July was Earth's third-warmest on record, EU scientists say
Despite a slightly lower global average temperature, the scientists said extremes, including heat and deadly floods, persisted in July.
Advertisement
'Two years after the hottest July on record, the recent streak of global temperature records is over for now. But this doesn't mean climate change has stopped,' said Carlo Buontempo, director of the Copernicus Climate Change Service.
'We continued to witness the effects of a warming world.'
The EU monitoring agency said new temperature records and more climate extremes are to be expected unless greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere are brought down.
On July 25, Turkey recorded its highest-ever temperature of 50.5C as it battled wildfires.
Advertisement
💧 July 2025: Above-average precipitation in central & other parts of Europe as well as parts of the USA, China & eastern Russia, leading to major flooding. Drier-than-average in parts of southern & eastern Europe, fuelling wildfires.
pic.twitter.com/qKLArFpr5S
— Copernicus ECMWF (@CopernicusECMWF)
August 7, 2025
While not as hot as July 2023 or July 2024, the hottest and second-warmest on record, the Copernicus Climate Change Service reported that the planet's average surface temperature last month was still 1.25C above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial period, before humans began the widespread burning of oil, gas and coal.
It said the average global surface air temperature reached 16.68C in July, which is 0.45C above the 1991-2020 average for the month.
Greenhouse gases released from the burning of fossil fuels like petrol, oil and coal are the main cause of climate change.
Despite a somewhat cooler July, the 12-month period between August 2024 and July 2025 was 1.53C above pre-industrial levels, exceeding the threshold set in 2015 to limit human-caused warming to 1.5C.
Advertisement
Copernicus is the European Union's earth observation system based on satellite and on-the-ground data collection. Britain rejoined the climate agency in 2023.
Julien Nicolas, a senior Copernicus scientist, said it was important to view last month's decrease in the context of two anomalous years in terms of warming.
'We are really coming out from a streak of global temperature records that lasted almost two years,' Mr Nicolas said. 'It was a very exceptional streak.'
He added that as long as the long-term warming trend persists, extreme weather events will continue to happen.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Alien: Earth – Ridley Scott's terrifying space monster finally comes to TV … and it's properly creepy
'I am human, and nothing human is alien to me,' wrote Roman playwright Terence in 165BC. He hadn't seen any of the Alien films, though. He hadn't seen Alien or Aliens or Alien 3 , he hadn't seen any of the Predator crossover canon, he hadn't seen Resurrection or Prometheus or the one after Prometheus. He hadn't even seen Alien: Romulus, even though it's named after the guy who co-founded Rome. The Oscar-winning franchise has earned well over a billion dollars worldwide. There's nothing more human than loving Alien. Part of the franchise's success is its malleability. A creature-horror stuffed with Freudian nightmare, the films blend action, sci-fi, theology and satire. (I don't want to be Frankenstein's Pedant about it, but the monster is the profit-driven corporation determined to bring the alien to Earth to develop as a biological weapon.) Now that the IP belongs to Disney, we should expect many more instalments. But can they keep stretching the story into exciting shapes? Or are the days of Alien: Below Decks or The Real Housewives of Moon LV-426 upon us? Thankfully, they've given control of Alien: Earth (Disney+, from Wednesday 12 August) to writer-director Noah Hawley, the TV genius responsible for Fargo and the dazzlingly ambitious Marvel series Legion. He takes us back a few years before the start of the first film, to an Earth run by a consortium of five tech companies. A deep space research vessel belonging to Weyland-Yutani, AKA Baddy Corp, crash-lands into a building owned by rival Prodigy. Guess what – there's a very, very bad dog on board, and the Jurassic ovoids being transported? Not Kinder Eggs. The Alien movies' main creature, the xenomorph, remains mesmerising. Rather than making an eight-hour slasher movie, Hawley uses its threat to explore a story about identity, the limits of AI and human weakness. An intriguing character is Boy Kavalier, the founder of Prodigy. To capture Weyland-Yutani's extraterrestrial IP, he sends a party of his new creations: Hybrids. We see him secretly transferring the consciousness of terminally ill children into synthetic bodies, with tremendous strength and upgradable minds. Thank God our tech leaders are more responsible! This is one of my favourite tropes: evil genius motivated by lonely boredom. Boy Kavalier, who resembles Richard Hammond in a Bob Dylan wig, has created a new species simply because he wants someone to have an interesting conversation with. No one gets him. There is a twisted romance to that idea, if far-fetched. I mean, what does Elon Musk want? Someone to laugh at his jokes? Maybe that's the same thing. The Hybrids are a great creation. Watching them, I was reminded of The Secret Life of 4 Year Olds. That documentary showed us infants playing, tracing the growth of recognisably adult behaviour. Kavalier's prototypes kill and jump off cliffs, charged by lithium batteries that would power a city. Yet in the aftermath they are confused, worried about getting in trouble. They're super-soldiers with the emotional age of children. Is there a current of identification between Hybrid and xenomorph? Is our enemy's enemy our friend – or just another enemy? Do humans deserve to survive? The series plays with big questions. Yet this isn't The Rest Is Aliens, a podcast about industrial espionage and existentialism. Its chief ambition is ramping up dread. And blood. Every episode is, frankly, an abattoir. New aliens have been designed that are blood-curdlingly creepy. The show boasts the sound design of the year, with chitinous clacking and background monkey whoops stoking constant unease. Even the casting is creepy, from child-adult Hybrids to Timothy Olyphant as an inscrutable robot scientist. Adrian Edmondson from The Young Ones is in it – yet so unrecognisable that I still don't know he's in it. Alien: Earth adds freshness to the franchise's convoluted lore – give it your eyeballs. Tasting notes include Conrad's Heart of Darkness, Westworld, Un Chien Andalou, plus The Secret Life of 4 Year Olds. There's also the most cinematic monster to ever do it, doing it plenty. If that isn't entertainment enough, then you truly are unknowable.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘It's missing something': AGI, superintelligence and a race for the future
A significant step forward but not a leap over the finish line. That was how Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, described the latest upgrade to ChatGPT this week. The race Altman was referring to was artificial general intelligence (AGI), a theoretical state of AI where, by OpenAI's definition, a highly autonomous system is able to do a human's job. Describing the new GPT-5 model, which will power ChatGPT, as a 'significant step on the path to AGI', he nonetheless added a hefty caveat. '[It is] missing something quite important, many things quite important,' said Altman, such as the model's inability to 'continuously learn' even after its launch. In other words, these systems are impressive but they have yet to crack the autonomy that would allow them to do a full-time job. OpenAI's competitors, also flush with billions of dollars to lavish on the same goal, are straining for the tape too. Last month, Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook parent Meta, said development of superintelligence – another theoretical state of AI where a system far exceeds human cognitive abilities – is 'now in sight'. Google's AI unit on Tuesday outlined its next step to AGI by announcing an unreleased model that trains AIs to interact with a convincing simulation of the real world, while Anthropic, another company making significant advances, announced an upgrade to its Claude Opus 4 model. So where does this leave the race to AGI and superintelligence? Benedict Evans, a tech analyst, says the race towards a theoretical state of AI is taking place against a backdrop of scientific uncertainty – despite the intellectual and financial investment in the quest. Describing AGI as a 'thought experiment as much as it is a technology', he says: 'We don't really have a theoretical model of why generative AI models work so well and what would have to happen for them to get to this state of AGI.' He adds: 'It's like saying 'we're building the Apollo programme but we don't actually know how gravity works or how far away the moon is, or how a rocket works, but if we keep on making the rocket bigger maybe we'll get there'. 'To use the term of the moment, it's very vibes-based. All of these AI scientists are really just telling us what their personal vibes are on whether we'll reach this theoretical state – but they don't know. And that's what sensible experts say too.' However, Aaron Rosenberg, a partner at venture capital firm Radical Ventures – whose investments include leading AI firm Cohere – and former head of strategy and operations at Google's AI unit DeepMind, says a more limited definition of AGI could be achieved around the end of the decade. 'If you define AGI more narrowly as at least 80th percentile human-level performance in 80% of economically relevant digital tasks, then I think that's within reach in the next five years,' he says. Matt Murphy, a partner at VC firm Menlo Ventures, says the definition of AGI is a 'moving target'. He adds: 'I'd say the race will continue to play out for years to come and that definition will keep evolving and the bar being raised.' Even without AGI, the generative AI systems in circulation are making money. The New York Times reported this month that OpenAI's annual recurring revenue has reached $13bn (£10bn), up from $10bn earlier in the summer, and could pass $20bn by the year end. Meanwhile, OpenAI is reportedly in talks about a sale of shares held by current and former employees that would value it at about $500bn, exceeding the price tag for Elon Musk's SpaceX. Some experts view statements about superintelligent systems as creating unrealistic expectations, while distracting from more immediate concerns such as making sure that systems being deployed now are reliable, transparent and free of bias. 'The rush to claim 'superintelligence' among the major tech companies reflects more about competitive positioning than actual technical breakthroughs,' says David Bader, director of the institute for data science at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'We need to distinguish between genuine advances and marketing narratives designed to attract talent and investment. From a technical standpoint, we're seeing impressive improvements in specific capabilities – better reasoning, more sophisticated planning, enhanced multimodal understanding. 'But superintelligence, properly defined, would represent systems that exceed human performance across virtually all cognitive domains. We're nowhere near that threshold.' Nonetheless, the major US tech firms will keep trying to build systems that match or exceed human intelligence at most tasks. Google's parent Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft and Amazon alone will spend nearly $400bn this year on AI, according to the Wall Street Journal, comfortably more than EU members' defence spend. Rosenberg acknowledges he is a former Google DeepMind employee but says the company has big advantages in data, hardware, infrastructure and an array of products to hone the technology, from search to maps and YouTube. But advantages can be slim. 'On the frontier, as soon as an innovation emerges, everyone else is quick to adopt it. It's hard to gain a huge gap right now,' he says. It is also a global race, or rather a contest, that includes China. DeepSeek came from nowhere this year to announce the DeepSeek R1 model, boasting of 'powerful and intriguing reasoning behaviours' comparable with OpenAI's best work. Major companies looking to integrate AI into their operations have taken note. Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil company, uses DeepSeek's AI technology in its main datacentre and said it was 'really making a big difference' to its IT systems and was making the company more efficient. According to Artificial Analysis, a company that ranks AI models, six of the top 20 on its leaderboard – which ranks models according to a range of metrics including intelligence, price and speed – are Chinese. The six models are developed by DeepSeek, Zhipu AI, Alibaba and MiniMax. On the leaderboard for video generation models, six of the top 10 – including the current leader, ByteDance's Seedance – are also Chinese. Microsoft's president, Brad Smith, whose company has barred use of DeepSeek, told a US senate hearing in May that getting your AI model adopted globally was a key factor in determining which country wins the AI race. 'The number one factor that will define whether the US or China wins this race is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world,' he said, adding that the lesson from Huawei and 5G was that whoever establishes leadership in a market is 'difficult to supplant'. It means that, arguments over the feasibility of superintelligent systems aside, vast amounts of money and talent are being poured into this race in the world's two largest economies – and tech firms will keep running. 'If you look back five years ago to 2020 it was almost blasphemous to say AGI was on the horizon. It was crazy to say that. Now it seems increasingly consensus to say we are on that path,' says Rosenberg.
BreakingNews.ie
3 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Astronauts return to Earth with SpaceX after five months at ISS
Four astronauts returned to Earth after hustling to the International Space Station five months ago to relieve the stuck test pilots of Boeing's Starliner. Their SpaceX capsule parachuted into the Pacific off the Southern California coast a day after departing the orbiting lab. Advertisement 'Welcome home,' SpaceX Mission Control radioed. A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) Splashing down were Nasa's Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russia's Kirill Peskov. They launched in March as replacements for the two Nasa astronauts assigned to Starliner's botched demo. Starliner malfunctions kept Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams at the space station for more than nine months instead of a week. Advertisement Nasa ordered Boeing's new crew capsule to return empty and switched the pair to SpaceX. They left soon after Ms McClain and her crew arrived to take their places. Mr Wilmore has since retired from Nasa. Before leaving the space station on Friday, Ms McClain made note of 'some tumultuous times on Earth' with people struggling. Advertisement A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) 'We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,' she said. Ms McClain looked forward to 'doing nothing for a couple of days' once back home in Houston, US. High on her crewmates' wish list were hot showers and juicy burgers. It was SpaceX's third Pacific splashdown with people on board, but the first for a Nasa crew in 50 years. Advertisement Elon Musk's company switched capsule returns from Florida to California's coast earlier this year to reduce the risk of debris falling on populated areas. Back-to-back private crews were the first to experience Pacific homecomings. The last time Nasa astronauts returned to the Pacific from space was during the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, a detente meet-up of Americans and Soviets in orbit.
