logo
Passport office denies entry to youth in shorts, viral post sparks debate: ‘He should have gone in a sherwani'

Passport office denies entry to youth in shorts, viral post sparks debate: ‘He should have gone in a sherwani'

Indian Express30-04-2025

A young man's visit to a passport office has ignited a wider debate on dress codes and generational attitudes after he was denied entry for wearing shorts. The incident, which took place at a regional passport office in a Tier-2 city in India, was witnessed by Vineeth K, 35, a consultant, who shared his observations in a post on X.
Vineeth recounted that the security personnel at the passport office refused entry to the man wearing shorts. In response, the man argued that he wears the same attire to his corporate office without issue, questioning why it should be unacceptable at a government office.
After a brief two minutes of discussion, the man's father entered the passport office and requested the officer to allow his son inside, explaining that they had travelled a long distance for the appointment. 'Finally after a 2 minute discussion, his dad (in 60s), went inside and requested passport officer to give an exception saying his son came from very far,' Vineeth wrote in the post.
Vineeth further shared that the security allowed the man inside, however, he said, 'Some people don't give value to our work and our offices. Who comes to the office in nightwear? There are women, elders inside – what if they feel uncomfortable? Entire generation is getting spoiled & their parents don't say a word.'
See the post here:
Today's incident – A perspective
A young adult came to passport office in his shorts today (I was waiting outside for my turn)
Security told, shorts are not allowed – this is passport office
He said, we go to out corporate offices this way. Why don't you allow to a govt… pic.twitter.com/hpAMxC4B4i
— Vineeth K (@DealsDhamaka) April 29, 2025
With over one lakh views, the post triggered a debate as several users backed the man for wearing shorts. 'What is so offensive about shorts ? We used to have the entire indian police force wearing shorts until 70s,' a user wrote. 'I agree he should have gone in a sherwani,' another user commented.
'This idiot won't walk into the American Embassy in shorts for a US Visa. Dress appropriately,' a third user said. 'That same guy would have worn a shoe and Jeans when headed to a pub or restobar,' a fourth user chimed in.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Iran Conflict: Last 24 Hours, Nuclear Fallout, And What The US Is (And Isn't) Doing
Israel-Iran Conflict: Last 24 Hours, Nuclear Fallout, And What The US Is (And Isn't) Doing

News18

time39 minutes ago

  • News18

Israel-Iran Conflict: Last 24 Hours, Nuclear Fallout, And What The US Is (And Isn't) Doing

Last Updated: From Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear sites to Tehran's missile strikes on Tel Aviv — here's what's happened in 24 hours, and where the US stands as the conflict escalates Iran and Israel are targeting each other with missiles and airstrikes in what has become Israel's biggest-ever air offensive against its longtime adversary, launched in a bid to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. On Saturday morning, air raid sirens echoed through Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as successive waves of Iranian missiles streaked across Israeli skies, sending residents rushing into shelters while defense systems worked to intercept the incoming projectiles. The escalation began with Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites that killed 78 people and wounded more than 320, according to Iran's UN ambassador, who said the overwhelming majority were civilians despite the operation targeting generals and scientists. Iran retaliated with two waves of long-range missiles aimed at Tel Aviv, wounding at least 41 people across both attacks. For years, Israel had threatened such strikes while successive American administrations sought to prevent them, fearing they would ignite wider Middle Eastern conflict. As projectiles and interceptor rockets left trails of smoke and flame across Friday's night sky, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed Israel would not 'escape safely from this great crime". The Last 24 Hours June 13: Early Morning June 13: Morning The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) says Iran responded by launching 'approximately 100 UAVs towards Israeli territory", claims they were successfully neutralised. Israel declares State of Emergency; schools and offices told to close, gatherings are prohibited. June 13: Midday Iran's state-run media reports Israeli strikes in Tabriz and Shiraz. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the military operation will continue for 'as long as necessary". June 13: Evening In major retaliation, Iran launches airstrikes against Israel, with explosions heard in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Initial attack reportedly used over 150 ballistic missiles. Around 34 people said to be wounded in Tel Aviv area barrage, including one woman critically injured >June 14: Early Morning Iran launches new wave of missiles early on Saturday, sirens and explosions heard over Jerusalem. At least two Iranian missiles hit the ground in Tel Aviv area. Reports say a hospital in Tel Aviv treated seven wounded people wounded Meanwhile, fire is reported at Tehran's Mehrabad International Airport What Is The Current Status? Iran's UN ambassador reports 78 people have been killed and more than 320 wounded in Israeli attacks. Israeli military says it is prepared for the operation to last up to two weeks. Netanyahu says the attack had been planned since November, originally scheduled for April but postponed. Both Iran and Israel remain on high alert as the international community calls for de-escalation. Damage Iran's Nuclear Facilities UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz has been destroyed. He said the UN is still gathering information about Israeli attacks on two other facilities, the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan. Israeli Justification Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon says intelligence had confirmed that 'within days Iran would have produced enough fissile material for multiple bombs". He called Israel's operation 'an act of national preservation". top videos View all What Is The US Doing? The US has described Israel's action as unilateral. In an interview with Fox News, Trump says Washington was not involved in the Israeli strikes. US ground-based air defence systems reportedly helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed for Tel Aviv. US media reports President Donald Trump has convened his cabinet for an emergency meeting. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says its top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Iran's UN envoy has accused the US of being complicit in the attacks and said it shared 'full responsibility for the consequences". About the Author Nitya Thirumalai Nitya Thirumalai, News Editor at writes on Indian and global politics as well as Formula 1. She was Google News Initiative-Columbia Journalism School Fellow in the inaugural Newsroom Leadership More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Benjamin Netanyahu donald trump iran iran nuclear program israel Middle East tehran Tel Aviv Location : Israel First Published: June 14, 2025, 09:02 IST News world Israel-Iran Conflict: Last 24 Hours, Nuclear Fallout, And What The US Is (And Isn't) Doing

H-word, M-word & fading K-word. India-Pakistan alphabet soup, with a side of Trump
H-word, M-word & fading K-word. India-Pakistan alphabet soup, with a side of Trump

The Print

time41 minutes ago

  • The Print

H-word, M-word & fading K-word. India-Pakistan alphabet soup, with a side of Trump

Let's call the first the 'zero-sum game'. If Washington sees the Subcontinent in a hyphenated manner, then it must balance the relationship. Gain for one is loss for the other. It brings an equivalence India detests. It believes it stands in a class by itself and linking with Pakistan demeans it. And its return is dreaded because our successive governments have laboured for three decades to rid us of what we see as the equivalence the big powers (read the US) used to draw between us and Pakistan. Three things follow. Much as I would've wanted to use 'khota sikka', the challenge of finding an exact translation brings me to the usual bad penny. Let's say, therefore, that like a bad penny, the dreaded H-word is back with us. H, as in hyphenation with Pakistan. The second can be called 'stature denial'. Given its growing Comprehensive National Power (CNP), India believes it deserves a sphere of influence. If ally Washington sees the region through an India-Pakistan prism, it's unacceptable. Rather than endorse India's sphere of influence, this undermines it. This is double trouble as China is already working hard at denying India that pre-eminence, which Pakistan calls hegemonism. And whereas India would expect US backing in this competition, it is galling when the US keeps saying sweet somethings to Pakistan. What's the point of the Quad then? We thought we were partners in a project to contain China. And the third, this means the return of the M-word that so triggers us. M for mediation. For Indian public opinion, Donald Trump has undone the work of the past decades by continuing to insist that he mediated the India-Pakistan ceasefire. Now, we know that his interest isn't in any mediation but in getting credit: 'nobody gives me credit for stopping a nuclear war', 'they never give me credit for anything', 'I stopped a nuclear war and I haven't seen any stories about it,' and so on. You can't blame the Pakistanis for latching on to it. They think Trump's renewed interest in the region emanates only from a fear of nuclear conflict. Therefore, they think they've been able to switch the global attention back to the nuclear threat, from the case India had built across decades for partnership in the global war on terror. Personifying this rediscovered mojo is Bilawal Bhutto, who said, in his usual breathless hyperbole, that the US will drag India to the negotiation table, if necessary, by the ear. Pakistani establishment has thrown everything in their desperation to revive their faded American connection, even a bunch of crypto. But anybody who's sidled up to Trump has ended up singing that sad old song: 'ik bewafa se pyar kiya… haye re hum ne yeh kya kiya' (best-effort translation: I fell in love with one who knows no love, how the hell did I get into this mess?). Also Read: Op Sindoor is the first battle in India's two-front war. A vicious pawn in a King's Gambit This is a very transactional Trump with no loyalties, and as focused on his domestic base as Narendra Modi in India. Any US partner who doesn't accept this, is setting themselves up for a feeling of grand betrayal and humiliation. The good thing is, our policy establishment is still wise not to respond emotionally and avoiding any public expression of anxiety. They are quietly progressing on the issue that matters right now, an India-US trade deal. If that works, much clutter would die down. In any case, nobody has brought back that other demon, the K-word as yet. Nobody is saying India and Pakistan should negotiate over Kashmir, and further that we are willing to mediate. I am not even sure Trump is aware of an issue like that. That said, Trump is now reshaping the world in his own vision uncluttered by history, facts and ideology. He's gutting NATO, ridicules the western alliance, serially insults Canada's prime ministers (Trudeau and Carney), and is impatient with Netanyahu. He detests Zelenskyy, adores Putin. Check out the latest gem from him: 'Putin says they lost 51 million people (in WWII) and we were your allies. Now everyone hates Russia and they love Germany and Japan. Let's explain that sometimes. It's a strange world.' It's unrealistic to expect that somebody making radical shifts not confused by history would even know or appreciate our concern over de-hyphenation. Modi government's current approach of social media noise-cancellation is wise. The nominated Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kapur's full testimony to the committee voting on his appointment is mature and fine for India. But just that one line saying he'd work with Pakistan where it suits America's interest has made so many in India sulk like a jilted lover. And the Centcom Commander, General Michael Kurilla calling Pakistan a phenomenal partner against terror comes from the essential geostrategic division the Pentagon has followed historically where Centcom covers Pakistan and India falls under Pacific Command. Ask any crime reporter worth her next scoop and she will explain to you how the first interest of any station house officer (SHO) at a police station is to curb crime in their own jurisdiction even if it means making deals with even the baddest guys. You might get a different answer from the Pacific Command chief. On top of this, our own news TV rumour machine, which has done more to undermine India's strategic credibility, invented its own fiction that Pakistan's newly self-minted field marshal was invited for the US Army Day parade. We were saved from mass neurosis by White House saying they weren't inviting any such guests. While such touchiness rules our larger public opinion which loves that self-defeating 'we have to do it all alone' obsession, it will be challenging for the Modi government to immunise serious policy from public responses. This government is obsessed with the buzz on social media. Also Read: Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous Finally, if you can use that noise-cancellation device again, and see what foreign involvement in our crises has meant. It will also help us distinguish mediation, intervention and involvement. After the Cold War, India endured about four years of intense American pressure over Kashmir over human rights. But, as India's economy grew post-reform, so did its stature. By 1998, the equation was changing. Not only was the second Clinton Administration quick to embrace the reality of a nuclear-armed India, the next year, 1999, it played a very constructive role during the Kargil crisis. Clinton hauled in Nawaz Sharif to Washington even on the US Independence Day (4 July) to give him a face-saver to retreat from Kargil. During Operation Parakram, repeated American interventions and frantic visits (most significant Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld on a day we seemed closest to war) helped both sides stay calm. The solidarity in war on terror over 26/11 and onwards served a dual purpose. One, to largely dehyphenate India from Pakistan. And second, to stick the 'terror state' label on Pakistan's chest. However, times do change. And with the return of Trump, how. Every crisis in the subcontinent has drawn American involvement to defuse it. That's the fire truck at our doors. Trump has only changed the language, junking old-fashioned diplomatic discretion. Trump seeks credit like a five-year-old. It's the new reality for the world, especially for America's friends and allies. PostScript: when Musharraf came for the Agra Summit (14-16 July, 2001), Vajpayee hosted a lunch for him at the biggest banquet hall in New Delhi's Taj Palace Hotel. He was also clever enough to invite Farooq Abdullah to it, and seat him just one table away. Dessert time, Farooq predeterminedly got up and walked to the head table with a big, mischievous smile. 'Arrey, yeh dekhiye, yeh toh third party intervention ho gayi,' a startled Musharraf found a good escape line, and everybody laughed. Next week: The perils of self-hyphenation Also Read: There's an all-new N-word now. And India's soft power has become its hard liability

Trump approves Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion purchase of US Steel
Trump approves Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion purchase of US Steel

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Trump approves Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion purchase of US Steel

US President Donald Trump approved Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion bid for US Steel on Friday, capping a tumultuous 18-month effort by the companies that survived union opposition and two national security reviews. Trump signed an executive order saying the tie-up could move forward if the companies sign an agreement with the Treasury Department resolving national security concerns posed by the deal. The companies then announced they had signed the agreement, fulfilling the conditions of Trump's directive and effectively garnering approval for the merger. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,' the companies said in the statement, thanking Trump. They added the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 as well as governance, production and trade commitments. Nippon Steel will buy a 100% stake in US Steel, a spokesperson for the Japanese company in Tokyo said on Saturday. The steelmakers provided no detail on the 'golden share' they pledged to issue to the US government, raising questions about the extent of US control. US Senator David McCormick of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered, said last month the golden share would give the government veto power over key decisions relating to the American steel icon. Reuters has reported that Nippon Steel would invest an additional $3 billion for a new mill after 2028. The takeover will set up the ailing US firm to receive the critical investment, allowing Nippon Steel to capitalise on a host of American infrastructure projects while its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50%. The Japanese firm also avoids the $565 million in breakup fees it would have had to pay if the companies had failed to secure approvals. For Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-biggest steelmaker, securing a foothold in the US is key to its global growth strategy. The US steel market, including high-grade steel, Nippon Steel's specialty, is growing amid rising global trade tensions. Still, some Nippon Steel investors are concerned about short-term financial pressure due to the scale of the additional investment commitment. The Japanese government, rushing to try to secure a trade deal with the US by the time Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba meet at the Group of Seven summit starting on Sunday, applauded the Nippon–US Steel agreement. 'The government of Japan welcomes the US government's decision, as we believe this investment will enhance innovation capabilities in the US and Japanese steel industries and further strengthen the close partnership between our two countries,' Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yoji Muto said in a statement on Saturday. Friday's announcement was hardly guaranteed, even if many investors had seen approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30 giving his vague blessing to an 'investment' by Nippon Steel, which he described as a 'great partner.' Shares of US Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told Japan's Nikkei newspaper that the takeover required 'a degree of management freedom' to go ahead after Trump said the US would be in control with the golden share. The bid has faced opposition since Nippon Steel launched it in December 2023. After the United Steelworkers union came out against the deal last year, both then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, expressed their opposition as they sought to woo voters in the presidential campaign in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Shortly before leaving office in January, Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in US Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store