logo
Murder in August: Pakistan's covert role in Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination

Murder in August: Pakistan's covert role in Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination

First Post4 hours ago
Pakistan has never fully accepted Bangladesh's independence, and its actions since 1971 prove it remains a persistent adversary of the country's sovereignty
A man is silhouetted as he passes by a graffiti of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reuters
The birth of Bangladesh in 1971 cannot be reduced to a mere civil war. It was the culmination of decades of political, cultural, and emotional alienation between West Pakistan and the Bengali-speaking population of the East.
From the very beginning, Pakistan's ruling elite viewed the Bengali identity—with its distinct language, heritage, and democratic aspirations—as a threat to their Urdu-centric, militarized state structure. India's recognition and military support during the Bangladesh Liberation War sealed Pakistan's defeat but did not diminish its ambitions to control or destabilize the region.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on August 15, 1975, barely four years after Bangladesh's independence, marked a grim turning point in the country's history. It bears the fingerprints of both internal betrayal and external orchestration.
This year, as we observe the golden jubilee of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination, we revisit the deep-rooted tensions, the language-based suppression, and the geopolitical motives that suggest Pakistan never stopped seeing Bangladesh as a province that slipped away—and Mujib as the man who made it happen.
The Oppression of East Pakistan
Before 1971, East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) endured relentless discrimination under West Pakistan's political and military establishment, culminating in one of the darkest chapters of South Asian history.
Despite Bengalis being the demographic majority, they faced systemic marginalization, economic exploitation, and cultural suppression—including the infamous attempt to impose Urdu as the sole state language, which triggered the 1952 Language Movement and the killing of unarmed students in Dhaka.
The crisis deepened when Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's Awami League won a decisive majority in the 1970 general elections, but West Pakistan's leadership refused to hand over power, sowing the seeds of rebellion.
Horrors of Operation Searchlight
On March 25, 1971, the Pakistan Army launched Operation Searchlight, a coordinated campaign of mass murder, rape, and terror in Dhaka and other cities. International media, including The New York Times and The Sunday Times (London), reported horrifying scenes of bodies piled in the streets and widespread accounts of atrocities, including brutal sexual violence against women and even young girls.
A 1971 report by Time magazine described Dhaka University as 'a slaughterhouse,' where students and professors were executed in large numbers. In the face of this genocide, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman became the unwavering voice of Bengali resistance, embodying the spirit of liberation and unity.
Resistance, Liberation, and Refugees
The brutal crackdown by the Pakistan Army in 1971, marked by mass killings and systematic oppression, ignited a nationwide resistance movement and a full-scale liberation struggle.
As violence escalated, millions of Bengali refugees fled into India, triggering a massive humanitarian crisis. Under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, India extended political, military, and moral support to the Bengali freedom fighters—the Mukti Bahini.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On December 3, 1971, after Pakistan launched pre-emptive airstrikes on Indian airbases, India formally entered the war. In just 13 days, Indian forces, in joint operations with the Mukti Bahini, overwhelmed the Pakistani military. On December 16, 1971, 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered in Dhaka—one of the largest mass capitulations in modern military history.
This decisive victory shattered Pakistan's oppressive regime in the East and gave birth to an independent Bangladesh, fulfilling the long-cherished dream of a sovereign Bengali nation.
Saddled with Humiliation
After its humiliating defeat in the 1971 Liberation War, Pakistan was reluctant to recognise Bangladesh as an independent nation and continued to view it as a 'lost province.' Driven by vengeance and bitterness over global embarrassment, Pakistan delayed formal recognition until 1974 and remained hostile even afterward.
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the architect of Bangladesh's independence, became Pakistan's prime target. Determined to destabilize the young nation, Pakistan is believed to have orchestrated a covert plan to eliminate Mujib, working through pro-Pakistan elements within the Bangladesh Army, including officers ideologically aligned with Islamabad.
This conspiracy culminated in the brutal assassination of Mujib and most of his family members on the dark morning of August 15, 1975. It was far more than a political killing—it was an attack on the very soul of Bangladesh, intended to erase the legacy of its founding father and plunge the nation into uncertainty.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Legacy of Bangabandhu
Revered as Bangabandhu ('Friend of Bengal') and the Father of the Nation, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman led the oppressed people of East Pakistan through decades of exploitation, poverty, and unspeakable atrocities, including mass killings and systematic sexual violence by the West Pakistani regime.
Through unshakable determination, Mujib united a broken and victimized region, transforming it into an independent Bangladesh in 1971. His vision, courage, and compassion made him a beacon of hope for the Bengali people.
His assassination on August 15, 1975, sent shockwaves not only across Bangladesh but around the world. The global community mourned the loss of a leader who symbolised justice, freedom, and dignity for the oppressed.
Islamabad at Odds with Reality
Pakistan has never fully accepted Bangladesh's independence, and its actions since 1971 prove it remains a persistent adversary of the country's sovereignty. The assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his family in 1975 was Pakistan's first hidden victory in its long-term strategy to destabilise Bangladesh.
That conspiracy, executed through pro-Pakistani officers within Bangladesh's own military, silenced the very voice that gave birth to the nation.
Decades later, Pakistan's shadow looms again—this time allegedly supporting unrest, funding misinformation, and fomenting student uprisings against Sheikh Hasina, Mujib's daughter and the current Prime Minister.
The recent political upheaval and shifts in power can be seen as Pakistan's second strategic success in weakening Bangladesh from within. As citizens of a free nation—born out of blood and sacrifice—it would be a betrayal to forget Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's leadership, vision, and ultimate sacrifice.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
To neglect his legacy is to deny our identity. To ignore Pakistan's ongoing interference is to risk losing the very sovereignty that was won at such immense cost.
Lt Gen Dushyant Singh (Retd) is the Director General of the Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS). Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Belarus and Iran, both friends of Putin, plan to strengthen military and broader ties
Belarus and Iran, both friends of Putin, plan to strengthen military and broader ties

First Post

time5 minutes ago

  • First Post

Belarus and Iran, both friends of Putin, plan to strengthen military and broader ties

Belarus and Iran, both supporters of Russia's war in Ukraine, plan to deepen bilateral ties, including defence, as agreed by Presidents Alexander Lukashenko and Masoud Pezeshkian in Minsk Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian shake hands during a meeting in Minsk, Belarus, on Wednesday. Reuters Belarus and Iran - two countries that have backed Russia's war in Ukraine - plan to deepen bilateral ties across all areas including defence, their presidents said at talks in Minsk on Wednesday. Belarusian state news agency Belta said presidents Alexander Lukashenko and Masoud Pezeshkian agreed to work on a strategic partnership treaty. 'In conditions of geopolitical turbulence, Minsk and Tehran are undertaking consistent and balanced steps to further develop cooperation, and are working hard to turn each new challenge into a new opportunity,' it quoted Lukashenko as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We are ready to discuss any issues, we have no closed topics,' Lukashenko said, adding that the two countries could partner across a range of areas including 'military-technical cooperation'. Lukashenko, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, allowed Russia to use Belarusian territory as a launchpad for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and later assented to hosting Russian tactical nuclear missiles. Iran has supplied drones to Russia for use in the war and Pezeshkian signed a strategic cooperation treaty with Putin in January, although it did not include a mutual defence clause. Both Iran and Belarus are under what Pezeshkian described as 'illegal Western sanctions'. Belta quoted him as saying Iran was ready to help Belarus 'neutralise' such measures, noting that it had more than 40 years of experience in this area. Pezeshkian said the two countries needed to build their economic and other ties to a level that matched the high level of trust between them. 'Of course, our common views should be implemented in the economic and cultural spheres, in the development of tourism between our countries, and also, as you noted, in the development of military-technical cooperation,' Belta quoted him as telling Lukashenko. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Are engineers taking over India's civil services?
Are engineers taking over India's civil services?

India Today

time28 minutes ago

  • India Today

Are engineers taking over India's civil services?

Once the backbone of India's civil services, humanities graduates are now finding themselves edged out by engineers and technocrats. In the 1980s and '90s, subjects like history, political science, and sociology dominated the UPSC ranks. Fast forward to today, and the majority of recruits come from technical streams, with engineers alone making up nearly two-thirds of successful candidates. A recent parliamentary committee report has flagged this imbalance, warning that the nation's bureaucracy may be losing its diversity of thought and, along with it, the empathy and perspective that the humanities once brought to 2023 report by the Department-related Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice titled 'Review of Functioning of Recruitment Organisations of the Government of India' raised concerns over the growing dominance of candidates from technical backgrounds in the Civil Services The share of successful candidates from engineering backgrounds rose sharply—from 46% in 2011 to 65% in professionals: Their representation dropped from 14% to just 4% over the same While fluctuating between 23–28%, the proportion decreased from 27% in 2011 to 23% in engineers and medical professionals, over 70% of recruits in recent years came from technical streams raising concerns that the country may be losing 'exceptional doctors and engineers' to bureaucracy. Further data from 2017 to 21 echoes this skew:76% of recommended candidates hail from the science stream (engineering, sciences, medicine).Only 23.6% came from the humanities. INSIGHTS BEYOND NUMBERS: HISTORICAL CONTEXT & TRENDSHistorical shifts: Up until the 1980s, the Humanities and Social Sciences dominated the educational backgrounds of IAS recruits. But between 2000–2019, the trend reversed: disciplines such as engineering, medicine, and computer science became more prevalent. For instance, Electrical Engineering and Medicine emerged among the top entry-fields, while Economics and Political Science declined in impact: The 2011 introduction of the Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT) recalibrated the landscape:Humanities candidates' IAS success dropped from ~30% in 2009 to 15% by engineering representation surged to ~50%.Humanities aspirants argue CSAT's format disadvantaged non-technical and non–English-speaking though UPSC uses a normalization formula to level scores across optional subjects, the number of engineers remains high. Many engineers still choose humanities subjects (like political science, sociology, geography) as their options due to better familiarity with exam structure and 'model answers.'WHY IT MATTERSLoss of interdisciplinary richness: Humanities graduates often bring critical thinking, empathy, and nuanced analytical capacity—qualities crucial for public mismatch: The committee lamented that the increasing allure of civil services may be depriving sectors like healthcare and engineering of high-caliber in decision-making: A disproportionately technical bureaucracy risks underrepresenting social and cultural perspectives essential for inclusive Table (Note: 2017–21 data shows 76% from science overall, and ~23.6% humanities, approx data)The parliamentary panel's warning is more than a statistical footnote it's a reminder that India's civil services must reflect the country's intellectual diversity. A bureaucracy dominated by technocrats may deliver efficiency, but risks losing the cultural, social, and ethical lenses that humanities graduates naturally bring to governance. Scholars and policy experts have suggested several reforms: revisiting the structure of the CSAT to reduce technical bias, creating differentiated service tracks for domain experts, and encouraging a balanced intake across many countries nurture civil servants from social sciences and liberal arts, valuing their ability to question, contextualize, and connect policies with people. For India, a similar recalibration could ensure that the next generation of administrators are not just problem-solvers with technical acumen, but empathetic leaders who understand the social fabric they serve. After all, governance is not only about efficiency it is also about equity, context, and vision.- Ends

Russia says security discussions without Moscow are 'road to nowhere'
Russia says security discussions without Moscow are 'road to nowhere'

Economic Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Russia says security discussions without Moscow are 'road to nowhere'

Synopsis Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov asserted on Wednesday that any attempts to address security concerns related to Ukraine without Moscow's involvement are futile. He criticized the recent U.S.-led discussions on security guarantees for Ukraine, emphasizing that Russia's participation is essential for any meaningful resolution. Reuters FILE PHOTO: Spokesperson of Russia's Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova attends the annual press conference held by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, January 14, 2025. REUTERS/Evgenia Novozhenina/File Photo Russia said on Wednesday that attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without the participation of Moscow was a "road to nowhere". Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made the comments two days after U.S. President Donald Trump hosted Ukraine's president and European leaders for discussions about security guarantees for Ukraine that could help to end the war. "We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work," Lavrov said. "I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store