Wrestling icon, 43, clears up 'retirement' claim 6 months after last match
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
All Elite Wrestling star Bryan Danielson has insisted he has 'no desire to wrestle' again, but he's refused to call it a retirement.
The 43-year-old former world champion, who wrestled in WWE as Daniel Bryan on Raw and SmackDown, hasn't had a match since losing to Jon Moxley in October 2024.
Almost seven months later, he exclusively told Metro that the state of his neck after decades of punishment means he's happy to hang up his boots.
'I have no inclination right now, and no desire to wrestle right now. The last six months of my career built up to that I actually, I look at it now as a blessing,' he said.
'Because the six months leading into my last match were so hard and my neck was so bad. And, I mean, there's things that I couldn't physically do, right?'
He recalled facing Kazuchika Okada days before his last match when the story called for his rival's title to be on the line for the first 20 minutes of the bout, after which point only Danielson's world championship would be up for grabs.
'What the story should be in that scenario is I'm pushing and pushing and pushing and pushing him, trying to get this fall done in the first 20 minutes,' he pointed out.
'That should have been the story, but my legs just couldn't do it. So it was to the point where I was like, 'Oh, I'm not physically able to do some of the things that I should, that this story requires me to do.' '
In other matches, he found himself 'trying to get through and not get hurt', and he decided he was 'at peace' with his career ending.
'When the last match came against, against Moxley, I was ready. And that's a good place to be, because when I was forced to retire before [in WWE in 2016], I didn't want to be retired,' he explained.
What? AEW Dynamite & Collision, and AEW x NJPW: Forbidden Door
AEW Dynamite & Collision, and AEW x NJPW: Forbidden Door When and where? August 20 (Dynamite/Collision) at Glasgow's OVO Hydro, August 24 (Forbidden Door) at London's O2 arena
August 20 (Dynamite/Collision) at Glasgow's OVO Hydro, August 24 (Forbidden Door) at London's O2 arena Tickets: Various pre-sales are underway now, with general sale here at 10am on May 2.
'I kept fighting internally and outwardly to to come back. Now I'm at peace with it. And I don't know if I would be so at peace if I hadn't been hurting as bad as I was the last six months.'
Despite those feelings, Danielson insisted he would rather not call himself retired, particularly as people ask if he'll be part of AEW and NJPW's Forbidden Door show at London's O2 arena in August.
'I'm like, 95% chance no,' he laughed. 'But the reality is that, say you have a big main event and something happens where somebody gets hurt, and Tony says, 'Hey Bryan, we need you for this thing, is there something you could do?'
'Yeah, there's something I could do. I just have to be careful. But I mean, it's one of those things where there's ways to work around it. But you just can't do it all the time.'
Last summer, Danielson – who once said he would have happily wrestled at Butlin's for the rest of his life – admitted he knew he'd need neck surgery one day, although he's hoping to be able to rehab it'.
'I'm making progress, but that still doesn't mean I won;t have to get neck surgery. I'm trying to avoid it,' he smiled, pointing out that his and Brie Bella's son is 'jumping on my neck all the time', which is less of a problem if he's not recovering.
He noted 'the day to day has gotten better' in the months since his last match, while AEW's Cope (known to WWE fans as Edge) pointed him towards 'someone in Toronto' to help.
'He worked on me for six hours straight, two days in a row, and he's moving veins, like nerves,' he said. 'At that point, it had been almost a year since I had slept seven hours straight.'
Now, Danielson is in a much better place health-wise, and more satisfied than he was when WWE told him he had to hang up his boots in 2016.
While he likely won't be wrestling at The O2 for Forbidden Door, the venue still holds a special place in his heart.
'In [2015], it was the last place that I got to wrestle. It was me and John Cena against Tyson Kidd and Claudio Castagnoli,' he recalled. 'I remember so them telling me the day before, like, 'Hey, we can't have you wrestle. And by the way, you're doing the main event of SmackDown tomorrow!'
'I think it was more stressful for Tyson Kidd and Claudio, because they were specifically told, 'If Bryan even falls down, you're both fired.' So it's like, what do you do with that?'
This time road, Danielson's at peace, as he takes inspiration from the works of Utopia For Realists author Rutger Bregman and his idea of 'moral ambition'. More Trending
'What can I do to make the world just a little bit better?,' the former champ pondered. 'Those are the things I'm thinking about and working on.'
He added: 'Honestly, I think a lot of things, most people who are doing things to make the world a better place, you're never going to hear about…
'I'm actively working on doing stuff outside of wrestling, there are things that I care about… You just want to do them for yourself, or the people around, the people you love.'
View More »
AEW returns to the UK for Dynamite & Collision at Glasgow's OVO Hydro (August 24) and Forbidden Door (Aug 24). Tickets go on general sale on Friday, May 2 at 10am.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: Amazon Prime fans have days to binge 'best sci-fi series in years'
MORE: WWE star uses fan's prosthetic leg as a weapon in 'craziest match ever'
MORE: 'I made one of Netflix's most popular shows – it's changed people's lives'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Six methods people claim will induce labour, rated by a midwife
Meghan Markle tried to twerk her baby out — and she might be onto something. To mark Princess Lilibet's fourth birthday, the Duchess of Sussex shared a never-before-seen video from the maternity ward, filmed before her daughter was born. The clip, which some are calling cringeworthy, showed Meghan throwing it back to Baby Momma Dance by Starrkeisha, with Prince Harry bopping alongside. Just your average royal birth preparation. She captioned the video: 'Both of our children were a week past their due dates.. so when spicy food, all that walking and acupuncture didn't work — there was only one thing left to do.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video With Lillibet arriving safely, the world can only assume Meghan's rhythmic tactics worked. We've all heard the same theories as Meghan, but every mum's experience is different, and what works for some, definitely won't for others. So, can a last-minute boogie really get things moving? Metro asked Lesley Bland, lead midwife for education at My Expert Midwife, to share her thoughts on the most popular labour-inducing tricks — and how effective they are out of five. Turns out Meghan's dancing wasn't so random after all. 'If you are going to try anything, try a little boogie, shimmy, or a wiggle,' says Lesley. The midwife explains dancing — or similar exercise — can encourage the baby's head to descend through the pelvis, which in turn puts pressure onto the cervix, which can start uterine contractions.' However, she adds: 'As always, there is no guarantee that your Lambada or Salsa will induce labour, but you might have fun doing it, which will release that incredible hormone of love, oxytocin, which in itself is associated with labour.' Lesley advises giving it a try. 'At best, your labour will kick in; at worst, you'll have fun! Lesley says this is another method of encouraging labour that she can get on board with. 'Adopting an upright mobile position can help to get the baby's head down into the pelvis, which puts pressure onto the cervix and kickstarts early labour.' She says gentle walking three to four times a week, and curb walking (where one foot is on the curb and one on the road) have been recommended. 'Exercise in general can have positive effects on labour and recovery in the postnatal period,' she adds. While it's not guaranteed to induce labour, she suggests trying it to boost your mental health and general well-being too. This is a commonly suggested way to induce labour, but is there any truth to it? Lesley says: 'There have been some trials looking at sexual intercourse to induce labour, but the results are very spurious, and the conclusions are uncertain. 'We know sperm contains prostaglandins, which are hormone-like substances that are used in the induction of labour to make the cervix more favourable.' She adds that sex can also release the love hormone, oxytocin, which is associated with labour. Is there any harm in trying it? Lesley says: 'Some women find having sex at the end of the pregnancy really uncomfortable, while others enjoy the intimacy it brings with their partner before the sleepless nights.' She adds that sex should always be avoided if you have a low-lying placenta, have experienced any vaginal bleeding or have an amniotic water shave broken. If you have been advised not to for any other reason by your healthcare team, you should also abstain. Becca Mascarenhas, Midwife at The Portland Hospital (part of HCA Healthcare), tells Metro: 'Expectant mums are often keen to try natural ways to bring on labour, but it's important to know which methods are based on evidence, and which ones are more of a myth. 'It's also important to speak to your midwife before trying any labour-inducing techniques. Every woman and every pregnancy is different, so personalised advice is key. 'I would also add that we only ever recommend any of these techniques from 37 weeks pregnant to reduce the risk of pre-term labour.' Lesley says: 'This one has done the rounds for years, and, to be honest, is probably one of the ones that I would be encouraging women not to try.' Spicy food can cause a degree of irritation to the gastro system, which is more likely to cause diarrhoea than induce labour, according to Lesley. 'If you enjoy spicy food, then there is no reason not to have it if you really fancy it, but as a midwife, I wouldn't be using it as a means of inducing labour.' Some suggest eating prunes for the same reason as eating spicy food. Lesly says: 'It's more likely to give you loose bowels than induce labour, but if you fancy some then go for it.' Drinking raspberry leaf tea has been shared far and wide on social media as a natural remedy to induce labour. However, Lesley advises against it. She explains: 'Raspberry leaf tea helps to strengthen the smooth uterine muscle wall, which means that when contractions do start, they are more effective and efficient, helping labour to progress well.' More Trending So, the fruity tea gets an extra point for helping during labour, but as Lesley says: 'There is no evidence to support the theory that drinking it will actually induce labour, and as a midwife, I would not recommend this for that purpose.' Lesley explains that the method of drinking castor oil was used in the past as an alternative method for inducing labour, even during the 20th Century. She says: 'As a registered midwife, I would strongly recommend not even giving it a go. 'There has been some evidence that suggests castor oil can cause some uterine contractions, but if we are being honest about it, the effects are more likely to be an upset stomach and diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting than induction of labour.' Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ View More » MORE: King Charles serenaded by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's wedding singers at SXSW London MORE: Intruder arrested at Windsor Castle close to William and Kate's home MORE: Full list of the lavish presents Royals have received since 2020 Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Doctor Who fans fume that character was 'butchered' as actor speaks out on exit
Doctor Who season 15 came to a divisive end last week, and one show's stars has finally spoken out about her exit. Varada Sethu, who played Belinda Chandrab– the latest companion to join Ncuti Gatwa's Doctor in the Tardis – addressed her exit on Instagram. In an emotional post, the 30-year-old apologised for being 'late to the party' but said she 'needed to take a few days' to process the show, the finale and everything Doctor Who had brought into her life. 'My heart has doubled in size,' she wrote. 'I have felt so so full of gratitude and love, I still feel I haven't found the words to express it. It has been a true gift to know a woman like Belinda, I will never forget our journey together. 'Thank you @ncutigatwa for being my partner in crime, my beloved Doctor. You are unending, pure magic, what a privilege it's been to bear witness to it. Mom & Dad forever❤️ My sweet angel @milliegibbo, thank you for your kindness, for always lifting me up, you have stolen everyone's hearts!! I cannot wait to see what life has in store for you.' Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Varada finished by thanking the 'beautiful fans' and Russell T Davies, adding she finally understands what he meant when he said her life would 'never be the same again'. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Despite Varada's grateful words, a number of fans aren't happy with how Belinda (and Varada) were treated in the finale with some going so far as to say her character was 'butchered'. 'You and Ncuti deserved BETTER!' wrote ryan__norman__97, while Merrony97 added: 'Fantastic character until the final episode where it completely jumped the shark'. Noinxo wrote, 'Feels incomplete, like someone gave me a book with pages ripped out of it; but leaving the last chapter.' 'They didn't do your character justice, but it was a Beautiful ending to a chapter. Such an amazing cast and amazing characters. Still, though, continue success in everything you do!' Sadly, this feeling that Belinda was done dirty is pretty pervasive in the Doctor Who community at the moment. Across Reddit, X, and Instagram, you'll find countless fans praising Varada for her performance but complaining about the treatment of Belinda in the finale. Their main issue seems to be that the character was established as an independent woman who had her agency stolen from her when the Doctor rewrote reality to bring her 'wish world' child, Poppy, back to life. They believe the Doctor took this decision without considering whether Belinda would have wanted a child in the first place. Our Deputy TV editor Tom Percival gives his verdict… The most recent Doctor Who finale had some moments of greatness, but honestly, for the most part, it was a confusing mess. The episode's big baddies, The Rani and Omega, were dealt with far too quickly, the stuff about Poppy was harder to wrap your heart around than theoretical physics, and don't get me started on Susan's disappearing act. That said, I'd be lying if I said I didn't find Ncuti's final decision to regenerate to save a child quite emotional, and I did enjoy seeing the Time Hotel again. Of course, the elephant in the room is Belinda's ultimate fate. I'm not sure if it was just bad storytelling or a poorly conceived idea, but the Doctor rewriting reality to give a woman a child (without her consent) just left a bad taste in my mouth. You don't have to look far to find fans expressing this view. On another Instagram post, one fan going by the name _raggedywho wrote 'NEVER forgive RTD for what he did to Ar Belinda…' Meanwhile, _ataho_ said, 'The character assassination of Belinda Chandra, Original timeline. Belinda, we mourn you.' On Reddit, Icy_Bandicoot3674 complained that 'Episode 1 Belinda is a completely different character to the rest of the season, and by episode 8, there is absolutely nothing left. She basically doesn't exist from Ep 4 to Ep 8'. This sentiment was echoed by agitatedandroid, who added, Belinda could have been so much more.' 'Perhaps a sort of cross between Donna and Martha. But she was never really given an opportunity to even be Belinda,' they continued. 'And by the end, she's not even the Belinda she started as. Her entire reality is rewritten into what the Doctor wants.' KronksKronk, however, was probably the most withering, labelling Belinda's treatment as 'gross'. More Trending 'The Belinda from episode 1 is… dead in a way, they raged. 'Her whole life got rewritten without her consent, so she suddenly has a kid and an ex-husband, and it gets played off as a victory.' It wasn't just Belinda's fate that annoyed fans who tuned in for the finale. Others were let down by the treatment of the Rani and Omega, two classic villains fans have wanted to see return for years. Others, though, were just disappointed to see Ncuti Gatwa regenerate into Billie Piper, a move criticised by some as stunt casting. Doctor Who is available to stream now on iPlayer. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Race Across The World fans moved as episode honours Sam Gardiner after death aged 24 MORE: Former BBC studios where EastEnders was filmed riddled with asbestos MORE: Violent Doctor Who scene 'put show at risk of being cancelled before it started'
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
The Virgin Island hate is atrocious - season 2 will prove me right
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Even before Virgin Island aired, the backlash was building as TV viewers clutched their pearls at yet another shock factor Channel 4 show. Now it's been greenlit for season two, and everyone is up in arms again. But I'm happy it's returning. Initially, I too was swept up in the confusion around the show's intention and concerned it was setting up vulnerable people to be ridiculed in front of the nation for their sexual inexperience. However, that couldn't be further from my feelings after season one. Instead, I saw a safe space in which participants like Emma, Tom and Dave could explore their sexuality without judgment. For those who haven't watched Virgin Island, each participant is paired with a surrogate partner who works with them to build confidence and discuss past trauma that may have stopped them from being intimate. Each episode sees the sexological bodyworkers – a fancy term for the hands-on sex therapists – lead a group session, too. The main criticism hurled at Virgin Island is that it is exploitative, pushing these naïve people to expose themselves for our entertainment – but the participants are encouraged to only go as far as they want. In one session, Charlotte strips off in front of her surrogate partner to tackle her body issues, but her breasts have been blurred in the edit. Others get naked behind panels, or the camera cuts away when things get intimate. Virgin Island is careful not to turn these incredibly personal experiences into voyeurism, focusing on the emotional developments rather than exposing the physical ones. I'll admit most of the group sessions are deeply uncomfortable to watch for both those on screen and viewers. Some participants eagerly acted out sexual positions while others looked away, embarrassed. I agree that, at these points, the show felt like it was less about helping and more focused on shock value. Getting adults to pretend to be animals crawling around on the floor is just mortifying to watch – virgin or not. However, is that not what makes good reality TV? It was cringey, not exploitative. A Love Islander acting in a similar way keeps us wanting more, but for some reason, when it's a Virgin Islander that's no longer acceptable. Some critics have taken aim at the premise itself and claimed the participants are not able to give full informed consent as they have not had sex, so how could they know what they're getting into? To me, this is blatant infantilisation of virgins. It reeks of superiority and upholds the exact stigma that the show is attempting to combat. Let's be totally clear – all of the participants were adults who signed up for this of their own free will and have not expressed any negative emotions about their time on the show publicly. In fact, many have said it gave them a newfound confidence. Over the two weeks, many participants formed a real connection with their therapist, with three participants feeling confident enough to come out as bisexual or gender-fluid to huge cheers from the rest of the group. A group session where the men wore makeup was incredibly impactful for Tom and opened up his journey into gender expression. More sessions like this in season two would be brilliant. More Trending Only one participant, Dave, felt comfortable enough to have sex while on the show (and is now in a relationship), while three more have since gone on to shed their virgin status. Clearly, Virgin Island worked for them. Once you move past the shock of these adults having the courage to admit they were virgins on national TV – something often perceived as shameful in our society – there's real heart to Virgin Island. It deserves the chance to be a grower, not just a shower. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: In defence of Meghan Markle's twerking pregnancy video MORE: Feel Good remains one of the greatest LGBTQ+ gifts to TV MORE: Incredible binge-worthy LGBT+ shows guaranteed to send your heart soaring
