-for-society-at-large paradigm shift. Taking all traditional banking services and especially the ambition to take the new interconnecting customers to always- there mobiles was the third paradigm shift. Now – when all corporate and private customers (and their AI-agents) will be able to exchange verified data with EUDI-interoperable wallets - the next paradigm change for banking - will happen. Verifiable data from ID-wallets to safely employ and empower wallet-carrying AI-agents will be the next paradigm shift.
What role do you think Mobey plays in shaping the (future of) financial services?
Very clear:
Make sure that banks see to it that all their customers will get the data the need for their business and life events to interoperable identity building wallets. Make sure that banks can lower risks and costs by helping customers to supply the needed Make banks central in the creation of a global Trust Infrastructure (together with Trust over IP, EU and the Open Wallet Foundation)
If you were to explain Mobey's relevance today to a new banking innovator, what would you say?
The all-important action is to join the wallet-work for customer value, automation and risk management 3.0 and now also making it safe and easy to use verifiable data for employing organisational and private ID-wallet carrying AI-agents (the LLM-initiated fifth paradigm shift). Be ready for the dynamic ID-wallet&AI-agent duo..
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump ally bids for £170m Crystal Palace stake
John Textor is considering three sale offers to rescue Crystal Palace 's Europa League place – including one from Donald Trump ally Woody Johnson. Telegraph Sport understands the New York Jets owner tabled a 43 per cent purchase proposal, marginally less in overall value than two others being discussed. Raine Group, the New York broker which secured sales for Chelsea and Manchester United, had been in discussion with parties on behalf of Textor since last year. However, the American is conscious of the club's need to now secure a quick transaction to guarantee European competition next season. A quick sale for as little as £170 million has been mooted for Eagle Football Holdings' 43 per cent stake as Textor's ownership of Lyon leaves Palace facing the threat of expulsion from Europe's second tier. Industry insiders believe a purchase of Textor's shares by the current co-owners, Josh Harris and David Blitzer, is the most likely outcome this summer. However, options include at least two other proposals from the US, one of which has been established for months. A deal with Johnson, 78, is viewed as an outside shot. He is a controversial figure in US sport, with the New York Jets facing scrutiny last year following reports of 'controversial and dysfunctional practices' under his watch. Johnson bought the New York Jets in 2000, with the NFL franchise now estimated to be worth around $6.9 billion. The Jets' $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium will hold next year's World Cup final. Johnson is also well-known in UK politics. The long-time Republican Party donor was appointed as US ambassador to the UK during Trump's first term. His brother, Christopher, took over Jets operations during his post. The American businessman has long been interested in buying a Premier League club, having approached Raine about Chelsea in 2022. Other suitors for Palace, meanwhile, are believed to include NBA star Jimmy Butler, part of a consortium of sport and entertainment executives that is expected to make an offer. That separate proposal was first reported by The Athletic on Wednesday night. Another international consortium advised by the veteran football financier Keith Harris also previously expressed interest. Mr Harris's group would probably execute its deal through the recently incorporated Sportbank vehicle. The Sportsbank consortium – worth upwards of £200 million – is said to be made up of a collection of investors from North America, Canada, Europe and the Gulf. Textor, who previously expressed interest in buying Everton, is willing to find another club as soon as possible. Textor acquired his holding in Palace in 2021 for about £90 million. His multi-club network Eagle Football also includes French club Olympique Lyonnais, Rio-based Botafogo and RWD Molenbeek in Belgium. His priority is to pursue a club which can accept players across the group. Crystal Palace's overall value is said to be around £500 million – around the same price that Everton was valued at, minus debt, during Farhad Moshiri's protracted sale. Stanley Tang, of the US-based food delivery company DoorDash, denied suggestions that he was also in discussions to buy Textor's stake. Chairman Steve Parish, Textor and his fellow US businessmen Harris and Blitzer oversee the running of the Selhurst Park club as general partners. However, Textor has repeatedly hinted at frustrations that he does not exert as much club control as he would like. Uefa is set to inform Palace whether they are in breach of its multi-club ownership rules by June 30 – although the matter may then be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) which would delay a final verdict. The FA Cup winners met Uefa officials last week in a two-hour meeting in an attempt to avoid being barred. Palace insist there is no sharing of information or staff or facilities with the French side. The club argue that despite Textor's shareholding, he has no say in the day-to-day running and has just 25 per cent of voting rights. Indeed, Textor has previously spoken about his annoyance at the lack of say he has at Palace and has been trying to sell his shares. Textor reiterated this after last week's meeting in Nyon. However, Nottingham Forest have written a letter to Uefa expressing their position and asking for clarification over whether Palace will be involved.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Wallace accuses Labour of ‘conning' public over defence spending boost claim
Former defence secretary Ben Wallace has branded Labour's claims that it has boosted military spending 'a con' after concerns were raised over how the figures are being calculated. The row has exploded following Rachel Reeves' spending review on Wednesday where she boasted that defence spending would be 2.6 per cent of GDP. But this included wrapping in security and intelligence spending for the first time. Earlier this year prime minister Sir Keir Starmer controversially slashed international aid to boost defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, two years ahead of schedule. At the time he also promised it would rise to 3 per cent by 2034. However, since then the 3 per cent pledge has been qualified to 'if economic circumstances allow', while the new calculation on defence spending has left questions over whether the boost is as big as first claimed. According to the spending review, in 2027/28, Defence is £71bn and the security and intelligence is £5.1bn, making a combined total of 76.1bn, which was cited as '2.6 per cent of GDP.' However, the Tories noted that security and intelligence element equated to 0.186 per cent of that total GDP number as opposed to 0.1 per cent suggesting defence spending would below 2.5 per cent. Added to that there was nothing in the spending review about spending for the Chagos deal could cost as much as £30bn over 99 years, according to some estimates. Sir Ben Wallace, respected former Tory defence secretary who criticised his own government for not investing in the military enough, posted: 'As Rachel Reeves tries to con us all with her Defence GDP definition it is worth reading NATO's guidelines on what can count. 'If you claim other forces/police or intelligence you can only do so if, 'In such cases, expenditure is included only in proportion to the forces that are trained in military tactics, are equipped as a military force, can operate under direct military authority in deployed operations.'' He added: 'I'd like to be in the room when someone tells the workforce of MI6, GCHQ and MI5 they are about to be conscripted and go through military training .' Ms Reeves was challenged on LBC over whether her new calculations were 'trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.' She responded: 'No. Our commitment is to get to 2.5 per cent. We have not included all intelligence spending. We have [included some] under the Nato definition because obviously intelligence is an important part of our defence.' However, it was pointed out that according to its guidelines NATO defines defence spending as 'expenditure as payments made by a national government specifically to meet the needs of its armed forces, those of Allies or of the Alliance.' The explanation was not accepted by political opponents. Tory shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'Labour promised to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on Defence- but it already looks like they won't even deliver that- and that's before factoring in the potential cost of the Chagos settlement, which could strip hundreds of millions from the Defence budget in this spending review.'
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Activist fund Palliser builds stake in travel retailer WH Smith
A prominent activist investment firm has begun building a stake in WH Smith, the travel retailer, weeks after it sold off its historic high street arm. Sky News has learnt that Palliser Capital has acquired close to 5% of the London-listed company in recent weeks - worth about £65m at the current share price. Sources said the stake was expected to be disclosed publicly at an industry conference on Thursday afternoon. Palliser, which recently led an effort to force Rio Tinto, the global mining group, to abandon its London listing in favour of Australia, is said to hold WH Smith's management team - led by chief executive Carl Cowling - in high regard. The investment fund believes, however, that returns to WH Smith shareholders could be bolstered through a series of self-help measures. These included reviewing the travel retailer's leverage targets and capital allocation policy to ensure better use of its balance sheet, according to one source. Improving investor communication and disclosure, and overhauling its executive incentive structure to align it more closely with the interests of shareholders are also on Palliser's wishlist, the source added. Shares in WH Smith are still trading at levels comparable to their lows during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the global travel industry faced near-total shutdown for long periods. The company's depressed share price is not unique to WH Smith, with SSP, the transport catering group, also drawing interest from activists in recent months. WH Smith trades from more than 1,200 travel stores in over 30 countries. "The group operates in structurally advantaged growth markets," it said in April. "Passenger numbers are forecast to grow in air travel by 2.5 times between 2024 and 2050, driven by both population and economic growth. "Investment in airport infrastructure is also increasing across the globe creating more opportunities for airport retailing." Palliser is understood to have identified WH Smith's high growth potential in the US as particularly attractive, and is said to believe that there is scope for its shares to nearly double in value in the next three years. WH Smith's decision to offload its town centre business, which dates back to 1792, was revealed by Sky News in January, and was viewed as a fresg symbol of the British high street's decline. Comprising about 480 stores and roughly 5,000 staff, the unit was sold to Modella Capital, an increasingly prolific investor in retail businesses. The stores are being rebranded under the new name TG Jones. On Thursday afternoon, shares in WH Smith were trading at around £10.60 - down more than 10% over the last year, and giving the company a market capitalisation of £1.36bn. A spokesman for Palliser, which led a successful campaign against the board of London-listed Capricorn Energy, declined to comment.
